‘Money will be made available': Ramaphosa plans to make judiciary fully independent
A joint committee is now in action to finalise the process of the independence of the judiciary.
Plans are underway to make South Africa's judiciary fully independent, enabling it to manage its own administration and finances, says President Cyril Ramaphosa.
He was speaking during an event marking the 30th anniversary of the Constitutional Court (ConCourt) in Braamfontein on Friday.
The announcement follows a recent meeting between the president and members of the judiciary, led by Chief Justice Mandisa Maya.
While the judiciary is constitutionally recognised as one of the three arms of government – alongside the executive and the legislature – its administrative functions currently fall under the department of justice and constitutional development.
Ramaphosa on judiciary's independence
In his address, Ramaphosa emphasised the need for structural reforms to ensure the judiciary can carry out its duties independently and effectively.
He referred to the judiciary's 2022/2023 annual report, which outlined challenges the ConCourt faces in meeting case finalisation targets.
'This is no doubt owing to the significant volume of cases the court is dealing with,' Ramaphosa said.
'Enhancing access to justice and improving court services has been allocated for in this year's budget and there have been increases for improving superior court services, for judicial education and support, for the filling of vacant posts and to address other funding shortfalls.'
ALSO READ: Will performance of ConCourt improve in 2025?
The president said that a dedicated team has been established to develop an action plan to be finalised six weeks from now.
'A joint committee is now in action to finalise this whole process of the independence of the judiciary.
'It has been an anomaly of our constitutional architecture that we've had parliament as an independent institution in our constitution fully and properly recognised, and the executive – but the judiciary has on an unfair basis had to depend on government on a variety of matters from getting approval on the appointment of people and not even being in complete control of their own budget,' said Ramaphosa.
'This comes to an end now. The judiciary will be independent. We will ensure the judiciary is rightly constituted as an equal branch of the state, same level as the executive and the legislature.'
The promise of the Constitution is far from fully realised. Persistent inequality, threats to judicial independence, lack of implementation of court orders, and erosion of trust in institutions remain pressing challenges. https://t.co/cFDJe3Ks7E — Cyril Ramaphosa 🇿🇦 (@CyrilRamaphosa) June 20, 2025
Budget constraints and funding strategy
Speaking to the media, Ramaphosa highlighted the current fiscal challenges facing the country, but reiterated government's commitment to financially support judicial independence.
'Money is getting tighter and tighter because our fiscal situation is challenged with the lackluster growth of our economy.
'So the revenues that come into government are becoming slimmer and slimmer. However, we do need to empower various arms of the state.
'Parliament is one, the judiciary is one and the executive of course plays a leading role of the arms of the state,' the president said.
READ MORE: 'Unacceptable': Judiciary budget constraints, shortage of judges and backlogs
He stressed that despite budgetary constraints, funds will be made available to allow the judiciary full control over its operations.
'Money will be made available and of course to the extent that we are able to mobilise the resources as we grow the economy, the judiciary will have the money and they will be in control just as parliament is in control of its own budget.
'They will be able to embark on infrastructure projects, administrative capability, training and all those without having to always go ask for permission.'
Proposals for reform
The ConCourt came under criticism last year for not delivering judgments within the prescribed timeframes.
The judicial norms and standards require judges to issue rulings within three months of a hearing or trial conclusion
However, most courts, including the ConCourt, have often exceeded this deadline, with some judgments delayed for over six months.
Several proposals have been put forward to improve the ConCourt's efficiency including amending the Constitution to permit smaller panels of three judges – rather than the full bench of 11 – to hear new applications.
