
Pahalgam attack: A leaf out of old Pak army playbook?
ISLAMABAD : It was long apprehended by peace activists in Pakistan. Now, it has happened – a terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Kashmir.
Well-meaning elements in Pakistan were on tenterhooks when the secessionist Baloch Liberation Army last month attacked the Jaffar Express, killing dozens. At the time, the Pakistani ministry of foreign affairs (MOFA), without specifically blaming India for the incident, accused it of 'sponsoring' terrorism in Pakistan. The peaceniks were worried Pakistan might retaliate, thereby triggering a spiral of tit-for-tat. They hoped that Pakistani chief of army staff (COAS), General Asim Munir, going ballistic in a recent speech would be the response. That hope was belied on Tuesday.
But why did Munir suddenly go off on a tangent with a volley of hostility towards India? And what can be made of the strike in Kashmir, the worst in years?
Salman Raja, the lawyer of ousted Pakistani PM Imran Khan, contended, 'His continued incarceration is fuelling public anger and alienation.'
The Pakistan Muslim League's Nawaz Sharif, as prime minister, attempted to prune the army's powers, but without success. However, the confrontation between the army and Imran Khan, leader of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), who is now in jail, could have caused an erosion in Pakistanis' goodwill towards their army; and its General Headquarters (GHQ) seem to be struggling to combat this slippage.
Indeed, the development has been seen in some academic, media and political circles in Islamabad as a reason for Munir's surprisingly sharp rhetoric – an attempt, in other words, to regain favourable public ratings.
Besides, as Raja put it, Pakistan's foreign policy is 'guided by the vision of the armed forces about the requirements of national security'. Thus, the diatribe against India.
A former director-general of the Pakistan Army's espionage wing, Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), said GHQ was losing patience over what they believed was India aiding and abetting the Afghanistan-based Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) – which a United Nations Security Council resolution says hopes to 'overthrow' the Pakistani government 'to establish an emirate based on its interpretation of Islamic law' – and separatists in the western Pakistani province of Balochistan.
Sitting across him, a retired senior officer of the Indian external intelligence agency, Research and Analysis Wing (R&AW), who narrowly missed becoming this organisation's chief, challenged the ex-DG of ISI by saying TTP was too small an outfit to pose a threat to Pakistan.
There's a kind of hush in Pakistan; especially in its twin cities of Islamabad, the country's capital, and Rawalpindi, where the GHQ is located and which is looked upon in diplomatic circles as the nation's nerve centre. People at best converse in whispers.
Raja is a graduate of Cambridge University and Harvard Law School. Now in his 50s, he's reputed to be a skilful attorney, and defended Sharif when he was ousted from office in 2017 and his family was accused of having links with off-shore companies. At present, he is not merely counsel for Sharif's arch opponent, Khan, but also secretary-general of PTI.
On a balmy late March evening in Islamabad, Raja drove up in a white SUV to collect me from my hotel. It was after dinner. We went to a café in a parade buzzing with customers at restaurants and other retail outlets, which have mushroomed in Islamabad. A stream of people came up to greet him, reminding him of messages they sent to him, or sought an appointment for a future meeting. In today's complex Pakistani politics, Raja is a quintessential Opposition insider.
Khan, an Oxford graduate, celebrated cricketer and captain of the squad that won Pakistan's only Cricket World Cup in 1992, took the plunge into politics in 1996 by forming PTI.
For over 20 years, he languished in the wilderness, barring winning his own seat and making gradual headway at the provincial level in the North West Frontier Province, now known as Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Then, in a trice, he became the flavour of the season; with the not-so-tacit backing of the puissant Pakistan Army.
There were always competing opinions about Khan's abilities as a politician, even more so about his eligibility to be prime minister. Yet, the men in uniform saw in him an alternative. But within six months of his election as prime minister in 2018 – suspected to have been engineered in his favour – the aforementioned DG, ISI, said the choice was seen as a mistake.
While the kingmakers pondered over how to eject him and whom to replace him with, Khan and PTI's head start in the sphere of social media and his anti-corruption stance enhanced his popularity, even penetrating into significant sections of serving and retired armed forces' personnel and their families.
