Elon Musk again accuses Chuck Schumer of corruption, calls him ...
has responded to a Senator
Chuck Schumer
who has publicly criticised the
Tesla CEO
, stating that his past actions will cause "lasting damage to the American people." Schumer's comments specifically targeted the Musk's
DOGE
, asserting that he should apologise to the US citizens.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
"Over and over again, what Musk did with his DOGE is going to cause lasting damage to the American people," Schumer stated in an interview in an interview on "Morning Joe". He dismissed the idea that Musk's current position outside the administration negates responsibility, calling it "ridiculous."
"...and just saying, now, he's out of the administration, and he's in a bind. That's, that's ridiculous. He ought to be apologising to the American people for what he has done," he said.
Schumer then outlined his expectations, saying, "If for some reason he sees the light. I don't know if he does or not, but that's what we need an apology and him to tell Trump to undo the damage that he has done."
Musk calls Chuck Schumer 'Scumbag'
In response, the entrepreneur posted on social media platform X, directly addressing Schumer's comments. Replying to a post by a user's post, Musk stated, "@DOGE did 'lasting damage' to his graft and corruption.
Chuck Scumbag
."
This is not the first time that Musk has called Schumer corrupt.
In April, Musk hit at Schumer, accusing him of potentially being involved in government fraud. When Schumer said, 'Trump has unleashed chaos on America', Musk replied, saying, 'Chuck, I'm starting to think you're getting a piece of the action with the government fraud. But no, that couldn't possibly be the reason, could it?…'
Schumer was reportedly called 'Scumbag' last year in videos circulating online which showed the an calling him names at the Dominican Day Parade in New York City.
"Hey, Chuck. You know Dominicans actually hate your guts, because you're a scumbag. You know that right?" the unidentified man said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Harvard vs. Trump round two: US blocks foreign students over national security concerns
Trump blocks foreign students from entering Harvard over security concerns In a sweeping proclamation issued Wednesday evening, Trump barred the entry of foreign students under Harvard-hosted student and exchange visitor visas, citing national security concerns. The order, effective immediately, suspends new admissions under the F, M, and J visa categories, halting the arrival of students who were set to begin their academic journeys at Harvard. The proclamation also places current international students and researchers at the university under review, directing the U.S. Department of State to consider revoking existing visas on a case-by-case basis. The suspension is set to last for six months, with the possibility of an extension. The move comes on the heels of the Department of Homeland Security's earlier, failed attempt to decertify Harvard's ability to enrol international students — a decision that was blocked by a federal court after the university sued. Trump's proclamation appears to be a legal workaround, invoking presidential authority under Sections 212(f) and 215(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act — the same basis used for the travel bans upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court during his first term. A Policy with Far-Reaching Impact Harvard currently hosts more than 10,000 international students and scholars. The ban disrupts not just their mobility, but also their education, research, and career trajectories. While current students may remain temporarily, their visa status is now subject to review under the banner of "national interest." Unlike previous broad travel bans that targeted specific countries, this order is unique in singling out one academic institution. It accuses Harvard of failing to report disciplinary and criminal information regarding international students — despite the university stating that no such convictions exist for the past two years. The administration's rationale includes a mix of national security concerns, allegations of ties to the Chinese government, and accusations that Harvard has hosted individuals affiliated with the Chinese military. In a supporting fact sheet, the administration pointed to over $150 million in foreign funding since 2020, rising campus crime rates, and support for diversity and inclusion policies as further justification. Shifting Sentiments Among Global Students This proclamation has introduced fresh instability for students who once saw American education as a sure investment in their futures. Many who had secured admission to Harvard are now left in limbo, unable to enter the U.S. and uncertain whether they'll be able to pursue their degrees at all. The ban is likely to accelerate a trend already in motion — international students exploring alternative destinations such as Germany, Ireland, Australia, and Asian countries, where policies have remained relatively stable and welcoming. Institutions in those regions may now benefit from an outflow of highly qualified students deterred by U.S. restrictions. For generations, the United States has been the top destination for international students seeking academic excellence, innovation, and global opportunities. From Ivy League campuses to cutting-edge research labs, American institutions have drawn the best minds from across the world. But the latest move by the U.S. President Donald Trump has cast a shadow over that reputation. With rising visa restrictions and unpredictable policy shifts, many are questioning whether the U.S. remains a reliable choice for higher education. Beyond Harvard: A Larger Pattern? While the immediate order targets Harvard, it raises concerns that similar actions could extend to other American universities, especially those receiving significant foreign funding or engaged in global partnerships. The precedent set by targeting a specific institution based on political grievances introduces a degree of unpredictability previously unseen in U.S. higher education policy. International students — once seen as cultural