Company secretary's husband steals, sells wife's gold worth Rs 41 lakh
Surat: A 31-year-old company secretary filed a complaint of theft against her husband, alleging that he stole 96 tolas of gold jewellery, worth Rs 41 lakh, which she had kept in an electronic safe.
She alleged that he then sold the jewellery to an Udhna jeweller and lost the money while speculating in shares. As the husband did not return the jewellery, she filed a complaint against him at Adajan police station.
According to the FIR filed by Priyanka Rathod, she is a company secretary in Surat and married Harikrushna Parmar, in 2017. The couple and their children have been living at Rathod's mother's house in Adajan for the last nine months.
In Jan, she moved her jewellery from Parmar's house to her mother's and put it in an electronic safe with her fingerprint identification. The safe could also be opened manually, for which it had a key, which Rathod gave to her mother, Dolly.
The couple went to Dwarka and returned on May 13. After this, when Rathod tried to open the safe with her fingerprint, it did not open. After getting a replacement battery from the vendor, on opening the safe, she found her 96 tolas of gold jewellery, worth Rs 41 lakh, was missing.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025
Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List
Undo
Rathod called her maternal uncle, Prashant, to Surat, who spoke to Parmar about it. Parmar allegedly confessed to stealing the safe key from Dolly's cupboard and stealing the gold. He also allegedly confessed to selling it to an Udhna jeweller, Rajesh Soni.
When the family went to Soni, he admitted buying the jewellery and told the family that Parmar sold it saying he needed money urgently as his mother-in-law was in hospital.
Soni also told the family that he has CCTV footage of Parmar selling the jewellery.
Rathod's FIR also states that Parmar made her take a Rs 4.5 lakh personal loan in 2024 and liquidate shares worth Rs 2 lakh from her demat account. He then took the funds.
"After the theft was discovered, Parmar assured the victim he would get back her jewellery. He then went to Shirdi and did not return. He also blocked the victim. We detained the accused and are investigating further," said Adajan police inspector P J Solanki.
Surat: A 31-year-old company secretary filed a complaint of theft against her husband, alleging that he stole 96 tolas of gold jewellery, worth Rs 41 lakh, which she had kept in an electronic safe.
She alleged that he then sold the jewellery to an Udhna jeweller and lost the money while speculating in shares. As the husband did not return the jewellery, she filed a complaint against him at Adajan police station.
According to the FIR filed by Priyanka Rathod, she is a company secretary in Surat and married Harikrushna Parmar, in 2017.
The couple and their children have been living at Rathod's mother's house in Adajan for the last nine months.
In Jan, she moved her jewellery from Parmar's house to her mother's and put it in an electronic safe with her fingerprint identification. The safe could also be opened manually, for which it had a key, which Rathod gave to her mother, Dolly.
The couple went to Dwarka and returned on May 13. After this, when Rathod tried to open the safe with her fingerprint, it did not open.
After getting a replacement battery from the vendor, on opening the safe, she found her 96 tolas of gold jewellery, worth Rs 41 lakh, was missing.
Rathod called her maternal uncle, Prashant, to Surat, who spoke to Parmar about it. Parmar allegedly confessed to stealing the safe key from Dolly's cupboard and stealing the gold. He also allegedly confessed to selling it to an Udhna jeweller, Rajesh Soni.
When the family went to Soni, he admitted buying the jewellery and told the family that Parmar sold it saying he needed money urgently as his mother-in-law was in hospital.
Soni also told the family that he has CCTV footage of Parmar selling the jewellery.
Rathod's FIR also states that Parmar made her take a Rs 4.5 lakh personal loan in 2024 and liquidate shares worth Rs 2 lakh from her demat account. He then took the funds.
