
Pahalgam attack: A leaf out of old Pak army playbook?
ISLAMABAD : It was long apprehended by peace activists in Pakistan. Now, it has happened – a terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Kashmir.
Well-meaning elements in Pakistan were on tenterhooks when the secessionist Baloch Liberation Army last month attacked the Jaffar Express, killing dozens. At the time, the Pakistani ministry of foreign affairs (MOFA), without specifically blaming India for the incident, accused it of 'sponsoring' terrorism in Pakistan. The peaceniks were worried Pakistan might retaliate, thereby triggering a spiral of tit-for-tat. They hoped that Pakistani chief of army staff (COAS), General Asim Munir, going ballistic in a recent speech would be the response. That hope was belied on Tuesday.
But why did Munir suddenly go off on a tangent with a volley of hostility towards India? And what can be made of the strike in Kashmir, the worst in years?
Salman Raja, the lawyer of ousted Pakistani PM Imran Khan, contended, 'His continued incarceration is fuelling public anger and alienation.'
The Pakistan Muslim League's Nawaz Sharif, as prime minister, attempted to prune the army's powers, but without success. However, the confrontation between the army and Imran Khan, leader of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), who is now in jail, could have caused an erosion in Pakistanis' goodwill towards their army; and its General Headquarters (GHQ) seem to be struggling to combat this slippage.
Indeed, the development has been seen in some academic, media and political circles in Islamabad as a reason for Munir's surprisingly sharp rhetoric – an attempt, in other words, to regain favourable public ratings.
Besides, as Raja put it, Pakistan's foreign policy is 'guided by the vision of the armed forces about the requirements of national security'. Thus, the diatribe against India.
A former director-general of the Pakistan Army's espionage wing, Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), said GHQ was losing patience over what they believed was India aiding and abetting the Afghanistan-based Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) – which a United Nations Security Council resolution says hopes to 'overthrow' the Pakistani government 'to establish an emirate based on its interpretation of Islamic law' – and separatists in the western Pakistani province of Balochistan.
Sitting across him, a retired senior officer of the Indian external intelligence agency, Research and Analysis Wing (R&AW), who narrowly missed becoming this organisation's chief, challenged the ex-DG of ISI by saying TTP was too small an outfit to pose a threat to Pakistan.
There's a kind of hush in Pakistan; especially in its twin cities of Islamabad, the country's capital, and Rawalpindi, where the GHQ is located and which is looked upon in diplomatic circles as the nation's nerve centre. People at best converse in whispers.
Raja is a graduate of Cambridge University and Harvard Law School. Now in his 50s, he's reputed to be a skilful attorney, and defended Sharif when he was ousted from office in 2017 and his family was accused of having links with off-shore companies. At present, he is not merely counsel for Sharif's arch opponent, Khan, but also secretary-general of PTI.
On a balmy late March evening in Islamabad, Raja drove up in a white SUV to collect me from my hotel. It was after dinner. We went to a café in a parade buzzing with customers at restaurants and other retail outlets, which have mushroomed in Islamabad. A stream of people came up to greet him, reminding him of messages they sent to him, or sought an appointment for a future meeting. In today's complex Pakistani politics, Raja is a quintessential Opposition insider.
Khan, an Oxford graduate, celebrated cricketer and captain of the squad that won Pakistan's only Cricket World Cup in 1992, took the plunge into politics in 1996 by forming PTI.
For over 20 years, he languished in the wilderness, barring winning his own seat and making gradual headway at the provincial level in the North West Frontier Province, now known as Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Then, in a trice, he became the flavour of the season; with the not-so-tacit backing of the puissant Pakistan Army.
There were always competing opinions about Khan's abilities as a politician, even more so about his eligibility to be prime minister. Yet, the men in uniform saw in him an alternative. But within six months of his election as prime minister in 2018 – suspected to have been engineered in his favour – the aforementioned DG, ISI, said the choice was seen as a mistake.
While the kingmakers pondered over how to eject him and whom to replace him with, Khan and PTI's head start in the sphere of social media and his anti-corruption stance enhanced his popularity, even penetrating into significant sections of serving and retired armed forces' personnel and their families.
There arrived, though, a moment when GHQ decided it was time to act. With a chunk of his lawmakers abandoning him under pressure from the powers-that-be, Khan's coalition government was defeated in a confidence vote on April 9, 2022. 'It reflected the basic fault line in Pakistani politics…including the functioning of parliament,' said Raja.
'Every election result is manoeuvred by the Establishment (code for the Pakistan Army and its allies in the top echelons of the civil service) to ensure that no single party is able to form a government on its own. There is always an Establishment-backed party, with sufficient seats given to it, that can help topple a government once the main opposition parties have been given the go-ahead by the Establishment. The PTI government headed by Imran Khan was brought down with the Establishment shepherding the process,' he said.
Asked about the general elections on February 8, 2024, which independent observers were convinced wasn't free or fair, Raja alleged the vote 'was massively rigged, not during polling but through consolidation of results'.
