Greenlanders embrace Danish PM after JD Vance's disastrous visit
The people of Greenland have warmly welcomed the Danish prime minister after pointedly rebuffing US vice-president JD Vance and Usha Vance, the second lady, during their visit last week.
Mette Frederiksen was cheered upon her arrival in the Danish overseas territory for a three-day visit that has been characterised as a show of solidarity in the face of repeated US take-over threats.
One resident shouting from a window said: 'Hey Mette! Thanks for being here,' according to Danish public broadcaster DR. Footage of the prime minister descending the steps of her aeroplane shows two people embracing her.
The scenes marked a stark contrast from the arrival of Mr Vance and his wife at a US airbase on the island on 24 March, when no official representatives from Greenland or Denmark came to greet them.
'It is clear that with the pressure put on Greenland by the Americans, in terms of sovereignty, borders and the future, we need to stay united,' Ms Frederiksen said after arriving.
Her visit is timed to reassure the island's 57,000 residents, the vast majority of whom want to become independent from Denmark but do not wish to become part of the United States, polls show.
Donald Trump has repeatedly said the US should take over Greenland for security reasons and has not ruled out the possibility of using military force to do so, causing relations with Denmark to sour.
In a pointed message to Mr Trump, Mette Frederiksen said 'you cannot annex another country.'
The vice president and his wife were widely mocked when the second lady's plans for a solo visit to the island were jettisoned after locals refused to turn-out to greet her.
Mrs Vance had originally been slated to visit the territory with one of her sons to watch the Avannaata Qimussersu dog-sled race in Sisimiut.
However, the programme was reorganised amid diplomatic backlash, with Mr Vance announcing he would join his wife at the last minute.
Reports later emerged that US representatives had spent a week canvassing door-to-door in Nuuk ahead of the diplomatic sojourn to sound out if residents would welcome a visit from Mrs Vance.
The US advances were shot down by Greenlandic residents, according to TV 2 reporter Jesper Steinmetz, who said the 'Americans' charm offensive mission has failed'.
During the visit, which lasted only a matter of hours, Mr Vance addressed US troops at a Pituffik military base, where he criticised Denmark for not having 'done a good job by the people of Greenland' by 'underinvesting' in security.
Mr Vance declared that the US could no longer 'bury our head in the snow' and ignore China's attempts to establish itself in the semi-autonomous territory.
He also explicitly urged Greenlanders to vote for independence from Denmark, urging its citizens to join the US's 'security umbrella' in comments that caused outrage in Copenhagen.
Lars Lokke Rasmussen, Greenland's foreign minister, responded in a post on social media that 'we are open to criticisms, but let me be completely honest, we do not appreciate the tone in which it's being delivered'.
Meeting on the sidelines of a Nato summit in Brussels on Thursday, Marco Rubio, the US state secretary, reassured Mr Rasmussen of the 'strong' ties between the countries.
According to The Washington Post, the White House is currently estimating the cost for the US federal government to control Greenland, and the potential revenues it could derive from exploiting its largely untapped natural resources.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump Is Officially Spiting Pride Month
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said that President Donald Trump has no intention to officially recognize Pride Month. 'There are no plans for a proclamation for the month of June,' Leavitt said at a White House press briefing Tuesday. 'But I can tell you this president is very proud to be a president for all Americans, regardless of race, religion or creed.' The reporter who asked the question, MAGA podcaster Alec Lace, suggested that the White House could name June 'Nuclear Family Month' rather than honoring LGBTQ Americans. President Bill Clinton first named June 'Gay and Lesbian Pride Month' in 1999 in a tribute to the Stonewall riots of June 1969, which helped launch the gay rights movement. Pride Month was expanded to include bisexual and transgender Americans under President Barack Obama. Trump declined to officially proclaim June Pride Month during his first presidency—although in 2019, he tweeted in support of Pride Month. 'As we celebrate LGBT Pride Month and recognize the outstanding contributions LGBT people have made to our great Nation, let us also stand in solidarity with the many LGBT people who live in dozens of countries worldwide that punish, imprison, or even execute individuals on the basis of their sexual orientation,' Trump said. 'My Administration has launched a global campaign to decriminalize homosexuality and invite all nations to join us in this effort!' However, since returning to office, Trump has made what he calls 'gender ideology' among his top priorities. Trump has eradicated DEI programs from the federal government, sought to prevent trans women from competing in women's sports and also to eliminate trans people from the military. Many corporations and brands are planning to scale back their celebrations of Pride Month in this new political climate, according to CNN. Nevertheless, many LGBTQ Americans are still boisterously celebrating June. Pride Month events in Washington, D.C.—including a parade and a street festival—are expected to draw hundreds of thousands of attendees, according to ABC News.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
'Un-American' or 'necessary'? Voters divided on Trump's LA protest crackdown
US President Donald Trump has sent thousands of National Guard troops and hundreds of US Marines to Los Angeles as protests take place against the administration's ramped-up immigration enforcement. While the president's allies cheer him on, both the governor of California and the mayor of Los Angeles say Trump is overstepping his authority and stoking tensions. Everyday Americans are no less divided over the issue. But do they feel it is the president or the protesters who have gone too far? Here's what six voters had to say about the news. This Indiana man worries about the precedent Trump is setting by sending the National Guard into Los Angeles. I've seen some different takes on the legality of it, but it feels to me like the federal government is being very, very heavy-handed on this, which is concerning to me since protest is a protected form of expression in this country. I'm concerned that this sets Americans against Americans, and specifically American military against American citizens. The Trump administration is going about [the ICE raids] in an interesting manner... While making unilateral raids like these, they're making a lot of mistakes and those mistakes are costing people their freedoms. [The Trump