Trump administration wants to remove protections for threatened Kansas bird
The plight of the lesser prairie chicken, which roams in Kansas grasslands, wages on as the Trump Administration attempts to strip it of its protected species status. (Dave Kendall)
TOPEKA — The Trump administration is attempting to strike protections for the lesser prairie chicken, a bird that has teetered between threatened and endangered for decades.
The administration argued in a May 7 court filing that a Biden-era ruling granting protections for the lesser prairie chicken contained mistakes when the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service identified two distinct populations of the bird.
The filing alleges the USFWS improperly applied policy when determining whether the lesser prairie chicken should be listed under the Endangered Species Act, which 'amounts to a serious substantive defect because it calls into question the very foundation of the listing decision.'
The lesser prairie chicken forages on the grasslands and brush of southeastern Colorado, southwestern Kansas, eastern New Mexico, western Oklahoma and the panhandle and south plains of Texas. Those lands are also viewed as prime cattle-grazing and oil and gas drilling areas.
In the bird's southern range in New Mexico and the southwest Texas Panhandle, it is listed as endangered. In it's northern range of Kansas, Oklahoma and the northeast Texas panhandle, it's threatened, a lesser listing but still affording some protections. Experts and politicians have argued that the lesser prairie chicken serves as an indicator species, signaling the health of grasslands and prairies.
In 2023, then-President Joe Biden vetoed legislation from Kansas Republican U.S. Sens. Roger Marshall and Jerry Moran that would reverse its status as a threatened species. Again in 2025, U.S. Rep. Tracey Mann and Marshall introduced legislation in each chamber to delist the lesser prairie chicken and prevent any future efforts to relist the species. Neither bill has progressed.
The Center for Biological Diversity, which has been advocating for protections for 30 years, said the lesser prairie chicken has been left in jeopardy. The center renewed an attempt to intervene in the case and opposed the Trump administration's move.
'The Trump administration is again capitulating to the fossil fuel industry, ignoring sound science and common sense, and dooming an imperiled species to extinction,' said Jason Rylander, legal director at the center's Climate Law Institute.
The Endangered Species Act, passed and enacted in 1973, restricts certain uses, including drilling and ranching, on lands that are habitats to endangered or threatened species. The Trump administration's court filing argued that the lesser prairie chicken's habitat is adequately protected without the listing. It is served by 'at least sixteen different conservation efforts and programs administered by state, federal, and private entities,' the filing said.
Rylander said there's 'no question' the lesser prairie chicken is imperiled.
'Removing Endangered Species Act protections is a purely political act that won't stand up in court,' he said. 'We won't let this administration drive species to extinction so fossil fuel billionaires and their shareholders can make a buck.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
28 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Parts of Trump Coalition 'Disillusioned' as Musk Rips 'Big, Beautiful Bill'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Billionaire Elon Musk sharply rebuked President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" this week, sparking both praise and backlash. An analyst told Newsweek that a slice of Trump's coalition is now getting "disillusioned" by him, and Musk is the most recent example. Why It Matters Musk was chosen by Trump to lead the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) during the president's first few months of his second term in office. Since his January inauguration, Trump has enacted sweeping cuts across the federal bureaucracy, mainly through executive orders and the creation of DOGE. The SpaceX CEO pushed for DOGE to gain access to the most sensitive and confidential information about American taxpayers, leading to a slew of lawsuits. Musk has also faced fierce backlash amid his drastic cuts to the budget, including thousands of federal jobs, and the dismantling of entire agencies. Amid the uproar, Tesla cars and property have been targeted and torched across the United States as protesters demonstrated against Musk's appointment as an unelected official. