logo
How the King's cousin swapped Colditz for the Palace just in time for VE Day

How the King's cousin swapped Colditz for the Palace just in time for VE Day

Telegraph07-05-2025

As she welcomed VE Day veterans to her tea party at Buckingham Palace on Monday, Queen Camilla inevitably spared a moment to remember one valiant warrior who couldn't be there – her father, the swashbuckling former cavalryman Major Bruce Shand.
Shand, a career soldier and later wine merchant who died in 2006, flew home from his two-and-a-half year incarceration in a German prisoner of war camp just in time to celebrate VE Day with the crowds outside Buckingham Palace in May 1945.
Within the palace walls were two more recently released prisoners of war: King Charles's great-uncle, George Lascelles (later the Earl of Harewood), and Charles's first cousin once removed, John Elphinstone. Both had returned to Britain the night before.
Inmates of the notorious Colditz Castle, their well-being had been a cause of special anxiety for their uncle and aunt, King George VI and Queen Elizabeth, due to their proximity to the throne. Shand, still years away from joining the royal circle, was perhaps the most distinguished soldier of the three, though the hardships they endured were shared by all.
After attending Rugby (which he described as 'a school I cordially disliked'), Bruce Shand was commissioned into the 12th Lancers, an historic cavalry regiment once served by the great Duke of Wellington. At 23, he earned his first Military Cross at Dunkirk. Another followed in January 1942, when he demonstrated exceptional bravery under attack by the German Afrika Corps in the Western Desert, North Africa.
In November 1942, during the Second Battle of El Alamein, Shand came under fire again. His armoured car was destroyed by enemy gunfire, and he was badly wounded and captured. Shand endured a long journey, first to Greece and then on to Spangenberg near Frankfurt, where he joined 300 other prisoner-of-war officers at the local 13th-century castle.
Shand had suffered debilitating injuries, nearly losing an eye and a leg, but his memories of the Spangenberg years remained upbeat and wry. Dunkirk, he recalled, was 'unpleasant' while Spangenberg was 'neither Shepherds nor Claridges'.
But in the early days of his imprisonment, Shand was haunted by waves of remorse over the loss of the two crew members in his vehicle. 'They had considerable trust in me, a trust that had been betrayed, even if their deaths were blessedly instant,' he wrote. In hindsight, it's clear Shand made no tactical error – he had simply been ambushed by the Germans.
At Spangenberg, he quickly learned to rely on his wits. He delivered lectures to fellow prisoners on the progress of the war but kept a decoy subject at the ready in case a guard entered unexpectedly. His chosen cover? 'The flora and fauna of Lower Egypt and the seasonal fall and rise of the Nile.'
He was appointed security officer – responsible for operating whatever clandestine wireless set could be cobbled together, at least until its inevitable discovery by the guards. He transcribed broadcasts from the outside world and quietly passed on the intelligence to fellow prisoners. He also became the camp's 'laundry officer' – a role that officially involved washing but in practice meant bribing guards and local laundresses for precious scraps of information.
The long days of capture were cold, malnourished, claustrophobic and depressing. Shand found solace in the prison library, voraciously consuming history, biography and memoirs. In the spring and summer he was permitted to do some gardening and timber-cutting, but in the dark winter months the prisoners had to entertain themselves with drama productions and lectures.
'Not all of these talks were rewarding,' he observed drily in his memoirs. 'The Albigensian heresy, the classified claret growths of Bordeaux, the manufacture of scent, the breeding of racing pigeons, heraldry, the Pentateuch – there was always someone who had a knowledge of these abstruse matters.
'I believe there was even a set or two of bagpipes, but their use was actively discouraged.'
A passing acquaintance at Spangenberg was King George VI's nephew – George Lascelles, son of his sister Mary, Princess Royal. A 21-year-old lieutenant in the Grenadier Guards, Lascelles had been captured after being wounded during the Italian campaign in June 1944.
Soon Lascelles was moved on to Colditz Castle, 200 miles deeper into eastern Germany. 'Everyone there either had a record of escape or some other punishable offence,' he recalled years later. '[My offence] was to have prominent relations'.
He became one of the Prominente – the German term used during the Second World War to describe a select group of captured personnel with real or imagined connections in high places. Elphinstone was another.
Compared with Spangenberg, the regime at Colditz was harsher, more brutal – prisoners existing on rations which yielded no more than 1,100 calories a day: 'To go upstairs meant either a pause after a few steps or a blackout,' he recalled.
Much of Lascelles's day during the winter was spent fully dressed in bed. As the war dragged on, many of the longer-serving prisoners – those captured at Dunkirk, for instance – began to suffer nervous breakdowns; the wait had simply gone on too long. Others, more resilient, buried themselves in writing, while Lascelles – who would later become a leading figure in British opera – took up the clarinet.
'Poker schools, music appreciation groups, philosophy classes, history lectures – we tried every kind of activity, intellectual or otherwise, until in the end the cold beat us,' wrote Lascelles in his memoirs. 'Colditz, I realised, played Redbrick to Spangenberg's Oxbridge – rougher perhaps, more energetic certainly, the atmosphere far less rarefied.'
One officer who kept very much to himself at Colditz was Elphinstone. Educated at Eton, he was among kindred spirits, but somehow remained austere and apart. 'He seemed to operate in a kind of deep freeze,' recalled Giles Romilly, nephew of Clementine Churchill and another of the Prominente.