administration] is not admitting to their mistakes and they're not following due process. We have laws in this country for a reason. This Mexico-born Texas resident - a naturalised US citizen - supports the deployment of troops to put down "shameful" protests in California. It's a shame that people who have come to this country to set themselves up are doing this, the riots. I tend to think that many of the rioters are people with criminal histories. Violent protesters. People that want to be here to create a future and have a family in this generous country would not be doing that. Many are even waving Mexican flags. That's so shameful. I respect the president in so many ways. He is a guy who knows how to get things done. He's the law-and-order president. What was he supposed to do? Let them burn trash? Let them destroy Los Angeles?When I saw they called on the National Guard, I just started crying because he's weaponising everything he possibly can. There's no free speech, there's no dissent - it's Hitler's playbook all over again. It's heartbreaking, really. I just feel for the people he's targeting. It's wrong, it's so un-American. It's so against what this country was founded for. I'm just shocked. I probably shouldn't be, but I just can't believe it's happening. I can't believe the military and the National Guard are supporting this. How protests erupted after rumours of immigration raid Analysis: This is a political fight Trump is eager to have This Indiana man wants the violence to stop, but also worries about what deploying the military in response to protests means for the future. This goes far beyond just protest, in my view. This is an attack on our sovereignty and our civil society. We can debate immigration policy, but violence and chaos should not be tolerated. [But Trump is] the one who's going to push the envelope to the legal limit, and if he can get by with more, he will, I think. That's one of my concerns about this whole thing. I'm not 100% on board with it, but at the same time, I think something has to be done. It's not getting taken care of. My trepidation is about precedent...I feel like everything we do, when we set new precedents, it will become new norms and not the exception. This Nebraska woman says she's likely to get involved with protests happening in her town because she's upset with what she sees Trump doing in LA. When watching clips, I saw some mostly peaceful protests. It seems like Trump is just mad that they're happening, rather than trying to prevent them from being violent. More and more, he's become a president who uses his power to enforce his will [rather] than the will of the people. I wonder to what extent is he going to keep doing this. It's extremely valid that people are protesting ICE, because in all honesty there is very little proof of due process for people who have been taken by ICE and wrongfully detained. A 29-year veteran of the US Army who retired as a colonel, this Texan - from the overwhelmingly Latino Rio Grande City on the border - believes that it is the protests that have gone too far. When state and local governments fail to support federal law - in this case deportation orders - the military deployment is necessary to protect lives, property and the movement of commerce. The protesters are blocking major highways, disrupting commerce, destroying and burning police cars, and interfering with police orders to disperse in certain areas. Everyone has the right to protest, but you don't have the right to make me or others listen to you. Creating violence so I can have your attention comes with consequences. Everything we know about the demonstrations Trump's deportation drive is perfect storm in city of immigrants LA's chaotic weekend of protests in maps and pictures
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump admin approves waivers for 3 states to ban soda, other junk food from public food programs
Department of Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins signed waivers with three states on Tuesday, allowing them to prohibit participants of the government's Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) from buying junk food, like soda and candy, through the social welfare program. Arkansas, Idaho and Utah became the latest states to obtain waivers from the federal government to begin banning junk food within the federally administered, but state-operated, public assistance program that provides food stamps to low-income individuals. The three states have become the latest to obtain waivers from the Trump administration that allow states to restrict what type of food SNAP funds are eligible to be used on. Other mostly GOP-led states, like Nebraska, Indiana and Iowa, have also obtained waivers to reform their SNAP programs. Last month, during a Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) event at the White House, Rollins indicated that several states were lining up to get the waivers. Nebraska Becomes First State Approved To Ban Soda Purchases With Food Stamps "Since my confirmation, [the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)] has encouraged states to think differently and creatively about how to solve the many health issues facing Americans," Rollins said at a press conference announcing the new waivers Tuesday afternoon. "One way is disallowing taxpayer-funded benefits to purchase unhealthy items, like soda, candy and other junk food." Read On The Fox News App Tuesday's waivers bring the total number of states that have moved to ban junk food from their SNAP programs to six. Rollins indicated several other states, including Colorado, Kansas, West Virginia, Texas, Ohio, Florida and Louisiana, are also working through procedural steps in hopes of getting waivers approved. West Virginia Passes First-of-its-kind Law Banning Food Dyes And Preservatives; Gov Cites Maha Movement Texas, however, may not even need the waiver after its legislature passed Senate Bill 379 during the last week of its legislative session that ended on June 2. The new bill, which prohibits SNAP participants in the state from using the public assistance program to buy junk food, is expected to be signed by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott, especially after he wrote a letter to Rollins in May seeking a USDA waiver. "The Trump Administration is unified in improving the health of our nation. America's governors have proudly answered the call to innovate by improving nutrition programs, ensuring better choices while respecting the generosity of the American taxpayer," Rollins added Tuesday. "Each waiver submitted by the states and signed is yet another step closer to fulfilling President [Donald] Trump's promise to Make America Healthy Again." On average, 42 million low-income Americans receive food-stamp assistance each month, according to the MAHA report released last month. It added that one-in-five American children under 17 receive SNAP article source: Trump admin approves waivers for 3 states to ban soda, other junk food from public food programs
