Movie Review: ‘How to Train Your Dragon' might have just redeemed the live-action adaptation
Ever wanted to soar through the skies on the back of a friendly dragon? The new 'How to Train Your Dragon' may be the ticket, from a decidedly safer, though possibly still vertigo-inducing, distance.
This live-action adaption of the underdog adventure story sends the audience cascading through the clouds with the teenage Viking boy Hiccup and his dragon friend Toothless. It's the kind of immersive sensation and giddy wish fulfillment that might just have you forgetting momentarily to breathe and, maybe more importantly, that you're still in a movie theater. Credit to veteran cinematographer Bill Pope, no stranger to fantasy worlds, whether it's 'The Matrix' or 'Scott Pilgrim vs. The World.'
'How to Train Your Dragon' doesn't stray far from the original, from shots to story beats. Gerard Butler once again plays Berk's Chief Stoick the Vast. The new Hiccup, actor Mason Thames, even sounds a bit like Jay Baruchel. But unlike so many live-action remakes of animated films, it also doesn't feel superfluous, or, worse, like a poor imitation of its predecessor that trades the magic of animation for photorealism.
Perhaps that's because filmmaker Dean DeBlois, who made the three animated films, stayed in the director's chair. Who better to kill their darlings than the one who brought them to the screen in the first place? And, crucially, to know where live-action might actually enhance the fabric of the world created by author Cressida Cowell.
It helps that dragon technology has come a long way since, say, 'DragonHeart.' These fire-breathing CG creatures feel disarmingly real. And though it might look like 'Lord of the Rings' or 'Game of Thrones,' the tone stays light enough for younger filmgoers. There are a few intense sequences, but none that takes it any further than the animated film did 15 years ago.
'How to Train Your Dragon' does start a little slow, however, which is odd because it also begins with a fiery battle between the Vikings and the dragons on the Isle of Berk. There's a lot of exposition and introduction that needs to happen before you can just give yourself over to the story. In this more multicultural version, the warriors on Berk have been recruited from tribes around the globe to try to defeat the dragons.
Hiccup is a Viking nepo baby. As the chief's son, he sits in a place of privilege, but he's also a general outcast in this world of ruthless warriors — skinny and weak, he just longs to be part of the action, not sharpening the weapons. Killing dragons is currency in this society, and his crush Astrid (Nico Parker) happens to be one of the most promising up-and-comers. His sole champion is Gobber (a delightful Nick Frost), the blacksmith and dragon slayer teacher, who convinces the chief to give the clever Hiccup a shot.
The film finds its internal engine when Hiccup finds Toothless, the wide-eyed 'Night Fury' dragon whom he can't bring himself to kill. Instead, he decides to study this discovery, who he finds is not as nearly fearsome as everyone assumes. 'How to Train Your Dragon' teaches empathy and ingenuity without a sermon.
Thames, a teenager himself, is the perfect embodiment of adolescent awkwardness and boldness. You can have all the cute dragons you want, but the audience would be lost if the human conduit to the relationship isn't up to the task. Butler seems to be having a good time, resplendent in fur and chest-thumping ideas about ancient duties. And Parker gives Astrid a relatable depth — the best in the bunch who is outshone in an unequal fight.
Kids deserve movies that are made on the biggest possible canvas. 'How to Train Your Dragon' is one that's worth the trip to the theater. It might just spark some young imaginations, whether it's to go back and read the books or dream up their own worlds. And, chances are, no one is going to be yelling 'chicken jockey.'
'How to Train Your Dragon,' a Universal Pictures release in theaters Friday, is rated PG by the Motion Picture Association for 'sequences of intense action and peril.' Running time: 125 minutes. Three and a half stars out of four.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
How to Train Your Dragon vs Lilo & Stitch: which live-action remake scored better on Rotten Tomatoes?
