Proposed Arkansas legislation poses danger to citizens' direct democracy efforts
Arkansans protest several bills introduced by Sen. Kim Hammer, R-Benton, that would change the citizen-led ballot initiative process Tuesday, Feb. 11, 2025 at the Arkansas Capitol. (Tess Vrbin/Arkansas Advocate)
Eight anti-direct democracy bills sponsored by Rep. David Ray and Sen. Kim Hammer threaten Arkansans' fundamental right to self-governance.
Even one of these — HB1221, HB1222, SB207, SB208, SB209, SB210, SB211 and SB212 — threaten Arkansans' fundamental right to self-governance. Even one of these bills becoming law would severely weaken our direct democracy, affecting state, county and municipal levels.
During the Senate State Agencies & Governmental Affairs Committee hearing on Tuesday, Sen. Hammer and his supporting citizens repeatedly mentioned 'abortion' in their commentary about these 'petitioning' bills. It appears the true aim of this legislation is to destroy the direct-democracy process to prevent abortion access from reaching the ballot, as it nearly did in 2024.
Further, the committee's actions, which included limiting the voices of Arkansans who traveled to the Capitol to share their concerns about the bills, reinforce a dangerous precedent set during the last legislative session.
This creates a potentially dangerous scenario of the Legislature versus The People.
Arkansas has long been a national leader in constitutionally protected access to direct democracy. These bills are part of a broader, coordinated effort across the country, with Arkansas being one of many states targeted by 171 proposed measures to restrict direct democracy.
The only beneficiaries will be legislators seeking to consolidate power, along with wealthy, out-of-state special interests that can afford to manipulate the system.
Unconstitutional emergency clauses: Many bills contain emergency clauses that violate Arkansas Supreme Court rulings.
Constitutional violations: Several bills attempt to bypass or weaken constitutional protections for direct democracy.
Unequal power structure: These bills would establish an unfair and unconstitutional imbalance of power between the Legislature and the people.
Exploitable loopholes: By adding unnecessary procedural barriers, these bills create new ways for opponents to easily block citizen-led ballot measures.
None of these bills improve the direct democracy process. I have repeatedly called for legislation requiring the Secretary of State, Attorney General and Ethics Commission to create clear, consistent administrative rules for ballot initiatives under the Arkansas Administrative Procedures Act. This would address issues caused by conflicting statutes and siloed agency responsibilities.
Arkansas currently ranks 50th in the nation in both civics education and civic engagement. Instead of restricting direct democracy, the Legislature should seize this moment to build on civic energy and create a more accessible, transparent process that strengthens our democracy.
Shackling direct democracy, restricting political speech and undermining our state motto are an affront to all Arkansans. Every legislator who values their oath of office and believes in protecting both Arkansas and the U.S. Constitutions should stand with the people and vote against these anti-democracy bills.
As a native Arkansan who has managed four grassroots ballot initiative campaigns in the past five years, I can attest that these eight bills are deliberately designed to discourage participation and price ordinary Arkansans out of the process.
Our state motto is 'Regnat Populus (The People Rule).' Let's ensure it remains true by rejecting these harmful bills and preserving our strong tradition of direct democracy. Arkansas should continue to lead the nation in empowering its citizens, not become a cautionary tale of democracy's erosion.
