US suspends licenses to ship nuclear plant parts to China, sources say
Smoke rising from chimneys at a power plant during sunset in Taicang, in eastern China's Jiangsu province. PHOTO: AFP
WASHINGTON - The US in recent days suspended licenses for nuclear equipment suppliers to sell to China's power plants, according to four people familiar with the matter, as the two countries engage in a damaging trade war.
The suspensions were issued by the US Department of Commerce, the people said, and affect export licenses for parts and equipment used with nuclear power plants.
Nuclear equipment suppliers are among a wide range of companies whose sales have been restricted over the past two weeks as the US-China trade war shifted from negotiating tariffs to throttling each other's supply chains. It is unclear whether a June 5 call between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping would affect the suspensions.
The US and China agreed on May 12 to roll back triple digit, tit-for-tat tariffs for 90 days, but the truce between the two biggest economies quickly went south, with the US claiming China reneged on terms related to rare earth elements, and China accusing the US of 'abusing export control measures' by warning that using Huawei Ascend AI chips anywhere in the world violated US export controls. After June 5's call, further talks on key issues were expected.
The US Department of Commerce did not respond to a request for comment on the nuclear equipment restrictions. On May 28, a spokesperson said the department was reviewing exports of strategic significance to China.
'In some cases, Commerce has suspended existing export licenses or imposed additional license requirements while the review is pending,' the spokesperson said in a statement. The Chinese Embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
US nuclear equipment suppliers include Westinghouse and Emerson.
Westinghouse, whose technology is used in over 400 nuclear reactors around the world, and Emerson, which provides measurement and other tools for the nuclear industry, did not respond to requests for comment.
The suspensions affect business worth hundreds of millions of dollars, two of the sources said.
They also coincide with Chinese restrictions on critical metals threatening supply chains for manufacturers worldwide, especially America's Big Three automakers.
Reuters could not determine whether the new restrictions were tied to the trade war, or if and how quickly they might be reinstated. Department of Commerce export licenses typically run for four years and include authorised quantities and values.
But many new restrictions on exports to China have been imposed in the last two weeks, according to sources, and include license requirements for a hydraulic fluids supplier for sales to China.
Other license suspensions went to GE Aerospace for jet engines for China's Comac aircraft, sources said.
The US also now requires licenses to ship ethane to China, as Reuters reported first last week. Houston-based Enterprise Product Partners said June 4 that its emergency requests to complete three proposed cargoes of ethane to China, totaling some 2.2 million barrels, had not been granted.
Enterprise said a May 23 requirement for a license to sell butane to China, in addition to the ethane, was subsequently withdrawn. Dallas-based Energy Transfer said it was notified on June 3 about the new ethane licensing requirement, and planned to apply and file for an emergency authorisation.
Other sectors that have been hit with new restrictions include companies that sell electronic design automation software such as Cadence Design Systems. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Trump deploys National Guard over LA immigration protests
LOS ANGELES: US President Donald Trump deployed 2,000 troops on Saturday (Jun 7) to handle escalating protests against immigration enforcement raids in the Los Angeles area, a move the state's governor termed "purposefully inflammatory". Federal agents clashed with angry crowds in a Los Angeles suburb as protests stretched into a second night Saturday, shooting flash-bang grenades and shutting part of a freeway amid raids on undocumented migrants, reports said. The standoff took place in Paramount, where demonstrators had gathered near a Home Depot that was being used as a staging area by federal immigration officials, the Fox 11 news outlet reported. They were met by federal agents in gas masks, who lobbed flash-bang grenades and tear gas at the crowd, according to news reports and social media posts. Since taking office in January, Republican Trump has delivered on a promise to crack down hard on the entry and presence of undocumented migrants - who he has likened to "monsters" and "animals". Late Saturday, Trump signed a memo deploying 2,000 National Guardsmen "to address the lawlessness that has been allowed to fester," White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement. "The Trump Administration has a zero tolerance policy for criminal behavior and violence, especially when that violence is aimed at law enforcement officers trying to do their jobs." About an hour before the White House confirmed the deployment, California Governor Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, said he opposed the move. "That move is purposefully inflammatory and will only escalate tensions," he said on social media platform X. "We are in close coordination with the city and county, and there is currently no unmet need." The protests came a day after masked and armed immigration agents carried out high-profile workplace raids in separate parts of Los Angeles, attracting angry crowds and setting off hours-long standoffs. LA Mayor Karen Bass acknowledged that some city residents were "feeling fear" following the federal immigration enforcement actions. "Everyone has the right to peacefully protest, but let me be clear: violence and destruction are unacceptable, and