He's still waiting for FOI records Toronto police said he could have last summer, requested in 2020
Jamie Jelinski feels a bit like David — and the Toronto police are his Goliath.
The trouble is, he's worried that this time Goliath might win.
Jelinski filed a freedom of information (FOI) request to Toronto police in June 2020 for records concerning the facial recognition technology Clearview AI after the police service admitted to using the controversial tool beginning in October 2019 and committed to stop using it in February of the following year.
Jelinski said he filed the request hoping to learn how Clearview AI is used in practice — all part of his research into visual identification techniques and technologies used by Canadian law enforcement. But nearly five years later, the visual culture scholar still hasn't received all of the responsive records, despite paying police more than $200 for the remaining 1,100 pages of emails last July.
"To me it suggests they don't respect the legislation that they're supposed to be operating within, they don't respect public transparency," said Jelinski, who is now a lecturer in the University of Liverpool's department of communication and media.
"If they didn't intend on disclosing this to me last year, they should not have accepted my money."
In Ontario, public institutions like police services are subject to provincial or municipal freedom of information and protection of privacy laws. The legislation requires institutions to issue a decision for FOI requests within 30 days and to disclose the records if access is granted in that timeframe, with a few exceptions.
FOI experts told CBC Toronto that Jelinski's experience highlights why Ontario's access to information legislation needs to be modernized — and why it needs to include tools to enforce legislated timeframes and its own orders to disclose records.
If the requester of information disagrees with an institution's decision or believes it has failed to meet legislated timeframes, they can submit an appeal to the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario (IPC).
3 appeals for 1 request
Jelinski has submitted three IPC appeals for this request. The first, because Toronto police originally denied him access to any records. Then, after winning that appeal in 2023, he filed one in 2024 when Toronto police failed to issue him a final decision letter about whether he'd have access to the documents. He filed the third appeal earlier this year, because he hadn't received the records he paid for last summer.
"I have to force them through the IPC every step of the way," said Jelinski.
In response to his most recent appeal, the privacy commissioner asked Toronto police to give Jelinski copies of the records by April 24. The service didn't meet that deadline. So in an email last week, the IPC told Jelinski it would issue an order to disclose the records.
CBC Toronto asked police why Jelinski's request has taken so long, why it didn't meet the most recent deadline from the privacy commissioner — and when it is that police intend to provide Jelinski with the records he's paid for.
Police say some records released
The service declined an interview request, but in an email, a spokesperson said certain records have already been released to Jelinski and noted the ongoing IPC mediation process.
"The Toronto Police Service has requested an extension on this file," said spokesperson Stephanie Sayer in the email. "Any updates are being communicated to the requester through the IPC."
Jelinski received some records in February 2022 and one additional record in 2023 after winning his first appeal but hasn't received the rest. As of Wednesday, the IPC had yet to issue the order to Toronto police to disclose the records.
But even when it does, Jelinski worries police won't comply and that then his only options would be to wait or take police to court, which is expensive.
"They can just ignore it, and nothing happens to them," he said. "There needs to be some updating of the legislation."
Why enforcement isn't easy
Even though IPC orders are legally binding, a former IPC assistant commissioner says the Ontario oversight body doesn't have a straightforward way to enforce them, unlike in some other provinces.
"This situation is kind of distressing, because it really shouldn't be the case that enforcement falls back onto the shoulders of the requester," said David Goodis, an access and privacy lawyer who worked for the IPC for 30 years until early 2021.
"Some of the more modern FOI laws allow people, commissioners — really anyone — to file commissioner orders with the court so that they're enforceable as a court order. And that can make a difference."
Both B.C. and Alberta's access to information laws have that provision, according to Goodis. To adopt a similar mechanism, the lawyer said the Ontario legislature would have to amend the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy and Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy acts.
Premier Doug Ford's office did not respond to questions about whether his government is considering such changes.
"What we're talking about is fixing the act to deal with these outlier cases," said Goodis. "In my experience, this is really rare."
While these cases aren't the norm, public policy researcher and FOI expert Ken Rubin said he's seeing this kind of response more and more often when he files requests.
"Review commissions don't exactly have penalty-making power," he said. "I think certain agencies have realized that, and so either they ignore [requesters] or they just drag it out."