The Arkansas Public Policy Panel provides hands-on experience in civic participation by helping community groups organize, create infrastructure, set goals and develop action plans to reach those goals.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lawmakers disagree over medical marijuana picks
PIERRE, S.D. (KELO) — There was friction aplenty on Monday about should be on the latest version of the South Dakota Legislature's Medical Marijuana Oversight Committee. Just three of panel's 11 members will be returning from last year's group — medical doctor Francine Arneson of Sioux Falls, addiction counselor Kristi Palmer of Sturgis and Sioux Falls police chief Jon Thum. Teen sentenced to 20 years for fentanyl death The Legislature's Executive Board makes the appointments. Lawmakers voted 15-0 for the first nominee, Republican Sen. Lauren Nelson with no discussion. But after that, there was a lot of disagreement. The appointment of Republican Sen. John Carley went through 9-6, with nays from Republican Rep. Mellissa Heermann, Republican Rep. Brian Mulder, Republican Sen. Randy Deibert, Republican Sen. Steve Kolbeck, Democratic Sen. Liz Larson and Democratic Rep. Erin Healy. The dissension further surfaced when Healy nominated Republican Rep. Terri Jorgenson. Republican Rep. Scott Odenbach called for Republican Rep. Josephine Garcia instead. Odenbach, the House Republican leader, said he had conversed by text with several applicants from the House and they eventually settled on Garcia and Republican Rep. Travis Ismay as those applicants' preferences. Garcia went through on a 9-6 vote, drawing nays from the same lawmakers as Carley had. Odenbach next nominated Ismay, who has repeatedly tried to derail South Dakota's medical marijuana program, after nearly 70% of voters approved it in the 2020 election. 'There's no doubt Representative Ismay is a passionate person on this issue,' Odenbach said. Healy said she didn't want to appoint someone opposed to medical marijuana. Emmett Reistroffer, representing Genesis Farms, a medical marijuana producer with retail outlets in various communities, spoke against Ismay's appointment. Reistroffer claimed that Ismay has used profanity at times in describing the medical marijuana industry and wouldn't meet with its lobbyists. 'We just feel this nomination is not appropriate,' Reistroffer said. Healy reminded other Executive Board members that it was up to the board to make the appointments. 'Ultimately, we are here for a reason and we need to make the best decision that we can,' she said. Kolbeck noted that the Legislature a few years ago came up with the current slots for the committee when some lawmakers were trying repeal the program altogether. 'It's how it should run,' Kolbeck argued, saying the board shouldn't appoint someone who isn't willing to respect the voters' wishes. Mulder then nominated Republican Rep. Bobbi Andera instead. Republican Sen. Tom Pischke said Andera was very busy with other things in her life and questioned whether she didn't apply because 'she doesn't have the bandwidth to serve' on the panel. Both Mulder and Republican Rep. Aaron Aylward said they had texted with Andera last week and she confirmed her interest. Reistroffer, representing Genesis Farms, told the lawmakers he was 'relieved' to hear Andera's name, describing her as 'fair' and said she 'listens.' He added that she was the only legislator to attend the medical marijuana industry's briefing earlier this year and said she sometimes voted yes and sometimes voted no on their proposals. Odenbach said he thinks well of Andera but she didn't apply and he said that was why he would vote against her. The board's chair, Republican Rep. Jon Hansen, the House speaker, said he had promised to support Ismay's nomination but also thought that Andera would make a great member. Republican Sen. Ernie Otten also said he couldn't support Andera. 'Without any application no,' he said. Andera nonetheless was appointed 10-5, with nays from Republican Rep. Spencer Gosch, Odenbach, Republican Sen. Jim Mehlhaff, Otten and Hansen. The board voted 11-4 for Dr. Arneson, with nays from Gosch, Hansen, Mehlhaff and Republican Sen. Chris Karr, the Senate's top member. The skirmishing seemed to have ended with 15-0 votes for physician assistant Andrew Schock of Hill City, certified nurse practitioner Julie Bostic of Hartford, police chief Thum, Meade County Sheriff Pat West and counselor Palmer. But the board split again on who should serve as the committee's qualifying patient — someone who is a current cardholder. Karey Entwisle of rural Canistota drove to the meeting at the Capitol accompanied by her father, a U.S. Marine who served two tours in Vietnam a half-century ago and now suffers from kidney disease. She wanted the qualifying patient seat. Mehlhaff questioned whether Entwisle had a conflict of interest because her husband operates Pitbull Acres, a state-licensed cultivator of medical marijuana. Entwisle minimized her role there. 'I'm strictly by the books providing facts,' she said. However, research after the meeting by KELOLAND News of public records on file with the South Dakota Secretary of State office found only her name listed as organizer for Pitbull Acres. Entwisle spoke of her father, who was in a wheelchair. 'This plant has been healing him,' she said. Mehlhaff asked her again how she would compartmentalize the roles of qualifying patient and spouse of a licensed cultivator. 