those responsible will be held accountable," she said on X. ROADBLOCKS AND CHANTS FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino said multiple arrests had been made following Friday's clashes. "You bring chaos, and we'll bring handcuffs. Law and order will prevail," he said on X. On Saturday, amid chants for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents to get out, some protestors waved Mexican flags while others set a US flag on fire, the Los Angeles Times reported. Cement blocks and overturned shopping carts served as crude roadblocks. A crowd swarmed a US Marshals Service bus exiting a nearby freeway, with authorities later closing on and off ramps to keep protesters from taking over the highway and to stop new people from flowing in. The White House has taken a hard line against the protests, with deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller calling them "an insurrection against the laws and sovereignty of the United States". Los Angeles, the second-most populous city in the United States, is one of the most diverse metropolises in the country. The suburb of Paramount, home to about 50,000 people, is 82 per cent Hispanic or Latino, according to US Census data.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Chinese students reconsidering the US as Republicans threaten their visas
AUSTIN, Texas – Over lunch at the University of Texas at Austin, a professor from China and two Chinese students spoke dispiritedly this past week of the directive issued by Secretary of State Marco Rubio to 'aggressively revoke' visas of Chinese nationals studying in 'critical fields'. They also talked about a Republican bill in Congress that would ban Chinese student visas to the United States. Even if such matters never come to pass, said Xiaobo Lu, a professor of government at the university in Austin, 'the damage is already being done'. 'Chinese students are practical,' he said. 'They now have to consider whether, if they come to America, their studies will be disrupted. There's no removing that uncertainty. That ship has sailed.' The two students accompanying Prof Lu to lunch, who asked not to be named for fear that their visa status might be at risk, described several recent conversations with Chinese friends. One had decided to turn down offers at two prestigious American journalism schools and had opted instead for the programme at the University of Hong Kong. Another said no to a coveted slot at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in favour of a modest local government job. A third Chinese friend, currently studying at Johns Hopkins University, is mulling whether to pack his bags and finish his degree back home. Their accounts align with sentiments shared by a senior academic official at the University of Texas, who said that several excellent graduate school candidates from China had withdrawn their applications. The official added that a number of Chinese students on the Austin campus were afraid to criticise the measures. He spoke on the condition of anonymity because he shared those fears. There are about 1,400 Chinese students on the Austin campus. A spokesperson for the university said that its administrators would have no comment. The chilling effect that has overtaken some Chinese nationals in the United States on student visas comes as the Trump administration and its allies have suggested that their presence constitutes a national security threat. Such assertions, combined with the continuing trade war with China, represent an increasingly strident anti-China sentiment among conservative officials, even as their states wrestle with the benefits and drawbacks of having Chinese students in their colleges and universities. The bill in Congress, called the Stop CCP Visas Act, was introduced in March by Representative Riley Moore, a freshman Republican from West Virginia who said in an interview that 'we're going to push hard for it'. Its prospects in the House are uncertain, and it has little chance of passing in the Senate, where it would need Democratic support to achieve a filibuster-proof supermajority. The timing of the legislation is also curious, given that Chinese student enrollment in the United States has fallen by more than 25 per cent, from about 370,000 in 2019 to roughly 277,000 in the 2023-24 academic year, according to data from the Institute of International Education. Critics say that even if the bill goes nowhere, its message and Mr Rubio's directive will alienate foreign students who are considering the United States. 'Why take the chance to come here when you know that some new policy might disrupt your studies?' said Eddie West, the assistant vice-president for international affairs for California State University, Fresno. 'And you could understand if a family in India is looking at this and saying, 'Are we going to be targeted next?'' Of the Chinese citizens whose visas would be revoked by his bill, Mr Moore was dismissive of the idea that they were here simply studying. 'Maybe some are,' he said. He added that a law passed in 2017 by the Chinese government, the National Intelligence Law, stipulates that citizens living abroad must support their home country's intelligence-gathering efforts. Of the estimated 15 per cent of Chinese nationals who receive government scholarships to study abroad, he said, 'they have to regularly report back to the diplomatic mission. They are active spies'. Mr Moore did not provide evidence to support his claims. The two University of Texas students, and eight other Chinese students and faculty members interviewed for this article, said they had never once interacted with their government back home, other than during the visa procurement process. Mr Moore did cite three instances over the past three years when Chinese students had been charged with attempting to gain access to US military information. He said his views on Chinese students were validated by an investigative