Canadiens expectations, Logan Mailloux as a trade chip, Stanley Cup checklist: Mailbag
We had Part 1 of the Montreal Canadiens mailbag earlier this week, and here is Part 2, featuring some of the questions we didn't get to. Of course, there were 226 comments on the question submission form, so we are not getting to the vast majority of them. But this is a democratic process, and we take the questions that got the most likes on the form.
This is the best of the rest.
Fans' expectations for the team are much higher for this season than for last season. The goal last season was to be 'in the mix' last year and make the playoffs this year. Now since they made the playoffs, certain fans seem to be expecting the team to compete to win rounds this year. Have HuGo changed their goals for the Habs, or are they still just looking at making the playoffs this year as the goal? Do you expect them to start to put messaging out there to reduce expectations for fans for this season?
I think missing the playoffs would be a normal part of the rebuild but that fans might react as if it's a disaster. – Nick L.
Missing the playoffs would not necessarily be a normal part of the rebuild, Nick. Most rebuilding teams, once they reach the playoffs, tend to grow on that achievement. But in the Canadiens' case, it could easily be argued they reached the playoffs a bit sooner than expected by management, so within that context, missing them next season would not – or at least should not – be seen as a setback.
Advertisement
The Canadiens will be consistently competitive when – and only when – their young core has reached its peak. And right now, that young core is nowhere near its peak. Nick Suzuki is definitely approaching it, and it will be interesting to see if he can build on his 89-point season, if that is the new normal, or if it turns out to be an outlier. I could see Suzuki building on it, but I think it's most likely to be the new normal for him.
We have not yet seen Cole Caufield and Juraj Slafkovský play to their ceiling, and there is no way we have seen the best out of Lane Hutson, Ivan Demidov and David Reinbacher, the latter two still awaiting their NHL rookie seasons. Jacob Fowler is years away from being a factor in Montreal. Same for Michael Hage. There are so many complementary pieces in the Canadiens prospect pool that will emerge to fill important roles on the big club, from Logan Mailloux to Oliver Kapanen to Owen Beck and others.
In other words, the Canadiens remain relatively far from their peak potential, the time when the young core is mature enough to truly drive the bus. In the interim, the Canadiens undoubtedly want to remain competitive. But the real window they are managing is the one where Demidov is, say, 23 and Suzuki is 29, with all those other core elements falling in between that age range. That is still three or four years away.
This is not to say the Canadiens will miss the playoffs next season. But it is to say that Canadiens management's eyes remain transfixed on that contention window that remains an abstract point on the horizon right now. They have set a good path to get there, but they are not yet close to arriving.
How high (or low) is the front office on Logan Mailloux?
In the past few weeks, a lot of people include him in potential trades and therefore seem to be ready to let him go. While I understand that he could be the asset that ultimately gets us a significant player like a 2C/RHD, he still is a great RHD prospect who's only 22 and is going through normal growing pains (decision making at the pro level) if you can even call it that. I get that HuGo didn't draft him, so maybe they would be less hesitant to trade him, but I still wonder about how much they value him (or what return value would be enough for them to trade him). I know that they can't keep everyone forever and that his value is really high right now with the actual market, but I also think we shouldn't trade this kind of asset just because he hasn't made the team yet.
Big, mobile RHD with a cannon like his don't really grow on trees. – Olivier G.
What are your thoughts on one of David Reinbacher or Logan Mailloux breaking camp with the Habs? I noticed you had a RHD as your ideal UFA target, so was wondering if that meant you thought neither were quite ready for the show? – Chris N.
No, they don't grow on trees. But that's exactly why Mailloux would have value on the trade market. The trade late Wednesday night — the Buffalo Sabres sent JJ Peterka to the Utah Mammoth for right-shot defenceman Michael Kesselring and forward Josh Doan — is one example of how much value a good right-shot defenceman can have. Kesselring was a total find for Utah, acquired from the Edmonton Oilers in a deadline deal for Nick Bjugstad and Cam Dineen, and they've now converted him into a legitimate top-six forward with upside.