NOW READ: 'Free' judges, lack of resources: Hlophe bemoans judicial 'nightmare' after budget cuts
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald
an hour ago
- The Herald
Ramaphosa to make judiciary fully independent of justice department
Ramaphosa said the dependence of the judiciary on the government has been odd. 'A joint committee is now in action to finalise this whole process of the independence of the judiciary. It has been an anomaly of our constitutional architecture that we've had parliament as an independent institution in our constitution fully and properly recognised, and the executive — but the judiciary has on an unfair basis had to depend on government on a variety of matters from getting approval on the appointment of people and not even being in complete control of their own budget,' said Ramaphosa. 'This comes to an end now. The judiciary will be independent. We will ensure the judiciary is rightly constituted as an equal branch of the state, same level as the executive and the legislature.' At the meeting with the senior leaders of the judiciary led by the chief justice earlier this month, Ramaphosa and minister of justice Mmamoloko Kubayi committed to ensuring the independence of the state. 'Within the principle of the separation of powers, each arm of the state has a responsibility to co-operate with, and provide support to, the other arms of the state in giving full effect to our constitution. It requires, in particular, that we create conditions in which each arm of the state can fulfil their respective mandates without hindrance,' said Ramaphosa at the time. 'It is an opportunity to develop common approaches on issues that are critical to the effective functioning of the judiciary. At the core of our deliberations is our shared commitment to safeguarding and entrenching the independence of the judiciary and ensuring that it has the space and means to administer justice.' Presidency spokesperson Vincent Magwenya said as much as the judiciary has always been independent, some aspects including its finances have been under the department. 'It's always been independent but on some administrative aspects they were dependent on the department. So those administrative areas will now be fully managed by the judiciary as they should be,' he said. TimesLIVE
eNCA
2 hours ago
- eNCA
Concourt landmark rulings as it celebrates 30 years
JOHANNESBURG - This year marks 30 years since South Africa's highest court opened its doors not just as a courtroom and as a beacon of hope for justice, equality and Constitutional supremacy. Established after apartheid the Constitutional Court doors were first opened by former President Nelson Mandela in the land in 1995. Its first President was Justice Arthur Chaskalson under then Chief Justice Michael Corbett. Among the first justices on the bench were Richard Goldstone, Pius Langa and Ismail Mohamed. The court Chief Justice, Mandisa Maya. She takes over from Raymond Zondo, as the first woman to hold the position. According to Maya the ConCourt was entrusted with the responsibility to enforce constitutional limitations on the exercise of public power and safeguarding human rights. She was speaking at a celebratory event held in Braamfontein, Johannesburg on Friday. She says the court functions as an independent and impartial institution tasked to ensure compliance and provision of the constitution and serve as the ultimate arbiter of all constitutional matters. 📸| The 30th anniversary of the Constitutional Court. The @ConCourt is the apex court in South Africa and was established following the first democratic election in 1994. #GovZAUpdates — South African Government (@GovernmentZA) June 20, 2025 And over the three decades, it has done just that, handing down landmark rulings that transformed the law, protected rights and deepened constitutional democracy. Here are some of the most influential Constitutional Court rulings that changed South Africa. S v Makwanyane (1995) Issue: The death penalty Outcome: The death penalty is a cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment and it should be declared unconstitutional. It was the court's first ruling. National Coalition for Gay and Lesbian Equality v Minister of Home Affairs (1999) Issue - Same-sex marriage Outcome - The impact of discrimination on gays and lesbians is rendered more serious. And their vulnerability increased by the fact that they are a political minority, not able on their own to use political power to secure favourable legislation for themselves. This also led to the legalisation of same-sex marriage- the first in Africa. Government of the RSV v Grootboom (2000) Issue: Right to housing Outcomes: The state must devise and implement within its available resources a comprehensive and coordinated programme progressively to realise the right of access to adequate housing. Minister of Health v Treatment Action Campaign (2002) Issue - Inheritance under the African customary law of intestate succession Outcome - This ruling struck down male-only inheritance promoting gender equality. It found that the rule that male primogeniture wherein the eldest son inherits property was declared inconsistent with the Constitution and invalid, to the extent that it excludes women and extra-marital children from inheriting property. Bhe and Others v The Magistrate, (2004) Outcome - This ruling struck down male-only inheritance promoting gender equality. It found that the rule that male primogeniture wherein the eldest son inherits property was declared inconsistent with the Constitution and invalid, to the extent that it excludes women and extra-marital children from inheriting property.
Eyewitness News
2 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Ramaphosa: The Constitution is a guardian watching over SA's legal health
JOHANNESBURG - President Cyril Ramaphosa has described the Constitution as a guardian that has been watching over the nation's legal health. Dignitaries gathered at Constitutional Hill on Friday to mark the 30th anniversary of the Constitutional Court. Ramaphosa was the chairperson of the Constitutional Assembly, which was tasked with drafting the new Constitution in 1994. On Friday, while delivering the keynote address at the 30th anniversary of the apex court, Ramaphosa recalled the steps that led towards the finalisation of the country's supreme law. "Speaking in my capacity, then, as chairperson of the Constitutional Assembly, I described this, our Constitution, as our new nation's birth certificate, reflecting the history from which we have emerged and the values of human dignity, equality, and freedom that we now cherish." He said that Friday's festivities called for more than just celebration but also reflection. A packed programme has been prepared for Friday's celebration, with dialogues expected to reflect on significant judgments by the Constitutional Court, such as State vs Makwanyane, which led to the abolition of the death penalty.
