SKorea President Lee's law violation hearing postponed
A Seoul court has indefinitely postponed the trial of South Korea's President Lee Jae-myung on charges of violating election law in 2022.
South Korea's Supreme Court ruled in May, before Lee was elected, that Lee had violated election law by publicly making "false statements" during his 2022 presidential bid, and sent the case back to an appeals court.
The Seoul High Court, which had scheduled a hearing for the case on June 18, said on Monday that it will postpone the hearing "to be decided later" without a date, a court spokesperson confirmed.
Lee's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The court said its decision to postpone the hearing was due to "Constitution Article 84", without elaborating.
South Korea's Constitution, Article 84, says a sitting president is "not subject to criminal prosecution while in office" for most crimes.
However, legal experts are divided on whether that applies to ongoing trials that were already prosecuted before a president was elected.
The National Court Administration under the Supreme Court gave as its opinion that judges of each court where Lee's trials are being held will have to decide whether to stop or proceed, according to its statement to a lawmaker in May.
"The court in charge of hearing the case will determine whether Article 84 of the Constitution should be applied to a criminal defendant who was elected in the presidential election," the statement said.
Lee's ruling Democratic Party, which controls parliament, is planning to pass a bill this week which suspends ongoing trials for the incumbent president, local broadcaster KBS reported.
The Constitutional Court may be asked to rule whether the bill is unconstitutional, legal experts have said.
A Seoul court has indefinitely postponed the trial of South Korea's President Lee Jae-myung on charges of violating election law in 2022.
South Korea's Supreme Court ruled in May, before Lee was elected, that Lee had violated election law by publicly making "false statements" during his 2022 presidential bid, and sent the case back to an appeals court.
The Seoul High Court, which had scheduled a hearing for the case on June 18, said on Monday that it will postpone the hearing "to be decided later" without a date, a court spokesperson confirmed.
Lee's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The court said its decision to postpone the hearing was due to "Constitution Article 84", without elaborating.
South Korea's Constitution, Article 84, says a sitting president is "not subject to criminal prosecution while in office" for most crimes.
However, legal experts are divided on whether that applies to ongoing trials that were already prosecuted before a president was elected.
The National Court Administration under the Supreme Court gave as its opinion that judges of each court where Lee's trials are being held will have to decide whether to stop or proceed, according to its statement to a lawmaker in May.
"The court in charge of hearing the case will determine whether Article 84 of the Constitution should be applied to a criminal defendant who was elected in the presidential election," the statement said.
Lee's ruling Democratic Party, which controls parliament, is planning to pass a bill this week which suspends ongoing trials for the incumbent president, local broadcaster KBS reported.
The Constitutional Court may be asked to rule whether the bill is unconstitutional, legal experts have said.
A Seoul court has indefinitely postponed the trial of South Korea's President Lee Jae-myung on charges of violating election law in 2022.
South Korea's Supreme Court ruled in May, before Lee was elected, that Lee had violated election law by publicly making "false statements" during his 2022 presidential bid, and sent the case back to an appeals court.
The Seoul High Court, which had scheduled a hearing for the case on June 18, said on Monday that it will postpone the hearing "to be decided later" without a date, a court spokesperson confirmed.
Lee's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The court said its decision to postpone the hearing was due to "Constitution Article 84", without elaborating.
South Korea's Constitution, Article 84, says a sitting president is "not subject to criminal prosecution while in office" for most crimes.
However, legal experts are divided on whether that applies to ongoing trials that were already prosecuted before a president was elected.
The National Court Administration under the Supreme Court gave as its opinion that judges of each court where Lee's trials are being held will have to decide whether to stop or proceed, according to its statement to a lawmaker in May.
"The court in charge of hearing the case will determine whether Article 84 of the Constitution should be applied to a criminal defendant who was elected in the presidential election," the statement said.
Lee's ruling Democratic Party, which controls parliament, is planning to pass a bill this week which suspends ongoing trials for the incumbent president, local broadcaster KBS reported.
