Toronto's largest taxi company warns of shortage of accessible cabs as early as 2026
Shah Hzart says driving an accessible taxi in Toronto is very rewarding — he enjoys helping people. But it's not as financially rewarding, even when he works seven days a week.
The costs associated with the vehicle are equivalent to a mortgage, he says.
"If I don't work one day, I am behind," Hzart said.
"I have to work every single day to break even, I am not saving anything."
There may be nearly 100 fewer accessible taxis on Toronto's roads as early as next year, as Canada's largest taxi company warns most of its accessible fleet will age past the city's limits, and there isn't enough incentive for new drivers to take on the role.
Ninety-eight of Beck's 100 accessible vehicles will need to be replaced as of March 2026, according to operations manager Kristine Hubbard.
While the city has made efforts to buy the fleet time — including allowing wheelchair accessible vehicles to be on the road for up to 10 years instead of seven — Hubbard says Beck's concerned drivers won't want to sign up for the job unless more financial support is provided for the industry. The city says it offers incentive programs and grants for drivers.
While ride-hailing services took away some of his business, Hzart says there is such a great need for accessible rides that he often has back to back rides booked.
"Right now when I talk to customers, they wait an hour or two for me to get there," he said.
He says he tried to take one day off recently and got an emergency call to take a client to a rehab appointment, which he agreed to.
"Once I start my car I don't stop because there's so much demand I go from one place to another," Hzart said.
Plan needed for future, Beck Taxi says
There is a lack of motivation and interest from drivers when it comes to taking on the role of operating an accessible cab, Hubbard says.
Drivers have to be willing to purchase and customize a new minivan. Those costs, along with fuel and insurance, have skyrocketed in recent years, she says.
"Drivers are not making a living and we're going to be in real trouble," she said, adding she's been flagging this problem to the city for years.
Hubbard says the city should implement a centralized system, combining all of the accessible cabs in one place to help alleviate confusion and wait times for those calling an accessible cab.
"Maybe that's run by the city, maybe a third party, but if it's all on one platform people won't have to hope they're calling the right place to get the service," she said.
"The business plan has to exist. It doesn't right now."
City says it offers financial incentives
The City of Toronto's Accessibility Fund Program has provided incentives for wheelchair accessible taxicab owners and drivers to help offset the costs of providing this service since 2020, city spokesperson Shane Gerard said in a statement.
"The program offers a grant to cover vehicle conversion costs and an incentive based on meeting service standards. Drivers could also receive an incentive for providing wheelchair accessible service," Gerard said.
WATCH | It's expensive to have a disability:
Research shows it's expensive to thrive in the GTA if you have a disability
8 months ago
Duration 3:03
The grant is split into annual disbursements over the lifespan of the vehicle.
The program is funded by a charge the city levies on taxi, ride-hailing and limousine drivers of non-accessible vehicles. Between 2020 and 2024, owners of 2,303 vehicles operating as accessible taxis, limos and ride-hailing services have accessed grants and incentives through the program, Gerard told CBC Toronto.
While this money helps, drivers say it's not enough. Hzart for example, with a rear entry vehicle, would be eligible to receive about $3,800 per year for seven years, according to numbers provided by the city. He says his current monthly expenses are around $3,000.
Next year, his vehicle will be one of two that is still able to remain on the road. He hopes a plan is put in place before then, because he doesn't want to see vulnerable residents left behind.
"I can't do this alone," he said.