There arrived, though, a moment when GHQ decided it was time to act. With a chunk of his lawmakers abandoning him under pressure from the powers-that-be, Khan's coalition government was defeated in a confidence vote on April 9, 2022. 'It reflected the basic fault line in Pakistani politics…including the functioning of parliament,' said Raja.
'Every election result is manoeuvred by the Establishment (code for the Pakistan Army and its allies in the top echelons of the civil service) to ensure that no single party is able to form a government on its own. There is always an Establishment-backed party, with sufficient seats given to it, that can help topple a government once the main opposition parties have been given the go-ahead by the Establishment. The PTI government headed by Imran Khan was brought down with the Establishment shepherding the process,' he said.
Asked about the general elections on February 8, 2024, which independent observers were convinced wasn't free or fair, Raja alleged the vote 'was massively rigged, not during polling but through consolidation of results'.
''The actual results recorded at polling stations in nearly a 100 national assembly seats and an even larger number on the provincial assembly elections in Punjab, Sindh, Balochistan were changed. This is universally accepted inside Pakistan. Imran Khan's PTI won a landslide victory,' he said.
'The PTI was disallowed from participating in the election as a party. Its candidates were declared independents. Even so, PTI backed candidates won over 90 seats. The actual number should have been closer to 180 seats in the National Assembly,' he added.
Raja said Khan's arrest and detention was part of the latest effort at political engineering by the Establishment. 'Cases against him are silly. The entire judicial system has been assaulted through the Establishment mandated 26th Amendment to the (Pakistan) Constitution and a campaign of intimidation of independent-minded judges.'
Reacting to the amendment enacted last October, the secretary-general of the International Court of Justice, Santiago Canton, indicated that the changes incorporated in it 'bring an extraordinary level of political influence over the process of judicial appointments and the judiciary's own administration.'
'Six judges of the Islamabad high court wrote a letter to the then Chief Justice of Pakistan complaining of surveillance and intimidation to which they had been subjected by the agencies. The main object of this assault on the judiciary is to prevent Imran Khan and his party members from getting justice,' alleged Raja
In the past, the Establishment has done deals, whereby an accused, convicted or imprisoned politician has been let off in lieu of leaving the country. Is such an understanding in the pipeline? 'There is no formal offer. However, Imran Khan has himself alluded to offers requiring him to go politically silent in return for his freedom,' Raja said.
The Pakistan Army and MOFA did not respond to a request for comment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
14 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Who is Iranian rapper Tataloo, a former President Ebrahim Raisi endorser who now faces death sentence
Iranian singer-cum-rapper Amir Hossein Maghsoudloo, popularly known as Tataloo, is facing death sentence after being convicted on charges of blasphemy and 'insulting Islamic sanctities'. Tataloo, who once supported a hard-line Iranian presidential candidate, now stands out against the gray prison uniform. The court sentenced him to the death penalty in May after he was found guilty of blasphemy in January this year. The 37-year-old rapper's songs reverberated with the Islamic Republic's youth at a time when the opposition to the country's government was splintered and largely remained leaderless. His music became popular as it challenged Iran's theocracy and the hierarchy of the system. In a major turn of events in 2022, the Iranian rapper's lyrics became more political after the death of 22-year-old Kurdish-Iranian woman Mahsa Amini and the subsequent wave of nationwide protests. Amini was detained and died in state custody of Iran in relation to state-imposed religious dress in September 2022. Tataloo also appeared in videos that criticised the government. Tataloo started his music career in 2003. He is known for combining rap, pop, rhythm-and-blues and rock with Farsi lyrics. He comes from the underground genre and released his first album in 2011 which reportedly polarized the audiences. However, Tataloo never played publicly in Iran, where all the concerts are controlled by the Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance. Tataloo appeared in a 2015 music video which supported Iran's paramilitary Revolutionary Guard and the controversial nuclear program of the Islamic Republic, which has concerned the West for years that it could lead to Iran developing atom bombs. In the video for 'Energy Hasteei,' or 'Nuclear Energy,' Tataloo sang 'This is our absolute right: To have an armed Persian Gulf.' He endorsed hard-liner Ebrahim Raisi in 2017 and sat with him for a television appearance as part of Raisi's failed presidential campaign against Hassan Rouhani. Raisi later became the president in 2021 but was killed in a helicopter crash in 2024. Tataloo faced legal issues in Iran in 2018 and was allowed to leave the country for Turkey, where many Persian singers and artists performed lucrative stage concerts. T he singer started hosting several live video sessions on social media and became an instant rage among the youth, along with his tattoos covering his face and body. Among the tattoos he boasted, one was an Iranian flag and another image of his mother next to a key and heart. In 2020, Instagram deactivated his account after he called for underage girls to join his 'team' for sex. The Iranian singer even acknowledged taking drugs. Tataloo's long run in music came to a halt in late 2023 when his passport expired and he was deported from Turkey. Upon his arrival in Iran, the singer was immediately taken into custody. The Iranian Supreme Court upheld his death sentence in May this year.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
33 minutes ago
- First Post
Why is Iran cracking down on dog-walking in public spaces?