Advertisement
The difference between Kesselring and Mailloux, however, is NHL experience. Kesselring wasn't given time to accrue it in Edmonton, but once he did with Arizona/Utah, he became an extremely valuable trade chip. Teams love big, mobile right-shot defencemen with a cannon, but they want to know they can actually play in the NHL before giving up difference-making assets for them.
So, the long play here would be for the Canadiens to allow Mailloux to accrue some of that NHL experience before monetizing that heightened trade value. Until that happens, they might wind up being the Oilers in this Kesselring scenario, as opposed to the Mammoth, who now have a legitimate top-six forward signed through his prime thanks to demonstrating how valuable Kesselring can be at the NHL level.
This, however, goes back to that expectation of making the playoffs next season, because to allow Mailloux to get that NHL experience and to allow Reinbacher to take the necessary steps to reach his potential, the Canadiens would need to have both of them on the NHL roster next season. And I'm not sure how willing they would be to do that.
How well do you think the Canadiens have managed to fill out the 'Cup checklist' (by Dom Luszczyszyn) considering where the current core and blue-chip prospects could find themselves a few years down the line?
Suzuki / Demidov / Hutson should provide the elite production with Cole, Slaf, Guhle and Reinbacher spearheading an exciting support group. – Veeti L.
For reference of Dom's Stanley Cup checklist, here is the latest version, and it is an interesting exercise to go through for the Canadiens. It demonstrates just how much remains unknown on the ultimate journey.
The checklist elements we are looking to identify for the Canadiens are a franchise forward, a star forward, franchise offensive and defensive defencemen, shutdown offensive and defensive forwards, a star goalie, a support core and a depth core.
There's a lot of projection here, but here's how I would project the eventual Cup checklist for Montreal.
(Orange denotes support core. Blue denotes depth core.)
There are a lot of Canadiens prospects not mentioned here, and there are a lot of slashes. That means a lot of question marks remain for filling this out.
But what's important for the Canadiens is they have legitimate candidates to fill out each of these roles, and if a certain candidate doesn't quite fit the specific role needed, he becomes a trade chip to try and better fill that role.
Advertisement
Some eyebrows might be raised at how Suzuki is slotted here, but to me, finding a shutdown forward who can provide offence is rarer than finding a star forward, and Suzuki has the potential to be among the best in this category.
Do you think a Mike Matheson for Rasmus Andersson trade could work conceptually (perhaps with some sweeteners from Montreal)? Similar contract status (with Andersson seeming unlikely to stay in Calgary beyond this year). Montreal has an overload of LHD and Calgary has the opposite problem. Andersson would also fit the profile of the type of defenceman Montreal is looking for. – Jordan S.
Conceptually, this could work. It would highly depend on how the Calgary Flames view Matheson and what else is available on the market for them, with Andersson being one of the most prized trade targets in the league. But it honestly could make a lot of sense from both sides of it. There would need to be some sweeteners from Montreal, but they have tons of sweeteners to offer, so that wouldn't be an issue.
(Photo of Logan Mailloux: Bruce Bennett / Getty Images)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hamilton Spectator
26 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Dallas Stars captain Jamie Benn signs a 1-year deal to stay with his only NHL team
FRISCO, Texas (AP) — Dallas Stars captain Jamie Benn has signed a one-year contract to stay with the only team he has played for in his 16 NHL seasons. 'Jamie embodies everything it means to be a Dallas Star, and has since he was drafted 18 years ago,' general manager Jim Nill said Thursday. The deal has a base salary of $1 million, plus an additional $3 million in potential performance bonuses. This past season was the end of Benn's $76 million, eight-year contract extension . 'There was never a doubt that Jamie would return next season,' Nill said. 'We are thrilled for both our organization and our fans that he will continue to lead our team in our pursuit of winning a championship.' Hall of Fame center Mike Modano is the only player in franchise history with more than Benn's 1,192 regular-season games, 399 goals and 956 points. He has played in 120 postseason games. Benn, who turns 36 on July 18, had 16 goals and 33 assists in 80 regular-season games. It was the 13th time in his career to be over 40 points in a season, though he had only one goal and two assists in Dallas' 18 postseason games. The Stars have been to the Western Conference final three seasons in a row but haven't been to the Stanley Cup Final since 2020. Their only Stanley Cup title was in 1999. ___ AP NHL:
New York Times
27 minutes ago
- New York Times
Bruins trade tiers: Who could GM Don Sweeney move before the NHL Draft?
