Tank fire killed UN worker in Gaza, initial Israeli army probe says
An Israeli tank fire was responsible for the death of a UN worker in Gaza. This was initially denied but later confirmed.
The building was targeted due to an assessed enemy presence and was mistakenly not identified as a UN facility.
Israel expressed regret for the incident, shared its findings with the UN, and initiated reviews to prevent recurrence.
An Israeli tank fire killed a UN worker in Gaza last month, according to initial findings from an investigation released on Thursday by Israel's military, which initially denied operating in the area.
The United Nations Office for Project Services (UNOPS) announced on 19 March the death of one of its employees in the central Gaza city of Deir el-Balah when an unidentified piece of "explosive ordnance" hit their building.
"According to the findings collected so far, the examination indicates that the fatality was caused by tank fire from IDF (Israeli military) troops operating in the area," the military said in a statement.
The building was struck due to assessed enemy presence and was not identified by the forces as a UN facility.
At the time, an Israeli army spokesperson told AFP that "there was no IDF operational activity there and that the IDF didn't strike the UN compound".
Israeli foreign ministry spokesperson Oren Marmorstein also said on 19 March that "the initial examination found no connection... whatsoever" to Israeli military activity, though the circumstances were under investigation.
UN spokesperson Stephane Dujarric later said "an Israeli tank" had hit the UN compound, killing a Bulgarian employee and severely wounding six others.
The killing came a day after Israel renewed its intense bombardment of the Palestinian territory following the collapse of a two-month ceasefire with Hamas Palestinian militants.
In its statement on Thursday, Israel's military said it "regrets this serious incident and continues to conduct thorough review processes... to prevent such events in the future."
"We express our deep sorrow for the loss and send our condolences to the family," it added.The military said it had shared its initial findings with the UN.
The latest investigation findings come after the military last Sunday reported on a separate probe into the killing of 15 Palestinian emergency workers in Gaza.
The military admitted that mistakes led to their deaths and said a field commander would be dismissed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
17 minutes ago
- Politico
Judge blocks Trump admin from deporting Mahmoud Khalil using Rubio power
A federal judge in New Jersey blocked the Trump administration from deporting pro-Palestinian Columbia University protest organizer Mahmoud Khalil on foreign policy grounds. U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz ruled Wednesday that the Trump administration's effort to deport Khalil under a provision of federal law that allows the deportation of any foreign citizen whose 'presence or activities' in the U.S. is determined to 'have serious adverse foreign policy consequences' and is chilling Khalil's First Amendment free speech rights. In a 14-page order, Farbiarz said the rarely used statute Secretary of State Marco Rubio invoked against the former Columbia graduate student is likely unconstitutional. He also ruled that the activist and legal U.S. resident who has been in immigration custody in Louisiana since March can't be detained further on that basis. The judge said it was unlikely the Trump administration could justify detaining Khalil via another rationale it tacked on after his arrest in Manhattan: that when he applied for a green card, he failed to disclose all his past employment and membership in certain organizations. Immigrants are almost never detained for those sorts of omissions, the judge noted, finding it likelier that Rubio's determination was the basis for Khalil's ongoing detention. However, the judge's ruling did not foreclose Khalil's continued detention on alternative grounds, emphasizing that he had only definitively rejected Rubio's determination and that his decision had 'no impact' on other aspects of the effort to deport Khalil. Farbiarz, a Biden appointee, put his ruling on hold until Friday morning to allow the Trump administration to appeal. A lawyer for Khalil, Baher Azmy, said in an email that he believes Farbiarz's order means Khalil should be released from custody by Friday morning unless an appellate court intervenes. 'We are relieved that the Court determined that both his detention and his removal based on the ridiculous, overbroad Rubio determination would be unconstitutional,' Azmy said, 'and that he is suffering severe ongoing harms [from] the government's grotesque, vindictive retaliation for his constitutionally protected expression in support of Palestine.' The departments of Justice, State and Homeland Security did not immediately respond to requests for comment. While Khalil has remained detained, others who have been similarly swept up as part of the Trump administration's crackdown on pro-Palestinian academics have been released. In early May, a Vermont federal judge ordered the release of Rumeysa Ozturk, a Turkish Tufts University Ph.D. student. A few days later, a federal judge in Virginia ordered the release of a Georgetown researcher, Badar Khan Suri. Like Khalil, both Ozturk and Suri had been detained in March.