The Elphinstone family had been Scottish lairds since the 13th century and lived in considerable splendour. John, a lifelong bachelor, was a Black Watch officer among those forced to surrender at the Battle of Abbeville in 1940. He would spend nearly five years as a German prisoner, and his remoteness – along with his insistence on correctness in all things – was likely a defence mechanism. Yet, according to fellow PoW Martin Gilliatt (later Sir Martin, private secretary to the Queen Mother), he was 'the kindest, most undemanding and understanding friend one could possibly have.'
Not everyone agreed. The senior officer among the Prominente, Elphinstone deplored sloppiness and shabbiness in dress among his fellow prisoners – and never hesitated to express his disapproval, harshly, despite the appalling conditions in which they were held.
The Queen felt a special closeness to her nephew, and he to her, after she visited his regiment and momentarily mistook him for her dead brother Fergus – another Black Watch officer – who had perished in the First World War. Though no blood relation to the Royal family, Elphinstone took his connections very seriously. When writing letters home, he referred to each member by the nicknames known only to them – his aunt, the Queen, was always given a boy's name.
Despite this reclusive nature, he was to save the lives of his fellow Prominente as the Allies finally headed towards Colditz in late April 1945. 'He was a personality that was to play a resolute, decisive and quite possibly providential part in the impending dangers,' declared Romilly.
As the Allies advanced, the Nazi high command issued the order to evacuate the camps. In both Spangenberg and Colditz, fear spread among the prisoners that they may be used as human shields, or merely taken out and shot. For the Prominente, there was the added threat that they might be handed over to the Gestapo, in whose hands they would most certainly perish.
Shand and his fellow prisoners were forced to march for two days towards the Wehra river but, the following night, he and a few others slipped away from the column and hid in nearby woods: 'The rain was heavy, cold and there was an unpleasant eerie feeling with shells passing overhead.' Though this group was now nominally free, roaming groups of Hitler-Jugend – 'hair-trigger adolescents' – were a constant threat.
Eventually, Shand's party linked up with liberating US Army forces, who sent Shand by air to Paris via Luxembourg
His escape was cunning and successful, though relatively simple compared to that of Elphinstone and the Prominente back at Colditz. One night, these prized hostages were ordered onto a bus with no information about their destination and they feared the worst.
Their journey took them first to one detention centre, then another, before arriving at a civilian internment camp in Laufen. Here, they feared their military status would be revoked, leaving them vulnerable to elimination. The normally reticent Elphinstone, however, raised his voice and demanded they be moved to a military camp. His assumed authority – 'as if he were in command of both the Germans and the British' – worked, and they were subsequently taken to Tittmoning Castle in Bavaria.
The Prominente were determined to escape, and at Tittmoning, they discovered a secret hiding place within the 6ft-thick prison walls, left by previous PoWs. One night, one of them cut through the exterior perimeter wire, creating the illusion that they had escaped into the open countryside. In reality, they had concealed themselves in the cramped, tiny space within the wall, with a view to hiding there until the Americans or Russians arrived.
'In its way it was not without luxury,' recalled Lascelles drily. 'There was a great tin bucket which served as a lavatory. Only two could lie down so we slept in two-hour shifts, changing places when it was our turn.'
They survived three days, trying to read in the sparse daylight filtering through a hole in the wall, and talking only in whispers. Looked at from this distance, it's impossible to see how five men managed to survive so long in a space no bigger than a large wardrobe, but in the end they were discovered.
Ironically, the camp commandant was relieved to see them again – he had been condemned to death for allowing their escape but was now reprieved. However, they were once again loaded onto a bus and sent onward, still with no idea whether their special status would result in being treated like VIPs at their destination or, worse, being executed.
In fact, the Prominente had become pawns in a high-stakes game, with Ernst Kaltenbrunner, head of the Gestapo, eager to get his hands on the hostages. They were also informed by General Berger, an SS official, that he had received orders from Hitler to have them killed – though he insisted he wasn't going to carry them out.
Berger arranged for Elphinstone, Lascelles and the rest to be moved to a transit camp at Markt Pongau (today St Johann in Pongau) where they were introduced to a Swiss intermediary who guaranteed their safe delivery into Allied hands. A German doctor, ready to give himself up, was added to the group as a potential safeguard against further military interference.
Finally transferred to a larger vehicle, the group slowly approached the Allied lines, fearful that a trigger-happy US soldier might open fire on the unfamiliar convoy. But they arrived safely in Salzburg, where, that night, John Elphinstone received an unexpected call from the Queen. She insisted that he and George Lascelles return immediately to Buckingham Palace, where a champagne-laden dinner awaited them.
The following day, May 8, 1945, Britain celebrated VE Day. The Royal family, with their ex-PoW relatives taking a back seat, waved to the cheering crowds from the Buckingham Palace balcony.
Bruce Shand, still outside the royal circle, flew back from Paris, where he was warmly greeted by Rosalind Cubitt, the former debutante he had escorted to her pre-war coming-out dance – the last of peacetime. Once safely home, he proposed marriage.
Eight months later, the couple wed at St Paul's Church, Knightsbridge. A year after that, Major Shand became the proud father of Camilla, the future queen.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK Sport demands answers in British rowing's rape scandal
UK Sport demands answers in British rowing's rape scandal

