
Despair at Starmer's ‘divisive' language as he clamps down on immigration
Sir Keir Starmer has warned that the UK risks becoming 'an island of strangers' as he laid out one of the toughest set of rules in recent history to crack down on immigration.
Sir Keir also said that the number of people entering the country is causing 'incalculable damage' – remarks which have provoked a furious backlash, with his own MPs joining trade unions and charities in comparing the language with that of the far right and Enoch Powell.
In a dramatic early morning press conference on Monday aimed at seizing the political agenda, Sir Keir insisted his new immigration plans were being unveiled 'because they are the right thing to do'.
Among the measures announced were a ban on the recruitment of care workers from overseas, increased English language requirements for immigrants and the tightening of access to skilled worker visas.
But while Sir Keir denied his government's white paper was a 'reaction to a political party' following the success of Nigel Farage 's Reform UK at the local elections, critics condemned his attempts to 'pander' to Mr Farage.
Sir Keir's language marked an extraordinary turnaround in the last five years from when he was Jeremy Corbyn's shadow immigration minister promoting open borders and from three years ago when he claimed that those raising immigration as an issue were 'racist'.
One senior Labour backbencher compared his language to Enoch Powell's infamous 'rivers of blood' speech in 1968 which whipped up a frenzy of anti-immigration hatred across the UK.
Norwich South MP Clive Lewis said: 'It's simply not sustainable for the prime minister to echo the language of Enoch Powell's 'rivers of blood' speech – invoking the idea of 'living in a land of strangers.'
'This kind of language doesn't just alienate communities, it drives people away from our country altogether. And if those at the top think this is a clever tactic to win another five years by rolling out the red carpet for Nigel Farage, they're mistaken. We are losing far more progressive voters than we are gaining from Reform UK.'
Nadia Whittome, MP for Nottingham East, said in a post on the Bluesky social media platform: "The step-up in anti-migrant rhetoric from the government is shameful and dangerous.
"Migrants are our neighbours, friends and family. To suggest that Britain risks becoming 'an island of strangers' because of immigration mimics the scaremongering of the far right."
Liverpool Riverside MP Kim Johnson added: "For our prime minister to say today that unfettered immigration risks the UK becoming 'an island of strangers' is deeply concerning.
"We cannot concede to the anti-migrant agenda promoted by those who thrive on division."
Meanwhile, refugee charity Care4Calais chief executive Steve Smith said: "This is dangerous language for any prime minister to use. Has Starmer forgotten last year's far-right riots?
"Shameful language like this will only inflame the fire of the far right and risks further race riots that endanger survivors of horrors such as war, torture and modern slavery. Starmer must apologise."
The measures include:
Skilled workers will have to have a university-level degree to come to the UK. Salary thresholds will also rise.
Increased English language requirements to A-level equivalent, with a slightly lower level for dependants.
There will be a ban on recruiting care workers from abroad.
The Immigration Skills Charge – which is paid by sponsors – will rise for the first time since 2017.
New restrictions on people coming to the UK in areas where there are shortages of workers,
Increasing minimum pass requirement before foreign students can come to the UK.
Graduates will be able to stay in the UK for 18 months after their studies, compared to current period of two years.
The government will explore introducing a new levy on university income from foreign students.
Digital identity will be compulsory for all overseas citizens.
Sir Keir has declined to set a formal cap on immigration and would only commit to 'significant reductions' in visas each year.
Sacha Deshmukh, chief executive of Amnesty International UK, said: 'The suggestion of assessing people's 'integration' through subjective or undefined criteria raises serious risks of discriminatory treatment, including on the basis of race, class or culture. Any attempt to limit the right to private and family life – a core protection under the European Convention on Human Rights – would be especially concerning.
'The UK's immigration system must be grounded in fairness, legality and respect for the rights of all people not shaped by political expediency or performative control.'
Already the building sector has warned about a shortage of labour needed to build the 1.5 million homes Labour is targeting before the next election. The care sector has also responded with deep concerns.
Professor Nicola Ranger, general secretary and chief executive of the Royal College of Nursing (RCN), told delegates at a conference in Liverpool: "The UK is so reliant on overseas workers, especially in social care and the government has no plan to grow a domestic workforce.
"This is all about politics. Pandering. Scapegoating. This should be about people."
But David Hughes, chief executive of the Association of Colleges praised the white paper.
He said: "Today's immigration White Paper rightly recognises the need to grow our domestic skills and training provision to support priority sectors of the economy. Key elements of the new proposals are welcome, such as the use of the Immigration Skills Charge and the establishment of the Labour Market Evidence Group."
Zeena Luchowa, partner at Laura Devine Immigration, said: "As of October 2024, there were approximately 131,000 vacancies within the adult social care sector. The intention to imminently restrict and ultimately close this route is therefore likely to have a substantial impact."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NBC News
24 minutes ago
- NBC News
Anti-ICE protests spread beyond Los Angeles
As anti-ICE protests grow in Los Angeles, demonstrators in other major cities are rallying nationwide. NBC News' Gadi Schwartz reports on the unrest amid ongoing immigration raids.


