
Four former VW executives found guilty in ‘Dieselgate' case
Four former Volkswagen executives have been found guilty of fraud for their roles in the decade-old 'Dieselgate' scandal.
After nearly four years in court, their trial ended on Monday with jail time for two executives: diesel development manager Jens Hadler and Hanno Jelden, head of drive electronics.
Two other former employees received suspended sentences from the court in Braunschweig, near the VW headquarters in Wolfsburg.
Former VW development board director Heinz-Jacob Neusser, the highest-ranking defendant, was given a 15-month suspended sentence. Another former department head Richard Dorenkamp, responsible for exhaust management and the 'Clean Diesel' programme, was given a 22-month suspended sentence.
The verdicts come almost a decade after US authorities uncovered widespread manipulation of diesel emissions in September 2015, with software programmed to switch on filtering during tests and switch off while on the road.
As a result, VW-brand vehicles with the software in 'real drive' scenario were emitting levels of toxic nitrogen oxides far higher than legal limits.
'The authorities certifying the cars weren't told that the emissions were much higher in real drive,' said Christian Schütz, presiding judge at Braunschweig regional court. 'It's crystal clear that this wasn't in line with the law.'
No verdict was delivered against disgraced former chief executive Martin Winterkorn. He resigned days after the scandal broke and has consistently denied all knowledge of the fraud. The case against the 78-year-old, originally part of the trial that ended on Monday, has been suspended indefinitely due to reported health problems.
The managers were charged in 2019 with conspiring to equip vehicles with emission-software manipulation involving nine million cars sold in Europe and the US, later reduced to fewer than four million vehicles.
During proceedings over 170 days in Braunschweig, defence lawyers for the four men described their clients as corporate scapegoats for a wider conspiracy.
The judge said in his verdict that the four accused men had given 'deliberately untruthful or inaccurate' testimony but he agreed that many more people were involved in the global VW diesel fraud.
Another 31 former company employees are facing legal action as a result of the Dieselgate manipulation that, to date, has cost VW an estimated €33 billion.
In 2018 Volkswagen settled a criminal probe in Germany with a €1 billion fine, without admitting guilt. A year earlier in the US the company agreed to pay a €4.3 billion fine with admission of guilt. Even after the deal, former VW manager Oliver Schmidt was arrested and imprisoned after he arrived in Florida.
His direct superior, Neusser, was said to have direct involvement in creating the software 'defeat device' used to control exhaust filters.
Neusser was one of five executives charged by the US in January 2017 for involvement in the scandal. Until now he had avoided prosecution because Germany doesn't extradite its citizens to countries outside the EU.
While the convicted men are likely to appeal their verdicts, it is unclear whether the case against the ailing Mr Winterkorn will ever proceed – let alone reach a verdict.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Billion-dollar battery plant pauses construction amid electric vehicle and tariff uncertainty
COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) — A Japanese company has halted construction on a $1.6 billion factory in South Carolina to help make batteries for electric BMWs, citing 'policy and market uncertainty.' While AESC didn't specify what those problems are, South Carolina's Republican governor said the company is dealing with the potential loss of federal tax breaks for electric vehicle buyers and incentives for EV businesses as well as tariff uncertainties from President Donald Trump's administration. 'What we're doing is urging caution — let things play out because all of the these changes are taking place,' Gov. Henry McMaster said. AESC announced the suspension in construction of its plant in Florence on Thursday, 'Due to policy and market uncertainty, we are pausing construction at our South Carolina facility at this time," the company's statement said. AESC promised to restart construction, although it didn't say when, and vowed to meet its commitment to hire 1,600 workers and invest $1.6 billion. The company said it has already invested $1 billion in the Florence plant. The battery maker based in Japan also has facilities in China, the United Kingdom, France, Spain and Germany. In the U.S., AESC has a plant in Tennessee and is building one in Kentucky. The statement didn't mention any changes with other plants. The South Carolina plant is supposed to sell battery cells to BMW, which is building its own battery assembly site near its giant auto plant in Greer. BMW said the construction pause by AESC doesn't change its plans to open its plant in 2026. AESC has already rolled back its South Carolina plans. They announced a second factory on the Florence site, but then said earlier this year that their first plant should be able to handle BMW's demand. That prompted South Carolina officials to withdraw $111 million in help they planned to provide. The company is still getting $135 million in grants from the South Carolina Department of Commerce and $121 million in bonds and the agency said a construction pause won't prompt them to claw back that offer. South Carolina is investing heavily in electric vehicles. Volkswagen-owned Scout Motors plans to invest more than $4 billion and hire 10,000 people for a plant to build its new electric SUVs scheduled to open in 2027. The state has for decades made big bets on foreign manufacturers like BMW, Michelin and Samsung that have paid off with an economic boom this century, but there is uneasiness that Trump's flirtation with high tariffs might stagger or even ruin those important partnerships. McMaster told people to relax as state and business leaders are talking to Trump's administration and things will work out. 'I think the goal of the president and the administration is to have robust economic growth and prosperity and there is no doubt there has to be changes made in our international trade posture and President Trump is addressing that,' McMaster told reporters Thursday.