"There has to be a solution or a way to convince drivers to come back."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
34 minutes ago
- CTV News
An Ontario woman waited 5 years to get surgery. When she finally got the procedure, she says it failed
Karen Harris said she spent years on the surgical waitlist, but when she got the procedure done, it failed. Now she's waiting again. It took about five years for Karen Harris to get the surgery she needed and when she finally did, she says it failed and she was placed back on a waiting list with no indication of when she will be seen again. Harris, a Windsor resident, has a rare condition caused by an elongated styloid process known as Eagle's syndrome. Because of the condition, she says that she can't sit upright for a long time, is forced to wear a neck brace whenever she goes in a car and, at times, needs to use a wheelchair. She spent years on a waiting list for a procedure that doctors told her would finally help relieve her symptoms and improve her qualify of life and finally got the call late last year. Karen Harris But days after undergoing the procedure at Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto on Dec. 4, she says she hemorrhaged litres of blood and was thrown back onto the surgical waitlist. She said that she has considered going to the U.S. to get the procedure done but would have to put a second mortgage on her home to do so as the operation costs anywhere from US$30,000 to $100,000. Plus, she's afraid of what could happen if she has complications post-operation again. 'I'm losing. It's a losing battle,' she said of the frustrating wait for care. 'I'm just in this limbo again and it's just horrific.' Harris is just one of more than 200,000 Ontarians that are believed to be waiting for a surgical procedure. Nationally, the Fraser Institute estimates that approximately 1.5 million people are waiting for some sort of procedure. It says that the proportion of the population on a waiting list varies from a low of three per cent in Ontario to nearly eight per cent in Prince Edward Island. Harris told CTV News Toronto that her experience is particularly frustrating because it feels like 'a systemic issue.' 'There's just no pathway forward for a lot of patients like me, with chronic health conditions, or people waiting for surgery,' she said. 'We have amazing, worldclass doctors and hospitals a couple hours away from Windsor but it's just these silos—these healthcare silos—are just really making it impossible for people like me to get care.' Both Mount Sinai Hospital and Windsor Regional Hospital wouldn't comment directly on Harris's case. 'We know that any delay in care is stressful to our patients and their families,' a statement from Mount Sinai reads. The Toronto hospital adds there are 'many factors' that come into play with regards to their surgical waitlist and when surgeries are scheduled, but they did not elaborate further on what those factors are. 'Our surgical teams work to ensure timely access to care, balancing the needs of all the patients we serve.' Harris has been on long-term disability since 2019 For years Harris, 37, enjoyed her life to the fullest, working her dream job at a nutraceuticals company in Windsor. Harris says she has had underlying aches and pains before but dismissed her concerns as she'd chalk it up to the growing pains of being a mother to two, now-teenage, daughters. It was one day when she was making her way to the office that her aches and pains 'all of a sudden' hit her, causing her to go completely out of breath from just walking in the parking lot. 'My heart rate was just not slowing down, I was getting really dizzy,' Harris recounted in an interview with CTV News Toronto. Though she had a high heart rate already due to her POTS syndrome—an autonomic nervous system disorder—imaging she had taken after this episode revealed she had Eagle's syndrome. 'It's where I say it's like chicken bones, like they are extended multiple centimetres from the base of my skull, pressing into the sides of my throat,' Harris said. 'I've choked, I've aspirated fluids, I have hearing issues, facial pain—the list just goes on, and on, and on, and on." Eagle's syndrome An image of the elongated styloid processes. Harris has been on long-term disability ever since her diagnosis, starting in 2019. In 2020, she said she got a referral to surgeon in Toronto who could help her. At first it was an in-person appointment that May, which was switched to a phone call in June 2020 as a consequence of the COVID-19 pandemic. By January 2021, she says she finally got to see the surgeon in person, who then approved her for surgery. Harris recounts being told she was put on a high-priority waitlist and would be seen in either a couple of weeks or months. She adds she was told she would need to isolate while she waited for surgery, as her surgeon specialized in head and neck cancer surgeries and could not risk falling ill. So, Harris isolated. She said she didn't leave her house and didn't have anyone come over for a visit, because she didn't want to ruin her chance of getting surgery. Her daughters even transferred to online schooling, the mother adds. 'I missed everything for weeks and weeks, years and years,' Harris said. At the start she says the communication between her and health-care staff was 'pretty amazing,' but as time carried on, the quick responses apologizing for the wait turned to requests to stop calling for updates. 