General managers have yet to reach for pens that will be busy signing contracts on July 1. The 224 picks for the 2025 NHL Draft are all available. As such, Don Sweeney has more flexibility to move assets before Friday's first round than he will after the first 32 selections are made. On Wednesday, the Boston Bruins GM did not rule out the possibility of trading a roster player. He's done this before. Advertisement Ten years ago, in the hours leading up to the first round of the 2015 draft, Sweeney traded Milan Lucic and Dougie Hamilton. The return included two 2015 first-rounders and a pair of second-round picks the Bruins used to draft Jakub Zboril, Zach Senyshyn, Jeremy Lauzon and Jakob Forsbacka Karlsson. As has become clear, acquiring picks and hitting on them are separate matters. Whether it's for additional draft capital or immediate assistance, Sweeney is motivated to consider every option. The GM has layers of needs: multiple forwards, a right-shot defenseman, goaltending depth, more prospects. He would not be keen to chase a possible short-term upgrade such as Matt Dumba (unrestricted after 2025-26), regardless of need. 'When we have runway, I think that's what we'd look to do,' Sweeney said of acquiring a player with term. 'Otherwise, we are going to focus on some of the draft capital we have and use it as effectively as we possibly can. I don't say that if something presents with a player that has some term and/or runway, we wouldn't jump at that. Because we would.' What, then, could the Bruins use to acquire such an asset? One of six Americans to secure an Olympic spot, McAvoy is eager to get back at it after his shoulder injury and infection at the 4 Nations Face-Off. He's one of two candidates if the Bruins want a captain in 2025-26. Pastrnak performed well as the lone alternate captain following the deadline selloff. He's tasked, along with McAvoy, with leading the organizational transition. Only Nikita Kucherov is a more dangerous right wing. From the way Sweeney characterized negotiations, he's had regular communication with Judd Moldaver, Geekie's agent, but is not in the immediate neighborhood of an agreement. A contract will be tricky considering the factors: a breakthrough season, the rising cap and the possibility of arbitration. The chances of a trade increase later in the offseason if the sides remain apart, but even that is unlikely considering Geekie's value to the team. Advertisement It's hard to see any team being interested in assuming the six years remaining on the center's contract. He found a way to settle in between Geekie and Pastrnak by the end of 2024-25. He has value, albeit at an elevated price, as a multi-situation center. The blue line went sideways this past season in part because of Lindholm's season-ending knee injury. He could be a big part of the organizational recovery as an all-situations defenseman. Given rising salaries, his $6.5 million average annual value looks quite reasonable. As poorly as he played in 2024-25, it's possible it was a one-year exception considering the circumstances: the pressure of his $66 million contract, adjusting to life without Linus Ullmark and the crumbling of his defensive infrastructure. He has everything on his side to be a high-end No. 1. The Bruins would need another top-end goalie if they put Swayman on the market. It could be put in play if the Bruins want to move down, but considering the quality of player the Bruins could get at No. 7, they would have to be confident their target would still be available if they trade down. It's certainly possible one of them could be traded before next year's draft, but the greater likelihood is during the 2025-26 season for an existing player, not in this window. Three years remaining is a long time to commit to an inconsistent goalie, and one of the explanations for Swayman's downturn was that he wasn't pushed enough by Korpisalo, but he should be in line for more action in 2025-26 and be able to settle into a playing rhythm. The Bruins would need to sign or acquire another experienced goalie if they traded Korpisalo. Advertisement Sweeney classified Lohrei as being exposed at times defensively in 2024-25, but a bridge deal signals that both sides see room for growth in the 24-year-old. He may not develop into a top-two NHL center, but he has the hockey sense to be a No. 