Tank fire killed UN worker in Gaza, initial Israeli army probe says
An Israeli tank fire was responsible for the death of a UN worker in Gaza. This was initially denied but later confirmed.
The building was targeted due to an assessed enemy presence and was mistakenly not identified as a UN facility.
Israel expressed regret for the incident, shared its findings with the UN, and initiated reviews to prevent recurrence.
An Israeli tank fire killed a UN worker in Gaza last month, according to initial findings from an investigation released on Thursday by Israel's military, which initially denied operating in the area.
The United Nations Office for Project Services (UNOPS) announced on 19 March the death of one of its employees in the central Gaza city of Deir el-Balah when an unidentified piece of "explosive ordnance" hit their building.
"According to the findings collected so far, the examination indicates that the fatality was caused by tank fire from IDF (Israeli military) troops operating in the area," the military said in a statement.
The building was struck due to assessed enemy presence and was not identified by the forces as a UN facility.
At the time, an Israeli army spokesperson told AFP that "there was no IDF operational activity there and that the IDF didn't strike the UN compound".
Israeli foreign ministry spokesperson Oren Marmorstein also said on 19 March that "the initial examination found no connection... whatsoever" to Israeli military activity, though the circumstances were under investigation.
UN spokesperson Stephane Dujarric later said "an Israeli tank" had hit the UN compound, killing a Bulgarian employee and severely wounding six others.
The killing came a day after Israel renewed its intense bombardment of the Palestinian territory following the collapse of a two-month ceasefire with Hamas Palestinian militants.
In its statement on Thursday, Israel's military said it "regrets this serious incident and continues to conduct thorough review processes... to prevent such events in the future."
"We express our deep sorrow for the loss and send our condolences to the family," it added.The military said it had shared its initial findings with the UN.
The latest investigation findings come after the military last Sunday reported on a separate probe into the killing of 15 Palestinian emergency workers in Gaza.
The military admitted that mistakes led to their deaths and said a field commander would be dismissed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Epoch Times
10 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
Trump Admin Can't Detain Mahmoud Khalil on Foreign Policy Grounds, Judge Rules
A federal judge ruled on June 11 that President Donald Trump's administration cannot use foreign policy interests to justify detaining Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University student who played a leading role in the pro-Palestinian protests that rocked the school across 2024. Khalil, a lawful permanent resident in the U.S., has proven that his continued detention is causing irreparable harm to his career, family, and free speech rights, U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz
Boston Globe
25 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Judge says government must release Columbia University protester Mahmoud Khalil
Khalil's lawyers challenged the legality of his detention, accusing the Trump administration of trying to crack down on free speech. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio says he has the power to deport Khalil because his presence in the U.S. could harm foreign policy. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz had ruled earlier that expelling Khalil from the U.S. on those grounds was likely unconstitutional. Advertisement In a new ruling Wednesday, the judge said that Khalil had shown that his continued detention is causing irreparable harm to his career, his family and his free speech rights. Farbiarz gave the government until Friday to appeal the decision. He also required Khalil to post a $1 bond before he is freed. 'The court's decision is the most significant vindication yet of Mahmoud's rights,' said Ramzi Kassem, co-director of CLEAR, a legal nonprofit and clinic at the City University of New York that represents Khalil. 'But we aren't out of the woods until Mahmoud is free and back home with his wife and child.' Advertisement Lawyers and spokespersons for the Justice Department, which is handling the case, didn't immediately respond to an email seeking comment. Dr. Noor Abdalla, the wife of Mahmoud Khalil, spoke during an unofficial alternative graduation ceremony on May 18, at St. Paul and St. Andrew United Methodist Church in upper Manhattan. TODD HEISLER/NYT The judge's decision comes after several other legal residents targeted for their activism won custody in recent weeks, including another Palestinian student at Columbia, Rubio has cited a rarely used statute to justify the deportation of Khalil and others, which gives him power to deport those who pose 'potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States.' Khalil isn't accused of breaking any laws during the protests at Columbia. The government, however, has said that noncitizens who participate in such demonstrations should be expelled from the country for expressing views that the administration considers to be antisemitic and 'pro-Hamas,' referring to the Palestinian militant group that attacked Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. Khalil, a 30-year-old international affairs graduate student, had served as a negotiator and spokesperson for student activists at Columbia University who took over a campus lawn last spring to protest Israel's military campaign in Gaza. The university brought police in to dismantle the encampment after a small group of protesters seized an administration building. Khalil is not accused of participating in the building occupation and wasn't among the people arrested in connection with the demonstrations. But images of his maskless face at protests, along with his willingness to share his name with reporters, have made him an object of scorn among those who saw the protesters and their demands as antisemitic. The White House accused Khalil of 'siding with terrorists,' but has yet to give any evidence for the claim. Advertisement The Trump administration has said it is taking at least $400 million in federal funding away from research programs at Columbia and its medical center to punish it for not doing enough to fight what it considers to be antisemitism on campus. Some Jewish students and faculty complained about being harassed during the demonstrations or ostracized because of their faith or their support of Israel.
