San Mateo Co. voters set to decide on effort to oust embattled Sheriff Christina Corpus
In San Mateo County, allegations of misconduct inside the sheriff's office has residents deciding who holds the power to remove elected officials from office. On Tuesday, voters will decide the sheriff's fate at the ballot box in a single-issue special election.
Measure A asks voters if they support the Board of Supervisors having the power to remove elected officials from office. While it would give broad powers to the board, it is aimed at embattled Sheriff Christina Corpus, who has faced allegations of misconduct, misuse of power and conflicts of interests.
For some deputies, including Eliot Storch, the upcoming vote represents more than a political decision — it could mark a turning point to restore trust and honor within the department.
Corpus campaigned on restoring trust and accountability in the office, but Storch says Corpus' conduct within the department instead created a toxic work environment.
"It's absolutely affected morale," Storch told CBS News Bay Area. "One of Sheriff Corpus' greatest accomplishments here at the sheriff's office, that she has created a culture of fear and retaliation. That's all she's done is create a culture of fear retaliation."
Tensions within the department reached a boiling point in November, when Corpus arrested Deputy Sheriff's Association President Carlos Tapia for alleged time card fraud.
The arrest occurred on the same day an independent investigative report by retired Judge LaDoris Cordell was released, calling for Corpus' resignation.
Deputies argue the arrest was payback for Tapia's public criticism of the sheriff.
"Having President Tapia get arrested was a red line," Storch said. "It showed us that Sheriff Corpus would do anything possible to disrespect and mistreat the people who work here, and that she would do anything possible to maintain power, even at the expense of a good man's life."
The charges against Tapia were later dropped, but the fallout left deep divisions within the department.
The 400-page independent report painted a scathing picture of Sheriff Corpus' leadership. It accused her of using racist and homophobic slurs, fostering a toxic workplace culture, and consolidating power within the hands of her Chief of Staff, Victor Aenlle.
The report found Aenlle unqualified to weigh in on executive decision-making and cited his personal relationship with Corpus as a conflict of interest. Both Corpus and Aenlle have denied the allegations.
Corpus has pushed back forcefully, maintaining that she has been unfairly targeted because she is the county's first Latina sheriff. Her attorney, Brad Gage, argues the attacks amount to discrimination. Corpus has since filed a $10 million discrimination lawsuit against county officials.
"The election itself is geared only to target her," Gage told CBS News Bay Area. "Measure A has a time out in 2028, so basically it's never existed before and it won't exist after her term as the sheriff. And that is very concerning to us because it appears to be improper, discriminatory and retaliatory."
Gage stopped short of committing to a peaceful exit on behalf of Corpus if the measure passes, and the board votes her out. If the measure is approved by voters, it would require four of the five members of the board to vote for her removal.
"I don't believe that that vote would be appropriate, because you need to have a fair and impartial tribunal, but you already have two state two supervisors who have made statements that we contend were untrue and biased," Gage said. "We don't think that it's going to be deemed to be legal at the end of the day."
Critics of Measure A said the county already has established processes to remove a sheriff from office — such as a recall election or a civil grand jury investigation that could lead to a trial. They argue Measure A would give unprecedented power to the Board of Supervisors, potentially undermining voter control over the sheriff's position.
Caught in the middle are San Mateo County residents and local lawmakers. In communities such as Millbrae, which relies entirely on the Sheriff's Office for public safety, officials said they want to move past the controversy and refocus on frontline services.
"We want to bring an end to this issue and the challenges at the top leadership level as soon as possible," said Millbrae Mayor Anders Fung. "Ultimately, you know, we need to make sure that everybody feels comfortable with the Sheriff's Office leadership, and I think that's what we look forward to."
Half Moon Bay, San Carlos, Woodside and several other communities also contract with the sheriff's office for law enforcement services.