"After the theft was discovered, Parmar assured the victim he would get back her jewellery. He then went to Shirdi and did not return. He also blocked the victim. We detained the accused and are investigating further," said Adajan police inspector P J Solanki.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
Belagavi to press Arms Act for possession of weapons, top cop warns
Belagavi: Criminal activities in Belagavi district, which shares its borders with Maharashtra and Goa, has seen an uptick this year, posing a challenge to law-keepers. Bhushan Borase, the city police commissioner, told the media even minors were roaming around with deadly weapons. A special team has been formed to prevent such trends and this team has hit the ground going from Thursday itself, he added. "If deadly weapons, including knives and swords, are found in possession of any individual, a case will be registered directly under the Arms Act. We will also open a rowdy sheet," the CP warned. Arms Act, 1959, mandates licensing for possession of firearms, with specific provisions for different types of weapons and ammunition. In keeping with the stringent provisions under certain sections of this Act, an arrested person can secure bail only from the court as no station bail is allowed. While there were 85 murders and 185 attempted murder cases in entire 2024, these numbers were surpassed by the end of April 2025 itself. In addition, 107 riots and several Pocso cases were also recorded across the district in the first four months of this year. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Bangladesh: Unsold Sofas at Bargain Prices (View Current Prices) Sofas | Search Ads Search Now Undo More than 300 cases of violence were registered over the last five months in the district, including 33 murders and 70 attempted murders – stats that are keeping personnel at the 49 police stations in the district on their toes. Santosh Dharekar, a social activist, said DCP Seema Latkar, while she was posted in Belagavi, had formed a team called 'Channamma Pade' comprising female police personnel. This team not only worked to maintain law and order in Belagavi city, but also created awareness among the public against criminal activities. However, with the initiative gradually discontinued, criminal activities are yet again on the rise. Police also revealed that minors were involved in the stabbing of a man on a bus at the central bus stand two days ago. Two people were taken into custody within 10 hours of the incident. Pic: The Belagavi City police commissioner's office
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
HC pulls up officials for lapses in preventing cracker unit accidents
Madurai: Madras high court has reprimanded officials of PESO, police, as well as industrial safety and health departments for their oversight in preventing frequent accidents in fireworks units, causing loss of workers' lives in Virudhunagar district. The court called for details of cases registered in the last five years while issuing a series of directions to officials to take steps to prevent such accidents. Justice B Pugalendhi said the repeated pattern of accidents — 131 deaths and 146 serious injuries between 2019 and 2023 in the region — suggests a chronic absence of inspection, enforcement, and accountability. "The regulatory bodies, despite knowing the hazardous nature of the work and workers' vulnerability, failed to discharge their constitutional obligation under Article 21 to protect the right to life of citizens working in high-risk industries. This lapse cannot be termed accidental; it is structural and ongoing," observed the judge. The judge noted that in the Achankulam fireworks accident case in Sivakasi, retired Justice K Kannan committee's report found subleasing of licensed premises, overcrowding, untrained workers, chemical mixing in open areas, and locked exits as major causes of the blast. Though a criminal case is registered for various offences whenever an accident occurs, investigations are conducted mechanically. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo "It appears that FIRs registered in 2019 and 2020 remain pending in 2024. There is no engagement of explosive experts, no forensic reports, and no meaningful determination of the cause," it said. Sections 9(1) and 9A of the Explosives Act mandate cause-based investigation and remedial recommendations, apart from the criminal investigation. However, these provisions are routinely overlooked, and neither the district collector nor the Controller of Explosives, PESO, have suggested any viable remedial measures. The judge asked the DGP to ensure that fire accidents involving explosives are investigated by personnel equipped with adequate technical knowledge, with due assistance from forensic experts. Under Rule 11 of the Explosives Rules, each factory is mandated to appoint a qualified foreman and a safety officer/supervisor (BSc Chemistry) in the ratio of 1:50 workers. However, these roles are often vacant or filled without proper qualification. Though the rules also mandate periodic safety audits, and adherence to quantitative and procedural restrictions, none of these safeguards were meaningfully implemented. The industrial safety and health department, which bears statutory responsibility to oversee factory safety under Factories Act and Tamil Nadu Factories Rules, is critically understaffed, the judge said. The judge directed the Director of Industrial Safety and Health to ensure strict enforcement of safety norms under various statutes, including compliance with licensing limits, mandatory appointment of safety personnel, periodic inspections, and safety