'I am focused on the facts and the situation,' she replied. Karr wanted someone else. He offered Nicholas Cardova instead, saying, 'I just think it's cleaner to avoid any potential conflicts.' The majority of board members disagreed, splitting six for and nine against Cardova. Reistroffer, from Genesis Farms, was invited to the witness mic to address the board a third time. He said he'd gotten to know Entwisle during the past year. 'Clearly she supports the relief her father is finding,' he said. Then Reistroffer spoke from a broader perspective. 'This entire (medical marijuana) committee is stacked from top to bottom. She's the only one we've got,' he said. Mehlhaff said it was important that Entwisle had addressed the conflict question. 'I think she would be a good candidate,' he said. He had served on the panel the past two years and clearly wasn't a supporter of some of the ways that the medical marijuana industry conducts business in South Dakota. Mehlhaff said it was easy for medical marijuana to bleed over to recreational marijuana and he was 'comfortable' that Entwisle would try to minimize that as much as possible. With that, the board voted 14-1 — with only Karr saying nay — for her appointment. In other appointments on Monday, the board chose: Circuit Judge David Wheeler, a former senator from Huron, to fill an opening on the state Code Commission; Brett Koenecke, from the May Adam law firm in Pierre, and Thomas Geu, a former dean at the University of South Dakota law school, to continue serving on the national Uniform Law Commission; and Michael Anderson of Watertown to the state Investment Council. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
16 new vetoes boost Lombardo total to 49; HOA limits, price fixing bill rejected
LAS VEGAS (KLAS) — Gov. Joe Lombardo vetoed 16 more bills on Monday, including two that would have reined in powers wielded by HOAs — homeowners associations. He also vetoed a price-fixing bill. The Republican governor has now vetoed 49 bills passed by the Democrat-controlled Nevada Legislature, which adjourned in the early morning hours of Tuesday, June 3. Lombardo has 10 days after adjournment (excluding Sundays) to veto bills. Lombardo set a record after the 2023 legislative session, vetoing 75 bills. Veto messages reflected Republican principles — smaller government and pro-business laws — as Lombardo his decisions. Here's a closer look at some of the vetoes issued on Monday: PRICE FIXING: One of the vetoed bills, Assembly Bill 44 (AB44), was singled out as 'a striking case of government overreach.' AB44 would have granted the Nevada Attorney General the authority to investigate and prosecute pricing decisions involving an 'essential good or service,' a definition that Lombardo said threatened to cripple a wide range of businesses. Notably, Nevada Attorney General Aaron Ford, who presented the bill to lawmakers, is a Democratic candidate seeking to challenge Lombardo in 2026. When prices go up, whether it's eggs, gasoline or electricity, there is often a public outcry for government action. But Lombardo attacked the language of AB44 as subjective and a threat to free markets. JUNE 4: Lombardo vetoes 33 bills in days following Nevada Legislature, 229 signed HOA POWERS: Two bills that Lombardo vetoed involved HOAs. AB185 would have required HOAs to allow in-home daycare businesses to operate inside communities. Democrats who sponsored the bill said community rules were preventing more child care businesses from setting up. In his veto message on AB185, Lombardo said: 'It is important to note that people choose to live in HOA communities with the clear understanding that certain activities are governed by agreed-upon rules designed to protect the consistency of the neighborhood. AB 185 undermines that mutual understanding by allowing some owners to bypass long-standing community standards through legislative action.' Senate Bill 121 (SB121) was also rejected, with Lombardo stating that the choice to buy within an HOA community comes with responsibilities to maintain community standards. The bill would have limited landscaping and parking restrictions. It also would have given homeowners at least three years after purchase to bring landscaping up to community standards. The same bill would have prohibited fines for some oil stains. CAMPAIGN FUNDS: AB79 would have toughened restrictions on how campaign funds could be used and required reporting on how that money is spent. But Lombardo said he was vetoing it for other reasons. 'Though ensuring transparency in elections is an important goal, AB 79 contains provisions, some vague, that would make political involvement less feasible for many and lack sufficial judicial oversight,' according to his veto message. He said the bill needed to do a better job of defining what constitutes a 'spent' or 'unspent' contribution. PROTECTING PROSTITUTES: AB209 would have set up protections for sex workers meant to encourage them to report violent crimes. It hinged on the prostitute asking for medical attention. But Lombardo said the wording of the bill could create a loophole that gives them immunity for more than is intended. A sex worker could actually use a request for medical attention to invoke immunity. Further, AB209 undermines law enforcement and assumes police aren't trustworthy. ICE ACCESS IN SCHOOLS: Lawmakers sought to keep immigration enforcement out of schools, but Lombardo vetoed AB217. The bill would have prohibited school employees, public schools or school districts from allowing access for ICE agents. Lombard called it well-intentioned, but attacked it as an overreach on a number of levels, even saying the bill would make school grounds into 'sanctuary zones' 24 hours a day. SUMMARY EVICTIONS: AB283 would have changed the summary eviction process, requiring landlords to file the initial court complaint. Similar attempts during the 2023 legislative session were vetoed, and Lombardo held firm with a veto on Monday. He called it 'lopsided, red-tape laden' and predicted disastrous consequences on Nevada's housing market if it were to become law. EXECUTIONS IN NEVADA: SB350 would have extended the time frame for executing a prisoner who was sentenced to death from the current 90 days to a full year. The bill sponsor argued that 90 days wasn't enough time to properly challenge court rulings. 