logo
Why CT's Electric Boat is hiring and building, as other shipyards struggle to retain workers

Why CT's Electric Boat is hiring and building, as other shipyards struggle to retain workers

Yahoo31-03-2025

Shipbuilder Electric Boat in Groton is proving again to be the exception as the U.S. Navy faces another hurdle in its massive effort to rapidly rebuild the U.S. nuclear submarine fleet: workforce retention.
Electric Boat, the Pentagon's prime contractor on the strategically important Columbia and Virginia class submarine programs, has managed to retain 89 percent of new recruits while hiring at an unprecedented annual rate that has hit 5,000 in recent years.
The EB retention rate is a stark contrast with other shipyards where turnover among first year hires has exceeded 50 percent — a number that threatens efforts to restore a manufacturing base and a submarine fleet that have shrunk and aged as a result of post Cold War production cuts.
Submarine production has become a Pentagon priority because of growing U.S. and allied concerns over China's rapid naval expansion and its aggressive moves in the Indo-Pacific.
A top Navy procurement officer told Congress last week that attrition has become an obstacle to the service's multi-billion dollar efforts to rebuild the submarine industrial base and the diverse supply lines that feed it, without either of which the service cannot meet production goals.
A massive recruitment drive paid for by the Navy and industry generated more than 2 million job applications and nearly 10,000 new hires in fiscal 2023, acting Naval Undersecretary Brett Seidle told a U.S. Senate Armed Services subcommittee last week. But he said 50 to 60 percent off he hires quit after working less than a year.
Seidle said the reasons new hires are leaving work is money.
As shipyard production has plummeted since the 1980s, so did manufacturing jobs, dropping from 35 to 12 percent of the U.S. workforce. At the same time, salaries in non manufacturing jobs became competitive. Aggravating the salary issue is a 20 percent spike in shipyard salaries that has occurred for a variety of reasons since the COVID-19 pandemic.
U.S. Rep Joe Courtney, D-2, who's district covers Electric Boat, said Congress and the Navy are exploring a number of ways to direct more money for salaries to shipyards.
In the short term, Courtney, who oversees naval shipbuilding programs as ranking member of the House Armed Services Seapower Subcommittee, said $500 million approved in a short term defense spending measure late last year should be directed to salaries at EB and Huntington Ingalls Newport News Shipbuilding in Virginia, a secondary contractor on the Virginia and Columbia sub programs..
Looking farther ahead, Courtney said there is support in Congress and the Navy for a budgeting reform that would allow shipyards to cover salary overruns on submarines under construction by accessing contract money awarded in advance for construction of future ships.
As a measure of the importance it places on expanding the submarine industrial base, the Navy said that in the decade ending in 2027, it plans to have invested $3.5 billion in areas such as supplier and workforce development. While submarine construction has increased drastically, the number of suppliers to the industrial base has dropped to about 5,000 from the 17,000 companies in business during the last submarine construction surge in the 1980s, the Navy said.
Labor costs are increasingly important as shipyards like Electric Boat seek to replace veteran employees who retired during the pandemic while recruiting the remarkable number of new employees needed to meet ramped up Navy production goals. EB hired 5,000 in 2023 and 4,130 last year. It temporarily lowered its 2025 hiring goal to 3,050 because its suppliers have been unable to keep up with its construction pace.
An EB spokeswoman said the company now employs about 24,000 in Rhode Island and Connecticut. The company said it is striving for peak employment of 33,000, which is close to the size of its workforce when submarine construction last boomed during the Reagan administration.
Courtney said Electric Boat has avoided retention problems while salary issues are being sorted out through its participation in an ambitious government-industry recruitment and training program. Among other things, the program has expanded a manufacturing curriculum from trade schools to high schools; provided free, intensive and relatively short duration training programs for trades such as welders, machinists and electricians; and in some cases provides transportation and day care services for trainees.
Last year, Courtney said EB hired 300 new employees directly out of trade school or high school and the recruitment and training model is being imitated elsewhere in the country. He said people hired at Electric Boat know what to expect when they start.
'I think the magic, or secret sauce or whatever you want to call it, is the fact that they had people who had enough immersion in terms of what the work was really going to look like,' Courtney said. 'As opposed to other parts of the country that did not use that model and which are now looking to imitate it.'
Hiring and salaries are expected to continue to rise in southeastern Connecticut for years, if not decades based on a U.S. naval modernization not seen in half a century and designed around the U.S. advantage in submarine warfare.
In addition to satisfying its own security interests in the far east, the U.S. is committed to selling from three or five of the state-of-the-art Virginia class attack submarines being built at Electric Boat to Australia under the China-inspired, AUKUS security agreement between Australia, the United Kingdom and the U.S.
The Navy wants a fleet of 66 Virginia class attack submarines, which now cost about $4.3 billion each, and a dozen Columbia class missile subs, at more than $10 billion each.
The Navy said wants Virginia class ships delivered at a rate of 2.3 a year. Late last year, Electric Boat and Newport News were building at a rate of about 1.5 a year.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