As the vote approaches, residents will not only decide the fate of Corpus — they will also weigh in on a larger question: what accountability should look like for every elected official in San Mateo County.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 hours ago
- Yahoo
Commission recommends Kern supes OK oil review, permitting plan
A high-stakes effort to resume local oil permitting advanced this week as Kern's Planning Commission voted Thursday night to recommend approval of the county's third attempt at a massive environmental review. The board voted 4-0 with Commissioner Joe Ashley, a local oil executive, absent. Next the controversial measure will head to the county Board of Supervisors, which is scheduled to consider certifying the review and adopting a related ordinance during a special meeting June 26. Because the board is seen as likely to approve the proposal over the objections of climate and environmental justice activists, the bigger challenge for the county may be getting the approval of state appellate court judges. They have ruled, as recently as two years ago, that the county's efforts violate the California Environmental Quality Act. Kern's latest attempt includes new concessions that would raise the costs oil companies face when applying for permission to drill in the county. If the legal bid falls short, permitting will remain in the hands of Sacramento, where producers complain that the process is slow and hobbled by politics. People attending Thursday's commission meeting spoke up in opposition and support for revisions that would allow the county to permit up to 26,970 new wells by 2035. The county estimates that, based on past experience and depending on barrel prices, it will give out no more than about 19,000 drilling permits during that time, and that many of those will merely replace other wells set to be idled. Relatively few people criticized the county effort on Thursday; if history is a guide, a much greater number of opponents will weigh in when the Board of Supervisors takes up the issue. Many groups see the permitting process as overly broad "fast-tracking" at a time when oil production should be curtailed for climate and health reasons. Policy Director Ema De La Rosa at the Leadership Counsel for Justice and Accountability urged the commission Thursday night to reject the proposal. She said oil and gas has historically impacted poor people and communities of color she said suffer disproportionately from illnesses including asthma, cancer and high-risk pregnancies. "Residents in Kern County already endure the worst air quality in the nation … and expanding these operations will only worsen the public health crisis and further burden already impacted communities," she said. Later she added, "Doubling down on fossil fuel reliance is a step in the wrong direction as the state is working toward a clean energy future." Director Lori Pesante of Sierra Club's Kern-Kaweah Chapter said in a statement ahead of Thursday's meeting it's time for the county to move past oil production. 'Kern's Planning Commission should prioritize clean air, new job opportunities in the renewable energy sector, and protecting the public from dangerous leaks and spills," she stated, "not double down on a failed approach that would give the oil industry a free pass to pollute our neighborhoods.' The architect of the county's effort, Director Lorelei Oviatt of Kern's Planning and Natural Resources Department, made the point oil production is still legal in the state, and that permitting done in Sacramento does not incorporate the 89 mitigation measures and standards Kern's system would impose for the protection of local air, water and biological and cultural resources. Oviatt said by email Friday the benefits of oil and gas production in Kern extend beyond the county, including to Southern California refineries that rely on local petroleum. "Returning Kern County to full environmentally protective permitting is critical for providing gasoline to consumers at prices we can all afford, stabilizing our local business community and providing investor confidence," she wrote. Since before it was initially adopted in 2015, the measure has been a top concern for local oil producers, which more recently are also dealing with a new state law forbidding oil work within 3,200 feet of a home, school or other sensitive site. Kern's proposed ordinance does not attempt to change that regulation. CEO Rock Zierman of the California Independent Petroleum Association trade group expressed support for the county's actions in an email Friday. "If we want any hope of saving the local oil industry and reducing gas prices, Kern must be empowered to take over permitting from the state, which is refusing to process permits in a timely manner' he stated. One of the county's newly proposed mitigation measures, included to address the appellate court's concerns, would prohibit new wells on farmland until old oil-field equipment is removed. Oil producers would also have to secure an ag easement within the county measuring the same size as any lost farmland. Additionally, oil companies applying for permits would have to pay into a fund that would match state investments in water systems serving local disadvantaged communities. Fees for each new oil well would amount to $9,732. It is projected to raise between $17.3 million and $25.9 million per year.