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. The live-action remake of animated classics has been a trend for a while now, but it's hitting another level this blockbuster movie season, as moviegoers have the choice between two live-action remakes playing in movie theaters at the same time — How to Train Your Dragon, which releases everywhere on June 13, and Lilo & Stitch, which is playing in movie theaters right now. Lilo & Stitch is the latest in Disney's slate of live-action remakes, this one for the 2002 animated movie about a mischievous alien who is befriended by a young girl in Hawaii. Meanwhile, the live-action of 2010's How to Train Your Dragon about a young Viking who becomes the first in his village to befriend a dragon instead of hunt one, is one of the first live-action remakes of a DreamWorks Animation movie. Because of their proximity in release and the fact that they're targeting the same primary audiences (both young kids and even a number of adults who are nostalgic for the animated movies), How to Train Your Dragon and Lilo & Stitch are going to be compared to each other a lot, including with what so many movies are based on these days, their Rotten Tomatoes scores. With reviews for How to Train Your Dragon now available, we're making it easy for you to compare the two with a breakdown of how both movies are scoring on Rotten Tomatoes as of publication (we'll update this post as How to Train Your Dragon gets more reviews in). As of June 10, How to Train Your Dragon has an 83% 'Fresh' score on Rotten Tomatoes. The early takeaway from critics is that the movie is a faithful adaptation of the original animated movie, maybe too much so. Helen O'Hara of Empire Magazine wrote, 'It's clearly made with real love and care, but shows far too much deference to its progenitor. Even in a remake, we need more originality and less playing the hits.' Slant Magazine's Justin Clark adds, 'As heartwarming as this story remains at its core, it's hard to shake that you already know how it will play out.' However, a number of critics praised what the live-action remake brought to the table. Brian Truitt of USA Today called How to Train Your Dragon 'a heartwarming, meaty adventure perfect for a new generation of young film fan (sic) but doesn't forget to entertain the older movie kids, either.' The Associated Press' Lindsey Bahr wrote, 'It's the kind of immersive sensation and giddy wish fulfillment that might just have you forgetting momentarily to breathe and, maybe more importantly, that you're still in a movie theater.' At this time, there are no fan reactions or scores for the movie. For comparison, the original How to Train Your Dragon has a 99% 'Certified Fresh' score on Rotten Tomatoes. The bar that How to Train Your Dragon will have to clear with critics on Rotten Tomatoes is Lilo & Stitch's 72% 'Fresh' score. However, it's worth noting that the Disney live-action remake has a 'Verified Hot' score of 93% from general moviegoers. The original Lilo & Stitch animated movie earned an 86% 'Certified Fresh' score. The critic consensus on Rotten Tomatoes is reminiscent of How to Train Your Dragon — the remake recaptures a lot of what movie fans loved about the original, though critiques revolve it either not quite living up to the original. Still, at 72% 'Fresh,' Lilo & Stitch has one of the better scores for a Disney live-action remake (ahead of 2017's Beauty and the Beast and 2023's The Little Mermaid). While the critical consensus can sum up the general feelings about a movie, the biggest factor for whether a movie is a hit or not is how it performs at the box office. And in that regard, Lilo & Stitch is a bonafide hit. The movie has made $335.7 million as of publication in the US, and $772.5 million worldwide. Those numbers make it the second highest-grossing movie of 2025 in the US to date, and the third highest-grossing in the world. You can watch Lilo & Stitch in movie theaters right now, while How to Train Your Dragon premieres worldwide on June 13. If you want to rewatch the animated movies as well, Lilo & Stitch is streaming exclusively on Disney Plus, while How to Train Your Dragon is streaming on Peacock and Max.
