Britain's 'Stop Brexit Man' acquitted by judge over his musical protests outside Parliament
An anti- Brexit activist who has spent years mounting a one-man protest outside Britain's Parliament won a court victory on Monday against a police attempt to pull the plug on his musical activities.
A judge in London cleared Steve Bray, known as 'Stop Brexit Man,' of failing to comply with a police order to stop playing amplified music in Parliament Square on March 20, 2024.
Bray, 56, came to prominence in the years after Britain 's 2016 vote to leave the European Union by bellowing 'Stop Brexit' near television reporters during live broadcasts while wearing a top hat in the blue and yellow of the EU flag.
More recently he has taken to playing satirically tinged songs before Parliament's weekly Prime Minister's Questions session, including the theme from 'The Muppet Show' and Darth Vader's theme from 'Star Wars.' He blasted 'Things Can Only Get Better' outside 10 Downing St. while then-Prime Minister Rishi Sunak called an election in May 2024.
Bray, who represented himself during his trial, argued that the music was part of his 'fundamental right to protest,' and Deputy District Judge Anthony Woodcock agreed.
Handing down a not-guilty verdict at Westminster Magistrates' Court, the judge said Bray believes he has 'an important message to disseminate.'
'How he chooses to express those views is a matter for him,' the judge said, noting that 'lampooning the government through satire is a long tradition in this country.'
After the verdict, Bray said that 'today is a very important day, not just for us as protesters, but for everybody's freedom of expression and their right to protest.'
'Regardless what side of the fence you're on, whatever your protest is, this is a victory for you,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
HMRC slammed for ‘unacceptable' delay in reporting £49m phishing scam
A committee of MPs has criticised HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) for failing to promptly report a data breach affecting approximately 100,000 taxpayers. The Treasury Committee said it only learned of the incident through a notification published on the HMRC website, coinciding with a live session on June 4. The breach, a phishing scam, resulted in the loss of £47 million, a figure recently revised to £49 million. HMRC officials informed the Treasury Committee that they have contacted, or are in the process of contacting, 100,000 individuals whose accounts were locked down following what they described as an "organised crime" incident that began last year. Adding to the controversy, the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA) stated in a letter published by the committee on Tuesday that it had not discussed the phishing incident with HMRC and was unaware of it before the June 4 hearing. The committee also published a letter sent via email from its chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier to John-Paul Marks, chief executive, HMRC. The letter said: 'I am alarmed that it was never deemed necessary to inform Parliament about an issue which affected such a vast number of taxpayers and led to the loss of £47 million of public money. 'To discover this information during a session from press reports and without adequate time for the committee to review the information in detail is unacceptable.' The letter said the committee is seeking responses from HMRC as to 'why was Parliament not notified earlier about the loss of £47 million of taxpayers' money, whether through a written ministerial statement and/or public or confidential letters to the Treasury Committee and the Public Accounts Committee?' The committee is also seeking responses on why the update was published on the day of the committee hearing on the work of HMRC and who else in Government was told about the incident and when. It also wants to receive a timeline of how the incident unfolded and find out what measures HMRC has put in place to ensure that such incidents do not happen in future. The letter asked for a reply by June 24, 2025. Meanwhile, the letter from Glenn Collins, head of technical and strategic engagement, ACCA, to Dame Meg, dated June 5, said: 'While we regularly engage with HMRC, including earlier in the year about issues relating to agent account access, we have not received any communication from HMRC on the issue of taxpayer account breaches until yesterday. 'We have highlighted to HMRC our frustration that HMRC has not been transparent or timely in its communication over this important issue.'