The Intercept
33 minutes ago
- The Intercept
Trump Appointee Wanted to Lock Up CIA Leaker for a Decade. The Judge Ignored Him.
A federal judge in Virginia sentenced the former CIA employee who leaked Israeli military secrets to three years and one month in prison on Wednesday, rejecting the government's request for a much harsher term. U.S. District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles said she had to balance the potential harm caused by Asif William Rahman's disclosure of secret analyses of Israel's plans for an attack on Iran against his swift decision to cooperate and plead guilty to two Espionage Act violations. 'For you to go from that to this — reckless, dangerous — I understand that something must have been going on.' While the high school valedictorian and Yale University graduate sat in a green jail jumpsuit at the defense table, Giles gave credit to the defense's argument that Rahman acted both in response to soaring tensions in the Middle East and out of trauma caused in part by a deployment to Iraq. 'For someone who has lived such a law-abiding life for all these years,' she said, 'for you to go from that to this — reckless, dangerous — I understand that something must have been going on.' In addition to his prison term, she gave Rahman two years' probation and a $50,000 fine. Rahman's sentence was significantly lower than the 9 years the government requested in a briefing last month — a sentence prosecutors said was warranted by the harm he 'could have' caused and ill will demonstrated by a list of relatively routine phone apps. Defense lawyers responded that the request violated the spirit if not the letter of Rahman's plea agreement and that bumping the prison term so far beyond sentencing guidelines despite his cooperation was 'unprecedented.' In the end, the defense prevailed, and Giles's sentence ended up below the statutory guideline. The sentencing capped a relatively short and secretive legal process that began with Rahman's arrest last November in Cambodia, where he was posted with the CIA. A month earlier, the government analyses of Israel's preparations for a strike on Iran were made public on social media. Prosecutors have said that those disclosures may have briefly delayed the Israeli strike that took place later that month. Much remains publicly unknown about Rahman's disclosures, including how many other documents he leaked and who he leaked them to. Prosecutors said the disclosures spanned multiple months. Giles hinted, however, that the other documents Rahman leaked contained highly sensitive information. 'What is on the public record is small to me,' she said. Still-classified records that are unknown to the public, she said, 'shows how serious this conduct is, how dangerous it is, how reckless.' In a reflection of the top-secret nature of the documents Rahman disclosed last year, the courtroom remained sealed to the public for much of the four-hour sentencing hearing. A federal prosecutor said Wednesday that it had backed off the high end of that recommendation, without publicly disclosing the government's new request. In court, Assistant U.S. Attorney Troy Edwards acknowledged that prosecutors had not charged Rahman with a separate offense that would have required them to show actual harm. While acknowledging that the judge had a 'complicated' decision to make, he said she should hand down a sentence that would deter future leakers. 'When you take an oath to serve this country it means something,' Edwards said, 'and it has to mean something.' Giles said she had completely discarded the inflammatory allegation in a declaration from a high-level political appointee at the CIA, Michael Ellis, that Rahman had caused 'exceptionally grave' damage to national security. Defense lawyers had cried foul over that declaration, which they said was not backed up by any evidence, and over a directive — which they said came from top Justice Department officials — to seek a sentence close to the 10-year maximum despite Rahman's extensive cooperation. They asked the judge to hand Rahman a 13-month sentence, but they and a large group of family members and supporters appeared to be satisfied with a prison term below the statutory guideline of roughly 5 to 6 years. Several family members exchanged hugs with Rahman's defense lawyers after the hearing. Lawyer Amy Jeffress told the Intercept she did not expect to appeal the sentence. In public court filings, the defense gave only vague explanations of the political motivations for the leaks, saying that Rahman acted out of a 'misguided' belief that he could advance the cause of peace. The former analyst himself addressed the judge in a brief courtroom statement where he apologized to his former colleagues at the CIA and said he constantly frets that his disclosures could have endangered servicemembers in the Middle East. 'There is no excuse for my actions. I constantly reflect on the trust that I violated,' he said. 'It was an honor and a privilege to work at the CIA.'