Gizmodo
13 hours ago
- Gizmodo
The Director of ‘How to Train Your Dragon' Talks Beefing Up Gerard Butler's Arc
Director Dean DeBlois and star Gerard Butler reunite for Universal Pictures' live-action adaptation of How to Train Your Dragon out later this week. The filmmaker sat down with io9 to discuss the unique opportunity he and Butler had in re-imagining the role of Stoick the Vast, Berk's Viking leader with staunch Dragon hunting inclinations who's also a single dad to his overprotected son Hiccup (Mason Thames). DeBlois explained his approach to directing Butler in the live-action feature. 'I think one of my aspirations going into this live-action reimagining was to dial up the relationships, the key ones, so Stoick and Hiccup have much depth going on—that push and pull of love and expectation,' he said. '[It's] something that so many kids feel and parents feel when their kid is not turning out the way that they want them to. I wanted to lean into that a little bit more because that just feels very timeless, and kind of travels the globe in terms of cultural specificity.' Butler previously voiced the character in the animated franchise from DreamWorks. Together the collaborators quickly eased back into the world of Berk and finding who Stoick is this time around. 'With Gerard, the moment that he came aboard it was sort of [like] visiting with an old friend because Gerard had such a strong input into who Stoick was in that first movie,' DeBlois said. 'He was like co-creator of the character; finding all of the nuance and the range and the arc that he undergoes was a conversation with [him], rather than us just telling him what he was going to do.' Deepening the emotional relationship between Stoick and Hiccup was a key part of the new film's narrative. 'I think when he was able to step into those boots for real and have that 90 pound costume put on—the five pieces of his beard and wig, which he complained about all the time—he is that character,' DeBlois said. 'All of that weight and burden becomes part of his emotional burden as well, because he's trying to keep this tribe together, keep fighting for the purpose that they came to this island for—yet somehow [also] be a single parent and navigate his way through that with a kid that he doesn't understand,' he added. 'I love that he finds so much nuance and depth in all of those tasks as an actor.' Stoick's arc with Toothless, which comes into play in a big way in How to Train Your Dragon 2, also gets more set-up time, much to the anticipation of fans of the animated franchise. 'We know where it's headed in future installations, but in this movie I really like those moments where Stoick and Toothless have to face off a little bit and to go from enemies to sort of a mutual understanding that they will save one another,' DeBlois said. 'There's a strength there and just the very truthful apology that Stoick makes to Toothless near the end of the movie feels very authentic. Those are not crocodile tears, that's true emotion coming through, the remorse and the regret and the change that Stoick undergoes.' How to Train Your Dragon opens June 13.
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
Seth Rogen and Jason Segel Relive 27 Years of Friendship: Smoking Before ‘The Matrix,' Peeing Next to Scorsese and Harrison Ford Watching Segel Naked
Jason Segel and Seth Rogen, who both emerged from the Judd Apatow comic universe, are now two of the funniest multi-hyphenates in the industry. Segel, with Bill Lawrence and Brett Goldstein, co-created 'Shrinking,' a dramedy about an unconventional therapist, played by Segel, going through the stages of grief. Rogen, with his longtime writing partner, Evan Goldberg, co-created 'The Studio,' and co-directs every episode. He stars as a newly appointed studio executive trying to keep his head above water. Seth Rogen: The first time we met — 27 years ago — I was 16 or 17 when we shot the pilot of 'Freaks and Geeks.' How old were you? More from Variety Dave Chappelle Joins Mo Amer for Rare Interview on Political Comedy, Fiery 'SNL' Monologues and Crying Over Netflix's 'Mo': 'I'm Not Doing This S--' If the 'Show Sucked' Like Father, Like Son: Arnold and Patrick Schwarzenegger on Nepo Babies, Nude Scenes and 'Becoming the Greatest Star of All Time' How 'The Studio,' 'Yellowjackets,' 'Monsters' and 'White Lotus' Make Bad Behavior Appealing Jason Segel: I was 18 or 19. It's crazy to think about that. In preparation for this, I was thinking about the first time we bonded. I have a very clear idea of the moment. Rogen: What was it? Segel: While we were shooting the pilot, 'The Matrix' came out. We didn't know each other that well. We didn't know anybody else that well. We were all just meeting each other. And all we knew is that you and I both liked to smoke weed. Rogen: [The film] came out the day the pilot wrapped, so in