Global Industrial Property Enters New Phase as Supply Chains Shift and Landlords Expected to Gain Ground
• The Logistics Real Estate Market on the Chinese Mainland Shows Signs of Stabilization Amid Ongoing Consumer and Industrial Demand
HONG KONG SAR - Media OutReach Newswire - 10 June 2025 - Cushman & Wakefield (NYSE: CWK) has published its inaugural global logistics and industrial outlook, ' Waypoint 2025 ', which highlights a significant shift in the sector as global supply chains are reconfigured and cost pressures evolve. Drawing on insights from more than 120 markets worldwide, the report shows that in the near term, the balance of power is tilting towards landlords, with wide-reaching implications for occupiers, investors, and developers.
The research reveals that globally, the proportion of tenant-favourable markets is expected to fall sharply from 52% today to just 28% by 2028. This change is being driven by constrained supply, robust demand, and rising costs across key inputs such as rent, labour, construction materials, and electricity. At the same time, landlord-favourable markets are forecast to rise from 24% to 35%, signalling a more competitive leasing environment in the years ahead for occupiers.
In Asia Pacific (APAC), fundamentals remain strong but market conditions are becoming more nuanced. The region currently offers more balanced conditions, with 24% favouring landlords and 33% favouring tenants. Over the next three years, markets in the region are expected to move away from a balanced, neutral position toward more polarising tenant- and landlord-favourable market conditions. Neutral markets are expected to decline to 29% from the current 42%, while tenant-friendly markets are anticipated to grow to 38% from 33%. Similarly, landlord-favourable markets are expected to rise to 33%, up from 24%.
Dr. Dominic Brown, Head of International Research at Cushman & Wakefield said, 'Asia Pacific markets are diverging, with Australia and Southeast Asia seeing a shift towards landlord-favourable conditions, while other parts of the region face rising vacancies and tenant-friendly dynamics. Nevertheless, 62% of APAC markets still expect rental growth in the next three years, driven by robust occupier demand, strategic manufacturing shifts and the region's cost competitiveness in labour and energy.'
In terms of labour costs, APAC remains highly competitive, with countries like India, Vietnam, Philippines, and Indonesia having significantly lower wages. China has moved toward higher value-added manufacturing, with wages around 50% of the global average.
Another highlight of the report is that general manufacturing, retail distribution and e-commerce distribution are the top three key drivers of demand for logistics and industrial space in Asia Pacific. This is very much aligned to what is being seen across the world. High-tech and automotive manufacturing have also been identified as drivers of occupier demand in APAC over the next three years.
Dennis Yeo, Head of Investor Services and Logistics & Industrial, APAC, Cushman & Wakefield said: 'Asia Pacific continues to demonstrate resilience, with markets such as India and Vietnam seeing sustained occupier demand. However, rising vacancy in some subregions, driven by a surge in new supply means that a one-size-fits-all approach no longer works. Businesses must adopt granular, market-specific strategies that account for local cost structures, infrastructure readiness, and automation potential.'
The logistics market on the Chinese mainland continued its path to stabilization and recovery in 2024, underpinned by favourable structural drivers. Key catalysts include the emergence of industrial clustering, the acceleration of new logistics productivity, and a more balanced supply-demand environment, all of which are reinforcing the market's long-term fundamentals.
In the consumer segment, the rapid rise of new e-commerce formats — notably live-streaming commerce and instant retail — has been instrumental in driving online consumption. Combined with the effective rollout of consumer goods trade-in policies, these trends have led to sustained growth in online retail sales of physical goods, bolstering demand for high-quality logistics infrastructure.
On the industrial front, strong logistics demand for industrial goods has been observed, supported by continued manufacturing activity and supply chain modernization. This dual-sector momentum — consumer and industrial — is injecting fresh vitality into the premium logistics warehouse market, reinforcing its status as a core asset class in the evolving logistics ecosystem on the Chinese mainland.
Tony Su, Managing Director, Head of Industrial & Logistics Property Services, China, Cushman & Wakefield said: 'The transformation and upgrading of key industries are fueling renewed demand for warehouse space. This resurgence in leasing activity is expected to absorb incoming supply efficiently, supporting steady growth in both occupancy levels and rental rates—particularly within the premium logistics warehouse segment. These dynamics position the sector for healthier and more sustainable long-term development.'
The report concludes that resilience and diversity in supply chains will be essential for navigating both short- and long-term market shocks. Businesses that act decisively and strategically will be best placed to thrive in this evolving industrial landscape.
The full report, including regional breakdowns of rental levels, market conditions and vacancy projections, energy and labour cost comparisons, and analysis of demand drivers such as e-commerce and manufacturing, is available at Waypoint 2025.
Note to Editors
'Waypoint 2025' is Cushman & Wakefield's inaugural global logistics & industrial research report which includes results from a survey of Cushman & Wakefield logistics and industrial market-facing colleagues for 127 markets worldwide. The survey was conducted from 7-18th April 2025, after the Trump Administration announced the suspension of most higher tariff rates for 90 days, while maintaining the 10% levy on nearly all global imports.