Iran has expanded its ban on public dog-walking to over 25 cities, citing health, safety and morality concerns. With no national law outlawing pet ownership, local prosecutors are enforcing restrictions using penal codes. Critics argue the crackdown reflects deeper efforts to suppress personal freedoms and cultural shifts seen as un-Islamic by the regime read more An Iranian child looks at the dog as he walks, in Tehran, Iran, March 30, 2021. File Image/WANA via Reuters Iranian authorities have drastically widened restrictions on dog ownership and public pet activity by banning dog-walking in at least 25 cities across the country. While there is no nationwide legislation banning dog ownership outright, these local-level prohibitions are being enforced using Iran's penal provisions and religious-cultural rationale. The measures, first implemented in Tehran in 2019, have now become a countrywide trend. Judicial officials in numerous provinces have justified the crackdown by citing concerns over hygiene, safety, morality and social order. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The renewed focus on dog bans puts a spotight the Iranian state's enduring discomfort with what it considers Western cultural infiltration, and is a continuation of the post-1979 Islamic regime's efforts to suppress behaviours seen as un-Islamic or foreign in origin, reported AFP. How Iran is enforcing a ban on dog walking Over the past week, prosecutors and judicial officials in cities across Iran have imposed fresh restrictions against dog walking, including in Ilam, Kermanshah, Hamadan, Kerman, Boroujerd, Robat Karim, Lavasanat, Golestan, Kashmar and Khalkhal, among others. The restrictions follow a precedent set by Tehran in 2019, where police first issued a directive against walking dogs in public places. According to domestic news outlets, cities like Isfahan and Kerman recently joined the expanding list. In Isfahan, public prosecutor Mohammad Mousavian announced that the act of walking a dog is considered a violation of 'public rights' and that it jeopardises the 'health, comfort, and peace of citizens.' As per Mousavian's directive, all forms of dog walking — whether in public areas, parks or inside private vehicles — are now banned. 'Any form of dog walking in the city — whether in parks, public spaces, or vehicles — is prohibited and will be dealt with seriously,' he said. Law enforcement has been directed to confiscate vehicles transporting dogs and to shut down pet shops and unlicensed veterinary clinics. Authorities in Ilam echoed a similar position. According to local media, a city official said, 'Legal action will be taken against violators,' though further details were not provided. In Khalkhal, a city in Ardabil province, prosecutor Mozaffar Rezaei confirmed the prohibition, stating, 'Offenders will face consequences if they are seen walking dogs in parks, public spaces, or carrying them on their vehicles.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Rezaei also stated that 'in addition to the financial and physical damages, religious rulings and cultural considerations must be taken into account, as this practice reflects the promotion of a Western lifestyle.' In Kashmar, a city in northeastern Iran, the public prosecutor declared that the purpose of the ban was to protect 'public hygiene and the physical and psychological safety of the public.' The reformist-leaning Faraz News reported that more than 20 cities had announced new restrictions over a single weekend. Despite the lack of a uniform national policy, local authorities have relied on articles from Iran's Penal Code and Constitution to impose these restrictions, notably Article 638 concerning public morality, Article 688 on threats to public health, and Article 40 which prohibits actions that cause harm to others. Why Iran is banning dogs in public spaces Iran's theocratic establishment has long opposed dog ownership, perceiving it as a sign of Westernisation and cultural deviation. Religious interpretations that classify dogs as najis, or ritually impure, underpin much of this opposition. Contact with dogs, especially their saliva, is viewed by many scholars as religiously unacceptable. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In 2017, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei weighed in on the issue, stating: 'Keeping dogs for reasons other than herding, hunting and guard dogs is considered reprehensible.' He added via Tasnim News Agency, 'If this practice resembles that of non-Muslims, promotes their culture or causes harm and disturbance to neighbours, it is deemed forbidden.' The religious establishment's influence on public lawmaking was also visible in 2021 when 75 lawmakers signed a letter denouncing dog ownership as a 'destructive social problem' that could 'gradually change the Iranian and Islamic way of life.' This echoed earlier efforts in 2010 when Iran's Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance barred advertisements for pets or related products. In 2014, lawmakers introduced legislation that proposed fines or even corporal punishment for dog-walkers, though the bill failed to pass. The controversial 'Protection of the Public's Rights Against Animals' bill, first floated over a decade ago, also attempted to curb pet ownership. Dr. Payam Mohebi, president of the Iran Veterinary Association and a vocal critic of the draft law, noted, 'Over the years, they have changed this a couple of times and even discussed corporal punishment for dog owners. But their plan didn't get anywhere.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD He also recalled earlier legislative proposals that sought to confiscate dogs and abandon them in deserts or hand them over to zoos. What that means for dog owners in Iran With the latest directives, police have been authorised to take more aggressive measures. Authorities have been instructed not only to confiscate dogs and impound vehicles but also to track and prosecute social media accounts promoting pet ownership or selling animals. Mousavian called on Iran's cybercrime units to dismantle such accounts and launch legal proceedings against those behind them. The justification given was that the bans were 'in response to serious public demands.' These developments come amid increasing reports of dog owners being fined, harassed or facing threats of eviction. In some cases, dogs have been confiscated or owners arrested for walking their pets in public. This video that I've received today made me angry. A young man being beaten up savagely by the police in Iran just because he resisted to give his dog away. His mother is trying to help him but see what happens. According to the laws in Iran, walking a dog in public is a crime. — Masih Alinejad 🏳️ (@AlinejadMasih) July 13, 2021 Given the heightened scrutiny, many citizens have started walking their dogs late at night or driving them around to avoid police detection. Despite these efforts, enforcement has remained inconsistent. In cities like Tehran, many residents continue to walk their pets in less visible locations, revealing the difficulty of fully enforcing the ban in urban environments where pet ownership has steadily grown. How pet ownership is evolving into a form of resistance in Iran Owning a pet — especially a dog — has, over time, evolved into a subtle form of resistance in Iran. For younger generations in particular, having a dog is a lifestyle choice that also expresses personal identity and rejection of rigid state norms. The act of walking a dog in public is increasingly being interpreted as a symbolic challenge to the state's attempts to control everyday life. This dynamic is comparable to other forms of passive resistance in Iran — such as violating the compulsory hijab, participating in underground gatherings, or consuming banned substances. All are behaviours that exist in legal grey areas and continue despite government disapproval. Public frustration is growing over what some perceive as misplaced priorities. Critics argue that with rising concerns over violent crime and economic instability, law enforcement should focus on genuine threats to public safety rather than cracking down on pet owners. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In Isfahan, a group of animal rights activists gathered outside the governor's office to protest what they alleged was municipal culling of stray dogs and called for a reversal of recent bans, reported Iran International. It remains uncertain how effective the government will be in curbing a social trend that continues to gain popularity, despite — or perhaps because of — official disapproval. Also Watch: With inputs from agencies


Scroll.in
34 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Bangladesh anti-Sheikh Hasina student protester Newton Das found to be Bengal voter