If we want NC to be a great place to live, we all have to pay for it with taxes
If we want NC to be a great place to live, we all have to pay for it with taxes

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

If we want NC to be a great place to live, we all have to pay for it with taxes

Richard Bostic's May 29 editorial hit the nail on the head. The truth is you get what you pay for. If North Carolina Republicans, Independents and Democrats want good schools, highways and government services that benefit individuals and society (including housing assistance, environmental protection and disaster preparedness) and make our state a great place to live, we all have to pay for it. If we don't, we will reap what we sow. I am glad to pay my fair share in income taxes not just to get what I pay for but to benefit fellow citizens and build a future we can be proud of. John Saxon, Hillsborough The 100% tariff on Chinese electric vehicles and any additional tariffs Donald Trump may impose are hurting Americans and U.S. climate goals. We must eliminate these tariffs as soon as possible. Chinese EVs cost much less than American ones because of government subsidies and cheaper production. These tariffs force us to pay inflated prices for domestic EVs or stick with gas cars. How are Americans supposed to contribute to the fight against climate change when they can't afford low-emission vehicles? Chinese companies like BYD offer longer battery life, faster charging and hybrid systems that outlast most American models. Protectionist policy proponents fear that without these tariffs, American workers and automakers will be harmed. A solution would be to require Chinese automakers to establish plants in the United States. Workers will have even more job opportunities in a future-proof car market. Congress must end these tariffs. Americans deserve access to innovative, affordable electric vehicles while we fight climate change and strengthen our economy. Holton Mody, Chapel Hill Thank you for the May 29 edition's article on Scott Pelley's (CBS 60 Minutes) commencement address at Wake Forest University. I was inspired to stream it on C-Span and found it eloquent, inspirational, dynamic and reassuring. He wasn't afraid to voice the truth of what is happening today, unlike many who have compromised their integrity in fear. He supported his statements with facts, not in support of any political party, but for democracy. Wanda Easley, Cary We are deeply concerned about the proposed $2.7 billion cut — nearly 40% — to the National Cancer Institute's budget. As representatives of the American Cancer Society in Central and Eastern North Carolina, we know firsthand this funding saves lives. Federal investment in cancer research has led to every major treatment breakthrough over the last 50 years. Because of this support, more than 18 million cancer survivors are alive today in the U.S. Slashing funding would delay progress, limit innovation and hurt patients and families. Cancer doesn't discriminate. Cutting lifesaving research is a step backward we cannot afford. We urge people to contact their lawmakers. Protect cancer research. Richard Averitte, executive director American Cancer Society – Central & Eastern North Carolina, Raleigh Studies approximate that 18 per 100,000 people people are intersex, meaning they have male and female sex characteristics, and about 1.7% of people are born with some intersex traits, which can put them in a gray area of sexual identification and gender conformity. As newborns, many are, intentionally or unintentionally, falsely classified as male or female (some are correctly listed as intersex). Intersex has been documented throughout history. How does this fit in with many Christian institutions stating that there are only two sexes, and supporting policies that recognize only two sexes? T This is important to not only for LGBTQ+ communities, athletic and marriage issues but to all of us who care about discrimination. Marnie Cooper Priest, Raleigh Our don't confuse me with the facts president has done it again; chickening out on tariffs as markets deliver their verdict and chickening out with Putin every time. Trump is unable to stand his ground, let alone lead. All talk and no action, withering in every interaction with Putin. Instead of leading, Trump enables China to win the innovation race. By attacking our own academic institutions, drivers of innovation gave us the edge, Trump is following Sen. Joseph R. McCarthy's model to bully those in the U.S. It's no longer a place for the best and brightest. China seems to be benefiting from Trump's policies. Jacqueline Allen, Carrboro