Please click here to download photos.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Express
21 minutes ago
- Daily Express
Now's as good a time as any to buy China-made cars
Published on: Thursday, June 12, 2025 Published on: Thu, Jun 12, 2025 By: Yamin Vong, FMT Text Size: BYD, for instance, has emerged as a leader in EVs and is iconic for its integrated supply chain, which includes battery production, rare earth supplies and its own record-setting 7,000 car capacity ocean-going car carriers. - FMT pic for illustration only. Now is a good time for people in Malaysia and Southeast Asia to buy Chinese cars. They offer good value for money, being about 30% cheaper than equivalent legacy car models, and are packed with features previously only offered in cars from premium brands that cost twice as much. However, the main disadvantage of Chinese cars is that they lack the legacy enjoyed by the 150-year old Mercedes Benz or Peugeot, or even the 118-year old Toyoda loom company which preceded the 88 year-old Toyota Motor Corporation. Advertisement To overcome that fear of the unknown, Chinese car makers who began global exports only about 10 years ago started with gimmicky but nevertheless mind-boggling vehicle warranties, such as a million kilometres for their internal combustion engines. While that phase is over, many Chinese EV makers still offer an outstanding eight-year 160,000km powertrain warranty covering electric motors, inverter and related drivetrain components to emphasise confidence in their core EV technology. Coming back to my main point, it's very simple. Malaysian and Southeast Asian car buyers are benefiting from China's industrial policy, which includes broad infrastructural subsidies for the car industry from the central government. On another level, many provincial governments in China compete in car manufacturing output to gain brownie points with the central administration. They provide incentives to the respective companies, such as export sales subsidies. It's understood that these export sales incentives can reach as much as RMB14,000 (RM7,800) per car. But it's not just subsidies that make China's cars cheaper than their legacy counterparts. China's automotive industry has emerged as a global leader in technological advancement. As a benchmark, its use of robotics has outstripped legacy car firms, significantly influenced by government policies and subsidies. The country's strategic approach has enabled various manufacturers – from state-owned giants such as Shanghai Auto (SAIC) and Beijing Auto (BAIC) to privately-held enterprises like BYD, Geely, Chery, and GWM – to thrive in a competitive market. Central to the Chinese government's policies is the 'Made in China 2025' initiative, which aims to elevate domestic manufacturing, particularly in high-tech sectors, including automotive production. This initiative seeks to reduce reliance on foreign technology, ensuring that Chinese carmakers can innovate and compete domestically and internationally. Moreover, Beijing's policies have focused heavily on promoting EVs both to improve energy security as well as to reduce carbon emissions. Subsidies for EV manufacturers have been generous; for instance, substantial financial incentives are provided to consumers purchasing electric cars, which in turn propels sales and encourages manufacturers to invest in research and development. These measures have resulted in a dramatic increase in EV production, placing China at the forefront of the global market. State-owned firms like SAIC Motor and Dongfeng Motor benefit from government backing and preferential access to funding, enabling them to invest in large-scale production facilities and enhance their technological capabilities. These companies can navigate the complex regulatory environment more effectively than private firms due to their established connections and resources. On the other hand, private companies like BYD, Chery, and GWM have leveraged the supportive environment fostered by government policies to carve significant market share. BYD, for instance, has emerged as a leader in EVs and is iconic for its integrated supply chain, which includes battery production, rare earth supplies and its own record-setting 7,000 car capacity ocean-going car carriers. China also made an unprecedented concession for Tesla, the world's leading EV innovator, allowing it the distinction of being the only 100% foreign-owned company permitted to manufacture its cars in China. The objective was to galvanise domestic Chinese EV makers to improve their cars to world-class status in competing with Tesla. Beijing's alignment with sustainable development goals has facilitated Tesla's growth, with subsidies for EV purchases benefitting its sales. Additionally, the cooperation between Tesla and local suppliers has allowed it to optimise its supply chain while adhering to local regulations. As a result, the price of Tesla cars in Malaysia are the cheapest in the world, after Shanghai, where the Tesla Model Y is made. Note: I'm not one to refuse subsidies and, after some budgeting, I've bought my first Chinese car, an EV, for RM100,000. Out of the more than 50 cars that I've owned in my lifetime, this is only my second new car. The first was a Toyota Prius hybrid which I bought for RM100,000 12 years ago, when hybrid cars were duty-free. This hybrid is still a reliable daily runner and delivers super fuel efficiency. Now entering the era of electrification, I want to experience how this BEV, as a representative of China's EV industry, performs. Read this column for updates. # The views expressed are those of the writer and do not necessarily reflect those of FMT.