my head, the whole pilot was just a march to 'The Matrix' being released. Segel: We rolled giant joints and drove to the movie theater and saw 'The Matrix' together. I remember coming out of that movie legitimately feeling like something had changed. It was a very inspiring thing. Rogen: It was like our 'Star Wars.' Segel: You and I started writing harder after that. I think about that period as something you can never get back. We had the naivete of youth. We didn't really know how to do it. Rogen: I remember having no fucking clue what I was doing at all. Meeting you — you had thoughts about the craft of acting. You were the first serious actor I ever talked to. All I did was memorize the lines and try to say them in a way that sounds remotely realistic and natural. Then I realized everyone else on the show was creating a whole character. Segel: But don't you think acting is all just tricks so that when they say 'Action,' you feel comfortable? Rogen: The longer I act, the less I understand it, honestly. Sometimes I look back at the choices I made, and they're more surprising at times than things I would do now. Segel: People always ask, 'What would older you say to younger you?' I think the opposite is more important for me at this age. Don't forget the guys who felt like, 'Why can't I make this movie and end it with a Dracula puppet musical? Why can't we do this whole movie about trying to get booze?' You know what I mean? There was a naivete that we had: 'Who's going to stop us?' Rogen: I've let pragmatism invade my thinking in many ways. You get too realistic about things, and you're like, 'What's going to work?' instead of 'What sounds fun in the moment?' Segel: The most strategic decisions I've made have been the worst ones. Do you have a true north — a view of life you're trying to express? Rogen: No. Sometimes. I'd say that some things I've made are trying to eventually have an idea that they're trying to get across — something I believe. But I mostly start thinking of an idea as I think of the energy of it. That's what becomes exciting to me. I never start with one single thing. Where do your ideas come from now? Segel: I don't write very often because I don't love it. I find it to be kind of fraught. I think of an idea, something I'm dealing with in my life, and then I try really hard not to write it. But if it keeps nagging at me, I'm like, 'This is something I'll write.' Rogen: Me and Evan talk about a Darwinistic approach to our ideas often — the ideas that stick around are the good ideas. Segel: It's not that hard to think of ideas. But I get a little indecisive about committing to one. You gave me a piece of advice for a script I'm working on now that really stuck with me. I didn't feel like I was smart enough to write this thing, and you said, 'We're the age now where you write stuff like that.' That's the beauty of this thing, starting to realize, 'OK, now let's try to up the degree of difficulty.' Rogen: Aging is weird in many ways. But acknowledging that your taste has changed and your sensibilities have changed … That was a scary thing for me and Evan to even acknowledge: Oh, we don't want to make stuff about dumb teenagers anymore. Segel: Or being afraid of girls. Rogen: It's been a decade since Evan and I wrote and directed and produced a thing I was also in. It took us a transition period from our 30s into our 40s where we were working on other stuff the whole time, but it wasn't our stuff. Segel: Do you and Evan have the same taste, or is it like a Venn diagram? Rogen: It's close enough that we've never really had a major conflict over what we want to work on. There's never been a thing that one of us really wants to make and the other doesn't want to make at all. Segel: You really notice, in 'The Studio,' this energy that goes through it. It felt to me like a mix: 'Birdman' meets 'Curb.' Rogen: That's exactly what we were going for. Segel: It's all of the awkwardness and reality of 'Curb,' but set to a rhythm. Rogen: I wanted it to be fast — that was a word I would use a lot. I thought a lot about: What do I want to do all day? What do I like to do? What I don't love to do is insert shots and establishing shots. I don't love doing scenes that feel like they're serving some storyline that will pay off in a few episodes. I love high-stakes, intense scenes where everyone wants to grab each other and shake each other. As we were writing the show, the first conversations we were having were 'How do we infuse every scene so I'm only doing scenes that are really funny?' Segel: It's like you only did the scenes that people like. Rogen: We didn't cut. Nothing we shot was not in the show. Do you guys improvise a lot? Segel: When it makes sense. Our show is also this mix of comedy and drama. You know I love talking about acting. Rogen: Not as much as some. Segel: All those improv skills that we learned for comedy and got pretty damn good at turned out to really apply to dramatic scenes also. Rogen: Even more so, I think. Because you aren't trying to make jokes. Segel: And you're not trying to prove you're clever. With 'Shrinking,' the writers are incredible, and they give us a really good treasure map that's pretty fucking detailed. But then you're dropped into the treasure map and it's three-dimensional and you're like, 'Oh, but there's an interesting little thing over here …' Rogen: Does the same person direct the whole show? Segel: No. Rogen: How's that? That's the one thing I'd never really done. 