''The actual results recorded at polling stations in nearly a 100 national assembly seats and an even larger number on the provincial assembly elections in Punjab, Sindh, Balochistan were changed. This is universally accepted inside Pakistan. Imran Khan's PTI won a landslide victory,' he said.
'The PTI was disallowed from participating in the election as a party. Its candidates were declared independents. Even so, PTI backed candidates won over 90 seats. The actual number should have been closer to 180 seats in the National Assembly,' he added.
Raja said Khan's arrest and detention was part of the latest effort at political engineering by the Establishment. 'Cases against him are silly. The entire judicial system has been assaulted through the Establishment mandated 26th Amendment to the (Pakistan) Constitution and a campaign of intimidation of independent-minded judges.'
Reacting to the amendment enacted last October, the secretary-general of the International Court of Justice, Santiago Canton, indicated that the changes incorporated in it 'bring an extraordinary level of political influence over the process of judicial appointments and the judiciary's own administration.'
'Six judges of the Islamabad high court wrote a letter to the then Chief Justice of Pakistan complaining of surveillance and intimidation to which they had been subjected by the agencies. The main object of this assault on the judiciary is to prevent Imran Khan and his party members from getting justice,' alleged Raja
In the past, the Establishment has done deals, whereby an accused, convicted or imprisoned politician has been let off in lieu of leaving the country. Is such an understanding in the pipeline? 'There is no formal offer. However, Imran Khan has himself alluded to offers requiring him to go politically silent in return for his freedom,' Raja said.
The Pakistan Army and MOFA did not respond to a request for comment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
33 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Is Trump a partner India can trust? Jaishankar's take on US-India ties
Indian External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, on a visit to Brussels this week, shared candid views on India's foreign policy priorities, the evolving geopolitical landscape, and relations with major powers — including the United States under President Donald Trump. In an interview with Euractiv, Jaishankar, who met European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and the EU's foreign affairs chief Kaja Kallas, also addressed India's position on terrorism and its relationship with China. Asked whether India trusts Donald Trump and views him as a reliable partner, Jaishankar responded, 'Meaning what?' He said, 'I take the world as I find it. Our aim is to advance every relationship that serves our interests — and the US relationship is of immense importance to us. It's not about personality X or president Y.' On India's relationship with China, Jaishankar highlighted a growing trend among global companies seeking to 'de-risk' supply chains by investing in India. He pointed out that many firms are also wary of where they store their data, emphasising that 'they'd rather place it somewhere secure and trustworthy than simply go for efficiency'. 'Would you really want that in the hands of actors you don't feel comfortable with?' he asked, underlining India's pitch as a more reliable economic partner than China. #WATCH | "We strongly believe that there should be zero tolerance for terrorism in all its forms and manifestations. In that context, it is also essential that we never yield to nuclear blackmail. This is a shared and interconnected challenge for the global community, and it is… — ANI (@ANI) June 10, 2025 Terrorism and the Kashmir question Jaishankar also addressed international perceptions of recent violence in Kashmir, where a terror attack in Pahalgam claimed 26 lives. He challenged the framing of the conflict as a simple 'tit-for-tat' between nuclear neighbours. 'Let me remind you of something — there was a man named Osama bin Laden,' he said. 'Why did he, of all people, feel safe living for years in a Pakistani military town, right next to their equivalent of West Point? I want the world to understand — this isn't merely an India-Pakistan issue. It's about terrorism. And that very same terrorism will eventually come back to haunt you.' Jaishankar was also pressed on India's refusal to impose sanctions on Russia or take a stronger stance in support of Ukraine. 'We don't believe that differences can be resolved through war — we don't believe a solution will come from the battlefield,' he said. 'It's not for us to prescribe what that solution should be. My point is, we're not being prescriptive or judgemental — but we are also not uninvolved.' Indian External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar with EU foreign affairs chief Kaja Kallas at the first strategic dialogue in Brussels on June 10. (Photo: X/@DrSJaishankar) Jaishankar defends India's neutrality When challenged on whether India was being too neutral, Jaishankar defended the country's position by recalling its own experiences. 'We have a strong relationship with Ukraine as well — it's not only about Russia. But every country, naturally, considers its own experience, history and interests,' he said. Jaishankar said that India had the longest-standing grievance, as its borders were violated just months after independence when Pakistan sent invaders into Kashmir. 'And the countries that were most supportive of that? Western countries. If those same countries — who were evasive or reticent then — now say 'let's have a great conversation about international principles', I think I'm justified in asking them to reflect on their own past,' he said. India in a multipolar world Looking ahead, Jaishankar emphasised the importance of a multipolar world and Europe's evolving role within it. 'Multipolarity is already here,' he said. 'Europe now faces the need to make more decisions in its own interest — using its own capabilities, and based on the relationships it fosters globally.' He acknowledged Europe's growing pursuit of 'strategic autonomy', calling it a term that was once part of India's own vocabulary. 'The EU is clearly a major pole in the global order — and increasingly an autonomous one. That is precisely why I'm here: to deepen our relationship in this multipolar world.' India's reservations on EU green agenda On the European Union's push to set global standards through its Green Deal — especially the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) — Jaishankar said, 'Let's not pretend — we're opposed to parts of it.' He said, 'We have very deep reservations about CBAM and we've been quite open about it. The idea that one part of the world will set standards for everybody else is something which we are against.'


