Visitors can now experience the Ten Courts of Hell at the Haw Par Mansion again
Hongkongers of a certain age might remember the Haw Par Mansion and its adjoining Tiger Balm Garden, a green space built in the mid-1930s by a wealthy Chinese-Burmese family that was later open to the public as an amusement park. The grounds were filled with sculptures and dioramas of scenes and characters from Chinese mythology, but the pièce de résistance for many was its gory depictions of the levels of hell.
Those who have experienced it will remember seeing artwork of grimacing sinners being fried in vats of boiling oil, climbing a mountain of blades, being tied to red-hot pillars, having their tongues ripped out, and more. The Tiger Balm Garden was eventually demolished in 2004, but now, a whole new generation of Hongkongers also gets to go through this traumatic lesson on karma!
The Haw Par Mansion guided tour is launching a brand-new exhibition titled 'Virtual Reality: The 'Ten Courts of Hell' of Tiger Balm Garden', which reconstructs the former fiery exhibit using a VR metaverse platform. Through VR headsets, visitors can explore the details of the old murals, as well as interact with them to learn about the cultural and historical contexts behind the Buddhist concept of hell. There will also be displays and video works to accompany this new exhibition.
Interested visitors can sign up to join the guided tours of the Haw Par Mansion for free, held four times each day from Fridays to Sundays. This includes being brought through the private garden and the mansion's interiors, with highlights on its history and architectural features, before moving on to the Ten Courts of Hell experience. Find out more and enrol for the tours on the Antiquities and Monuments Office website.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
12 hours ago
- NBC News
Trump travel ban hits immigrant family coming to U.S. amid bloody civil war in Myanmar
A Burmese American woman was eager to bring her siblings over to the U.S. from Myanmar amid a more than 15-year wait for visas. She'd been hoping to reunite with them since the 1990s, during military rule in her home country, so her brother's family could start a life in the U.S. But a day after she bought the plane tickets, President Donald Trump ordered a travel ban that included Myanmar. The woman, 51, and her husband, who were granted anonymity due to fear of retaliation, had sponsored her brother and sister-in-law to immigrate to the U.S. The siblings were then were hoping to bring their own adult kids, too, so that they wouldn't have to fulfill mandatory military service in the country's active civil war. With the travel ban in effect Monday, they said the policy has a heightened impact on people from war-torn countries like Myanmar who had hopes of finding sanctuary in the U.S. 'It's really frustrating because we were on the cusp of securing their safety to leave that situation,' said her husband, 57, adding he felt like a 'rug got pulled out from under us in an instant.' White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said Trump's policy is in the 'best interest of the American people and their safety.' 'His commonsense, country-specific travel restrictions include places that lack proper vetting, exhibit high visa overstay rates, or fail to share identity and threat information,' Jackson said. 'The restrictions fulfill the President's day one promise to protect American citizens from dangerous foreign actors who may come to the United States and cause us harm.' The travel restrictions, announced on Wednesday, completely bar entry to the U.S. for people from Myanmar, formerly known as Burma, in addition to those from Afghanistan, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Other countries, including Cuba, Laos and Venezuela, are under partial travel restrictions. According to Trump's proclamation, several of the countries on the list had declined to accept the repatriation of their nationals while others had visa overstay rates that the administration deemed 'unacceptable.' A few countries lacked 'the competence of the central authority' for issuing passports, the proclamation said. Jackson also pointed out a section in the proclamation that allows for applications for refugee status. 'Nothing in this proclamation shall be construed to limit the ability of an individual to seek asylum, refugee status, withholding of removal, or protection under the [international Convention Against Torture], consistent with the laws of the United States,' the proclamation said. However, after he took office, Trump limited refugee admissions for almost all countries including Myanmar. And in May, the Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to revoke the temporary legal status of more than 500,000 immigrants that was granted by the Biden administration. Those immigrants came from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela and are now subject to deportation. Myanmar was among the nine countries in the latest proclamation that Trump also targeted during his first term. In fiscal year 2023, the U.S. issued 13,284 visas to the country, with business and tourism permits making up the most common types of visas. Myanmar recorded 1,384 overstays that fiscal year, equating to an overstay rate of almost 30%. The new travel ban comes as Myanmar's violent military regime fights to hold on to power after it seized control from the elected government of Aung San Suu Kyi in a 2021 coup. Since then, violence has escalated across the region as the military clashes with ethnic minority rebel groups and pro-democracy militias. 