Motor 1
5 hours ago
- Motor 1
VW's New EV Platform Still Supports Combustion Engines
It's been a little over four years since Volkswagen announced SSP, its all-encompassing electric vehicle architecture. The Scalable Systems Platform was originally expected to be ready by now, but it has been delayed until later this decade. Multiple reports from German media attributed the setback to VW's software division, Cariad. However, the automotive conglomerate is now ready to discuss SSP, and there's a surprise. Although SSP is primarily an electric platform, it will also support combustion engines. VW Group plans to introduce range extenders, with internal combustion engines functioning solely as generators to charge the battery. Like the BMW i3, Mazda's rotary MX-30 , and the upcoming Ramcharger, these engines won't have a mechanical link to the wheels. Nissan's e-Power technology follows a similar principle: the gasoline engine powers the battery, not the drivetrain. Photo by: Volkswagen Volkswagen had already indicated its interest in range extenders. Its newly established Scout brand will launch a pickup and an SUV equipped with naturally aspirated ICE generators . In China, the recently unveiled ID. Era concept previews a three-row SUV developed with SAIC, also featuring a gasoline-powered generator. SSP is a major initiative for VW. It will serve as the foundation for models across all its brands and will eventually replace all existing electric platforms. A teaser image shows five different body styles, ranging from a city hatchback to a large SUV. Automotive News reports that there will be eight derivatives in total, covering every segment of the market. Next-generation EVs based on SSP are expected to begin rolling out in 2026, likely debuting in China before arriving in Europe a year later. We may not see this technology in Europe, where VW CEO Thomas Schäfer believes plug-in hybrids are the more viable option. He told Autocar that range extenders are expensive to engineer, while today's plug-in hybrids already offer decent electric range and fast charging. According to Schäfer, offering both solutions wouldn't be economically feasible. Photo by: Volkswagen One of the most significant models to use the SSP platform will be the ninth-generation, electric-only Golf. It's scheduled to arrive near the end of the decade and will coexist with the combustion-engine Mk8 for several years. VW may keep the current Golf on sale until the mid-2030s . The electric Golf will be built in Wolfsburg, while production of the ICE model will move to the Puebla plant in Mexico in 2027. With SSP's key specifications now finalized, VW Group CEO Oliver Blume stated: 'We aim to be the global technology driver for the automotive industry. SSP will play a crucial role in this. We've reached an important milestone in developing our electric future platform. Now it's full steam ahead to implementation.' Catch Up With VW: Volkswagen Is Making Less Money Because It's Selling More EVs Volkswagen Could Give Ford More Reskinned Cars Get the best news, reviews, columns, and more delivered straight to your inbox, daily. back Sign up For more information, read our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use . Source: Volkswagen Group Share this Story Facebook X LinkedIn Flipboard Reddit WhatsApp E-Mail Got a tip for us? Email: tips@ Join the conversation ( )


Car and Driver
20 hours ago
- Car and Driver
1978 Dodge Omni and Plymouth Horizon Test: Borrowing from the Best
From the January 1978 issue of Car and Driver. What you see here is not a VW Rabbit. It may look like a Rabbit and contain some genuine Volkswagen parts, but this car is in fact a Plymouth. The new Horizon and its Dodge twin, the Omni, represent the small-car plunge Chrysler has waited seven years to take. In many ways, the end result justifies the delay. Chrysler has been roundly criticized for not going after Pinto, Vega, and Gremlin business even though corporate officials claim they "went to the brink" year after year to justify a Chrysler subcompact. Each year hard-nosed analysts told them to pass. Americans have never demonstrated a strong taste for chopped or miniaturized big cars, which is really all we've been offered in a domestic label so far. The alternative is an import, and "buying foreign" has been such an attractive proposition that even Ford, Chrysler, and GM