Pro-Palestinian protest leader details 104 days spent in US custody
Mahmoud Khalil, one of the most prominent leaders of pro-Palestinian protests on US campuses, recounted his experience surviving 104 days in Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention after being targeted for deportation by the Trump administration.
"I shared a dorm with over 70 men, absolutely no privacy, lights on all the time," the 30-year-old said Sunday on the steps of Columbia University, where he was a graduate student.
Khalil, a legal permanent resident in the United States who is married to an American citizen and has a US-born son, had been in custody since March facing potential removal proceedings.
He was freed from a federal immigration detention center in Jena, Louisiana on Friday, hours after a judge ordered his release on bail.
The activist was a figurehead of student protests at Columbia University against US ally Israel's war in Gaza, and the administration of Donald Trump labeled him a national security threat.
"It's so normal in detention to see men cry," Khalil recalled, deeming the situation "horrendous" and "a stain on the US Constitution."
"I spent my days listening to one tragic story after another: listening to a father of four whose wife is battling cancer, and he's in detention," Khalil detailed in his first protest appearance since regaining his freedom.
"I listened to a story of an individual who has been in the United States for over 20 years, all his children are American, yet he's deported."
The circumstances of the detention were tough, Khalil described, and he took solace where he could find it to gain the strength to carry on.
- 'We will win' -
"It is often hard to find patience in ICE detention," Khalil said.
"The center is crowded with hundreds of people who are told that their existence is illegal, and not one of us knows when we can go free.
"At those moments, it was remembering a specific chant that gave me strength : 'I believe that we will win,'" he continued, to cheers from the audience.
Khalil said he even scratched the phrase into his detention center bunk bed as a reminder, being the last thing he saw when he went to sleep and the first thing he read waking up in the morning.
He repeats it even now, "knowing that I have won in a small way by being free today."
Khalil took specific aim at the site of his speech, Columbia University, chastising the institution for saying "that they want to protect their international students, while over 100 (days) later, I haven't received a single call from this university."
Khalil's wife Noor Abdalla, who gave birth to their son while her husband was held by ICE, said his "voice is stronger now than it has ever been."
"One day our son will know that his father did not bow to fear. He will know that his father stood up when it was hardest, and that the world stood with him," Abdalla said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Body language expert breaks down Donald Trump's ominous speech after bombing Iran nuclear sites
Donald Trump has never been one for following the script. But he has arguably never had to own up to something so consequential during his time leading the US. The true consequences of the US intervention in the current conflict between Iran and Israel, which ultimately led to the destruction of multiple nuclear sites over the weekend, are yet to truly reveal themselves. In the days leading up to the White House's decision to unleash stealth bombers armed with bunker busters on Iran, analysts were screaming to the hills about the uncontrollable butterfly effect that would follow. Iran, while weakened, has a few aces up its sleeve. One of them being the cutting off of a crucial maritime trade route that provides the globe with approximately 20 per cent of its fuel. Others warned the attack would embolden Iran's already anti-US allies into providing the nation, now on the back foot, with whatever it needs to counter-attack. That includes several Middle Eastern militias, some of which have already threatened the US of attacks on its bases in the region should Trump target Iran. Whatever the case, it was crystal clear Trump was a different man when announcing the handiwork of America's B-2 stealth bombers to the world. As he strode to the panel with his four horsemen to announce what had occurred, the usually brash 79-year-old appeared robotic. The uncharacteristically disciplined performance had even his closest allies watching him like a hawk. Mark Carter, an expert in human behaviour and body language, dissected the performance and told that Trump 'remained on a scripted, specific message, showing more self-control than he would normally demonstrate.' For a man known for improvisational tangents and hurling rhetorical bombs, the display was, in Carter's view, unusually restrained. 'Since winning the Presidency, Trump has shown an attitude of someone who could not care less what his scriptwriters write,' Carter said in a statement provided to 'He remains far more focused here. The staged entrance, the staged exit, and the mainly planned scripted segment in between.' The tension in the room was palpable, especially from Vice President JD Vance, a man who helped Trump get over the line last November, often attacking the Democrats for their alleged enthusiasm for war. 'You could see in the side-eye look at Trump at times by US Vice President JD Vance that there was concern that his Commander in Chief may head off on his own track. There was clear relief by those at his side that he did not,' Carter continued. 'The Vance-Trump relationship is one of convenience in many ways. Vance was extremely critical of Trump until a marriage of convenience emerged.' That uneasy alliance, Carter suggests, continues to manifest in 'a lack of congruence in Vance's body language versus the words he speaks'. During the address, as Trump launched into visceral imagery of Iranian-backed terror, Vance's discomfort was painted across his face and his subconscious actions, Carter claims. 'Holding his hands clenched forward, Vance kept an almost constant side gaze on the President, which intensified as Trump stepped into rhetoric around Iran's support of terror,' Carter said. 'Vance instead showed a curiously puzzled look, projecting a sense of 'what are you on about Mr President.'' The contrast with other Cabinet members was clear as day as the other two cut a more sycophantic figure. 'Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth stared blankly forward, head nodding hypnotically to Trump's words,' Carter said. While Trump delivered the message largely as planned, Carter's reading of the stage suggests the subtext was more chaotic. 'Even for the 'yes' people that Trump has surrounded himself with in this administration, there are serious scenarios, such as the use of US military force, where even these 'yes' people recognise the importance of remaining on message,' Carter continued. The performance may have gone off without a verbal hitch. But judging by the unease around him, Trump's team knew just how fragile that calm was. Trump losing key supporters over Iran escalation The unease is part of a broader fracturing of Trump's vast supporter base. For the libertarian and former Democrat wing of Trump's voter base – even some of those who have forever stood staunchly behind the billionaire – his actions over the weekend were viewed as unforgivable. Optimists saw him as a rejection of the past, but as each day passes, the Republican Party's old colours are shining through. After promising to clean up bloated bureaucracy and partially withdraw America from 'wasteful' overseas aid, some believe Trump has now taken the Iran fiasco to dangerous new heights. For the libertarian and former Democrat wing of Trump's voter base – even some of those who have forever stood staunchly behind the billionaire – this messaging was seen as poison. Optimists saw him as a rejection of the past, but as each day passes, the Republican Party's old colours are shining through. After promising to clean up bloated bureaucracy and partially withdraw America from 'wasteful' overseas aid, some believe Trump has now taken the Iran fiasco to dangerous new heights. Last week, when arguments were raging over the potential for US involvement, the President lashed out at Tucker Carlson for his vocal opposition to yet another war with nations a world away. The anti-war wing of America who stood behind Trump as America's 'solution' is now coming to terms with the current crisis and what it could mean for the future. 'While the American military may not have physically perpetrated the assault, years of funding and sending weapons to Israel … place the US at the centre,' Carlson said, doubling down on his criticism by blasting prominent conservative figures like Sean Hannity and Mark Levin as 'warmongers' for urging direct US intervention. Mollie Hemingway, editor-in-chief of The Federalist, warned that giving a 'green light' to Iran strikes would be 'an unforgivable betrayal by millions of American voters' and a 'strategic policy mistake'.

ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Joel Fitzgibbon and Arthur Sinodinos
Afternoon Briefing: June 2 and June 12 Afternoon Briefing interviewed Joel Fitzgibbon and Arthur Sinodinos respectively on issues related to the AUKUS submarine contract with the USA and United Kingdom. The programs failed to reveal that they are the co-chairs of the AUKUS Forum Advisory Board a body that represents industries and companies seeking to participate in the program.

ABC News
4 hours ago
- ABC News
Israel-Iran war escalation concerns
Andy Park: As the US hails its covert attack on Iran's nuclear facilities a glowing success, the world is reacting with fears it will lead to a dangerous escalation of the Israel-Iran war. International leaders are calling for calm as Tanya Dendrinos reports. Tanya Dendrinos: Fresh explosions ring out in Iran. The IDF saying around 20 fighter jets conducted what it called intelligence-based strikes across three Iranian locations as Israelis emerge from bunkers after another night spent sheltering from Iran's retaliatory strikes. Back on home soil meanwhile, American B-2 stealth bombers that carried out strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities returned to a US base in Missouri. At a Pentagon briefing, the Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth reiterated the administration's position. Pete Hegseth: This mission was not and has not been about regime change. The President authorised a precision operation to neutralise the threats to our national interests posed by the Iranian nuclear program and the collective self-defence of our troops and our ally Israel. As the President has directed and made clear, this is most certainly not open-ended. It doesn't mean it limits our ability to respond. We will respond if necessary. The most powerful military in the world is postured and prepared to defend our people. Tanya Dendrinos: But the President himself is more equivocal on the possibility of bringing down Iran's leadership. Donald Trump posting on his Truth Social platform with a play on his MAGA slogan. It's not politically correct to use the term regime change, but if the current Iranian regime is unable to make Iran great again, why wouldn't there be a regime change? It's a message resonating with Trump supporters in the US. Opinion: It's obviously his decision and hopefully it's the right decision. And time will tell, but I have confidence in him. Tanya Dendrinos: But other American voters are less supportive. Opinion: I think it's the wrong choice. Getting into another war. Tanya Dendrinos: Hundreds of anti-war protesters gathered in New York and Washington. Opinion: We don't want your racist war! Tanya Dendrinos: Protests outside the US too, including in Islamabad, Athens and Paris. The French President, Emmanuel Macron, called for no escalation. Emmanuel Macron: It is a grave moment for peace and stability in the Middle East, and with a clear impact on our collective security as well. I wanted to hold this meeting ten days after the strikes between Israel and Iran. Last night's American strikes opened a new phase which calls, of course, for vigilance and resolute action from us. Tanya Dendrinos: But in Tel Aviv, the US actions were celebrated. Israel's Knesset, illuminated in the colours of the US flag, has a tribute to its closest ally. The Israeli Prime Minister commending the work of the US and Donald Trump, while giving an update on the Israeli operation. Benjamin Netanyahu: There is no doubt that this is a regime that wants to eliminate us, to erase our existence. That is why we launched this operation, to remove the two existential threats, nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles. We are progressing step by step towards achieving these goals, and we are very, very close to completing them. Tanya Dendrinos: Iran's Foreign Minister has arrived in Moscow, and according to his Telegram channel, will meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin. What happens next, the biggest concern for the UN Security Council, which called an emergency session, UN Secretary General, Antonio Guterres. Antonio Guterres: The bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities by the United States marks a perilous turn in a region that is already reeling. We must act immediately and decisively to halt the fighting and return to serious, sustained negotiations on the Iran nuclear program. We need a credible, comprehensive and verifiable solution, one that restores trust, including with full access to inspectors of the IAEA, as the United Nations technical authority in this field. Tanya Dendrinos: But the Security Council remains divided, Russia and China condemning the US action, while Israel's ambassador to the UN said the cost of inaction would have been catastrophic. Andy Park: Tanya Dendrinos there.