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty What To Know The reconciliation bill, or the "big, beautiful bill" as Trump calls it, is a key avenue for Republicans to push forward the White House agenda following widespread GOP election victories in November. Key GOP holdouts in the House and Senate have voiced opposition to the bill over fears of raising the national debt, among other concerns. In a post to X, formerly Twitter, on Tuesday, Musk ripped the piece of legislation, saying, "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it." The White House reacted to Musk's condemnation on Tuesday, as press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in part, "Look, the president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill. It doesn't change the president's opinion." In a new post to X on Wednesday, Musk doubled down: "A new spending bill should be drafted that doesn't massively grow the deficit and increase the debt ceiling by 5 TRILLION DOLLARS." The Republican infighting is a distinct turn from Musk's MAGA loyalty and near constant presence alongside the president during his second term. "Musk's attacking Trump's bill that the House passed highlights the conflict among Republicans, especially now in the Senate, over passage of this reconciliation bill purposefully designed to avoid needing 60 votes and a Democratic filibuster. If it does not pass the Senate or otherwise not make it to Trump's desk by the summer, it will at minimum greatly embarrass the Trump administration," Columbia political science professor Robert Y. Shapiro told Newsweek via email Tuesday. "This embarrassment also puts Republicans in the Senate and the House in a tough spot, since this could affect Republican control of the House and also even put control of the Senate in jeopardy. This is all currently the Senate responsibility. And Trump needs this control of Congress to pass legislation and to prevent a Democratic controlled House especially from starting investigations of his unconstitutional acts as president and also blatant corruption in using the presidency to enhance his family's and his wealth," Shapiro added. He also said that Musk's jab at the bill "may make this only marginally more difficult" for Trump, while noting that he still has his MAGA base backing him. On the other hand, D. Stephen Voss, political science professor at the University of Kentucky, told Newsweek via email, in part, on Wednesday: "Parts of the Trump coalition are becoming disillusioned with the way he's governing. Elon Musk's defection from the White House is just one high-profile example of the disillusionment with Trump being seen among right-leaning libertarian types, who are bothered by Trump's willingness to grow government and increase executive power." "But that's not the only slippage," Voss added. "Consider, for example, disillusionment with Trump being expressed by the Hispanic voters who put him over the top in 2024. As Trump's public support slips, that's going to turn into less Republican party unity in D.C. The increasingly noisy opposition to Trump might not stop him from getting some version of his omnibus budget bill, but either way, it will make it harder for him to govern in the months ahead." Tesla CEO Elon Musk and President Donald Trump field a question from reporters in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30 in Washington, D.C. (Photo by) Tesla CEO Elon Musk and President Donald Trump field a question from reporters in the Oval Office of the White House on May 30 in Washington, D.C. (Photo by) What People Are Saying Republican Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia posted to X on Tuesday: "Do I like the price tag of the One Big Beautiful Bill? No. But we're still stuck with Biden's CR that funds tons of foreign aid and woke garbage at home and abroad. Passing the OBBB is a critical step toward delivering the America First MAGA mandate voters gave us in November." Greene added, "I'm focused on passing the @DOGE cuts that Elon and his team helped craft and I'm grateful he launched this effort." Republican Senator Mike Lee of Utah, responding to Musk on X Tuesday: "Federal spending has become excessive The resulting inflation harms Americans And weaponizes government The Senate can make this bill better It must now do so" Republican Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, also on X Tuesday in response to Musk: "I agree with Elon. We have both seen the massive waste in government spending and we know another $5 trillion in debt is a huge mistake. We can and must do better." Trump, on Truth Social Tuesday: "Rand Paul has very little understanding of the BBB, especially the tremendous GROWTH that is coming. He loves voting "NO" on everything, he thinks it's good politics, but it's not. The BBB is a big WINNER!!!" What Happens Next Trump has handed down a deadline for Senate Republicans to get the bill passed and on his desk before July 4th. It is unclear if Republican senators will garner enough votes to get it done in roughly one month.