The Constitutional Court may be asked to rule whether the bill is unconstitutional, legal experts have said.
A Seoul court has indefinitely postponed the trial of South Korea's President Lee Jae-myung on charges of violating election law in 2022.
South Korea's Supreme Court ruled in May, before Lee was elected, that Lee had violated election law by publicly making "false statements" during his 2022 presidential bid, and sent the case back to an appeals court.
The Seoul High Court, which had scheduled a hearing for the case on June 18, said on Monday that it will postpone the hearing "to be decided later" without a date, a court spokesperson confirmed.
Lee's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The court said its decision to postpone the hearing was due to "Constitution Article 84", without elaborating.
South Korea's Constitution, Article 84, says a sitting president is "not subject to criminal prosecution while in office" for most crimes.
However, legal experts are divided on whether that applies to ongoing trials that were already prosecuted before a president was elected.
The National Court Administration under the Supreme Court gave as its opinion that judges of each court where Lee's trials are being held will have to decide whether to stop or proceed, according to its statement to a lawmaker in May.
"The court in charge of hearing the case will determine whether Article 84 of the Constitution should be applied to a criminal defendant who was elected in the presidential election," the statement said.
Lee's ruling Democratic Party, which controls parliament, is planning to pass a bill this week which suspends ongoing trials for the incumbent president, local broadcaster KBS reported.
The Constitutional Court may be asked to rule whether the bill is unconstitutional, legal experts have said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
West Australian
17 hours ago
- West Australian
Landmark pepper spray trial in crime-hit community
A landmark trial allowing the public sale of pepper spray for self defence is set to be introduced by a crime-troubled territory. The Northern Territory is set to become only the second jurisdiction in the country to allow residents to carry pepper spray, giving people "more choice when it comes to personal safety". Chief Minister Lia Finocchiaro said a 12-month trial was set to launch from September, allowing approved members of the public to carry a low-percentage Oleoresin Capsicum (OC) spray under strict legal conditions. The move was part of the NT government's justice reforms that focus on reducing crime and restoring community safety and security, she said. "We're strengthening the frontline with more police, stronger laws and better prevention, but we also believe individuals should have lawful tools to protect themselves if needed," Ms Finocchiaro said in a statement. Ms Finocchiaro's government made law and order the cornerstone of its first budget with a record $1.5 billion investment in corrections, courts and police. The NT government also lowered the age of criminal responsibility from 12 to 10 and introduced tougher bail laws. Data shows the NT has an incarceration rate three times greater than anywhere else in Australia and has the highest reoffending rate, with six out of 10 prisoners returning to jail within two years of release. Consultation to determine the trial's specifics will be led by NT Police, industry bodies, licensees, other key stakeholders and the broader community. The initiative would ensure the NT joins Western Australia as the only jurisdictions in Australia allowing residents to carry pepper spray. "This is about giving Territorians more choice when it comes to personal safety," the chief minister said. "This is about equipping Territorians with more options, not less control." Approved OC spray is set to be made available for purchase from licensed dealers across the NT from September 1. The NT proposal comes as a class action trial in Victoria winds up involving climate protester Jordan Brown challenging the police's use of pepper spray against him during a mining protest. His lawyers have told the Supreme Court that Victoria Police's use of the spray on him at a 2019 protest outside the International Mining and Resources Conference in Melbourne was violent and excessive. But lawyers for Victoria Police claim the use of force was lawful, as protesters were impeding officers from making an arrest. Closing submissions before Judge Claire Harris are being heard on Wednesday and Thursday.