ambassadors and economic contributors — now face a climate where geopolitical narratives can redefine their eligibility overnight. Even institutions with strong global reputations are no longer immune from federal scrutiny or political backlash. The Long-Term Cost to U.S. Education International students are integral to American universities, contributing billions of dollars annually to the economy, diversifying campuses, and driving innovation in STEM and business fields. Policies that restrict their participation may erode the global standing of U.S. education, damage institutional competitiveness, and discourage future applicants. As the world watches Harvard's next legal move — and the outcome of any new court challenges — many students are quietly shifting their aspirations elsewhere. In an increasingly uncertain environment, academic excellence alone may no longer be enough to outweigh the risks of studying in the United States. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
'There's nothing there in the file': Did Jeffrey Epstein die by suicide? What FBI deputy said
The rumours around Jeffrey Epstein 's death have finally come to a full stop as FBI deputy director Dan Bongino gave some insightful information on this. In an interview with Fox News, Bongino confirmed on Wednesday that Jeffrey Epstein died by suicide and there could be no other cause that was possible. Regarding the Epstein investigation, Bongino explained that surveillance footage, though not of optimal quality, documented the final hours. "The video does show in that specific block, that he goes in, made a phone call; you'll see 12 hours of guards going in basically check on him, come back. You'll see nobody really comes out of that bay in that area than him. There's no one in there." "There's nothing there in the file at all that indicates anything other than in fact a suicide," Bongino added. The American financier passed away in 2019 while facing sex trafficking charges. Bongino outlined the FBI's renewed focus on various investigations, including the origins of COVID-19. He stated firmly that the public would receive answers about the pandemic's beginnings, noting "I ordered that case immediately to be looked into again. We have a great investigator on it." Discussing the Mar-a-Lago raid, Bongino indicated significant findings: "We found some troubling, really troubling items in there that we actioned immediately, to say the least." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với mức chênh lệch giá thấp nhất IC Markets Đăng ký Undo He acknowledged apparent differences in how classified documents cases involving Hillary Clinton and former President Joe Biden were handled. The Deputy Director confirmed ongoing investigations into several high-profile matters, including the discovery of cocaine at the White House in 2023, the 2022 Dobbs decision leak, actions against pro-life protesters, and the handling of parents at school board meetings. Emphasising the significance of these investigations, Bongino stated: "I get a kick out of it on social media. People are like, 'this case isn't a big deal. I don't care.' Well, I don't care that you don't care. I care." He particularly stressed the importance of resolving the White House cocaine incident, committing to finding answers with his team.
Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
Kill the Big Ugly Bill, says Elon Musk as Tesla CEO declares war on Donald Trump's bill
Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk has started a fierce campaign against US President Donald Trump's $4 trillion tax and spending bill, urging Americans to pressure lawmakers to reject it. In a viral post on X, Musk warned that the bill would bankrupt the country, calling it a 'disgusting abomination' and dubbing it the 'Debt Slavery Bill'. On June 4, Musk posted "Kill the Big Ugly Bill," signalling his intent to oppose the bill championed by Trump, who has previously referred to it as a "Big Beautiful Tax and Spending Bill." According to reports, Musk's primary concern is the bill's potential to exacerbate the national debt and lead to severe economic consequences. Elon Musk's Opposition to Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' The bill, which extends Trump's 2017 tax cuts, increases defense spending, and raises the national debt ceiling, has drawn criticism from fiscal conservatives . Musk, who recently left his role as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), argues that the legislation undermines cost-cutting efforts and could inflate the deficit by $2.5 trillion. Elon Musk, who has long warned of the national debt as an 'existential threat,' had previously offered only mild critiques of the bill despite his role as an informal adviser to Trump. However, his latest comments mark a dramatic escalation in tone. Musk urged his 180 million followers to contact their senators and representatives, stating: 'Call your Senator. Call your Congressman. Bankrupting America is NOT ok! KILL the BILL.' He also shared a photoshopped poster of Quentin Tarantino's 'Kill Bill', replacing the film's title with his anti-bill slogan. White House says Bill will stimulate US economy The White House has pushed back against the deficit projections, with officials arguing that the CBO estimates fail to account for the potential economic growth spurred by the tax cuts. They claim the bill's provisions will stimulate the economy enough to offset the increased spending. However, Musk's public rebuke highlights growing tensions within Trump's Republican Party over the legislation, which faced a rocky passage through the House due to opposition from both fiscal conservatives and moderates. The bill's passage has also drawn scrutiny from independent fiscal watchdogs. A recent CBO report warned that the tax provisions alone could increase the federal deficit by $3.8 trillion over the next decade, while proposed cuts to social programs like Medicaid and food stamps would only reduce spending by $1 trillion. The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a nonpartisan group, estimated the bill could add roughly $3.3 trillion to the national debt over the same period. AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