stock their small-car shelves from across the water. The Omni and Horizon will scramble this system because they are neither imported nor shrunken big cars. With a transverse-mounted, front-wheel-drive powertrain and highly efficient body, these cars are the state of the small-car art. View Photos Aaron Kiley | Car and Driver You're probably as surprised as we are to see Chrysler leap frog the competition like this. Just when its highly touted image of engineering superiority was starting to tarnish, it jumped GM by a full year and Ford by two years in the race to front-wheel-drive sedans. In truth it wasn't engineering progress, but rather anti-crisis action that boosted Chrysler over the front. Like all the revolutionary engineering programs for 1978, this one was born of Detroit's Doomsday, the winter of 1974. In the grip of an energy crisis and decimated big-car sales, Chrysler had to stretch Christmas holidays to weeks for every employee, and to months for many. Plants were shut down to deflate swelling inventories, whole engineering groups were sent on mandatory leave and operating costs were slashed to the bone. The lights were all but shut out. View Photos Aaron Kiley | Car and Driver As the cataclysm passed and the company recovered from shock, the message was clear. Chrysler's Commandment Number One for future survival had to be a fundamental shift to more efficient automobiles. And without the usual waffling or waiting, here it is. The Omni and Horizon are this company's commitment to the future. Richard Halatek, Chrysler's chief of small-car planning has suggested the name "Phoenix" for the Omni/Horizon program, because it really has risen from the ashes of Chrysler's old cheap-energy attitudes. We can all applaud Rabbit-like cars built in America by a company now prepared to take efficiency seriously, but the Omni and Horizon will begin their lives bearing a strong Wolfsburg imprint. No other car has trespassed so far beyond polite limits of plagiarism. Chrysler's ride and drive engineers have in fact mistaken VW Rabbits for their own prototypes on early test trips. And under the hood, the VW-Audi engine and transaxle casting marks are present for all to see. View Photos Aaron Kiley | Car and Driver The inevitable "not guiltys" that come in reply to these charges are weak. Chrysler planners credit the Rabbit's shape and layout as the one best suited to maximum efficiency in a four-passenger car. They feel that Omni and Horizon styling has been determined by function—four sitting comfortably erect with plenty of room for themselves and their luggage behind—rather than by artistic whim. Giugiaro, who created the Rabbit's crisp lines, must be a little piqued by such a Xerox of his ideas, but it is inevitable that cars of this type from every manufacturer will soon be moving our families. While Chrysler doesn't seem to mind a short ride on the Rabbit's reputation for initial impressions, that is where the similarity ends. The Omni and Horizon are American cars, and even though they're the smallest thing Chrysler has ever built, they are meant to deliver a full measure of what this company believes Americans prize most: ride and comfort. This means adjustments of the Rabbit blueprint amounting to a 4.7-inch longer wheelbase, 9.5 inches more length, 2.8 inches more width and roughly 200 pounds more weight. (Just to complete the longer, lower, wider triad, the roof is lower than a Rabbit's by 2.1 inches.) The longer wheelbase and heavier weight smooth out ride motions and the bigger exterior dimensions pay off in more interior room. However, the roominess advantages over a Rabbit are modest (about an inch in most important dimensions) when compared to the exterior's swelling. View Photos Aaron Kiley | Car and Driver At least the EPA is convinced. Its index of interior roominess measurements have classified the Omni and Horizon as "compacts," while VW Rabbits, Honda Accords, and Ford Fiestas are one size down as "subcompacts." The prototype cars we have driven did not offer a satisfactory basis for final ride judgments, but they did demonstrate exactly what Chrysler engineers are after. Extra-long wheel travel (6.6 inches in front, 7.7 inches in back, compared to 6.1 and 7.9 inches respectively in a Rabbit) is this car's claim to fame, even though such an attribute is rare in American cars. The long travel theory of