Telegraph

time31 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

UK Sport demands answers in British rowing's rape scandal

UK Sport, the Olympic funding body, has made urgent contact with British Rowing following 'deeply concerning' allegations at Britain's most prestigious rowing club. Leander Club, which supplied more than half of Team GB's rowers at the Paris Olympics, has been accused of failing to properly investigate allegations of rape and harassment. Telegraph Sport has learnt of three separate incidents involving male rowers who allegedly raped female squad members at the esteemed Henley-based club over the past five years. Concerns from female squad members – which were supported by more than a dozen of the men's rowing team – that sexual assault allegations were not being taken seriously are said to have been repeatedly ignored or dismissed by the Leander committee. The male rowers have denied the rape allegations. British Rowing received around £26 million of public money at the Paris Olympic and paralympic cycle, an investment that has since been upped to more than £28 million ahead of the Los Angeles Games in 2028. UK Sport have previously instigated investigations following welfare concerns at governing bodies which include British Cycling and British Gymnastic. Following the Leander allegations, UK Sport said: 'Our thoughts are with those affected by the allegations which have recently been reported, and we take matters of integrity and safeguarding extremely seriously. 'We encourage any member of staff or athlete on Olympic and Paralympic performance programmes to report allegations of unacceptable behaviour to Sport Integrity, the confidential reporting line. In light of these deeply concerning allegations, we are in contact with British Rowing.' In response to Telegraph Sport's investigation, Leander said: 'Leander Club takes seriously all issues relating to the safeguarding of our athletes. We have strict procedures in place to carefully examine any formal complaints and regularly review our club disciplinary processes to ensure they are fit for purpose, treating our athletes fairly and with respect. 'In addition to an updated code of conduct, we have partnered with a specialist external provider to ensure members of the club know without doubt the standards we expect and the ways to highlight any individual misconduct. When issues are raised, we will continue to take immediate action where necessary to protect the welfare of our athletes.' A British Rowing spokesperson said: 'We are not able to comment on individual safeguarding concerns and processes conducted at clubs owing to their confidential nature. 'What we are able to say categorically is that the safety of people taking part in our sport is the very first item of importance on our agenda. We investigate anything reported to us fully and comprehensively, as you would expect and as it is our remit to do. This would have been the case if sufficient information had been raised with us to conduct an investigation in respect of the raised allegations.'