San Francisco Chronicle
a day ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Here's how SFPD is proposing to cut down on overtime
San Francisco's interim police chief is proposing changes that he says will increase the number of officers fighting crime while also reducing the department's massive overtime spending. Yep, who recently took over from Chief Bill Scott, told the Board of Supervisors during a special budget meeting on Friday that he wants to start using retired police officers to staff a police reserve unit and special event officer program. The program would supplement police staffing and potentially cut down on the need for as much overtime as the department deals with what it says is a shortage of hundreds of officers. The number of police officers earning more than $100,000 in overtime more than tripled from 2021 to 2023, fueling concerns about officer performance, burnout and unsustainable taxpayer expenses. The chief's proposal comes as city officials pour over Mayor Daniel Lurie's proposed budget, which must close a roughly $800 million deficit. The plan calls for laying off over 100 workers, eliminating hundreds of vacant positions and cutting nearly $200 million in grant funds and contracts. The mayor's budget retains funding for police, fire and other public safety agencies as part of his pledge to revitalize the city by focusing on safety and the economy. The Board of Supervisors will hear from every city department throughout June and propose changes for the mayor to consider. The mayor must sign the budget by Aug. 1. Yep said retired officers in the new reserve unit will have full police powers and be assigned based on experience, whether that's working a foot beat or doing behind-the-scenes investigative work for the department. Meanwhile, retirees in the special events officer program would be assigned to specific events, such as Super Bowl celebrations, protests or festivals, and also have full police powers. The plan also calls for retaining the department's existing community ambassador program staffed by unarmed retirees on foot patrols in neighborhoods the department struggles to staff. Yep admitted he's still working on the details, but that the programs 'would give our current officers a break from mandatory overtime.' The department said the move would mean increasing the temporary salary budget from $3.4 million to $8.1 million. As a result, the department's proposed overtime budget would grow from $71 million to about $80 million. But Yep explained that by paying retirees a flat rate that is less than the overtime rate, the move will eventually yield savings. In May, San Francisco supervisors lambasted the department over its apparent inability to rein in public safety costs but ultimately approved $61 million in funds for overtime spending. A recent audit found that SFPD's overtime spending more than doubled from $52.9 million in 2018 to $108.4 million in 2023. The audit also found that about 12% of the cops who worked overtime were responsible for nearly a third of all SFPD overtime spending in the last year of the review. The department is also trying to save money by laying off six people in its civilian workforce and will eliminate 25 vacant civilian positions. Still, Supervisor Connie Chan, who chairs the Board of Supervisors budget committee, said that the department needs to do more to help close budget gaps. Chan is worried about social services funding that's on the chopping block in Lurie's proposed budget. Chan said the department should lower overtime spending and asked Yep to consider eliminating civilian management positions to find more savings. 'It's regrettable to hear about layoffs of some of the police department staff, particularly civilians,' Chan said. 'But I'm saying this to every department. I'd really like for you to work with us to evaluate the need for certain management positions. I know it's tough… but consider… are those necessary?'
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
I Was Stephen Miller's Student Body President. Now I'm Saving Migrants From Him
As White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller kept pushing for 3,000 immigration arrests a day, a former high school classmate who became a leading immigration lawyer was in court on Wednesday. Cynthia Santiago remembers being on stage with Miller in 2002, when they were both running for student government at Santa Monica High School at the western edge of Los Angeles. She recalls that Miller was as much a deliberately provocative attention seeker then as now, and his microphone was turned off just a few moments into his campaign speech as a candidate for speaker of the house. 'I'm Stephen Miller,' he began. 'I'm the only candidate up here who really stands out… I will say and I will do things that no one else in their right mind would say or do." And then he did just that. 'Am I the only one who is sick and tired of being told to pick up my trash, when we have plenty of janitors who are paid to do it for us?' he asked. Santiago might have been more surprised if she had not heard him speak dismissively in class about diversity, affirmative action, welfare, non-English speakers and anyone else who did not completely assimilate to his notion of being an American, all of it derived from right-wing writings. The reaction of his fellow students to his truncated speech presaged the fate of his candidacy. 'They booed him off,' Santiago recalled on Wednesday. 'He lost.' Miller could not have been pleased when Santiago became the school's first Latina student body president. 'He was very vocal about his political views of communities of color,' she noted. 'We celebrated diversity, and we were respectful to our staff and to the custodians on campus.' Santiago went on to Wesleyan University and then Southwestern Law School. She began working immigration cases in 2012, when the Obama administration instituted the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which offered a temporary shield to young immigrants who arrived in the United States. 'We were able to help a lot of young folks that could benefit from the DACA program,' she said. But at the same time, Obama was starting to make a name for himself as the 'deporter-in-chief.' 