Both Goodis and Rubin said the nearly five-year wait Jelinski is facing is way too long.
Complexity and volume of requests a challenge
A recent Toronto Police Service Board report Sayer provided to CBC outlines the service's FOI statistics for 2024 and the hurdles it's facing in responding to requests.
"Meeting the mandated 30-day compliance outlined in Section 19 of the Act continues to be challenging," reads the report submitted by Toronto Police Chief Myron Demkiw.
"This is mainly due to the number and complexity of the requests, the type, medium and volume of the records being requested and [the] needed consultation with internal and external stakeholders for certain requests."
Last year, Toronto police received 5,414 FOI requests — 403 more than it did in 2023. There were also 758 requests carried over to this year from 2024. The service's average compliance rate for completing requests within the mandated 30-day timeframe was 73.6 per cent last year, down about three percentage points from 2023.
So what does this wait mean for Jelinski?
His experience with this FOI request and others inspired him to write a book about how his fellow visual scholars can use access requests, which he says are rarely used for research in his field. But Jelinski can't finish the book until he gets these records.
"It's a key case study," he said. "I can't write up that chapter without the documents."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBC
14 minutes ago
- CBC
Ombudsman to investigate Ontario's response to strip-search by jail guards in riot gear
Ontario's ombudsman says its office will investigate the province's response to a strip search of inmates by jail guards in riot gear at Maplehurst Correctional Complex in December 2023. In a news release on Monday, Ontario Ombudsman Paul Dubé said the investigation into the ministry of the solicitor general's response is due to public concerns about transparency, accountability and inmates' rights. The strip search followed an assault on a correctional officer at the complex in Halton Region, which holds nearly 1,500 inmates in medium and maximum security. Members of Maplehurst's Institutional Crisis Intervention Team (ICIT) were involved. During the two days in which ICIT correctional officers were deployed at the jail, the ombudsman said inmates in unit 8 were stripped to their boxer shorts, forced to sit on the floor and face the wall with their wrists zip-tied, while correctional officers in tactical gear conducted patrols behind them. "Several inmates and members of the public have contacted us to express concerns about the treatment of inmates by the ICIT over two days in December 2023," Dubé said in the release. "The Ministry has already investigated the incident. What my investigation will cover is the steps the Ministry took as a result, and what it is doing to make sure something like this does not happen again." The Ombudsman received about 60 complaints about the Maplehurst strip search, including from inmates directly involved in the incident. The ministry has finished its internal investigations of the matter, the release said. Subsequently, judges who raised concerns about the incident have reduced the sentences of some of these inmates, according to the ombudsman. In one case, the prosecution argued that an inmate's rights under Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms had been violated during the strip search. "When an incident occurs in an Ontario correctional facility that impacts the administration of justice and the rights of inmates, it is imperative that we understand why it happened and what is being done to ensure that it does not recur," Dubé said. According to Dubé, the investigation will also look at what safeguards can be put in place to prevent a similar incident. The investigation will not look at personnel or disciplinary matters concerning individual correctional staff, he said.