London's ‘Little America' is no more. What's taking its place?
London's ‘Little America' is no more. What's taking its place?

Miami Herald

timean hour ago

  • Miami Herald

London's ‘Little America' is no more. What's taking its place?

From the Eagle Bar on the top floor of the new Chancery Rosewood Hotel in Mayfair, the views across London are unobstructed, save for a gilded aluminum eagle, its wings spread wide, which crowns the midcentury modern building that once housed the U.S. Embassy to the United Kingdom. The Americans pulled up stakes in 2018, relocating the embassy to a giant fortified cube on the south bank of the Thames. They left behind the eagle, along with a collection of monuments and memorials in the adjoining Grosvenor Square — relics of what was once an American citadel in its ancestral land. John Adams lived on the square. Gen. Dwight Eisenhower had his wartime office there. A statue of Franklin Roosevelt gazes across the patchy lawn. Diplomats threw star-spangled election night parties, while hopeful travelers lined up outside for visas. During the Vietnam War, protesters clashed with police under the trees. Now, Grosvenor Square is being recast for a post-American age. The Chancery plans to open to guests in early September, its Persian Gulf owners having converted the Brutalist landmark, designed by Eero Saarinen, into a Rosewood luxury hotel, with junior suites starting at 1,400 pounds (nearly $1,900) a night. The square, which lies in front of the hotel and has a different owner, is closing this week for a 13-month refurbishment. The project will add lush plantings that celebrate biodiversity and link the 6-acre expanse, which has fallen into a state of neglect, more closely to its 18th-century Georgian roots. The owner, Grosvenor Property, insists it is preserving the legacy of a place once known as 'Little America.' But Grosvenor Square attests to how much the world has changed, not least since President Donald Trump returned to the White House. Start with the fact that the embassy was bought by investors from Qatar, whose government recently gave the Trump administration a Boeing 747 as a replacement for Air Force One. 'If you're trying to attract people, if you're trying make money, highlighting America's prominence is not the way to do it,' said Leslie Vinjamuri, the director of the U.S. and Americas program at Chatham House, a research group in London. 'It's a good time to take a step back, to play it down a bit.' Ties between Britain and the United States ebb and flow, she noted, in a 'special relationship' that is neither as serene nor as harried as often portrayed. A new global crisis could swiftly bring these old allies back together. But Trump's acrimonious dealings with Europe have indisputably changed the mood. 'There is just a sense of pulling apart between the U.K. and the U.S.,' said Vinjamuri, who will leave London this month to become CEO of the Chicago Council on Global Affairs. Trump, who has a soft spot for the royal family and other totems of imperial Britain, complained bitterly about the sale of the embassy. He blamed it, wrongly, on his predecessor President Barack Obama. (The decision was made during the George W. Bush administration because of security concerns.) 'We had the best site in all of London,' Trump said in 2018. The new location, in a redeveloped industrial section of London known as Nine Elms, was 'lousy,' he said, spurning an invitation to a ribbon cutting. Indeed, since the days of Charles Dickens and Oscar Wilde, Grosvenor Square has been synonymous with posh London. The Grosvenor family laid it out in the 1720s to anchor the expansion of its property empire into West London. With grand dimensions and an elegant oval shape, it attracted wealthy residents, who were given keys to their own private Eden in the capital. (It became a public park after World War II.) It also attracted Americans, starting with Adams, who lived on the northeast corner from 1785 to 1788 as America's first envoy to Britain. After Eisenhower quartered himself there, it was nicknamed 'Eisenhower Platz.' The Roosevelt statue was paid for with donations from ordinary Britons as a gesture of gratitude to the United States for its aid in the war. Nothing sealed the American connection like the opening of Saarinen's chancery in 1960, a hulking nine-story building that was the first purpose-built embassy of any country in London. In its early days, it was reviled by some critics as a jarring intrusion on the genteel Georgian symmetry of the square. 