1 in 4 Quebec NDP candidates have little presence just days before election
Jérémie Juneau's candidate page on the NDP website is just an orange square, with no photo, no biography and no link.
And voters in the northwestern Quebec riding of Abitibi-Témiscamingue where he is running might not have much luck learning about him, as he campaigns on a part-time basis without election signs, a campaign director or volunteers.
"I'm literally alone," the 29-year-old Amos, Que., resident said in an interview Wednesday. "There's a song about it," he added a moment later, humming a few notes of Eric Carmen's All By Myself over a spotty Wi-Fi connection.
Juneau isn't the only one. Days before the April 28 vote, there was no photo or biographical information on the NDP website for more than 20 of its 78 candidates running in Quebec, in what two political scientists describe as another sign of distress for a party fighting to keep a presence in the province.
WATCH | How the NDP is attacking the final days of the campaign:
With NDP facing oblivion, Singh kicks into high gear
19 hours ago
Duration 2:09
All parties have "paper" candidates who help parties fill out their slates, but have little chance of winning and often a limited presence in the field. In Quebec, they are known as candidats poteaux, or "pole candidates," seen only in election signs on utility poles.
It's a title Juneau doesn't fully reject. While he lives in the riding — unlike many paper candidates — he also works two construction-related jobs, including one that requires seven-day shifts. He says he doesn't mind campaigning by himself, but his work schedule means he's unable to meet as many voters as he'd like.
After the 'Orange Wave'
In 2011, the NDP swept to power in Juneau's riding, as part of the "Orange Wave" that saw the party win 59 Quebec seats. But 14 years later, the riding is held by the Bloc Québécois, the NDP riding association is dormant and party members are few and far between.
"It's as if the party doesn't exist in the riding," Juneau said.
Tari Ajadi, an assistant professor of political science at McGill University, sees the number of NDP paper candidates as a "marker of distress" for a party that "aims to be a national party, but doesn't have the resources or the capacity to really leverage that national party status."
He said the disorganization is notable because it was guaranteed there would be an election in 2025: "If you don't have your candidates in place or at least a riding association, some momentum, some kind of connection to the grassroots, that's a real challenge."
The NDP appears to be focusing most of its resources in Quebec on a handful of ridings, mostly in Montreal, where the party is most competitive. The party's only Quebec MP is Alexandre Boulerice, who holds a riding in the city.
Thierry Giasson, a political science professor at Université Laval, says the NDP had little choice but to narrow its focus, given its limited number of volunteers and financial resources, which are generated by riding associations.
"They have to make choices," he said in a phone interview.
As a result, while posters abound for NDP candidates such as Craig Sauvé, who is running again after finishing a close third in a byelection last fall in Montreal's LaSalle-Emard-Verdun riding, you won't see any for 78-year-old Suzanne Dufresne, who is running in the downtown riding next door.
'I'm being an example'
However, Dufresne said she has received support from the party, who sent people to help her collect the last few dozen signatures she needed to confirm her candidacy.
"It's a pleasure for me to represent the NDP as a candidate, even if my adventure ends here," the retired rail employee said ahead of a candidates' debate at a Montreal community centre.
While she has little chance of defeating Liberal MP Marc Miller, who has been in office for a decade, Dufresne has other goals.
"I consider that the arrival of women in politics is very important," she said. "I'm being an example, encouraging other women."
While Giasson and Ajadi agree the NDP had to target its limited resources, they say there is a political price to pay for running paper candidates.
Ajadi points out that failing to support long-shot candidates will mean a lower share of the popular vote, and it deprives new candidates of proper campaign experience. Giasson notes that when a candidate is largely absent, "it's ideas that aren't circulating, it's the chance of getting people involved, in getting donations, too."
Running paper candidates doesn't always finish badly, he noted. The 2011 Orange Wave saw several elected, including Ruth Ellen Brosseau, a campus bar manager in Ottawa who had never set foot in her rural Quebec riding before becoming its MP.
Brosseau became a success, winning re-election in 2015 and becoming the party's agriculture critic before narrowly losing in 2019 and 2021. This year, she's running again in the riding, as one of the NDP's best-known faces.