'Junta forces have slaughtered thousands of civilians, bombed and burned villages, and displaced millions of people,' Tom Andrews, United Nations special rapporteur on the human rights situation in Myanmar, said in a press release earlier this year. 'More than 20,000 political prisoners remain behind bars. The economy and public services have collapsed. Famine and starvation loom over large parts of the population.' Under the new travel ban, anyone who obtained a visa prior to the policy is still able to come to the U.S. But there's confusion over how the restrictions will be implemented and enforced. The Burmese American woman and her husband are among those with concerns, particularly as there have been several cases of lawful permanent residents and citizens being swept up in the dragnet of Trump's immigration policies. 'It's terrifying to think that they could be randomly picked up because somebody had a bad day at the office, or somebody didn't do their job or didn't believe that their visa was true,' the woman's husband said. 'It's quite frankly terrifying.' For the woman, reunification with her brother has been a long time coming. She became a citizen in the late 1990s and began the process to help bring her sibling over a few years later. At the time, Myanmar had been under the control of a strict military junta that held power from the 1960s until 2011, and for decades had kept the country in a state of extreme isolation and deprivation. She said her brother, whose children were just a few years old then, hoped to come over and root his family in more stability. 'Their circumstances in Myanmar at that time were very, very bad. That was the system that I grew up in. There was no future for them, no prosperity,' the woman said. 'My brother was concerned for his children's future and education.' Amid moves and address changes, the couple said they never received the standard letter notifying them that the woman's brother had been able to progress in his visa process. They assumed the wait was a product of notorious immigration backlogs. It wasn't until the situation in Myanmar intensified again in recent years that the couple found out that the brother was close to finally being able to immigrate. But by then, the woman said, her brother's kids had aged out of the system. According to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, those who turn 21 before being approved for legal permanent resident status are no longer considered a child for immigration purposes and need to file an entirely new application, prolonging the green card process. At this point, the woman said, her brother and sister-in-law said they were willing to risk possible detention to come to the U.S., particularly if it meant easier access to the American immigration system that would enable them to fight to get their children to come over as well. However, with Myanmar's military draft in effect, the family is particularly concerned for their safety now that the travel ban adds another barrier to leaving. 'The reason they wanted to come here was for their kids,' the woman said of her brother and sister-in-law. 'Now, it's really hard to bring my nephews here to save their lives.' Quyen Dinh, executive director of the Southeast Asia Resource Action Center, said the bans are ultimately another part of 'the engine of Trump's mass deportation machine.' 'It's focused on demonizing immigrant families and communities by denying them family reunification, that we all rightfully deserve to be whole — especially now, when the world is more dangerous than ever,' Dinh said. Rather than protecting individuals' safety, Dinh said, she believes Trump's policy punishes those who need an escape from dangerous conditions. 'It perpetuates the violence that is happening across the world, as opposed to creating conditions for peace or humanitarian relief, and for these families who've been separated,' Dinh said. She also said she views the ban as evidence that the U.S. is misunderstanding its role as a humanitarian leader. 'We've got people who are legitimately trying to escape a civil war,' the woman's husband said. 'Now, because of some arbitrary decision by the Trump administration to pick a certain number of countries … without consideration of the actual cases, without an exception policy, it hurts them. They've done nothing wrong.'