'It was just really demotivating,' Harris said. 'All I'm doing is filling up an inbox or a voicemail inbox that's probably overflowing (…) like I'm just adding more burden into the healthcare system.' By 2024, she finally got the call with the surgery date. But after the procedure happened, Harris recalled waking up to hear the procedure became 'too risky.' 'He said he kind of pushed (the bone) to the side (but) he couldn't remove it because it was too close to my carotid artery and cranial facial nerves, and it was just too risky to remove from that approach,' Harris said, adding she was told the bone was left in her neck. 'I never heard of that happening before.' 'It wasn't even about the pain anymore' She returned home to Windsor after a couple of days, to ensure she'd be well enough. But Harris says five or six days later after the operation, she started coughing up blood. Harris says she immediately called the paramedics because she couldn't tell if the blood was coming from her surgical site or from her stomach, and they swiftly brought her to the emergency room. But says she waited hours on the gurney, 'throwing up a litre of blood,' while she waited to be admitted to a room. 'Staff was walking by me and everyone was—healthcare workers are all very empathetic and compassionate, but they're just so severely understaffed,' Harris said. Harris says she spent about three nights at Windsor Regional Hospital, profusely bleeding off-and-on throughout her stay and, at one point, pulling out blood clots 'the size of ping pong balls' from her throat. 'I was covered in blood, just covered. I was so mad. It wasn't even about the pain anymore,' Harris said. She says during her time there, she never met with an appropriate surgeon, adding she was repeatedly told doctors don't want to treat another surgeon's patient after an operation due to liability concerns. So, she was airlifted back to Sinai in Toronto, had CT scans there, and was discharged on Dec. 18. Karen Harris Karen Harris being airlifted to Toronto. Harris says she last saw her surgeon in February this year, where they requested more imaging and confirmed they would carry-on with her surgery again, but this time trying a different approach. She says she still hasn't heard back. Why is there a delay to get a surgery? Ontario's surgical backlog grew to more than 245,000 procedures amid the COVID-19 pandemic but has steadily decreased in recent years, as the province has poured millions of dollars into tackling the backlog. That, however, is of little comfort to patients like Harris. Isser Dubinsky, a retired clinical physician who had worked in emergency medicine and previously consulted in the development of the wait-time strategy in Ontario, said there's a variety of factors that come into play while waiting for a procedure. 'There's the wait-time to see your family doctor who has to come up with a diagnosis that requires surgery, there's the wait-time from when the family doctor sees or can arrange a referral to a surgeon, and then there's a wait-time from when after that patient sees the surgeon until they get access to surgical care,' Dubinsky said, adding each step is 'integral' to the problem. Outside of a shortage of family doctors, Dubinsky says they're not providing the same number of in-person office hours as they had before the pandemic with several patients being met online, mitigating against their ability of conducting physical exams and potentially leading to 'reasonable skepticism' from the surgeon when they don't have all of the given information they need. 'There's also a huge amount of fractionation of family medicine,' Dubinsky adds, as some family doctors don't fit the traditional role of what a family physician is. 'There are family doctors who only practice psychotherapy, there are family doctors who largely practice emergency medicine (…) and so on, so the number of family physicians who are providing what you or I might have thought of as comprehensive primary care is diminished.' Then when it comes to getting from a family physician to a surgeon, Dubinsky says surgeons will want to know what the patient's imaging has shown, which means various tests need to be arranged before a specialist will see them. Once tests have been completed and a patient is off to see a surgeon, Dubinsky says they follow clear guidelines for what an appropriate time is to wait for a procedure to be done—which is gauged on a patient's symptoms and physical findings. Dubinsky also says time is wasted in the operating rooms, which can stem from a doctor showing up just 15 minutes late. 'Let me give you the arithmetic example of your average community-sized hospital in Ontario that has six operating rooms functioning. If each of those six operating rooms starts 10 minutes late every day, that's an hour of time that's wasted every day, that's five hours a week, that's 260 hours a year. That's enough time to do 100 hip or knee replacements,' Dubinsky said, adding on top of that, surgeons have allocated operating room time, which can vary per doctor. A spokesperson for Ontario's Ministry of Health says the province has 'some of the shortest wait times' across Canada, with nearly 80 per cent of people receiving their procedure in the clinically recommended amount of time.
