Revealed: How Much Exercise You Need to 'Offset' a Day of Sitting
We know that spending lots of time sitting down isn't good for us, but just how much exercise is needed to counteract the negative health effects of sitting down all day?
Research suggests about 30-40 minutes per day of building up a sweat should do it.
Up to 40 minutes of "moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity" every day is about the right amount to balance out 10 hours of sitting still, the research says – although any amount of exercise or even just standing up helps to some extent.
That's based on a meta-analysis study published in 2020 analyzing nine previous studies, involving a total of 44,370 people in four different countries who were wearing some form of fitness tracker.
The analysis found the risk of death among those with a more sedentary lifestyle went up as time spent engaging in moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity went down.
"In active individuals doing about 30-40 minutes of moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity, the association between high sedentary time and risk of death is not significantly different from those with low amounts of sedentary time," the researchers explained in their paper.
In other words, putting in some reasonably intensive activities – cycling, brisk walking, gardening – can lower your risk of an earlier death right back down to what it would be if you weren't doing all that sitting around, to the extent that this link can be seen in the amassed data of many thousands of people.
While meta-analyses like this one always require some elaborate dot-joining across separate studies with different volunteers, timescales, and conditions, the benefit of this particular piece of research is that it relied on relatively objective data from wearables – not data self-reported by the participants.
At the time, the study was published alongside the release of the World Health Organization 2020 Global Guidelines on Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour, put together by 40 scientists across six continents. The British Journal of Sports Medicine (BHSM) also put out a special edition to carry both the study and the revised guidelines.
"As these guidelines emphasize, all physical activity counts and any amount of it is better than none," said physical activity and population health researcher Emmanuel Stamatakis from the University of Sydney in Australia.
"People can still protect their health and offset the harmful effects of physical inactivity."
The research based on fitness trackers is broadly in line with the 2020 WHO guidelines, which recommend 150-300 mins of moderate intensity or 75-150 mins of vigorous intensity physical activity every week to counter sedentary behavior.
Walking up the stairs instead of taking the lift, playing with children and pets, taking part in yoga or dancing, doing household chores, walking, and cycling are all put forward as ways in which people can be more active – and if you can't manage the 30-40 minutes right away, the researchers say, start off small.
Making recommendations across all ages and body types is tricky, though the 40-minute time frame for activity fits in with previous research. As more data gets published, we should learn more about how to stay healthy even if we have to spend extended periods of time at a desk.
"Although the new guidelines reflect the best available science, there are still some gaps in our knowledge," said Stamatakis.
"We are still not clear, for example, where exactly the bar for 'too much sitting' is. But this is a fast-paced field of research, and we will hopefully have answers in a few years' time."
The research was published here, and the 2020 guidelines are available here, in the British Journal of Sports Medicine. Further information is available here.
An earlier version of this article was published in November 2020.
Delayed REM Sleep May Be an Early Signal of Alzheimer's, Study Finds
Caffeine in Your Blood Could Affect Body Fat And Diabetes Risk, Study Reveals
Leading Cause of Death in US Claims A Life Every 34 Seconds
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
10 hours ago
- Forbes
Is Burnout Real? What The Scientific Debate Means For Your Company
Matches burning out My husband went to work this morning with a spring in his step. It was the first time in weeks. Why? Because our oldest son was laughing and joking at breakfast after weeks of poor sleep and bad moods. At work, my husband felt energetic. Quite a difference from the previous weeks, when he felt exhausted upon arrival at the office, and had the feeling work was piling up. My husband had been experiencing burnout symptoms, which include feeling exhausted, being negative about work, and lower efficiency. Burnout is acknowledged by the World Health Organization, which defines it in its International Classification of Diseases-11 as 'a syndrome resulting from chronic workplace stress that has not been successfully managed.' More than 50 years of research have been dedicated to understanding burnout. Now, it is being called into question. There are two camps – one consisting of psychologists and psychiatrists questioning the validity and need for the concept of burnout, and the other a group of occupational health researchers underscoring the relevance of burnout. Here are the key points, counterpoints, and takeaway messages that matter for #1: Does Work Cause Burnout? The first point adversaries of burnout make is that there is no convincing evidence that work factors primarily cause burnout. Advocates of burnout, however, maintain that the origin of burnout is the workplace. Understanding