'It had this sense of America being big and bold, and in a British context, a sense of 'Wow, how American,'' said Matthew Barzun, the last U.S. ambassador to have an office in the building. Barzun, who witnessed ups and downs in the trans-Atlantic relationship over Syria and Brexit, said the old embassy was designed to be 'light and open and welcoming.' But after the terrorist bombings of embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998, 'we added more and more fences and bollards,' he said. 'You start out building things to keep people out,' Barzun said, 'but you end up trapping people in.' Converting a diplomatic fortress into a sleek, five-star hotel was a design and engineering test for Qatari Diar, a real estate company backed by Qatar's sovereign wealth fund. The Qataris brought in Rosewood, a luxury hotel chain that was started in Dallas and is now owned by a Hong Kong conglomerate. 'Creating warmth was the biggest challenge,' said Michael Bonsor, the hotel's managing director, as he offered a sneak peek. 'You have this juxtaposition of one of the most secure, fortified buildings in London, where Marines used to run around with machine guns. It wasn't the most hospitable building in the world.' Dapper and discreet, Bonsor could have been a diplomat if he hadn't gone into hospitality. He said the hotel would make nods to its past, but would avoid becoming a Cold War-style theme park. In addition to the eagle, which is a protected landmark, the hotel has reinstalled statues of Eisenhower and Ronald Reagan that once flanked the building (the statues are wrapped in tarp to protect them during construction). Inside, the Chancery has retained some of Saarinen's design elements, notably his exposed-concrete ceiling. But prizewinning British architect David Chipperfield has reconfigured the building to add an atrium with cascading chandeliers. Two palatial penthouses are named after Elizabeth and Charles, monarchs not presidents. The hotel said their scale would appeal to guests from the Middle East. Across the street, the proprietors of Grosvenor Square are similarly aware of the tug between past and present. While they will retain the FDR statue, as well as a memorial to victims of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, they plan to add serpentine paths and extensive plantings to soften the square's stark appearance. 'The austere design, which was important during the Cold War period, has had its day,' said Cordula Zeidler, a heritage and design expert who advised Grosvenor Property. 'Having more plantings is both a Georgian concept and something people want today.' James Raynor, the newly named CEO of Grosvenor, acknowledged the complicated political backdrop to the project. But he said, 'I don't think we should be altering it for the long term on the basis of short-term noise.' In turbulent times, Raynor even holds out hope that the 18th-century square can still serve as a 21st-century bridge. 'Will the park by itself change the diplomatic relationship between the countries?' he said. 'I doubt it. But it will allow us to recognize what the two countries have done for each other.' This article originally appeared in The New York Times. Copyright 2025

We need guardrails for artificial superintelligence NOW — before it's too late
We need guardrails for artificial superintelligence NOW — before it's too late