training. According to rules, a district magistrate or district revenue officer is empowered to issue licenses when the total quantity of explosives, including raw materials, processed material, and finished goods, does not exceed 15kg. Quantities ranging from 15kg to 500 kg fall under the jurisdiction of the controller of explosives, PESO, and those above 500 kg under chief controller of explosives, PESO. However, it has come to light that DROs have issued licenses beyond their jurisdiction by permitting multiple sheds or exceeding the 15kg limit. Such licenses are patently invalid. The judge directed the chief controller of explosives, PESO, to take necessary steps to scrutinise licensing practices in Sivakasi and other firework clusters and take appropriate action wherever licenses are found to be issued in excess of the legal limits. The court said that in cases where it is established, upon inquiry that the accident occurred due to the employer's fault, including non-compliance with licensing conditions, safety protocols, or subleasing of premises, the licensing authority shall take appropriate action, including cancellation of licence. "The responsibility to regulate hazardous industries is statutory, not discretionary," observed Justice Pugalendhi.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Road spat ends in murder outside Ghaziabad police station, shooter a rape convict freed last year
1 2 3 Ghaziabad: A 35-year-old man was gunned down at the entrance of a police station Wednesday evening as a road rage incident that began with a minor argument ended hours later in murder. The brazen killing, after which the SHO of Muradnagar and two sub-inspectors were suspended, followed shots being fired at victim Ravi Sharma's house by the prime suspects, Monty and Mini, and a scuffle outside the police station between them and Ravi that a policeman allegedly recorded videos of rather than try to stop. It was during this scuffle that Monty shot Ravi. Convicted of raping a minor in 2015, Monty was released from prison last year and lived in the same village as the victim, though they didn't seem to know each other, police said. The confrontation began around 7.30pm when Ravi, his father and brother Arun were returning home from the market in their Scorpio. Near the gate of Milak Rawali, where the live, they had stopped to pick up their two cousins. Monty and Mini were in their Celerio and honked to be let through. When Ravi's father asked them to wait, they became furious. Heated words were exchanged between the two groups, and Ravi also got involved. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Manchas, rugas e pele opaca? Uma aplicação disso à noite está virando febre. A arte do herbalismo Undo Eventually, both parties drove off, but that wouldn't be the end of it. Monty and Mini tracked down Ravi's family, who called police after shots were fired at their house. A police team searched the locality but didn't find the suspects. The shooters, however, hung around, waiting for their opportunity. At night, when Ravi and others went to the police station, they followed them again. In his police complaint, Ravi's father Ravinder Sharma, who happens to be vice-president of Bharatiya Kisan Union (Bhanu), said, "The other car was going in the opposite direction. They honked several times to pass. I requested them to wait for a minute as the girls (Ravi's cousins) were getting into the car. But they started misbehaving with us. We returned to our house after a verbal exchange." An hour later, the family was watching TV when they heard a couple of loud bangs outside the house. "The same two men were firing at our house this time. We called police. They reached 10 minutes later," said Ravinder. One of the bullets was lodged in a tin sheet of a gate in the house. Later, the family decided to file a police complaint. Ravi, Arun, Ravinder and others went to Muradnagar police station together. While Ravinder and their uncle submitted the complaint inside the police station, Ravi, Arun and others waited outside. Anshul Kaushik, Ravi's brother-in-law and an eyewitness to the murder, said Ravi spotted Monty and Mini on a bike around 11.45pm. "They were on the other side of the road and Ravi ran after them. We followed. There was a fight, but we caught both. Some policemen also reached. When we were taking them to the police station, Monty managed to wrench himself free, took out a gun from his pocket, and shot Ravi twice," Anshul said. Ravi was hit in the stomach and died in hospital during treatment. Anshul said Monty also fired at others, but the bullets didn't hit anyone else. In the melee that ensued, he and Mini fled. "The four cops present at the spot didn't help Ravi. One of them was busy taking a video of the fight," Anshul said. On Thursday morning, angry locals protested outside Muradnagar police station, refusing to cremate Ravi till they got justice. The protest was called off after senior police officers met them and assured swift action. DCP (rural) Surendra Nath Tiwari said an FIR was registered against Monty Goyat and Mini (Ajay Chaudhary) under section 103 (murder) and 3 (5) (common intention) of BNS at Muradnagar police station. "We have formed five teams to nab the criminals. When the accused shot at Ravi's house, a police team went to arrest Monty and Mini from their houses, but they were not there. We are checking CCTV footage," he said. Police commissioner J Ravinder Goud suspended SHO Shailendra Singh Tomar, Sube Singh, night duty in charge of the police station, and Mohit Singh, the area's beat officer, for dereliction of duty and ordered a departmental inquiry against them.