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
China's trump card against US
THE nation is counting on one crucial advantage as it seeks to grind out a deal to ease its high-stakes trade war with the United States – dominance in rare earths. Used in electric vehicles, hard drives, wind turbines and missiles, rare earth elements are essential to the modern economy and national defence. Here's a look at how rare earths have become a key sticking point in talks between the United States and China. Mining boom: 'The Middle East has oil. China has rare earths,' Deng Xiaoping, the late Chinese leader whose pro-market reforms set the country on its path to becoming an economic powerhouse, said in 1992. Since then, Beijing's heavy investment in state-owned mining firms and lax environmental regulations compared to other industry players have turned China into the world's top supplier. The country now accounts for 92% of global refined output, according to the International Energy Agency. But the flow of rare earths from China to manufacturers around the world has slowed after Beijing in early April began requiring domestic exporters to apply for a licence – widely seen as a response to US tariffs. Under the new requirements – which industry groups have said are complex and slow-moving – seven key elements and related magnets require Beijing's approval to be shipped to foreign buyers. Deep impact: Ensuring access to the vital elements has become a top priority for US officials in talks with Chinese counterparts, with the two sides meeting this week in London. 'The rare earth issue has clearly ... overpowered the other parts of the trade negotiations because of stoppages at plants in the United States,' said Paul Triolo, a technology expert at the Asia Society Policy Institute's Center for China Analysis, in an online seminar on Monday. That disruption, which forced US car giant Ford to temporarily halt production of its Explorer SUV, 'really got the attention of the White House', said Triolo. Officials from the two countries said on Tuesday that they had agreed on a 'framework' for moving forward on trade – with US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick expressing optimism that concerns over access to rare earths 'will be resolved' eventually. Rare earth advantage: The slowing of licence issuance has raised fears that more automakers will be forced to halt production while they await shipments. China's commerce ministry said over the weekend that as a 'responsible major country', it had approved a certain number of export applications, adding that it was willing to strengthen related dialogue with 'relevant countries'. But that bottleneck has highlighted Washington's reliance on Chinese rare earths for producing its defence equipment even as trade and geopolitical tensions deepen. An F-35 fighter jet contains over 400kg of rare earth elements, noted a recent analysis by Gracelin Baskaran and Meredith Schwartz of the Critical Minerals Security Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. 'Developing mining and processing capabilities requires a long-term effort, meaning the United States will be on the back foot for the foreseeable future,' they wrote. Playing catch up: The recent export control measures are not the first time China has leveraged its dominance of rare earths supply chains. After a 2010 maritime collision between a Chinese trawler and Japanese coast guard boats in disputed waters, Beijing briefly halted shipments of its rare earths to Tokyo. The episode spurred Japan to invest in alternative sources and improve stockpiling of the vital elements – with limited success. That is 'a good illustration of the difficulty of actually reducing dependence on China,' said Triolo, noting that in the 15 years since the incident, Japan has achieved only 'marginal gains'. The Pentagon is trying to catch up, with its 'mine-to-magnet' strategy aiming to ensure an all-domestic supply chain for the key components by 2027. The challenge facing Washington to compete with Beijing in rare earths is compounded by sheer luck: China sits on the world's largest reserves. 'Mineable concentrations are less common than for most other mineral commodities, making extraction more costly,' wrote Rico Luman and Ewa Manthey of ING in an analysis published on Tuesday. 'It is this complex and costly extraction and processing that make rare earths strategically significant,' they wrote. 'This gives China a strong negotiating position.' — AFP
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Alibaba staff worked through holiday after DeepSeek breakthrough
Alibaba realised it had fallen behind in AI after the introduction of DeepSeek's R1 model, Tsai (pic) said at the VivaTech conference in Paris on June 11. — Reuters Alibaba Group Holding Ltd's engineers canceled vacations and worked through the Chinese New Year holiday to play catch up after DeepSeek shocked the global tech industry with its low-cost, powerful artificial-intelligence model in January. The Chinese e-commerce company realised it had fallen behind in AI after the introduction of DeepSeek's R1 model, Alibaba chairman Joe Tsai said at the VivaTech conference in Paris on Wednesday. He offered the anecdote as an example of how competitive the Chinese tech industry has become. 'Our engineering leads decided, they said, 'Cancel your Chinese New Year holiday. Everybody stay in the company. Sleep in the office. We are going to accelerate our development',' he said. 'Within a few weeks, we launched our version, which is the Qwen series of models, which is not bad. It's very, quite competitive.' Chinese New Year, one of the most important annual holidays in China as people use the extended break to spend time with their families, started in late January this year and extended into early February. Alibaba has since been releasing new models at a rapid clip as it pivots to focus on AI and especially artificial general intelligence. It has also pledged to invest more than 380bil yuan (RM 223.18 bil) on AI infrastructure such as data centres over the next three years. The Chinese company has secured a partnership with Apple Inc to provide AI tech for iPhones, Tsai said earlier this year, although the deal has attracted scrutiny from US officials. The returns of Alibaba's massive investments also remain uncertain. The company's March quarter sales grew a mere 7%, as its performance was dragged down by a prolonged Chinese economic slowdown. – Bloomberg