'Pam & Tommy' was the first time since 'Freaks and Geeks' or 'Undeclared' that I'd acted in a television show, and I honestly struggled with having different directors. I was very thrown off by it, having all these people come in, handing off the show from one person to the next. Segel: I get it. There's a lot of moving targets, and you're block shooting for locations, so … Rogen: … different directors will come in throughout the day. Segel: That happens occasionally. But we have a really cohesive unit up top with Bill Lawrence. But it's an interesting thing, you know, because you do all the jobs, but I don't think anyone knows, until you get into editing, what the show is. Rogen: Not on our show. Segel: This is a show about grief, and we wanted to honor that. People are really going through this shit in the world. You also want it to be funny. So it was a lot of turning the dials of how bad you can make him as a therapist. Rogen: I was explaining it to Lauren, my wife, as we were watching it. She was like, 'Is he doing cocaine and sleeping with prostitutes?' I didn't think this show went there. Segel: You've known me a long time, so you'd probably agree if you were directing me: I was like, 'Guys, you can have him do as much bad stuff as you want.' Rogen: 'It'll be OK.' Segel: People are going to think, 'Oh, I hope he's OK.' Rogen: Sympathy. Segel: Spend the currency. Rogen: How did you get Harrison Ford? Segel: We got Harrison Ford because Harrison Ford is the kind of person you make an offer to so that for three days you can say, 'We've made an offer to Harrison Ford,' and then you'll pick the real guy. Rogen: Sounds cool in a restaurant. Segel: He read it, and he didn't know anything about me. Brett Goldstein met with him, and they had a really nice meeting, and they sent him 'The End of the Tour' and 'Forgetting Sarah Marshall.' Then, apparently, Bill Lawrence got a text that said, 'I'm in. And tell the kid, great dick.' Rogen: Even if he was out, that would be great. I would take that. Segel: How about your cameos? Is that the people you've amassed throughout your career? Rogen: No, not at all. I'd say half of them were people I didn't know at all. We wanted people you haven't seen us with before. Martin Scorsese, we just sent it to his manager. I'd met Zoë Kravitz once or twice. I met a lot of these people in passing. I'm sure you have at a party. Segel: I did meet Martin Scorsese once. I met him at the Golden Globes, and we peed next to each other at the urinals. But I had the kids' one and he had the tall one. So everything about it was just way off. That's a great memory. Rogen: He's a little guy. Segel: Were you intimidated to direct people like that? Rogen: It was the worst thing in the whole world. We were shooting the show in such a specific way that I was so nervous it would be creatively rejected. Segel: I'm so interested to hear that you get nervous. Rogen: The character is me in many, many ways. And the crux of the character is that he doesn't want to let down his idols. And that's one of the biggest things that I'm navigating: Whenever I get anyone to come do a thing we're doing, I'm so aware of how upset I'll be if they think it's bad. Segel: How do you act while you have to be carrying all this other stuff too? Rogen: To me, it's more fun to be directing the scene and in the scene and having written the scene than it is to just be acting the scene. The fact that it's way harder, I like it. Segel: It's a tightrope. Rogen: 'Steve Jobs' was the first time I had done anything where there were these long, elaborate shots and these long walk-and-talks — it has to be exactly right. It was the first time I made a thing where everyone's really leaning in and everyone's engaged. And when you got it, everyone's clapping. That was an energy I wanted to try to create on a day-to-day basis. Segel: You're describing my ethos of acting. Repeatability is an important skill when you start doing all the other angles. But the magic part, the part where I'm like, 'Oh, fuck, we did it,' is when you catch something. Best of Variety What's Coming to Netflix in June 2025 New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week 'Harry Potter' TV Show Cast Guide: Who's Who in Hogwarts?