Back in Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Juneau has no illusions about winning — at least this time. Instead, he's looking to rebuild the grassroots support his party needs to succeed in the future, whether or not it's him on the ballot.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Calgary Herald
an hour ago
- Calgary Herald
Breakenridge: Supply management ignored for sexier political battles
Article content Supply management is not something that typically shows up these days on most lists of Alberta's grievances with Ottawa. Article content In fact, there's likely still a fair amount of support for the supply management system among those in these regulated sectors of agriculture — dairy, eggs and poultry. Conversely, it's not something the Alberta government has devoted much time or energy to; the same goes for many of the other voices who have demanded a fairer deal for our province within Canada. Article content Article content Article content But not only is it a system that is bad for consumers and harmful to potential trade deals, it also disadvantages the West in favour of Quebec. Alberta's government should not only be opposing the latest attempt in Ottawa to shield supply management from any future trade agreements, but we should be pushing for the end of supply management itself. Article content Article content In short, supply management operates like a legal cartel system, where valuable quotas limit and control who participates in the market, where prices are set by a marketing board (which also involves discarding significant quantities of milk each year), and where foreign competition is kept out by a wall of sky-high tariffs. Despite the argument that the system protects farmers, there are far fewer dairy farms now than before supply management came into existence. Article content It should come as no surprise that even with cross-party support in Ottawa for supply management, its biggest political champion is the Bloc Québécois. The Bloc has once again tabled legislation that would legally preclude the government from including supply management in any future trade talks. The most recent attempt managed to pass in the House of Commons, but got stalled in the Senate. Article content Article content This is no small point. Last year, the U.K. walked away from trade talks with Canada over our intransigence on this issue. The U.S. has made its displeasure with supply management well known, even though CUSMA did allow for some minor carve-outs for American products. Article content Article content The rest of the ag sector, on the other hand, is quite heavily reliant on access to foreign markets. Alberta exports billions of dollars worth of just beef and canola products to the U.S. each year. As the Canadian Agri-Food Trade Alliance warns, this bill would 'harm the thousands of farmers, ranchers, processors and agri-food exporters who rely on open access to global markets.' Article content But there's another aspect to this issue that's highlighted in a recent report from the Macdonald-Laurier Institute — the regional favouritism that supply management creates.

National Observer
4 hours ago
- National Observer
‘Harper's dreams coming true': MPs slam Carney's fast-tracking plan
Prime Minister Mark Carney's new bill to fast-track major projects will have to rely on Conservative votes to pass, with all other parties expressing major reservations. The legislation would allow the federal government to conditionally approve projects it deems 'in the national interest' before an environmental or impact assessment or other regulatory processes take place. Both the NDP and Greens have spoken out against it, while Patrick Bonin, Bloc Québécois environment and climate change critic, called Carney's plan to fast-track major projects 'highly problematic' at a French-language press conference on Monday. The federal government is seeking to give itself 'superpowers' to accelerate projects and weaken environmental protections, Bonin said. Some of the factors used to evaluate whether a project is in the national interest are vague, and there's no obligation for the government to adhere to it, he added. Then, there is the question of sovereignty and whether provinces can say no to projects in their jurisdiction. Last week, Carney said projects need consensus from provinces to move forward, but the legislation doesn't spell that out, leaving room for potential overreach on provincial jurisdiction, Bonin said. The Building Canada Act is part of an omnibus bill that also includes action to remove federal barriers to interprovincial trade, which is less controversial than the changes to major project approvals. On Monday, the Bloc Québécois called on the federal government to split the omnibus bill into two separate bills so the issues can be studied in the relevant federal committees. The federal Conservatives have not confirmed whether they will support the bill — Leader Pierre Poilievre said caucus will discuss it on Wednesday. For the Conservatives, the question is not whether legislation is perfect, but whether it is better than the way things are, Poilievre said on Friday. 'That's what we'll be looking at as we study this newly-introduced bill over the next few days.' 'We would vote in favour of accelerating even one project,' Poilievre said, indicating that he wants to see new pipelines in particular. 'Once a project is on that list, it's not a question of if it's going to move forward, but how,' Alexandre Boulerice, NDP critic for environment and climate change, said. 'It's like Stephen Harper's dreams coming true." Last week, BC Premier David Eby said he will not support Alberta Premier Danielle Smith's vision of building a new oil pipeline to BC's north coast. Poilievre made it clear he doesn't think provinces should get veto power over nationally important projects. 