The Wire
37 minutes ago
- The Wire
‘Some Progress' Yet Differences Over Farm Product Tariffs Hold Up US-India Trade Deal
Shipping containers at a port. Photo: Ali Mkumbwa on Unsplash. Real journalism holds power accountable Since 2015, The Wire has done just that. But we can continue only with your support. Contribute Now New Delhi: Differences over farm product tariff cuts is one of the reasons why officials of the United States and Indian sides have been unable to finalise an early trade agreement even after week-long negotiations, The Hindu Businessline has reported, quoting people aware of the matter. The outlet's sources said that 'some progress' had been made towards reaching a balanced deal. 'Differences continued over tariff cut demands by the US, especially for farm products, and the need to protect Indian sensitivities,' the source told Businessline. Reuters, meanwhile, has also reported on 'progress' in the latest round of talks in New Delhi on Tuesday. Government sources told the agency that talks focused on industrial and farm goods, tariff cuts, and non-tariff barriers. The US team has senior officials from the Office of the US Trade Representative. The delegation was in India from June 4-10. Indian trade ministry officials are headed by chief negotiator Rajesh Agrawal. Negotiations are likely to continue. 'During the visit, in-depth negotiations were held on various elements of the proposed BTA that among others included areas such as market access, SPS (sanitary and phyto-sanitary/TBT (technical barriers to trade), digital trade, customs and trade facilitation and legal framework,' an official told the news agency PTI. The report noted that the US has a special interest in digital trade, and its digital services providers have often flagged restrictions on cross-border data flows and competition policy as a hindrance in operating in India. Businessline's source told the outlet that India is ready to bring down tariffs for many US products and the list may include items like automobiles, alcoholic beverages, certain fruits and nuts and chemicals, among other items. India has not agreed to budge on items like rice and wheat. India has to arrive at a trade deal with the US by July 9, or face the brunt of the 26% 'reciprocal' duties imposed by Trump. The US president and Indian prime minister Narendra Modi had agreed earlier this year to conclude a bilateral trade agreement by fall 2025. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.


The Wire
38 minutes ago
- The Wire
UN Report Highlights Deep Contrasts Behind India's Population Numbers
Representative image of a woman with her children. Photo: PTI New Delhi: A United Nations report argues that beyond India's population numbers lies a crisis of individuals unable to achieve their desired family size. The UN Population Fund's (UNFPA) 2025 State of the World Population report found one in three adult Indians (36%) have faced an unintended pregnancy. Nearly a third (30%) have struggled with an unfulfilled desire for children. The report states 23% of Indians surveyed have experienced both. The report, 'The Real Fertility Crisis,' calls for a shift from focusing on population figures. It states the 'real crisis… is not underpopulation or overpopulation,' but the failure of systems to support 'a person's ability to make free and informed choices about sex, contraception and starting a family.' It also says that India's population is estimated to have reached 146.39 crore by April. While India has a national replacement-level fertility rate of 2.0, the UNFPA highlights a 'high fertility and low fertility duality.' This reflects disparities, with states like Bihar and Uttar Pradesh having higher fertility rates than states such as Kerala and Tamil Nadu. The report links this to unequal access to economic opportunity, healthcare, education, and regional gender norms. Findings from a YouGov survey across 14 countries show financial concerns are the primary obstacle for Indians, with nearly four in ten citing it. Job insecurity, housing constraints, and a lack of reliable child care also contribute. The survey found 19% of Indian respondents – the highest of any country – said their partner wanting fewer children was a key factor. Andrea M Wojnar, the UNFPA India Representative, said : 'India has made significant progress in lowering fertility rates… thanks to improved education and access to reproductive healthcare. This has led to major reductions in maternal mortality… Yet, deep inequalities persist across states, castes, and income groups.' Wojnar added: 'The real demographic dividend comes when everyone has the freedom and means to make informed reproductive choices. India has a unique opportunity to show how reproductive rights and economic prosperity can advance together.' The report illustrates this with a story of three women from one family in Bihar. The grandmother, married at 16, had five sons due to social pressure and lack of contraceptive knowledge. Her daughter-in-law had six children despite wanting fewer. The granddaughter, a university graduate, has chosen with her husband to have only two children, citing the need for a secure future. The UNFPA advocates for 'demographic resilience'—adapting to population change while upholding human rights. For India, it recommends a holistic, rights-based approach. The report calls for expanded access to sexual and reproductive health services, including infertility care; investment in childcare and housing; inclusive policies for unmarried individuals and marginalised groups; better data on bodily autonomy; and social change to challenge stigma. The UNFPA argues that focusing on population numbers misses the point, suggesting a nation's success is measured by whether its people can build the lives and families they desire. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.