report published last month by The Stanford Review, a conservative newspaper published by Stanford University students. The article, 'Uncovering Chinese Academic Espionage at Stanford,' relied on anonymous sources and concluded, 'In short, there are Chinese spies at Stanford.' But the only person named as a spy was a former Stanford researcher, Chen Song, who was charged with visa fraud in 2020 for what the Justice Department said was lying about her affiliation with the Chinese military. The Stanford Review story did not mention that the Justice Department withdrew the fraud charge and four other charges against Song a year later. A prominent Stanford faculty member quoted in the article, political sociologist Larry Diamond, reaffirmed to The New York Times his concern about 'the dangers of China penetrating our systems and ripping off our technology'. But, Mr Diamond said: 'I am completely opposed to Moore's legislation and think it would be incredibly destructive to our interests. 'This takes a blind sledgehammer to a problem that needs highly targeted tools.' Jessica Chen Weiss, a professor of China studies at Johns Hopkins University's School of Advanced International Studies, said that a vast majority of Chinese students in the United States are not here to spy or obtain information for their government. 'Chinese students who come to the United States want to stay and contribute,' she said, adding that three-quarters of Chinese graduate students in the fields of science, technology, engineering and math stay in the United States. The number is even higher for doctoral students in artificial intelligence, she noted. Democratic Representative Grace Meng of New York, chair of the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus, said in a statement that the legislation was 'xenophobic and wrongheaded'. She pointed to a survey earlier this year by The Asian American Foundation that found more than 1 in 4 Americans viewed Chinese Americans as a threat to American society. She added that Mr Moore's initiative, if passed, 'would send a dangerous message that people of Chinese descent – and Asian Americans more broadly – do not belong in this country'. Mr Moore said that he had not discussed the extent of any threat posed by Chinese students with his state's flagship college, West Virginia University, where around 130 Chinese students are enrolled. University officials declined to comment for this article. One of the bill's seven Republican co-sponsors, Representative Brandon Gill of Texas, said in a statement that 'it's time we start taking seriously the threat of the Chinese Communist Party and the hundreds of thousands of students they send to American universities each year, many of whom have been traced back to its espionage operations'. The statement provided no evidence for that assertion. Along with Mr Gill, five other co-sponsors – Representatives Troy Nehls of Texas, Andy Ogles of Tennessee, Burgess Owens of Utah, Addison McDowell of North Carolina and Scott Perry of Pennsylvania – represent districts in states that President Donald Trump won in November. Republican Senator Ashley Moody of Florida, where Mr Trump was also victorious in November, introduced a similar bill in the Senate. Each of these states has universities with large Chinese student populations, including the president's alma mater, the University of Pennsylvania, with more than 2,000 Chinese students, according to the most recent public data. 'We're literally skimming off the best and brightest China has to offer,' said Peter Lorge, a professor specialising in Chinese military history at Vanderbilt University, which has more than 700 Chinese students. 'They're fighting to come here, and their own country is struggling to get them to come back. The idea that we'd turn them away is baffling to me.' Mr David Firestein, the president of the George H.W. Bush Foundation for US-China Relations, said in an interview that the thousands of current and former Chinese students living in Texas contribute roughly US$500 million (S$644 million) annually to the state's economy. 'Banning them would be devastating to both our universities and to the state of Texas as a whole,' he said. His comments were echoed by Di Wang, a professor of history at Texas A&M from 1998 to 2015, who said in an interview that A&M's 'large number of professors and students from China have made substantial contributions to the education, research and exchanges between the people of the US and China'. Prof Wang described the current approach by Mr Rubio and Mr Moore as 'shortsighted, extreme and detrimental to the US. It would alienate many young Chinese who have a favourable view of the US and wish to learn from it'. Mr Moore scoffed at the idea that Chinese students experiencing life in an open society would have a salutary effect. 'They've been getting exposed to democratic values since Richard Nixon,' he said. 'That whole paradigm of, 'Let's introduce the free market into China and eventually democracy will flourish' – that's never happened.' Prof Weiss said that Mr Moore's bill could have unintended consequences for US security. During the Red Scare era of the 1950s, she said, a leading rocket scientist, Qian Xuesen, 'was prevented from continuing his scientific career in the United States,' even though he helped found the Jet Propulsion Laboratory at the California Institute of Technology. Instead, Qian returned to China, where he helped develop China's ballistic missile system. Mr Lu, the University of Texas government professor, also referred to the saga of Qian as an example of how the significant contributions by Chinese scholars can be imperiled by fixating on unsubstantiated suspicions. 'It would be like a doctor treating a small skin rash on a shoulder,' he said, 'by amputating the whole arm.' NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
Russian intelligence says it collects WeChat data. What does that mean?