Our politicians are the least serious in history – and that includes you, Nigel
Our politicians are the least serious in history – and that includes you, Nigel

Telegraph

time31 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Our politicians are the least serious in history – and that includes you, Nigel

This week an appalling case reminded us just how broken Britain is. We learnt that a 15-year-old boy killed elderly dogwalker Bhim Kohli while a female friend, aged 12, filmed it on her mobile phone. Both were laughing as the beloved grandfather lay dying in the street. How on earth can it have come to this? The case is emblematic of everything that has gone wrong – and continues to go wrong – in our fragmented, seemingly lawless society. We are led by complete incompetents: from police administering two-tier justice right the way up to our Prime Minister. It is little wonder there is a university course running in France on why the UK is such a failure. And Mayor of London Sadiq Khan's answer to our capital's woes, despite knife and other crimes soaring? Decriminalising cannabis. We knew Labour were not fit for purpose before they even took office, but this latest example of idiocy from City Hall really does sum up the problem with having hapless, careerist socialists anywhere near the levers of power. And now Reform UK appears to have imploded. Having abandoned the Conservative Party after an inept 14 years of governance, which left us with higher bills, higher taxes, higher NHS waiting lists and higher immigration, voters had hoped that Nigel Farage and his motley crew might bring the salvation Britain so desperately needs. Reform was meant to represent the alternative to 'uniparty' politics by ripping up the political rule book and restoring good old fashioned common sense. What we have learnt in the past 24 hours, however, is that the one thing uniting all four major parties in the UK (and I'm including the ludicrous Liberal Democrats in this, with their clown of a leader Sir Ed Davey) is just how thoroughly unserious they all are. Westminster currently resembles a cross-party circus act; what has the electorate done to deserve this? Let's take them one by one. We currently cannot believe a word slippery Starmer says after a string of Labour lies on tax, winter fuel, defence spending, relations with the EU, the Chagos Islands, immigration – you name it. They promised 6,500 more teachers with their vindictive VAT raid on private school fees and this week it was revealed teacher numbers are actually down since they took office. Millionaires are leaving, businesses are folding, more tax rises are on the way. We've got an Attorney General who wants to defend terrorists like Osama bin Laden's right-hand man while the justice system imprisons mothers like Lucy Connolly for 'hurty words' on the internet. The Left accuses Reform of being amateurs – and then run the country as if it's a university student union staffed by drop-outs. Yet the Right-wing opposition appears equally as childish. This week, we have had the shadow chancellor Mel Stride denouncing Liz Truss's premiership with some weasel words about the Tories 'never again undermining fiscal credibility by making promises we cannot afford'. The former prime minister – once famously compared to a lettuce – hit back with an excoriating statement on the political playground that is X, accusing Sir Mel of being a 'creature of the system' by siding with 'failed Treasury orthodoxy'. In what world does this blue-on-blue infighting help Kemi Badenoch as she struggles to cut through? Equally infantile was the typically boyish intervention of her former leadership rival Sir James Cleverly with a demand that the Conservatives stick to net zero – despite it being among the main reasons the party is now facing its own climate emergency. He's been invisible for months and then emerges with this sort of unhelpful Ed Milibandesque claptrap? Read the room, for pity's sake. All credit to Robert Jenrick for trying to find some grown-up solutions to some of the country's problems – like fare dodging, notwithstanding the self-serving nature of his attention-grabbing social media endeavours. Badenoch is trying her best to be a serious politician, with thoughtful rather than knee-jerk interventions on issues like our membership of the ECHR – only to have MPs in her ranks like Kit Malthouse spreading anti-Israel slanders like his declaration this week that Gaza is 'an abattoir where starving people are lured out through combat zones to be shot at'. Along with other Tories, he's also been calling for the Prime Minister to recognise a Palestinian state. Harebrained student politics are clearly not just confined to the Labour Party. We had hoped Reform, led by streetwise Nigel Farage, a man of political wisdom and experience, might rise above all this. But even he has been dogged by infantilism. If Rupert Lowe's 'more people watch my X videos than Nigel's' bravado wasn't bad enough, Reform now has been badly damaged by the similarly petulant flouncing out of party chairman Zia Yusuf. I like Zia and think he deserves credit for all the hard work he has put into professionalising the party over the past 11 months. But what on earth was there to be gained from such a public tantrum? Just leave quietly, don't blow the whole thing up with spiteful talk of working to get the party elected 'no longer being a good use of my time'. Similarly juvenile was the language he used to describe Reform MP Sarah Pochin's Commons call to ban the burka (which provoked laughter from the front bench: that's the state of public discourse in this country, folks). Responding to Katie Hopkins, of all people, on X, he wrote: 'Nothing to do with me. Had no idea about the question nor that it wasn't policy. Busy with other stuff. I do think it's dumb for a party to ask the PM if they would do something the party itself wouldn't do.' At the age of 38 and having worked at Goldman Sachs and established his own hugely successful business, he should know this is not the way to behave in the public eye. Reform remains a party that cannot even govern itself, let alone the country. This simply isn't good enough. The Government is useless, the Tories are a busted flush; if Reform seriously wants to break the doom loom of despair then it cannot be part of the problem. The party must get its act together – and fast.