3, which is a valuable commodity. He's already a good pro at 20 years old. Peeke is best cast as a third-pair defensive defenseman, but he could be in line for more playing time if Sweeney can't find right-side help. He will be unrestricted after 2025-26 and could be put in play as a rental during the season if the Bruins are out of playoff contention. It remains to be seen whether the 2022 second-rounder will make the team out of camp. He had a productive eight-game AHL playoff run with Providence that should do him good. Zacha would have leaguewide value because of how he touches the game in multiple areas. But it is the same reason the Bruins would want to keep him, especially with two years left at $4.75 million annually. The return would be significant considering the 28-year-old's three-zone reliability and cost control. He could open the year as the Bruins' No. 2 center. The big man settled down throughout the season in the defensive zone. He plays an important role when he focuses on patrolling his territory and playing with more restraint. He should still have the freedom to go up the ice on occasion. Lysell has NHL speed and skill but has yet to apply his strengths toward varsity traction. He did not score in the AHL playoffs. He's only 22 but may feel like he's hit his limit with the Bruins. Mittelstadt can make first-line plays because of his vision and creativity, but he didn't play with enough strength on the puck upon arriving from the Colorado Avalanche. He has a hefty price tag ($5.75 million annually) if he's centering the third line. (Photo of Casey Mittelstadt: Timothy T. Ludwig / Imagn Images)
New York Times
27 minutes ago
- New York Times
Maple Leafs GM Brad Treliving anticipates pending UFA Mitch Marner will ‘hit the market'
TORONTO — Brad Treliving confirmed the anticipated on Thursday morning, stating that he expects Toronto Maple Leafs star and pending unrestricted free agent Mitch Marner to test free agency. 'Unless there's a significant change here, I would anticipate that he's going to hit the market,' the Leafs GM said in a media availability. Advertisement After Treliving appeared to leave the door open for Marner's possible return during his end-of-season availability, there was a newfound finality in the way Treliving addressed the right winger on Thursday. 'You're trying to make your team better and the potential is there to lose a really good player. So (there are) lots of challenges, but we try to use it as an opportunity as well,' Treliving said. Since the Leafs were eliminated in the second round of the playoffs at the hands of the eventual Stanley Cup champion Florida Panthers, there has been little indication that Marner would return to Toronto. His six-year contract expires on June 30. 'Everybody's focused on July 1st, and I get it. We don't play on July 2nd, so you use the time starting on July 1st to try to make your team better,' Treliving said. NHL free agency opens on July 1. Yet Treliving suggested the Leafs would use different avenues throughout the offseason, including trades, to add the kind of offence they would likely lose with Marner's departure. 'That may come (on) July 1st, it may come August 1st, September 1st. You're not sure. So (we will) continue to work the market, but there are certainly some challenges. (Marner is) a really good player. And I think I said this before, too: There's not a Mitch Marner tree that you go to and just replace him. So if that indeed happens, we will continue to look at ways that we can help ourselves,' Treliving said. Marner is coming off his most productive NHL season. His 102 points — the first time he broke the 100-point plateau — were the fifth-highest in the NHL. On July 1, Marner will become one of the most sought-after free agents in recent NHL history. After being drafted fourth overall by the Leafs in 2015 and spending nine seasons in Toronto, it seems possible that Marner takes his time with his decision on where to continue his NHL career. Advertisement The Athletic's Pierre LeBrun spoke to Marner's agent Darren Ferris on Wednesday. 'As per the rules, we are only permitted to speak with teams beginning July 1,' Ferris said. 'At that time, prospective teams will have the opportunity to speak with Mitch directly. Following those conversations, Mitch will make an informed and thoughtful decision.'