Fox News
29 minutes ago
- Fox News
4-H federally funded camps under fire for cabining kids, adult counselors by 'identity'
EXCLUSIVE: Some federally supported youth programs still have policies in place permitting attendees and adult camp counselors to stay in overnight housing based on their self-identified gender rather than their biological sex – despite the fact that the policy these rules are derived from has since been rescinded by the Trump administration, according to one nonprofit group. The Washington-area Center for Practical Federalism is calling on the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), which oversees 4-H youth programs that federally funded public universities across the country administer, to evaluate the programs' gender ideology standards. The 4-H programs offer a host of activities for youth through more than 100 public universities across the country in areas including health, science, agriculture and civic engagement. The Center for Practical Federalism is an arm of the nonprofit organization the State Policy Network, and seeks to provide resources to the American public and policymakers to educate them about federalism, and the balance between state and national politics to prevent government overreach. The issue originated in 2017, when the National 4-H Council and USDA's National Institute of Food and Agriculture shared a "4-H Guidance for Inclusion of Individuals of all Gender Identities, Gender Expressions, Sexual Orientation and Sexes" on a USDA-managed website. That guidance has since been rescinded, and the Trump administration issued an executive order in January instructing agencies to take "appropriate action to ensure that intimate spaces designated for women, girls, or females (or for men, boys, or males) are designated by sex and not identity." But policies that allow 4-H attendees and adult chaperones to stay in overnight accommodations based on their gender ideology – rather than their biological sex – remain in place in multiple states, according to the Center for Practical Federalism. "Now that the Trump administration has rescinded all prior federal policies advancing gender ideology and replaced them with a clear biological framework through Executive Order, it is essential to ensure that federal grantees, including land-grant universities running 4-H programs, bring their practices into alignment with the law," Tony Woodlief, the Center for Practical Federalism's senior executive vice president, said in a letter to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, obtained by Fox News Digital. Specifically, the Center for Practical Federalism pointed to several instances where states have prioritized gender identity over biological sex for their 4-H programs. For example, the group alleged that, in 2022, the Rock Springs Ranch 4-H Camp in Kansas housed a person who was born a male but identified as a female in a cabin with preteen girls – without alerting the parents beforehand for consent. The Sentinel, a nonprofit news site that is a subsidiary of the free market think tank Kansas Policy Institute, also reported on the incident. The Kansas 4-H Foundation has not updated its gender policy online since then, which claims to ban gender discrimination based on "gender identity" in areas including housing, according to the Center for Practical Federalism. "The persistence of gender identity-based policies in 4-H programs shows how rescinded guidance can continue to shape policy and practice in violation of current federal directives," Woodlief said in the letter. "The situation at Rock Springs Ranch 4-H Camp in Kansas is a clear example of how these policies can conflict with parental rights and children's safety." The Kansas 4-H Foundation did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Fox News Digital. Other states have similar policies, according to the Center for Practical Federalism. For example, California and Oregon both espouse policies in official documents or in training materials for their 4-H programs that place participants and adult chaperones in overnight housing based on their gender identity, rather than biological sex, the group said. The University of California's 4-H Youth Development Program did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Fox News Digital, nor did Oregon State's 4-H Youth Development Program. As a result, the Center for Practical Federalism is requesting that the USDA conduct a review of all federally funded 4-H programs, land grant institutions and 4-H facilities to determine where rescinded gender ideology policies are still being enforced. Likewise, the group urges the USDA to institute formal standards "to prevent subregulatory guidance from circumventing lawful rulemaking." "We also recommend that the Department use this case as a springboard for a broader, agency-wide audit of existing guidance documents, rescinding those that bypassed the regulatory process or are no longer necessary," Woodlief said in the letter. The USDA did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Fox News Digital.