Russian intelligence says it collects WeChat data. What does that mean? Russian counterintelligence agents are analysing data from the popular Chinese messaging and social media app WeChat to monitor people who might be in contact with Chinese spies, according to a Russian intelligence document obtained by The New York Times. The disclosure highlights the rising level of concern about Chinese influence in Russia as the two countries deepen their relationship. As Russia has become isolated from the West over its war in Ukraine, it has become increasingly reliant on Chinese money, companies and technology. But it has also faced what the document describes as increased Chinese espionage efforts. The document indicates that the Russian domestic security agency, known as the FSB, pulls purloined data into an analytical tool known as 'Skopishche' (a Russian word for a mob of people). Information from WeChat is among the data being analysed, according to the document. The document offers insights into the espionage tactics of two authoritarian governments that are preoccupied with surveillance. According to the document, the system processes detailed data on WeChat users, including account log-ins, contact lists and message archives, some of which are extracted from phones seized from people of interest to Russia's spy hunters. The tool is used to scrutinise the data trail of 'people using the Chinese messenger WeChat to talk to representatives of the PRC intelligence services', the document says, using the abbreviation for the People's Republic of China. The exact functionality of the system is unclear. It is described in Russian as an automated data processing system that can be used in 'search activities'. Intelligence agencies typically use such tools to map messenger and social network connections to spot potential spies. The document makes clear that the FSB is particularly interested in WeChat. The Russian security agency asks field officers to send WeChat accounts and log-ins of interest to the China counterintelligence team, including 'lists of contacts (log-ins) and archives of chats from WeChat obtained during direct access to the smartphones of targets of interest'. The document says data can be run through another automated system, known as Laretz, a Russian word for a small decorated box, that can check 'more than a thousand electronic indicators simultaneously'. The Times was unable to confirm whether Skopishche had been effective as a counterintelligence tool or how extensively the FSB could intercept data from WeChat. One Western intelligence agency told the Times that the information in the document was consistent with what it knew about 'Russian penetration of Chinese communications'. The FSB and the Chinese Foreign Ministry did not reply to requests for comment. WeChat, owned by the Chinese tech giant Tencent, is one of the most widely used digital platforms in the world, mostly concentrated in China and among Chinese communities. It functions as an all-in-one tool that combines messaging, mobile payments, social networking and government services. The app has over 1.4 billion users globally, according to Tencent financial disclosures. Tencent did not reply to a request for comment. Russian intelligence agencies have worked to penetrate encrypted communication apps like Signal and WhatsApp. The FSB has have long viewed those apps, which are widely used by dissidents, as tools of subversion and foreign influence. In April, President Vladimir Putin of Russia barred government and bank employees from using foreign messaging apps. WeChat is different. By design, it does not use end-to-end encryption to protect user data. That is because the Chinese government exercises strict control over the app and relies on its weak security to monitor and censor speech. Foreign intelligence agencies can exploit that weakness, too. WeChat added some limited encryption features in 2016, according to Ms Mona Wang, a research fellow at the University of Toronto's Citizen Lab. But the security improvements still fall short of the encryption offered by other messaging apps like Signal or WhatsApp. It is unclear why Chinese intelligence officers would use WeChat to communicate with sources, given its lack of end-to-end encryption. But sources or potential recruits may not know they are communicating with spies, who often pose as diplomats and strike up casual conversations at first. WeChat was briefly banned in Russia in 2017, but access was restored after Tencent took steps to comply with laws requiring foreign digital platforms above a certain size to register as 'organisers of information dissemination'. The Times confirmed that WeChat is currently licensed by the government to operate in Russia. That licence would require Tencent to store user data on Russian servers and to provide access to security agencies upon request. Russia is separately pursuing a government messaging app of its own, one that has drawn comparisons to WeChat. NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