'We need a pipeline to the Pacific, and if the prime minister says he's going to wait till everyone agrees, then nothing will get done, which is what has been happening for the last decade,' Poilievre said at a press conference at Parliament Hill on Monday. If the Conservatives support Bill C-5, the Liberals will have the votes they need to get it through the House of Commons. The NDP says its members will vote against the bill, with one MP calling the major projects section 'really dangerous.' 'Once a project is on that list, it's not a question of if it's going to move forward, but how,' Alexandre Boulerice, NDP critic for environment and climate change, said in a phone interview with Canada's National Observer. 'It's like Stephen Harper's dreams coming true.' He said the NDP is currently exploring possible options to block the bill, but any action would likely require cooperation with the Bloc Québécois. Either way, Boulerice doesn't see how the federal government can rush the bill through by July 1, given that there are less than two weeks left before the House rises for the summer. 'It's a really capitalist logic that what we need to do is to provide certainty to investors and companies,' Boulerice said. Green Party Leader Elizabeth May also criticized the proposed legislation in a June 9 press release. 'Bill C-5 gives the federal Cabinet sweeping discretion to fast-track projects while weakening Indigenous rights and environmental protections,' May's statement reads. 'This is the first time in 40 years that Canadian environmental assessment law has been written to serve political deals first and environmental responsibility second.' Factors for determining national interest 'carefully worded' The bill lists some factors the government may consider when deciding whether a project will be listed for fast-tracking, one of which is whether it will 'contribute to clean growth and to meeting Canada's objectives with respect to climate change.' Another factor is whether it will 'advance the interests of Indigenous peoples.' Boulerice said these are nothing more than broad slogans. Mark Winfield, a professor of environmental governance at York University, was of the same mind. 'These are attempts to cover off points of potential vulnerability,' he said in a phone interview with C anada's National Observer. The bill does not have a clear definition of 'clean growth,' he said, which creates huge loopholes for approving projects or employing technologies that many Canadians wouldn't consider 'clean.' 'The government has been very liberal in its definition of 'clean' to include things like CCUS [carbon capture, utilisation and storage], critical minerals, [and] nuclear,' Winfield said. The bill raises serious questions about how the federal government will reconcile Canada's climate change obligations with all the talk of potential pipeline and fossil fuel export projects at the same time as northern Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Ontario are going up in smoke, he added. 'Everybody thinks that it's an open door for pipelines, in fact, for oil and gas,' Boulerice said. 'It's not about solving the housing crisis with a big project of building millions of homes. It's about energy.' Carney has made repeated references to both clean and conventional energy, the latter of which refers to fossil fuels like oil and gas. Carney has referenced 'decarbonized' oil and used the Pathways Alliance's proposed multi-billion dollar carbon capture project as an example of projects that could be considered for fast-tracking. 'Oil is carbon. There's no such thing as decarbonized oil,' Angela Carter, an associate professor of political science at Memorial University of Newfoundland, said in a phone interview. 'We need to be very, very careful about this definition of clean growth. If it's a project that contributes to sustaining and growing oil production, well, that's not clean growth. It's very, very, very simple.' Bloc Québécois House Leader Christine Normandin said it's too early to say whether her party will support the bill. First, they want the government to respond to their request to split the bill into two parts, one for interprovincial trade and one for major projects. 'In a sense, this is taking what Stephen Harper tried to do with C-38 and putting it on steroids … The problem with trying to take shortcuts is it has a tendency to backfire and to make the underlying conflicts worse than ever,' Winfield said. 'Look what happened: Northern Gateway died, Energy East went nowhere, it took extraordinary steps to get Trans Mountain done.' The biggest challenge for Carney's government will likely be navigating Indigenous opposition and constitutional rights, said Michael Wernick, former clerk of the Privy Council. Indigenous Peoples have the most 'legal ability' to slow things down, he said, adding that it is not unsolvable for the Carney government but will be a key hurdle. Assembly of First Nations National Chief Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak voiced her concerns with the bill on Friday and called an emergency meeting on it this week. Onlookers and experts who care about climate are looking on with 'considerable uncertainty' because the bill could allow for massive progress to be made on an east-west electricity grid or fast-tracking renewable energy infrastructure, but that may not be the case, James Rowe, an associate professor of environmental studies at the University of Victoria, said. 'Given the political economy of Canada as the fourth largest oil producer in the world … it's more likely those real powerful forces are going to get their way — and projects that might otherwise have been stopped by regulatory processes and consultations … are going to get fast-tracked,' he said.