'I also saw the side of many families being put into detention for being turned over by local law enforcement, because there was a very high number of contracts with local law enforcement, including in LA County,' Santiago remembered. She had one case involving a woman in Santa Monica who had just dropped off her child at middle school when she was arrested for driving without a license. The police turned the woman over to ICE, which put her on a bus to Mexico just as Santiago was in court, securing a deportation stay. The driver was instructed to keep the woman aboard when the bus reached the border and bring her back. 'She was returned back that night, so she was able to be reunited with her family,' Santiago reported. Santiago also represented a man on the same bus who had been picked up outside his home on the way to work. He too was returned. When Trump was elected to a first term, her classmate Miller's politics made him a perfect fit for a position at the White House. 'I was very concerned about where his thoughts were going, his views on immigration and the immigrant communities, his views against diversity in the United States,' she recalled. But Miller's time seemed to pass when Joe Biden defeated Trump. Deportations eased up, but Biden increased them as Trump sought to revive his political fortunes by conjuring fears of an invading horde of murderers, rapists and mental patients across the southern border. After Trump returned to office, he made Miller his deputy chief of staff. Miller had been relatively quiet during the campaign, and Santiago figures he spent the years in exile immersed in right-wing writings such as those that informed his world view during high school, a view that was more of an imagined past than the actual moment. 'A lot of the thoughts are just things that he digs from history, and not very much a perspective of the world we live in today,' she said. 'So, he's trying to repeat history, which is what we see now.' Trump declared that his second term was going to see mass deportations. But that requires more than a Sharpie signature on an executive order. And Miller began to push, push, push for it to happen. ICE had been hunting down actual murderers and rapists but there was not enough of them to deliver a fraction of the 3,000 arrests a day Miller was demanding. Miller declared that even people who followed all the official procedures before crossing the border and applied for asylum are criminals. ICE mounted ever more raids, including at a Los Angeles clothing company on Monday that triggered an impromptu protest, during which police arrested a prominent union leader. An unfounded rumor of another raid led to more protests. Trump used the disturbances as a pretext to activate the California National Guard without the approval of its Gov. Gavin Newsom. As Newsom predicted, the arrival of soldiers on the street only inflamed the situation, though not to the degree that Trump claims. The LAPD said that it could handle the situation without the military, but Trump went ahead and activated a Marine Corps unit to augment the guard who were not needed in the first place. Meanwhile, fear driven rumors reached Miller and Santiago's alma mater. The superintendent of the Santa Monica Malibu Unified School District posted a letter on its website. 'I am writing to you today because I understand that many of you are feeling deeply concerned and anxious about recent reports of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) activity in the greater Los Angeles area,' Superintendent Dr. Antonio Shelton wrote on June 9. 'We have heard the rumors circulating about ICE patrols in and around our schools and the Santa Monica community… As of 2:30 p.m. today, these sightings have not been confirmed, and we can assure you that ICE officials are not currently present in or at our schools.' Shelton went on, 'We recognize that the unrest unfolding across Los Angeles, sparked by reports of ICE raids in public spaces, is unsettling. For many of our families, these fears are very real and can make daily activities like leaving home, using public transportation, or even bringing your children to school feel daunting. We want to emphasize that the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District, (SMMUSD), along with the City of Santa Monica and the SMPD, remains committed to supporting and serving every single one of our families.' As the high school was preparing for its 2025 graduation on Wednesday, Miller was at the White House, expecting more arrests. Santiago was at Santa Ana Immigration Court, asking a judge to give her time to study the particulars of a new case. The client has no criminal history, and the judge agreed. That gives the client an interim reprieve. While there, Santiago observed a new tactic by the government to increase the number of deportees. The government has been going back to pending asylum cases that have been filed away as favorable. 'So they can put them back into court and try to deport them,' Santiago said. 'Every angle they can, they're doing this.' Then, having brought the asylum seeker into court and revived the case, the government asks the judge to dismiss it. And that removes the temporary protection asylum seekers receive when they successfully apply pending the ultimate outcome. 'The person is basically at an undocumented status with no case pending, and they're vulnerable to be picked up,' Santiago said. 'They have no status, no filing, no case opening.' And in several instances on Wednesday, ICE agents in their usual plainclothes attire of flannel shirts and jeans were waiting in the hallway of the courthouse to make an arrest and take the prisoner out to a van in the parking lot. 'I saw [ICE ] taking people from courtrooms, sticking them in the van,' she told the Daily Beast. 'It's very sad.' The sight was in keeping with the Miller she and her classmates knew back in high school. What she could not have foreseen is that a president would encourage him to do it. 'I don't think anyone imagined that there would be an administration like the one we have,' she said. When she is not in court, the 2003 president of the Santa Monica student body travels California in a van of her own, advising as many people as she can of their rights. 'I'm just, you know, trying to do my best to see who I can help,' Santiago said.