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
‘Pride crumble' served in House of Lords
The House of Lords canteen has served peers a 'pride crumble' dessert with a rainbow-coloured topping. The River Restaurant in Parliament, which caters for peers and other staff on the parliamentary estate, offered as its hot dessert option on Tuesday a 'pride crumble'. The topping of the £2.15 pudding appeared to be dyed with red and blue food colouring in horizontal stripes, and was served with custard to mark Pride month. It is unclear whether the crumble was designed to resemble a particular LGBT flag, such as the rainbow flag, or the pink, blue and white transgender flag. It comes after the House of Lords removed Pride flags from its canteen put up at the start of June following a complaint from a peer. The 'Progress Pride' flag, which was among the decorations, includes the colours of the transgender movement and is seen by many as indicative of support for gender ideology – the idea that sex is a spectrum and that people can change their identity. Baroness Nicholson, a Tory peer, complained to the Lord Speaker, Lord McFall, and officials agreed that the flags should be taken down as they had not been sanctioned by the authorities. During her time in Parliament, she voted in favour of section 28, which banned the 'promotion of homosexuality' by local authorities, and against gay marriage. The Progress Pride flag, designed in 2021, is replacing the traditional rainbow Pride flag in many venues. It includes an extra triangle of colour on the left hand side, made up of stripes including white, pink and light blue – the colours of the transgender movement. The flags were not on display in the House of Commons restaurants. The canteen also served rainbow couscous for peers last week as part of its Pride celebrations. The Pride flag was flown from Parliament for the first time in history in June 2016. Last month, Reform UK announced that its councils would not be allowed to fly any LGBT or Pride flags, restricting local authorities to flying only the Union Jack and the St George's Cross.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Everyone loves nuclear now – even when there's a certifiable lunatic in charge
It being Pride month, the Lords canteen is serving 'pride crumble' (it comes before a gooseberry fool). Dyed in the colours of the trans flag, sickly pink and blue, I skipped it for a coffee – for I have no desire to be an ally of gastroenteritis – and marvelled at the metaphor. Parliament is an incubator of dead consensus. Next up: a flat earth risotto and bisque de leach. For 20 years, the Commons was anti-nuclear energy. Now it's pro. And who have we put in charge of the power of a billion suns? Ed Miliband, a certifiable lunatic who, when not making a statement at the despatch box, sits down and continues the conversation by himself, chewing on his thumbs. He's furious that Rachel Reeves passed on funding his plan to build a pixie dust mine in Bishop's Stortford, despite arguing that gremlins can work it for free. 'Frankly Rachel, they're the next generation in renewables.' Just cover the critters in water and 12 more pop out on their back. Ed later told his psychiatrist, who then told my AA meeting, that he saw all this in a documentary. Gremlins 2: the New Batch suggests they can also be up-skilled to become brainy, electrical or even man-hungry brides. The Tories applauded his announcement. A Lib Dem MP – turquoise blazer and tennis shoes – approved the change from 'dither and delay by successive Conservative governments' (she forgets Nick Clegg opposed nuclear, too). Labour MPs practically popped champagne. Baggy Shanker referred the House 'to my register of interests', labelled it a 'wonderful day' and welcomed 'the selection of Rolls-Royce to deliver the first of the US small reactors.' According to said register, Baggy used to work at Rolls-Royce and owns shares in the company, as do his wife and son. 'It must be awful,' said a wag in the press gallery, 'for all these Labour MPs, knowing they're going to lose their seat to Reform.' Across town, Nigel showed off Zia Yusuf to photographers – proof of life! – and unveiled his replacement as party chairman, David Bull, a TV doctor who has presented a show about ghosts (as opposed to Zia who now looks like one). Was Dr David happy with the appointment? Hard to tell. I'm not saying he's had work done but when he folded his legs, he crossed his eyebrows, too. As for Nigel, he's impossible to sketch. He tells the gags before you've written them. Zia 'crawled under the wire' but 'lost his bid for freedom' and is 'back inside'. Nigel touched his arm and Yusuf visibly flinched. The boss expertly lampooned Green Ed and his net-zero madness, which – I agree – will never catch on. As Greta Thunberg has learnt, no matter how uncomfortable, it's still much easier to fly. Imagine it! Someday Baggy Shanker will be replaced by Darren Grimes MP: 'all me nan ever wanted was a Rolls-Royce reactor in her pigeon loft'. For everyone loves cuddly nuclear now, despite Windscale, despite Chernobyl – all except the Greens and SNP, the latter for reasons of hate. 'Fourteen billion pounds splurged on ENGLISH nuclear power plants,' spat SNP MP Kirsty Blackman, as if 'English' were a slur. We need an English pride day in the canteen, with a red and white pudding.