The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
Kim Kardashian speaks out against ICE raids in Los Angeles
Kim Kardashian spoke out Tuesday night against the Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids in Los Angeles which have sparked days of protests across the country. President Donald Trump's sweeping deportations of illegal immigrants sparked mass protests in the City of Angeles Friday, which have continued for days. In an unprecedented move, Trump deployed thousands of National Guard troops and 700 Marines to Los Angeles, without California Governor Gavin Newsom's permission, in response to the protests. Gov. Newsom said the move 'inflamed a combustible situation,' and the state has challenged it in court. Kardashian used her platform of 356 million Instagram followers to stand up for the immigrant population of her home city, telling fans there 'has to be a better way' to deal with illegal immigration than these ICE raids. 'When we're told that ICE exists to keep our country safe and remove violent criminals-great. But when we witness innocent, hardworking people being ripped from their families in inhumane ways, we have to speak up. We have to do what's right,' she wrote on Instagram. 'Growing up in LA, I've seen how deeply immigrants are woven into the fabric of this city. They are our neighbors, friends, classmates, coworkers, and family. No matter where you fall politically, it's clear that our communities thrive because of the contributions of immigrants. We can't turn a blind eye when fear and injustice keep people from living their lives freely and safely. There HAS to be a BETTER way,' she wrote. Kardashian has praised Trump in the past, saying on late-night TV that she was 'very grateful' after he commuted the sentence of Alice Johnson in 2018. Johnson served over 20 years of a life sentence for a nonviolent drug offense when she was freed with the help of Kardashian. The celebrity had spent months working to commute Johnson's sentence, which included meeting with Trump. During an appearance on Jimmy Kimmel Live! in July 2018, Kardashian, who had met with Trump that May, said, 'I have nothing bad to say about the president.'


BBC News
33 minutes ago
- BBC News
Americans react to Trump sending military into Los Angeles
US President Donald Trump has sent thousands of National Guard troops and hundreds of US Marines to Los Angeles as protests take place against the administration's ramped-up immigration enforcement. While the president's allies cheer him on, both the governor of California and the mayor of Los Angeles say Trump is overstepping his authority and stoking Americans are no less divided over the issue. But do they feel it is the president or the protesters who have gone too far? Here's what six voters had to say about the news. Eric Kaiser, 46, Independent This Indiana man worries about the precedent Trump is setting by sending the National Guard into Los Angeles.I've seen some different takes on the legality of it, but it feels to me like the federal government is being very, very heavy-handed on this, which is concerning to me since protest is a protected form of expression in this country. I'm concerned that this sets Americans against Americans, and specifically American military against American citizens. The Trump administration is going about [the ICE raids] in an interesting manner... While making unilateral raids like these, they're making a lot of mistakes and those mistakes are costing people their freedoms. [The Trump administration] is not admitting to their mistakes and they're not following due have laws in this country for a reason. Demesio Guerrero, 70, Republican This Mexico-born Texas resident - a naturalised US citizen - supports the deployment of troops to put down "shameful" protests in a shame that people who have come to this country to set themselves up are doing this, the riots.I tend to think that many of the rioters are people with criminal histories. Violent protesters. People that want to be here to create a future and have a family in this generous country would not be doing that. Many are even waving Mexican flags. That's so shameful.I respect the president in so many ways. He is a guy who knows how to get things done. He's the law-and-order president. What was he supposed to do? Let them burn trash? Let them destroy Los Angeles? Lori Gregory, 62, Democrat This California woman is distraught over what she sees in Los Angeles and an "attack" on immigrants by the Trump administration. When I saw they called on the National Guard, I just started crying because he's weaponising everything he possibly can. There's no free speech, there's no dissent - it's Hitler's playbook all over again. It's heartbreaking, really. I just feel for the people he's targeting. It's wrong, it's so un-American. It's so against what this country was founded for. I'm just shocked. I probably shouldn't be, but I just can't believe it's happening. I can't believe the military and the National Guard are supporting this. How protests erupted after rumours of immigration raidAnalysis: This is a political fight Trump is eager to have Jim Sullivan, 55, Republican This Indiana man wants the violence to stop, but also worries about what deploying the military in response to protests means for the goes far beyond just protest, in my view. This is an attack on our sovereignty and our civil society. We can debate immigration policy, but violence and chaos should not be tolerated. [But Trump is] the one who's going to push the envelope to the legal limit, and if he can get by with more, he will, I think. That's one of my concerns about this whole thing. I'm not 100% on board with it, but at the same time, I think something has to be done. It's not getting taken care of. My trepidation is about precedent...I feel like everything we do, when we set new precedents, it will become new norms and not the exception. Devynn De Velasco, 22, Independent This Nebraska woman says she's likely to get involved with protests happening in her town because she's upset with what she sees Trump doing in watching clips, I saw some mostly peaceful protests. It seems like Trump is just mad that they're happening, rather than trying to prevent them from being violent. More and more, he's become a president who uses his power to enforce his will [rather] than the will of the people. I wonder to what extent is he going to keep doing this. It's extremely valid that people are protesting ICE, because in all honesty there is very little proof of due process for people who have been taken by ICE and wrongfully detained. Ross Barrera, 59, Republican A 29-year veteran of the US Army who retired as a colonel, this Texan - from the overwhelmingly Latino Rio Grande City on the border - believes that it is the protests that have gone too state and local governments fail to support federal law - in this case deportation orders - the military deployment is necessary to protect lives, property and the movement of protesters are blocking major highways, disrupting commerce, destroying and burning police cars, and interfering with police orders to disperse in certain has the right to protest, but you don't have the right to make me or others listen to violence so I can have your attention comes with consequences. Everything we know about the demonstrationsTrump's deportation drive is perfect storm in city of immigrantsLA's chaotic weekend of protests in maps and pictures