suspension design allows soft spring rates for absorbing little bumps, with less likelihood of bottoming out over big bumps. Body roll is managed by front and rear anti-sway bars. This is a typically European approach, but while VW or Fiat would finish the job with tight damping, Chrysler has chosen very low shock-absorber control. This lessens the influence of small bumps on comfort but also makes the car slow to settle after wavy pavement. On fast steering maneuvers, the Omni and Horizon react in a lazy fashion—they're still zigging when you're ready to zag. The idea here is not to make former VW owners feel at home, but rather former big-car owners, who might be ready for more efficient transportation. View Photos Aaron Kiley | Car and Driver They will be asked to bear few sacrifices. The options sheet is fat with goodies new to this size car. In spite of the engineers' best recommendations, power steering is at the top of the extra-cost list. It's not at all necessary from a functional standpoint, but the marketing types had no desire to cold turkey their power-assist addicts. Inside, there has been no skimping—no exposed heaters, no bare metal panels, no rubber floor mats—and this should tell you the Omni and Horizon start out at import-deluxe levels of trim. How far you take them in the luxo-garnish-molding direction is limited primarily by your imagination. You can pick from two upgrades of interior and exterior trim, outside woodgrain, or even premium outside woodgrain. Vinyl bucket seats are standard, but you may choose from five other vinyl, or cloth and vinyl combinations in two different backrest designs. Cut-pile carpeting is standard with all interiors. View Photos Aaron Kiley | Car and Driver The overall impression is plenty of comfort but less quality than most imports have built their reputations on. Again, we'd rather wait for real cars for final assessments, but daily contact items like door handles and controls seems a little rough around the edges. The outside door latch looks like a pull will open it, but instead it takes a squeeze. The parcel shelf requires an awkward two-handed maneuver to release. And rear lift-over is the highest of any car in this class. It is weak detail execution that reveals Chrysler as a newcomer to little-car business. Four-cylinder engines are also new to Chrysler (the last domestic-built one came in 1932 Plymouths), but even so, the new four-banger seems right at home in the Omni and Horizon. Very little vibration shakes through, and in normal cruising, the 40-pound blanket of sound insulation is worth its weight in quietness. We measured a noise level of 75.0 decibels at 70 mph, exactly what we've found in both the VW Rabbit and Honda Accord. At full throttle, the Omni/Horizon does blast through a loud, resonant voice at 85.0 decibels, compared with the Honda's 84.0 decibels and 77.0 decibels in the Rabbit. Everything you feel, see or hear while driving reflects the Chrysler touch, so every sensation after the first glance reinforces the Omni/Horizon's made-in-America label. Everything, that is, but a close inspection of the parts. The big bought-out item is the powertrain. Volkswagenwerk AG will ship assembled short block, cylinder head, and four-speed transaxle assemblies to Chrysler's Trenton, Michigan engine plant. There, the American labor force will take over to "dress" engines with external components such as carburetors, ignition, and emissions controls and prepare them for cars that will be screwed together in Chrysler's Belvedere, Illinois assembly plant. View Photos Aaron Kiley | Car and Driver The basic design of the engine is shared with the Rabbit—an in-line four with a belt-driven overhead camshaft and an aluminum non-crossflow cylinder head. While VWs and Audis sharing this engine have shifted to a smaller 1457 cc displacement for 1978, Chrysler has opted for a larger 1710 cc long-stroke version for more torque. (1976–77 Rabbits used a 1588 cc engine.) The larger displacement also helps offset the power lost moving from VW's Bosch fuel injection to the Omni/Horizon's Holley two-barrel carburetor. Power output is a healthy 75 hp at 5600 rpm, making this the highest specific output engine of any car made in America. Chrysler has added one key refinement of its own, a Lean Burn electronic ignition system. While VW supplies Rabbit four-speed manual-shift