A man allegedly linked to the 2024 students' protests in Bangladesh was found to be a voter in West Bengal's Kakdwip Assembly constituency, The Hindu reported on Sunday. Several images of the man, identified as Newton Das, participating in the agitation in the neighbouring country were widely shared on social media. Das has claimed that he was an Indian citizen but acknowledged that he had actively participated in the protests in Bangladesh, The Hindu reported. 'I went to Bangladesh in 2024 for issues related to an ancestral property and got caught in the revolution,' The Hindu quoted Newton Das as saying in a video. 'I have been a voter in Kakdwip since 2014 but lost my voter card in 2017.' Newton Das said that he had received a fresh voter card in 2018 with the help of Trinamool Congress MLA Manturam Pakhira. He also claimed that he had voted for Pakhira, who represents Kakdwip, in the 2016 Assembly polls, The Hindu reported. The constituency is in South 24 Parganas district. 'This is a conspiracy against me by a particular community,' India Today quoted Newton Das as saying in the video. He did not specify whether he was currently in India or Bangladesh. His cousin Tapan Das, who resides in Kakdwip, claimed that Newton Das was born in Bangladesh and had exercised voting rights in both countries, The Hindu reported. Tapan Das claimed that his cousin had gone to Bangladesh after the Covid-19 pandemic to sell land and had not returned. 'Since he was born in Bangladesh, he is a voter of Bangladesh too,' The Hindu quoted Tapan Das as saying. 'It is his fault that he is registered as a voter in both the countries.' Kakdwip is close to the Sundarbans and India's border with Bangladesh. Political row The incident sparked a political row in the state. The Bharatiya Janata Party's West Bengal unit on Sunday criticised West Bengal's ruling Trinamool Congress claiming that a ' Bangladeshi protester ' was voting in both countries. 'Let that sink in,' the Hindutva party said on social media. 'This isn't an accident. This is the TMC blueprint – flood Bengal's voter rolls with illegal infiltrators and secure elections with ghost votes.' West Bengal 'isn't just lawless – it's compromised from within', the BJP claimed. BJP leader Suvendu Adhikari claimed that lakhs of Bangladesh citizens were registered as voters in the state, The Hindu reported. The Opposition leader claimed that an alleged member of Bangladeshi militant group Ansarullah Bangla was also enlisted as a voter in Murshidabad. West Bengal BJP chief Sukanta Majumdar on Saturday described the incident as an example of the 'so-called Egiye [progressive] Bangla Model'. 'The same Newton who was seen wielding a stick during Bangladesh's quota reform movement is now a registered voter in Kakdwip,' the BJP leader said on social media. 'Thousands of Bangladeshi 'Newtons' voting in Bengal – courtesy of [Chief Minister] Mamata Banerjee's infiltration theory and appeasement politics,' he alleged. 'With illegal voters and these lathi-wielders miscreants as her support base, she's not running West Bengal… she's scripting a blueprint for Greater Bangladesh.' The Trinamool Congress rejected the BJP's allegations and said that the responsibility for border security was with the Border Security Force, India Today reported. The Border Security Force reports to the Union home ministry. 'Whether these people come from land, water or air, the BSF and Union government are responsible,' The Hindu quoted Trinamool leader Kunal Ghosh as saying. 'The state administration will do its role for sure.' The state's ruling party also claimed that the Election Commission was complicit in voter list tampering. In February, Banerjee had accused the BJP of allegedly attempting to add residents of Gujarat, Rajasthan, Punjab and Haryana to West Bengal's voter lists. The chief minister had also accused the BJP of adding fake voters to electoral lists to win the Assembly elections in Delhi and Maharashtra. In 2024, weeks of widespread student-led protests in Bangladesh against Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and her Awami League government had led to her resignation and her fleeing to India on August 5. In August, weeks of student-led protests in Bangladesh against a controversial quota scheme for government jobs snowballed into a broader agitation against the Sheikh Hasina government.