Perth Now
17 hours ago
- Perth Now
Landmark pepper spray trial in crime-hit community
A landmark trial allowing the public sale of pepper spray for self defence is set to be introduced by a crime-troubled territory. The Northern Territory is set to become only the second jurisdiction in the country to allow residents to carry pepper spray, giving people "more choice when it comes to personal safety". Chief Minister Lia Finocchiaro said a 12-month trial was set to launch from September, allowing approved members of the public to carry a low-percentage Oleoresin Capsicum (OC) spray under strict legal conditions. The move was part of the NT government's justice reforms that focus on reducing crime and restoring community safety and security, she said. "We're strengthening the frontline with more police, stronger laws and better prevention, but we also believe individuals should have lawful tools to protect themselves if needed," Ms Finocchiaro said in a statement. Ms Finocchiaro's government made law and order the cornerstone of its first budget with a record $1.5 billion investment in corrections, courts and police. The NT government also lowered the age of criminal responsibility from 12 to 10 and introduced tougher bail laws. Data shows the NT has an incarceration rate three times greater than anywhere else in Australia and has the highest reoffending rate, with six out of 10 prisoners returning to jail within two years of release. Consultation to determine the trial's specifics will be led by NT Police, industry bodies, licensees, other key stakeholders and the broader community. The initiative would ensure the NT joins Western Australia as the only jurisdictions in Australia allowing residents to carry pepper spray. "This is about giving Territorians more choice when it comes to personal safety," the chief minister said. "This is about equipping Territorians with more options, not less control." Approved OC spray is set to be made available for purchase from licensed dealers across the NT from September 1. The NT proposal comes as a class action trial in Victoria winds up involving climate protester Jordan Brown challenging the police's use of pepper spray against him during a mining protest. His lawyers have told the Supreme Court that Victoria Police's use of the spray on him at a 2019 protest outside the International Mining and Resources Conference in Melbourne was violent and excessive. But lawyers for Victoria Police claim the use of force was lawful, as protesters were impeding officers from making an arrest. Closing submissions before Judge Claire Harris are being heard on Wednesday and Thursday.
West Australian
a day ago
- West Australian
Editorial: Independent corruption watchdog is as important as ever
The role of corruption fighter is not for the faint hearted. By its very nature, the job of being an anti-corruption warrior means being prepared to take on powerful characters. Of course that means the holder of the office may also encounter push back. And it may also mean the office is caught up in political cross-fire. WA's soon to depart Corruption and Crime Commissioner John McKechnie has been no stranger to controversy. WA's first director of public prosecutions, Mr McKechnie went on to spend more than 15 years on the bench of the State's Supreme Court before his appointment as the corruption watchdog chief. He has served as the State's Corruption and Crime Commissioner since 2015 and will retire at the end of this month. Mr McKechnie has seen more cases, tried more cases, heard more cases and written up more cases that possibly any other jurist in the State. Having been the State's DPP for seven years up until 1999, he had overseen prosecutions of the most sensitive kind. Two premiers — Brian Burke and Ray O'Connor — and a deputy premier, David Parker, came under his prosecutorial gaze. As did the Rothwells and horse-race fixing charges laid against Laurie Connell. In his time as a judge of the Supreme Court, then Justice McKechnie sentenced some of the worst offenders, including child killer Dante Arthurs. Under Mr McKechnie's leadership, the CCC uncovered several high-profile public servants accused of corruption, including former Housing Authority boss Paul Whyte, who pleaded guilty to stealing more than $27 million from the Department of Communities. He also led investigations into MPs misusing electoral allowances, five contractors given deals with the North Metropolitan Health Service in exchange for kickbacks for public servants and, more recently, the overseas travel of former ombudsman Chris Field. However, under his leadership the commission also drew criticism from the parliamentary inspector Matthew Zilko, who found it had falsely implied former Japanese trade commissioner Craig Peacock had committed tax evasion. Mr McKechnie was also at the centre of a political storm and came under fierce attack from the Liberal Opposition in the lead up to his 2021 reappointment under the McGowan Labor government. Now the spotlight turns onto who will replace Mr McKechnie. It is said that there can be a tendency for the wheels to fall off when governments are in office for a long time. The State Labor Government is now entering its third term, again with a huge majority. Power and hubris can be a powerful combination if left unchecked. In The West Australian today Mr McKechnie warns that the WA public service was losing its independence. His message is clear. The need for a strong and independent corruption watchdog is as important as ever.