precisely what causes burnout is essential, as it can help us find more effective solutions to prevent it. In my husband's case, I wondered, what caused his burnout complaints? The last few weeks were marked by numerous tight submission deadlines. But it was nothing out of the ordinary for his line of work, and something he otherwise dealt with fine. The added family worries had made it difficult to cope with his work demands. This is not to say that work cannot be the sole cause of burnout. Many people work in dismal working conditions where work is the clear culprit of burnout complaints. However, it is essential to consider the overall burden placed on employees, both at work and at home. In a study published almost twenty years ago in Journal of Vocational Behavior, professors Tanja van der Lippe, Esther Kluwer, Henk Flap, and I found that employees with children under six years old were more likely to report burnout complaints than those with older children, even when controlling for work pressure and work hours. A meta-analysis published in Human Relations in 2014 confirms that work-family conflict, characterized by insufficient time or energy to perform both roles effectively, can lead to burnout. The fact that nonwork factors contribute to burnout does not mean that burnout is not work-related. Work demands, together with nonwork demands, might push someone over the edge. Exhausted employees more often call in sick, perform suboptimal, and have less energy to support colleagues properly. There is thus sufficient reason for organizations to support burned-out employees and ensure they have the necessary resources to recover and fully re-engage in their work. When searching for the right resources, however, it will be critical to understand where someone needs help: at work, at home, or both.(Dis)agreement #2: How Prevalent is Burnout? Opponents of burnout argue that burnout researchers exaggerate that burnout is a condition of epidemic magnitude. Proponents, however, also condemn the popular notion that burnout is rampant. As discussed by Professors Hans de Witte from Catholic University Leuven and Wilmar Schaufeli from Utrecht University, the solution lies in clearly differentiating between burnout complaints versus clinically diagnosed burnout. Burnout complaints indicate that an employee often feels exhausted, distances themselves from work, and perceives their accomplishments as lower. These feelings of work stress are, in fact, quite prevalent. A clinical form of burnout, diagnosed by a medical expert, where the employee is on leave for weeks or months, is relatively rare, and the trend appears to be stable. A longitudinal study published in the Journal of Psychiatric Research suggests that fewer than four percent of German employees received a formal diagnosis of burnout, and this number remained stable between 2012 and 2022. When the media refers to burnout as epidemic, they essentially mean that more employees feel exhausted and cynical about work, which differs from what is suggested by the word burnout alone, namely, an employee who is sick at home. Disagreement #3: Is Burnout the Same as Depression? Challengers of burnout argue that it is unclear if burnout is different from depression. Professors Renzo Bianchi from the Norwegian University of Science and Technology and Irvan Sam Schonfeld from City University of New York vouch for retiring the term and instead viewing it as a subset of depressive symptoms. Burnout supporters, however, pinpoint apparent differences – depression is a mood disorder, primarily characterized by depressed mood and loss of interest and pleasure in activities. Professors De Witte and Schaufeli frame burnout as an energy disorder, primarily characterized by emotional exhaustion and physical fatigue. When asking Christaan Vinkers, Psychiatrist and Professor in Stress and Resilience at the Amsterdam University Medical Center, the Netherlands, if he sees a way out of this impasse, he responds, 'We need large-scale studies that examine the differences and similarities between burnout, depression, and anxiety. We don't know if burnout is truly different from depression, because work stressors can also cause depression, and burnout is not caused by work alone.' Vinkers calls for clinical studies that meticulously map the symptoms of employees who are so distressed that they can no longer perform their work. By focusing on this group, you can determine if there is a clear set of symptoms that belong to the diagnosis of burnout or if these symptoms are so similar to depression and anxiety that they should be categorized there. Vinkers also underscores the need to examine the underlying stress response in more detail. 'It might be even more important to shift focus to the dysregulation process. What causes someone to feel so overwhelmed by life that they can't function anymore? If we know what pushes people over the edge, we can better prevent and treat stress-related illness, regardless of what we call it.'Takeaways for Organizations While some may dismiss this debate as an academic squabble, it contains important lessons for practice. The following guidelines may help organizations. The proponents and opponents of burnout both made valid points. Part of the clash might be attributed to two disciplines using different lenses. A psychiatrist's job is to diagnose people correctly, and for that purpose, better diagnostic burnout tools are necessary. Occupational health psychologists focus on employees who might experience elevated stress at work but are not clinically ill. Both camps have essential roles to play, and these roles seem complementary rather than adversarial.