Politico
32 minutes ago
- Politico
‘Wake-up call': Ukraine drone strike exposes dangers to US aircraft
Ukraine's stunning drone strikes on Russian airfields are intensifying calls from military leaders and lawmakers in both parties to address gaping vulnerabilities in U.S. air bases. Kyiv this week launched more than 100 drones inside Russia using artificial intelligence, a daring move that eviscerated five military bases and damaged more than 40 aircraft. Footage of Russian bombers and fighters erupting in flames while parked on open tarmacs rippled across the internet — and Washington. While it was a significant blow struck by a U.S. ally, the attacks also laid bare how easily and cheaply uncrewed systems can cripple sophisticated air forces. Officials' concerns are particularly acute in the Pacific, where the U.S. is seeking to beef up its presence. Ukraine's success underscored how swiftly an adversary can destroy airpower with drones. 'It has to make you much more aware of how vulnerable we as a nation are,' said Sen. John Boozman (R-Ark.), chair of the Appropriations subcommittee on Military Construction and Veterans Affairs, said in an interview. 'The Ukrainians defeated the Russian navy without owning any ships, and now they've decimated their air force with virtually no air force of their own.' Lawmakers and military officials say U.S. aircraft are particularly vulnerable since they sit out in the open without protective cover. The strike could force a reassessment of the American military's defensive posture and spending priorities, including whether to invest in more counter-drone technologies, hardened aircraft shelters or camouflage. Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David Allvin called the Ukrainian offensive a 'wake-up moment' and suggested it would impact defense budget conversations unfolding in Washington. 'Seemingly impenetrable locations, maybe, are not,' he said Tuesday at a Center for a New American Security event, noting the damage of $7 billion was eyebrow-raising. 'We need to pay more attention to that.' The Air Force, in a statement, said its forces 'maintain a high state of readiness to defend against a range of threats,' including swarms of drones. The service is also developing capabilities to ward against future threats, the statement said, and investing in 'layered air and missile defense technologies, early warning systems, and rapid response protocols designed to detect, track and neutralize airborne threats.' President Donald Trump is aware of the military's vulnerabilities and taking steps to fix them, White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt told reporters Tuesday during a press conference. Plans for a massive Golden Dome missile shield were launched with this kind of threat in mind, she said. Trump 'has a full understanding … about the future of warfare and how drones are a big part of that.' That is one of the reasons Trump 'wants the one big beautiful bill to be passed,' Leavitt said, referring to Republicans' tax and spending package that would pump $150 billion into Pentagon coffers. The issue could reverberate through Congress' consideration of that megabill. Senate Armed Services Chair Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) noted the bill includes more money for counter-drone defenses as demand for those capabilities skyrockets. The military has considered the threat drones present to grounded aircraft long before the Ukrainian attack, he said. But the episode could focus public attention on concerns posed by cheap uncrewed technology. 'There's no doubt that we have a myriad of aircraft …. stored in facilities, really, that are designed to protect them from the weather and are not resistant to explosives like the ones the Ukrainians used,' Wicker said Wednesday during a Defense Writers Group event with reporters. 'It should be a wake-up call to the public. I'm not sure that it is much of a surprise to our military strategists.' The alarm is especially high in the Pacific, where U.S. bases sit within range of China's growing missile arsenal. A Hudson Institute report by Thomas Shugart and Timothy Walton found that China has built more than 400 hardened aircraft shelters — protective concrete bunkers designed to shield warplanes from missile and drone attacks — over the past decade. The U.S. has added just 22 in the region. 'Large numbers of American bombers sit open on the tarmac, just like the ones we saw in those videos,' Shugart, a former Navy officer, said.'There needs to be more robust measures than appear to be happening at this time.' The worry is crossing partisan lines. Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.), the top Democrat on the Senate Defense Appropriations subcommittee, said the drone attack shows Ukraine is 'really in this fight' and validates a 'pressing concern' that the U.S. doesn't have enough counter-drone capabilities at home and overseas. 'I have been raising this and pressing this in every meeting with every senior military leader, how to speed up procurement, speed up deployment,' Coons said in an interview. 'This makes it clear that we face genuine risks from sophisticated drone attacks almost everywhere in the world.' The attack is receiving particular attention in Virginia, a state with a heavy military presence. Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.), a senior member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, called the strikes a 'case study in battlefield innovation' that should prompt a reevaluation of the safety of U.S. bases. 'We have to do an awful lot to protect our infrastructure at home,' he said. 'I don't think we've figured out all the policies we need or the resources to implement them.' Fellow Virginian and the Senate Intelligence Committee's top Democrat, Sen. Mark Warner, said a national security professional sent him satellite images of American bases after the Ukraine attack with U.S. military aircraft sitting exposed. 'The Ukrainians are redefining warfare,' he said. 'We have to learn from this.' Jack Detsch contributed to this report.