'Since rather than promoting fairness or finality, SB 350 threatens to undermine the very foundation of justice by creating endless delays that retraumatize victims' families and erode public confidence in our legal system, I cannot support it,' Lombardo said in his veto message. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Both sides lobby Ayotte over parental rights, trans bills
Conservative and liberal organizations lobbied Gov. Kelly Ayotte for and against legislation promoting parental rights, which critics unfairly contend target transgender residents. Last week, the Legislature completed action on a series of bills that conservative groups have dubbed a 'landmark parental rights package.' The coalition includes RebuildNH, Young Americans for Liberty, Citizens Alliance of New Hampshire, the New Hampshire Liberty Alliance and Health Freedom N.H. 'These bills collectively ensure that parents — not government institutions — retain the primary role in guiding their children's development,' said Melissa Blasek, executive director of RebuildNH. 'This package embodies New Hampshire's commitment to freedom and personal responsibility. It's time to lead the nation once again.' The Parental Rights Package includes the following bills: • Parental rights: HB10 and SB72 would establish a Parental Bill of Rights, codifying parents' fundamental rights to make decisions regarding the care, custody, education and medical treatment of their children. • Risk surveys: HB446 requires parental notice and opt-in consent for non-academic surveys administered in public schools. • Child's library records: HB273 would grant parents access to their child's records, which supports said would ensure transparency. • Mandating student info disclosure: SB 96 would require school district employees to disclose material information regarding a student's mental, emotional or physical health to parents. • Ban mask wearing: HB 361 would outlaw mandatory mask policies in schools, reinforcing the right of parents to make medical decisions for their children. • Obscenity definition in schools: HB324 would prohibit obscene or harmful sexual materials in schools, protecting children from age-inappropriate content. 'The Parental Rights Package is about trust — trusting parents to know what's best for their children,' said Dan Gray, executive director of Citizens Alliance of New Hampshire. 'Governor Ayotte has an opportunity to affirm the rights of every New Hampshire family and to send a clear message that our state values liberty and family sovereignty.' Ayotte urged to veto 4 bills A liberal bloc of organizations called upon Ayotte to veto four bills, starting with the parental rights bill they charge would leave students dealing with gender identity issues without a 'trusted adult' to confide in. 'The majority of New Hampshire politicians chose to insert themselves in conversations between young people, their parents, and doctors, by passing a ban on medically necessary health care that has vastly improved the well-being of transgender young people,' said Linds Jakow, founder of 603 Equality. 'Politicians likewise chose to insert themselves in conversations between young people, their parents, and teachers, by passing bills that would require teachers to reveal a student's gender or sexuality, rather than suggest a conversation between the parent and their student. We control our bodies and lives. Gov. Kelly Ayotte must swiftly veto this legislation, which has no place in any state that claims to value individual freedom.' These groups include 603 Equality, Planned Parenthood of New Hampshire Action Fund, N.H. Outright, GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD Law) and the American Civil Liberties of New Hampshire. Other bills these advocates opposed included: • Gender-affirming care: HB 712 would ban all elective surgeries for transgender patients under 18 years old, even with parental consent and after consultations with medical professionals. On Thursday, the House will decide whether to concur with changes made to this bill along with HB 377 that restricts access for minors to puberty blockers. • Allow segregation of spaces: HB 148 would allow government agencies and private businesses to restrict access to restrooms, sports teams and prisons to members of the same biological sex. Gov. Chris Sununu vetoed an identical bill (HB 396) in 2024. 'It is clear that these bills would cause harm, permit discrimination, and heighten cruelty and harassment in our communities — and they have no place in New Hampshire,' said Courtney Reed, ACLU-N.H's policy advocate. 'Every Granite Stater deserves the freedom to control their bodies and to seek the health care they need free from government intrusion — period. These merciless, cruel, and endless legislative attacks against LGBTQ+ Granite Staters need to end.' What's Next: Most of these bills that both sides are working on have passed both branches of the Legislature and are on the way to Ayotte's desk. Prospects: Ayotte has expressed support for the parental rights bills and publicly she hasn't raised an objection to any of the other measures. klandrigan@