Scotsman
15 hours ago
- Scotsman
Edinburgh's 12 ‘best' Chinese restaurants, including local institution opened in 1956
Edinburgh has plenty of amazing Chinese restaurants, and now SquareMeal has picked what it considers to be the best of them. Introducing its selection, the foodies guide says: 'Edinburgh is brimming with a great selection of Chinese restaurants, serving everything from pillowy dim sum, to bowls packed full of thick noodles. 'There's something for every style and budget, regardless of the occasion. Whether you're on the hunt for fine dining menus amongst an ultra-glam backdrop, or cosy little hideaways that are best known amongst the locals, Edinburgh's best Chinese restaurants bring some seriously good deals.' Take a look through our photo gallery to see the 12 best Chinese restaurants in Edinburgh, according to SquareMeal. 1 . Tattu Where: 18 West Register Street, EH2 2AA. SquareMeal says: 'Bringing a more contemporary feel to your Chinese dining, it doesn't get more glamorous than Tattu. This statement-making spot brings eye-catching decor and its famous foliage, alongside indulgent menus of authentic Chinese fare.' Photo: Tattu Edinburgh Photo Sales 2 . Street of Beijing Where: 37 Home Street, EH3 9JP. SquareMeal says: 'Beloved amongst locals, Street of Beijing brings an extensive collection of authentic cuisine, offering something for all tastes, and catering for a range of dietary requirements.' Photo: Street of Beijing Photo Sales 3 . Rendezvous Where: 10a Queensferry Street, EH2 4PG. SquareMeal says: Turning out authentic Chinese cuisine to the punters of Edinburgh since 1956, Rendezvous is one of the city's original Chinese restaurants, and decades later it's still a fan favourite. Photo: Rendezvous Photo Sales 4 . Beijing Banquet Where: 17 Maulsford Avenue, EH22 1PJ. SquareMeal says: 'The family-run restaurant is a local favourite and also has sites in Glenrothes, Sighthill and Renfrew.' Photo: Beijing Banquet Photo Sales Related topics: Edinburgh
Daily Mirror
19 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
British couple try Chinese takeaway in America and notice big difference
Chinese takeaways are popular in the UK, as well as the US, and a British couple sampled one in America. They noticed a big difference that they found confusing A British couple tried a Chinese takeaway in America for the first time and noticed one big difference. Brits love ordering 'a Chinese', which features popular dishes like egg fried rice, chow mein and sweet and sour chicken. There are many Chinese takeaways across the UK and they are popular for casual gatherings with family or friends. For some households, getting a Chinese takeaway for dinner is a treat and an easy option for others who don't fancy cooking. People in America also enjoy Chinese takeaways and a British couple, James and Siana, posted a video on TikTok trying one in the US. James shared that a Chinese takeaway 'is normally very good in Britain' so the couple were 'intrigued' to see how it is in the US. Siana firstly opened a 'stunning' container of broccoli beef and noted that it 'actually smells really good.' The next dish in their order was orange chicken. James admitted that he had never had this before in the UK and Siana said she had never heard of it but did hear that it's a 'big thing' in the US. Lifting the lid of the container, James smelled the chicken and remarked: 'Oh it smells amazing.' Siana enthusiastically added: 'Ooh yum, that smells like sweet and sour chicken.' They also ordered some chicken fried rice. The next dish was one that confused them. They explained that the item was called egg rolls but the couple thought they looked like spring rolls. Siana asked if that is just what they're called in the US and asked viewers to let them know if egg rolls are the same thing as spring rolls. She mentioned another big difference between Chinese takeaways in America and the US: 'The one thing that we're missing is prawn crackers.' James added: 'They usually just put them in for free but it seems like they've just added some white rice for free. Maybe that's something they do here instead.' Although they didn't get any prawn crackers, they did get some fortune cookies. The first dish in their order that they tried was the egg rolls and after taking a bite, Siana said: 'That's a spring roll but thicker.' She liked how thick it is was and thought it was 'actually really nice.' Moving onto the orange chicken, James shared that it was 'really good' and the pair agreed that it tasted similar to sweet and sour chicken found in Chinese takeaways in the UK. They then tried the broccoli beef, which they thought was 'average' and lacked flavour. However, Siana felt that since it wasn't 'overpowering', it was 'still quite nice.' Next, they sampled the chicken fried rice and they both loved it, with Siana sharing that it was 'just your typical fried rice' and 'very similar to the UK.' The Food Network has cleared up the confusion about egg rolls and spring rolls on its website. It explains that egg rolls were created in the US but spring rolls were invented in China. Also, egg rolls have a thicker skin and use a "wonton or thick, yeast dough wrapper" while spring rolls have a "more delicate, thin skin and use a spring roll wrapper." In terms of the filling, egg rolls "typically contain cabbage and meat" and spring rolls are "traditionally vegetarian or vegan" but some variations include meat or seafood.