transaxles for the Omni and Horizon, the optional three-speed automatic is a variation of the ever-popular Chrysler TorqueFlite. Even though Chrysler buys nothing but powertrains from VW, they have "borrowed" a number of chassis design concepts. The front suspension is MacPherson strut with coil springs—just like the Rabbit's—and also features a negative scrub radius layout. (The steering axis intersects the ground outboard of the tire contact patch center. This produces automatic steering forces to maintain straightline stability when traction differs on left and right sides of the car.) The coil spring is purposely not concentric with the strut tube, so bending-induced friction is partially cancelled. Minute VW details such as ball-joint attachments and control-arm pivot connections have also been religiously duplicated by Chrysler. At least when the engineers decided to copy someone else's paper, they picked the brightest kid in the class. View Photos Aaron Kiley | Car and Driver The Omni and Horizon's rear suspension is familiar, although it is neither the Rabbit's "torsion-crank" design nor the Dasher's beam axle/trailing arm configuration. Like the VW Polo (a Honda Civic-sized car not exported to America), Chrysler has chosen a pair of trailing arms linked by a transverse member midway between the suspension's pivot axis and the axle centerline. Really, this layout was chosen more for fuel-tank packaging than any suspension function. Chrysler has dubbed the design "semi-independent," since the transverse member does partially tie together left and right wheel movements. Rear coil springs and shock absorbers are concentric, a common design practice for lightweight rear suspensions. All of this adds up to a driving feel that is clearly aimed more at family use than hard charging. The steering is numb and slow, so you're not likely to provoke a maneuver you can't manage. However, when forced to prove itself, this car does know how to sink its tires into the pavement. We measured a cornering grip of 0.71 g. As long as you keep the power on, understeer limits cornering speed. To make things a little more interesting, you need only lift off the throttle and the car promptly tightens its line. This might help aggressive drivers find their apexes, but it's bound to be a source of surprise to the 55-mph set. Braking is the Omni/Horizon's forte, and here the new little kid on the block can beat every other car Chrysler builds. Stopping distance from 70 is a very short 206 feet. The system is disc-front and drum-rear, with an optional power booster. We found the power assist unnecessary. Without it, pedal effort is 32 pounds at 0.5 g deceleration, about optimum for good control. Part of the excellent braking feel and linearity is a result of Chrysler's choice of leading-and-trailing-shoe (rather than duo-servo) rear brakes. View Photos Aaron Kiley | Car and Driver All sporting intentions have been purposely muted in the Omni and Horizon. But just for now. In time, the five-door body style will be teamed up with a more aggressive three-door. (Just hope it's not a Scirocco duplicate.) An American-built 2200 cc four-cylinder engine is under development and turbocharger rumors have been circulating for months. Chrysler hereby joins the world-car scheme of manufacturing, with a new twist on this increasingly popular approach. Rather than design one car for local construction in many markets, the engineers have shopped around the world for the best parts to bring back home for their new small car. They may be mostly VW underneath, but the Omni and Horizon are undeniably Chrysler's ride to the future. Specifications Specifications 1978 Dodge Omni/Plymouth Horizon Vehicle Type: front-engine, front-wheel-drive, 4-passenger, 4-door hatchback PRICE As Tested: N/A ENGINE SOHC inline-4, iron block and aluminum head, port fuel injection Displacement: 105 in3, 1710 cm3 Power: 75 hp @ 5600 rpm Torque: 90 lb-ft @ 3200 rpm TRANSMISSION 4-speed manual CHASSIS Suspension, F/R: struts/multilink Brakes, F/R: 9.1-in disc/7.9-in drum Tires: FIrestone Deluxe Champion Radial P155/80R-13 DIMENSIONS Wheelbase: 99.2 in Length: 164.8 in Width: 66.2 in Height: 53.4 in Curb Weight: 2170 lb C/D TEST RESULTS 60 mph: 11.7 sec 1/4-Mile: 18.8 sec @ 74 mph 90 mph: 41.9 sec Top Speed (observed): 92 mph Braking, 70–0 mph: 206 ft Roadholding: 0.80 g C/D TESTING EXPLAINED