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
Study finds child vaccination rates are dropping globally, threatening millions
Researchers found on Tuesday that vaccination rates among children are dropping across the world, increasing the risk of outbreaks of preventable diseases, as economic inequality, misinformation, and foreign aid cuts threaten to stymie decades of progress. Efforts to vaccinate children against deadly diseases are faltering across the world due to economic inequality, Covid-era disruptions and misinformation, putting millions of lives at risk, research warned Wednesday. These trends all increase the threat of future outbreaks of preventable diseases, the researchers said, while sweeping foreign aid cuts threaten previous progress in vaccinating the world's children. A new study published in The Lancet journal looked at childhood vaccination rates across 204 countries and territories. It was not all bad news. An immunisation programme by the World Health Organization was estimated to have saved an estimated 154 million lives over the last 50 years. And vaccination coverage against diseases such as diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough, measles, polio and tuberculosis doubled between 1980 and 2023, the international team of researchers found. However the gains slowed in the 2010s, when measles vaccinations decreased in around half of the countries, with the largest drop in Latin America. Meanwhile in more than half of all high-income countries there were declines in coverage for at least one vaccine dose. Then the Covid-19 pandemic struck. (FRANCE 24 with AFP) Read more on FRANCE 24 EnglishRead also:Robert F. Kennedy fires entire US vaccine panel, citing conflicts of interestMorocco scrambles to contain measles outbreak blamed on global anti-vax campaign
Yahoo
19 hours ago
- Yahoo
Child vaccine coverage faltering, threatening millions: study
Efforts to vaccinate children against deadly diseases are faltering across the world due to economic inequality, Covid-era disruptions and misinformation, putting millions of lives at risk, research warned Wednesday. These trends all increase the threat of future outbreaks of preventable diseases, the researchers said, while sweeping foreign aid cuts threaten previous progress in vaccinating the world's children. A new study published in The Lancet journal looked at childhood vaccination rates across 204 countries and territories. It was not all bad news. An immunisation programme by the World Health Organization was estimated to have saved an estimated 154 million lives over the last 50 years. And vaccination coverage against diseases such as diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough, measles, polio and tuberculosis doubled between 1980 and 2023, the international team of researchers found. However the gains slowed in the 2010s, when measles vaccinations decreased in around half of the countries, with the largest drop in Latin America. Meanwhile in more than half of all high-income countries there were declines in coverage for at least one vaccine dose. Then the Covid-19 pandemic struck. Routine vaccination services were hugely disrupted during lockdowns and other measures, resulting in nearly 13 million extra children who never received any vaccine dose between 2020 to 2023, the study said. This disparity endured, particularly in poorer countries. In 2023, more than half of the world's 15.7 million completely unvaccinated children lived in just eight countries, the majority in sub-Saharan Africa, according to the study. In the European Union, 10 times more measles cases were recorded last year compared to 2023. In the United States, a measles outbreak surged past 1,000 cases across 30 states last month, which is already more than were recorded in all of 2024. Cases of polio, long eradicated in many areas thanks to vaccination, have been rising in Pakistan and Afghanistan, while Papua New Guinea is currently enduring a polio outbreak. - 'Tragedy' - "Routine childhood vaccinations are among the most powerful and cost-effective public health interventions available," said senior study author Jonathan Mosser of the US-based Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME). "But persistent global inequalities, challenges from the Covid pandemic, and the growth of vaccine misinformation and hesitancy have all contributed to faltering immunisation progress," he said in a statement. In addition, there are "rising numbers of displaced people and growing disparities due to armed conflict, political volatility, economic uncertainty, climate crises," added lead study author Emily Haeuser, also from the IHME. The researchers warned the setbacks could threaten the WHO's goal of having 90 percent of the world's children and adolescents receive essential vaccines by 2030. The WHO also aims to halve the number of children who have received no vaccine doses by 2030 compared to 2019 levels. Just 18 countries have achieved this so far, according to the study, which was funded by the Gates Foundation and the Gavi vaccine alliance. The global health community has also been reeling since President Donald Trump's administration drastically slashed US international aid earlier this year. "For the first time in decades, the number of kids dying around the world will likely go up this year instead of down because of massive cuts to foreign aid," Bill Gates said in a separate statement on Tuesday. "That is a tragedy," the Microsoft co-founder said, committing $1.6 billion to Gavi, which is holding a fund-raising summit in Brussels on Wednesday. dl/yad