40 minutes ago
Judge rules Trump administration cannot continue to detain Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil
A New Jersey federal judge has issued a preliminary injunction barring the Trump administration from deporting or continuing to detain Columbia University pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil. In his ruling, Judge Michael Farbiarz is barring the administration from seeking to remove Khalil based on Secretary of State Marco Rubio's determination that his continued presence in the country would pose a risk to foreign policy. The judge is staying his injunction until 9:30 a.m. Friday to allow the Department of Homeland Security time to appeal the decision.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rubio vowed to revoke Chinese student visas. Trump now says Chinese students are welcome
In a potential pullback after U.S. officials said two weeks ago that they would "aggressively" revoke visas for Chinese students enrolled at U.S. universities and increase vetting of student visa applicants, President Trump said Wednesday that he had come to an agreement with China on students "using our colleges and universities." The president offered no details on the students in the announcement posted to his Truth Social platform as part of a brief outline of a trade deal with China that he said was pending approval by each side. But the decision appeared to relax a clampdown on America's second-largest international student group that has been under increased scrutiny since May 28, when Secretary of State Marco Rubio suggested the U.S. would broadly revoke Chinese student visas and target individuals with ties to the Chinese Communist Party or who studied unnamed "critical fields." On Wednesday, Trump said that having Chinese students at U.S schools "has always been good with me!" "Our deal with China is done, subject to final approval with President Xi and me. Full magnets, and any necessary rare earths, will be supplied, up front, by China. Likewise, we will provide to China what was agreed to, including Chinese students using our colleges and universities (which has always been good with me!). We are getting a total of 55% tariffs, China is getting 10%. Relationship is excellent! Thank you for your attention to this matter!" Trump said in his all-caps post. Read more: Trump administration threat to revoke Chinese student visas roils California The State Department did not respond to a request for clarification on the visa matter, including the question of whether Rubio's comments still applied. The May policy to aggressively cancel Chinese student visas has roiled higher education nationally and in California. Universities depend on the full tuition fees paid by international students and see Chinese and other foreign students as integral to their academic operations and missions to foster diverse campuses. The May 28 Rubio announcement — and now the potential relaxing of it — has exacerbated growing uncertainty at universities, which have been dealt a barrage of actions under Trump, including grant cancellations, federal investigations into alleged antisemitism and investigations into admissions policies. International students have especially been in the crosshairs. There have been thousands of student visa cancellations over the spring for violations as minor as speeding tickets and attempted deportations of pro-Palestinian college activists who are international students. There is a pause of new student visa application appointments while the State Department increases security vetting procedures, including probing social media profiles for pro-Palestinian language and imagery. Trump's new travel ban, which went into place Monday, has also led some universities to advise incoming students from countries on the list to defer enrollment. Of the 1.1 million foreign students enrolled at U.S. universities, roughly 277,000 are Chinese — second only to Indians. The 51,000 Chinese nationals in California make up more than a third of the state's nearly 141,000 foreign students. The University of California has 17,832 Chinese students across all of its campuses. Locally, USC has nearly 6,000 and UCLA has 2,208. Read more: S. Jack Hu, new UC Riverside chancellor, defends international students amid Trump crackdown A UC spokesperson declined to comment on Trump's social media post and pointed The Times to the university's prior statement on Chinese student visa restrictions that said it was "concerned about the U.S. State Department's announcement to revoke visas of Chinese students." "Chinese students, as well as all our international students, scholars, faculty and staff, are vital members of our university community and contribute greatly to our research, teaching, patient care and public service mission," the statement said. A USC spokesperson did not respond to a request for comment Wednesday. While there are no data pointing to widespread security concerns over Chinese students and scholars, there have been incidents in recent years. This week, the U.S. said it arrested a Chinese scientist who was arriving in Detroit to pursue research at the University of Michigan. The scientist, from University of Science and Technology in Wuhan, is accused of illegally smuggling biological material related to worms that require a government permit. In an interview, Rep. Mark Takano (D-Riverside), a member of the Republican-led House Committee on Education and the Workforce, called the potential Trump shift on Chinese student visas an example of "TACO," a phrase some Democrats are using to say "Trump always chickens out," reflecting the president's policy shifts. Republicans have argued that the president's shifts are a negotiation strength. "In allowing Chinese students to come here, it's part of the importance of the United States being a draw for students from everywhere," Takano said. "But his overreach, his interference in the operations of universities ... endangers the higher education enterprise of America." There is also political value to the U.S. in having Chinese students here, experts said. "For the United States, bringing Chinese students [here] isn't just about educating them in subjects like math and science — it is about educating them in American values, like democracy and freedom of speech," said Emily Baum, an associate professor of modern Chinese history at UC Irvine. "And the expectation is that either they will stay in the United States because they enjoy life here or take those values back to China and influence the political system." It could be that some Chinese students are turned off by the vacillations of the Trump administration and decide to stay in China for university, one expert added. Gaurav Khanna, an associate professor of economics at UC San Diego, said that around the year 2000, China began a major campaign to build new universities. Within about half a decade, it had doubled the number of institutions in the country, he said. "They invested heavily," Khanna said. "In some ways, they are well-suited to say, 'Hey, don't risk your future going to a second-tier American university. Why don't you stay back here in China and go to this really good university where ... there is funding for research?'" Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