National Post
36 minutes ago
- National Post
Opinion: Indigenous leaders call Canada's anti-Israel joint statement hypocritical
We are deeply disappointed by the joint statement, co-signed by Canada, France, and Britain on 'the situation in Gaza and the West Bank.' This call rewards Hamas for the torture and murder of 1,200 innocent civilians on October 7 and the kidnapping of 250 others. We note that these are the same Western powers that bombed Raqqa and Mosul into rubble to eliminate ISIS, yet now invoke humanitarian concern to shield Hamas from the consequences of their own atrocities. Article content Article content Hamas started this war, and Israel has every right to defend itself against terrorists. One wonders what Canadian authorities would do if these Hamas atrocities had targeted Canadian citizens on Canadian soil. Article content Article content From the outset of the war, Hamas has hijacked international aid, diverting food, fuel, and medical supplies to sell on the black market. The proceeds— estimated at up to half a billion dollars — have effectively been a war subsidy, funding the recruitment and arming of more terrorists. Article content Under the Fourth Geneva Convention, aid restrictions are entirely lawful when there is a risk that the aid will be diverted to enemy combatants. Every truck that Hamas seizes is a reward for terrorism and an incentive to repeat their strategy. In spite of this, Israel ensured there was enough aid in Gaza to last months, with 25,000 aid trucks entering Gaza during the 42-day ceasefire. Indeed deliveries of aid have re-started, and a new mechanism has been put in place to ensure that aid is distributed to the needy, rather than diverted and stolen by Hamas. Article content Article content Meanwhile Hamas still holds 58 hostages in inhumane conditions underground — starving, torturing, and sometimes murdering them. Article content The conflict in Gaza could end tomorrow if Hamas laid down its arms and released the hostages. This is the path to peace. Hamas has never accepted Israel's right to exist. After Israel withdrew from Gaza in 2005, Hamas did not build a state; they built terror tunnels and stockpiled rockets, planning for October 7. To believe that a Palestinian state can be negotiated with a group that rejects the very existence of Israel is a dangerous and naïve fantasy. Article content Every ceasefire gives Hamas time to regroup and plan the next massacre. This is the unbearable dilemma Israel faces. Unless Hamas is defeated, this war will not end — it will merely pause, until the next October 7. If Western leaders enable this cycle, they will bear responsibility for the bloodshed to come — on both sides. Article content We are also concerned for the Jewish and Israeli people in Canada. Israel's Ministry of Diaspora Affairs upgraded its travel alert for Canada to Level 2 due to rising threats against Israelis and Jews, following multiple recent attacks on Jewish institutions and a rise in hostile rhetoric. Israelis in Canada were urged to avoid public displays of Jewish/Israeli identity. Leaders of nations should be mindful of how their pubic statements (or lack thereof) might correlate with a rise in antisemitic attacks.
National Post
36 minutes ago
- National Post
Kelly McParland: Poilievre needs to earn an extension as leader
Canada's federal Conservatives are stuck with a dilemma as they consider whether to do anything different in the next two years than they did in the last two. Article content At the centre of the dilemma are a host of riddles. As in, did they actually lose the last election? Sure, they didn't win, but did they lose lose? Like, did Canadians actually reject them, or did something else happen that got in the way of the victory they anticipated? Article content Article content Article content If they did lose, what do they do about it? And if they didn't lose lose, what do they do about that? Article content Article content Depending on the answers to those questions is another of equal weight: do they head into the future with the same team of decision-makers who didn't quite win if they maybe didn't lose? And how do you answer that question when you don't know what the future holds, given that one complaint against the current leader is that he didn't respond effectively enough when the playing field changed? Article content As far as Pierre Poilievre is concerned, there's nothing to decide. 'We had the biggest vote count in our party's history, the biggest increase in our party's history, the biggest vote share since 1988 and we're going to continue to work to get over the finish line,' he replied when asked. That same argument is on offer from other Conservatives keen on moving past the vote that left them once again in second place. Article content The 'nothing to see here' case goes like this: In any previous election dating back 40 years the Tory results would have put them in power, likely with a majority. The fact this one didn't was the result of unprecedented exterior factors, specifically, the timing of Justin Trudeau's departure and the coinciding emergence of a U.S. president even his most fervent detractors didn't foresee as being quite this nuts. Alarmed and unnerved, voters opted for continuity and incumbency over the very real practical policies they'd been firmly embracing until then. Article content It's not a bad argument, but also not entirely convincing. In the Liberal bastion of greater Toronto, it sounds a lot like the local NHL team's annual excuses for once again failing to deliver the goods. 'Hey, at least we did better than our last collapse,' doesn't quite cut it. Article content Article content To its credit, the conservative universe isn't ready to simply roll over and accept the excuses. In this the party shows itself once again to be more independent-minded than the rival Liberals, who — after refusing to give themselves the power to oust Justin Trudeau, and living to regret the fact — made the same decision over his replacement. A majority of the caucus voted not to accept the rules of the Reform Act, meaning Prime Minister Mark Carney knows he can rule as he sees fit, safe in the knowledge the minions can't get rid of him. Would any other party in the democratic world vote to remain minions? Article content Conservatives not only adopted the Reform rules, but are discussing whether Poilievre should face a leadership review. A decision could be made as early as this month, with a review to take place next spring. It's possible they'll reject the option, but it would be a mistake. The world a year from now may look a lot different than it does today. Given the level of international uncertainty and the daily madhouse in Washington, it would be a shock if it didn't. Locking themselves into a recently-defeated leader when circumstances could easily demand an entirely different set of calculations would not be a show of confidence but an act of denial.