Mum wins £11k payout from Premier League star who ‘helped his brother dodge child support payments to daughter, two'
Mum wins £11k payout from Premier League star who ‘helped his brother dodge child support payments to daughter, two'

The Sun

time32 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Mum wins £11k payout from Premier League star who ‘helped his brother dodge child support payments to daughter, two'

A MUM has won an £11,000 payout from a Premier League star accused of helping his brother dodge child support payments for his young daughter, she claims. Chelsea ace Tosin Adarabioyo allegedly funds older brother Fisayo's extravagant lifestyle, paying for a £2.9million mansion, giving him a monthly income and a credit card to go shopping with. 5 5 The Sun snapped photos of flashy Fisayo, 30, a former pro-footballer, carrying a £3,140 Bottega Veneta leather briefcase. But despite his millionaire lifestyle, Fisayo has yet to pay a penny towards his two-year-old daughter Anara's upbringing after telling the Child Maintenance Service he's skint, it is claimed. Anara's struggling mum Nadia Messaoud, 41, who dated Fisayo for a year before they split in 2022, said she was forced to take action after being ignored. She took civil action against Chelsea defender Tosin for funding his brother while allegedly knowing of his sibling's obligations. Legal documents relating to the civil action, seen by The Sun, state: 'The defendant (Tosin) has been knowingly providing his older brother, Fisayo Adarabioyo, with an income that is not being declared to HMRC or the child maintenance service. 'This is with the intention to obstruct my daughter's legal right to obtain child maintenance. 'My child has for the last three years been awarded the nil level of CMS.' Nadia also alleged that as well as thousands of pounds a month in cash income, Tosin also provides his brother with a credit card to spend on. According to Land Registry documents, Tosin, 27, thought to be on £120,000 a week at Chelsea, owns the Cheshire mansion in which Fisayo lives. The Department of Work and Pensions has awarded unemployed Fisayo a "nil rate" on child support for the past three years because he claims he does not earn enough to pay. Nadia staged a protest outside Chelsea's Stamford Bridge stadium last month to raise awareness around her cause. She wore a vest top and held a sign both of which said: 'TOSIN #4 Women Matter, Children Matter, D.A (Domestic Abuse) survivors matter.' She is backed by domestic abuse charity Women's Aid. Fisayo was convicted of harassment without violence in 2022 after turning up at Nadia's terraced home in Cheshire, banging on her door and leaving her terrified. He also bombarded her with texts, saying he hoped she miscarried the baby and threatened to kill her. After allegedly failing to respond to Nadia's legal claim, his brother Tosin has been ordered by the court to pay her £11,000. However, Tosin's legal team told The Sun the order was a "default judgement" made in error "on the part of the court". Nadia said: "I've not received a penny from Fisayo to help with our daughter, while he's living a footballer's lifestyle thanks to his Chelsea playing brother. "I've been rebuffed at every opportunity which is why I decided to take legal action against both of them. "All I ever wanted was a reasonable level of financial support but Fisayo has claimed poverty. Now I know the truth. "As a Premier League player Tosin is supposed to be a role model, but his actions have essentially blocked my daughter from receiving the financial support she's entitled to by law." Tosin's lawyers' statement added: "The Order arises from a default judgement which has been entered by the Court in a claim issued by Nadia Messaoud against our client ('the Claim'). Unfortunately, it would appear that our client's strike out application has not been properly processed by the Court and it has therefore allowed automatic default judgement to be entered in favour of Ms Messaoud. "This is a very serious administrative failing on the Court's part and one which we are addressing with the Court on our client's behalf. Inappropriately, she made an application for judgement in default, despite being served with that application. "Your summary is not a fair and accurate report of anything that has taken place in the Court proceedings." They added that as well as "chasing" the court, they have also made an application on their client's behalf "to have the default judgement order set aside". "In summary therefore, the Order which you have seen is subject to an active challenge, and should never have been issued by the Court in the first place." They said the claim is a "pattern of behaviour" by Ms Messaoud "to exert unwanted pressure on our client to provide further funding to her". "Our client has no relationship with Ms Messaoud and owes no legal or other duties or obligations to her," the statement adds. The Sun has also contacted Fisayo's lawyer and Chelsea for comment. 5

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store