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

We need guardrails for artificial superintelligence NOW — before it's too late

America's 'AI race with China' is a headline we see more and more. But we're actually in two high-stakes races with China in artificial intelligence. First: a competition for commercial dominance that is reshaping economies, military power and global influence. The second race, though less visible, has the potential to be even more existential: a sprint toward artificial superintelligence. What's ASI? Unlike current AI models trained to perform relatively narrow tasks, ASI refers to a hypothetical future version of AI that exceeds human intelligence across every domain — creative, strategic, even emotional. It could be capable of autonomously improving itself, outpacing our ability to control or predict it. This technology doesn't yet exist, but leading experts, industry leaders and lawmakers believe its emergence could be possible within the next decade. That's the problem: It may not feel urgent — until it's too late. Which is why the time to act is now. President Donald Trump and his team are in a unique position to secure America's preeminence on both fronts by winning the commercialization race and negotiating what may be the most consequential diplomatic deal since the nuclear-arms treaties of the Cold War. China's advancements in commercial AI have dramatically closed America's lead on the rest of the world. How? Beijing bought, stole and downloaded US technology, leading to breakthroughs that resemble a modern-day Sputnik moment. Chinese firms are unveiling AI models that are both cheaper and more sophisticated than we knew possible (remember our reaction to DeepSeek?). China's state-directed pursuit extends far beyond economic ambitions. The Chinese Communist Party openly seeks a technological dominance that's anchored in its own core principles: surveillance, censorship, and control. A Chinese-led AI era risks embedding these authoritarian pillars into the digital fabric of global civilization and everyday life. An unregulated race toward ASI presents an even deeper danger. Influential forecasts — notably AI 2027, a predictive framework developed by key experts — warn that the emergence of ASI could pose unprecedented risks to humanity. Yes, these risks are still theoretical, but they're also not so far-fetched. In the hands of an adversary, an ASI system has the potential to destroy global electrical grids, develop incurable super-viruses or empty every bank account in the world. That may sound like the latest plot in Tom Cruise's 'Mission Impossible,' but it's also the plausible consequence of unchecked superintelligence in the wrong hands. Most top AI leaders believe ASI could materialize within this decade and pose unprecedented risk. Ilya Sutskever, co-founder and chief scientist of OpenAI, told his researchers: 'We're definitely going to build a bunker before we release [artificial general intelligence].' So, if bunkers are the recommended precaution for AGI, what should we prepare for ASI? Vice President JD Vance appears to be grappling with these risks, as he reportedly explores the possibility of a Vatican-brokered diplomatic slowdown of the ASI race between the United States and China. Pope Leo XIV symbolizes precisely the kind of neutral, morally credible mediator capable of convening such crucial talks — and if the Cold War could produce nuclear-arms treaties, then surely today's AI arms race demands at least an attempt at serious discussion. Skeptics naturally and reasonably question why China would entertain such negotiations, but Beijing has subtly acknowledged these undeniable dangers as well. Some analysts claim Xi Jinping himself is an 'AI doomer' who understands the extraordinary risk. Trump is uniquely positioned to lead here. He can draw a clear line: America will outcompete China in commercial AI, no apologies. But when it comes to ASI, the stakes are too high for brinkmanship. We need enforceable rules, verification mechanisms, diplomatic pressure and, yes, moral clarity — before this issue gets ahead of us. During the Cold War, Presidents Dwight Eisenhower, John Kennedy and Ronald Reagan all knew that competing militarily didn't mean refusing to negotiate guardrails. Reagan's mantra — 'trust but verify' — is just as relevant for ASI as it was for nuclear arms. This is President Trump's opportunity. He can drive the AI economy forward, infusing American founding principles into global AI adoption, while leading a parallel effort to prevent catastrophe. Done right, this would be the most consequential diplomatic initiative since the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty. And it wouldn't come at the cost of American strength; it would cement it. We've reached a crossroads. The commercialization of AI can secure America's future, but the weaponization of superintelligence could end it. Chris Stewart was a member of Congress from Utah from 2013 to 2023. Mark Beall is president of the AI Policy Network.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store