Winnipeg Free Press
6 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Unresolved questions require independent commission
Opinion Manitoba's ethics commissioner, Jeffrey Schnoor, recently released a report in which he concluded that former Progressive Conservative premier Heather Stefanson and two of her former cabinet ministers violated the province's conflict-of-interest laws after losing the 2023 election. They were accused of breaching the rules in an effort to approve the controversial Sio Silica sand mine during the short 'caretaker period' before the new NDP government was sworn in. Schnoor found that their actions 'lacked ethical and constitutional legitimacy,' but failed to identify what motivated them to act so recklessly. He says he found no evidence that any of the them acted for personal benefit but, if that wasn't the reason, why did they do it? MIKAELA MACKENZIE / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS Then-premier Heather Stefanson and finance minister Cliff Cullen announce the 2023 budget to media. Columnist Deveryn Ross says it's time to have an independent commission examine PC spending decisions. That's just one of many serious questions still swirling around the former government. Last week, Finance Minister Adrien Sala asked auditor general Tyson Shtykalo to investigate what went wrong with Manitoba Public Insurance's Project Nova technology project. MPI abandoned the program two months ago after a review estimated that total project costs had soared from $107 million to $435 million. The project was initially justified as an upgrade of MPI's digital capabilities, which would enable Manitobans to renew or amend their auto insurance and driver's licences online. It would also provide 'seamless connectivity' between MPI and repair shops. That was the hope back in 2020. Five years later, however, MPI Minister Matt Wiebe describes the program as a 'waste of taxpayers' money.' Where did all that money go, and why did MPI keep spending it? In April, the Kinew government asked Shtykalo to investigate an (almost) $100-million taxpayer-funded contract to build daycare facilities throughout the province. It alleges that the project, in which the province partnered with a company named JohnQ Public Inc., 'may not have followed normal provincial or municipal procurement practices.' Specifically, the government claims the contract enabled the previous government to funnel $2.8 million to Boom Done Next, a company owned by Marni Larkin. Larkin was the campaign manager for the Tories' 2023 doomed re-election campaign. How does a company earn almost $3 million on such a project? Two weeks ago, a CBC report revealed that the previous government gave an $18 million grant to JohnQ Public days before the 2023 provincial election was called. There was no public announcement of the funding, which was reportedly for a large land purchase in the RM of Ritchot to develop a proposed 'Winnipeg regional rail port.' Why the secrecy and rushed timing of the grant? In February, at a debate between PC Party leadership candidates Obby Khan and Wally Daudrich, Kahn alleged that Daudrich was the party's top donor for 12 years and accused him of receiving 'licensing permits up north under the table' from the previous government. Daudrich's company, Lazy Bear Lodge and Expeditions, first received approvals to operate off-road vehicle tours near Churchill in 2004. The total number of permits for all tour operators in the coastal plain of the Churchill Wildlife Management Area was limited to 18 between 1984 and 2020. Five years ago, however, the former Tory government reportedly approved two additional permits, both of which were awarded to Lazy Bear. Did Khan have inside knowledge that permits were improperly issued to Daudrich's company, or was his accusation simply bluster in the heat of the moment? There is no evidence that anybody acted improperly in these instances, let alone illegally, but there are many questions and few answers. Weekday Evenings Today's must-read stories and a roundup of the day's headlines, delivered every evening. The Kinew government and many Manitobans are counting on the auditor general to expose and explain the questionable conduct of the previous government, but their hopes may be overly optimistic. That's because Shtykalo has significant discretion as to which matters he chooses to investigate, and his office has limited resources. Even if he decides to review the issues referred to him, more than a year could pass before any reports are issued. That's neither good enough nor fast enough. The better, more efficient course of action is for the government to appoint an independent commissioner to investigate the many unresolved issues, and to give that commissioner the power to compel testimony and gather evidence if necessary. Manitobans deserve to know the truth. An independent commission is the best path to those answers. Deveryn Ross is a political commentator living in Brandon. deverynrossletters@ X: @deverynross