Ottawa Citizen
19 minutes ago
- Ottawa Citizen
Jewish outrage at RCMP war-crimes probe of Canadian IDF soldiers
The RCMP's 'structural investigation' into whether Canadian citizens serving with the Israel Defense Forces in Gaza may have committed war crimes has sparked outrage in the Jewish community and its leaders, who accuse Ottawa of political targeting. Article content 'It's funny how law enforcement in our cities have watched tens of thousands of people illegally protest and harass Jews while the RCMP tells us they want to play global cop and pour resources into finding bogeyman crimes,' said Toronto-based Israel Ellis, whose son Eitan is an Israeli soldier guarding a humanitarian corridor in Gaza. Article content Article content Article content After a flurry of media reports, the RCMP said in a statement on June 4 that it began investigating in early 2024 whether Canadian citizens were in contravention of this country's Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act. Article content Article content The force said it wasn't a criminal investigation, but to 'collect, preserve and assess information' that included 'open-source material and voluntary submissions.' The data may be used in the future, if it meets the legal threshold for prosecution. Article content The RCMP statement did not specify any group, entity, or army by name — such as Israel Defense Forces (IDF), Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Abu Shabab, PFLP, Muslim Brotherhood, or others, who are fighting in the conflict in and around Israel. But multiple Jewish groups contacted by the National Post said the announcement seemed politically targeted at Canadians who have fought for the IDF. Article content Article content Nitsana Darshan-Leitner, president of Israel-based Shurat HaDin – Israel Law Center, said the Mounties have made an 'unprecedented decision.' Article content Article content 'No other Western democracy is criminally investigating its citizens for fighting alongside an ally, let alone one defending itself from a genocidal terror organization,' she wrote in a statement. Article content The Canadian government 'should focus its pressure on Hamas — the party that initiated this war,' she said, adding her organization will provide 'legal defence and advocacy for those targeted by politically driven investigations.' Article content Hillel Neuer, the Montreal-born executive director of UN Watch, said the investigation is 'nothing less than a moral inversion. It turns Canadian values upside down.' Article content Neuer said that 'for good reason, Ottawa has never prosecuted dual citizens who served with British, French or American forces in fighting ISIS and al-Qaida.' He called it 'unconscionable' that the federal Liberals 'were even contemplating the prosecution of Canadians who fought in defence of civilians against a genocidal terrorist group.'


CTV News
20 minutes ago
- CTV News
Judge upholds obstruction conviction for B.C. Mountie in Dale Culver case
Dale Culver, 35, went into medical distress after being tackled to the ground and pepper-sprayed by RCMP officers on July 18, 2017. A provincial court judge has ruled that the guilty verdict stands for an RCMP officer convicted of obstruction of justice in the case of an Indigenous man who died in police custody in 2017, clearing the way for sentencing. A statement from the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association says Judge Adrian Brooks dismissed the attempt by RCMP Const. Arthur Dalman to have the proceedings stayed, rejecting Dalman's claim that his Charter rights were breached. The B.C. Prosecution Service has confirmed the ruling, which communications counsel Damienne Darby says was released on May 29. Dalman was found guilty last July of obstruction of justice for ordering witnesses to delete video footage taken at the time Dale Culver was arrested in Prince George. The civil liberties association says officers used pepper spray during the 'violent' arrest and Culver died about 30 minutes later after complaining of breathing difficulties. The Independent Investigations Office of B.C. recommended charges in 2020 after finding reasonable grounds to believe two officers may have committed offences related to the use of force and three others may have obstructed justice. But the civil liberties association says manslaughter charges against two officers were stayed last year, one obstruction charge was stayed and another officer was acquitted of obstruction, leaving Dalman as the only officer convicted in the case. The reasons for Brooks' judgment have not been released, and Darby said in a statement on Monday that Dalman's next appearance is on June 19 to set a date for a sentencing hearing. Culver was from the Gitxsan and Wet'suwet'en Nations. He was 35 years old at the time of his death. An RCMP release from the time said police had received a report about a man casing vehicles and found a suspect who tried to flee on a bicycle. The civil liberties association, meanwhile, said after Culver's death that it was aware of reports from eyewitnesses that he 'was taken forcibly to the ground by RCMP members immediately after exiting a liquor store, apparently unprovoked.' The group shared a statement from Culver's daughter, Lily Speed-Namox, following the judge's decision to uphold Dalman's conviction this week. The family has waited 'eight long years' for accountability, Speed-Namox says. 'I have somehow managed to remain positive about my feelings that eventually someone would be held accountable. 'Even if it's because Dalman lied under oath to 'protect' his fellow officers. How many people have to die before people realize that the justice system is broken?' In the earlier decision finding Dalman guilty of obstruction of justice, the same provincial court judge, Adrian Brooks, found the officer deliberately lied and his evidence was 'so fraught with illogical missteps … and so contradictory when compared with reliable evidence, that it (was) not worthy of any belief.' Culver's cousin, Debbie Pierre, says in a statement that Brooks' latest decision upholding Dalman's conviction marks a step toward accountability. 'But true justice goes beyond one decision. My vision is for a system where Indigenous lives are protected — not silenced — and where police are trained to de-escalate, not destroy. 'This is not just about Dale; it's about transforming a justice system that continues to fail our people. We will not stop until that change is real.' This report by Brenna Owen, The Canadian Press, was first published June 9, 2025.