
King, Pingree condemn firings of 7 Togus employees, including 5 veterans
Feb. 26—Members of Maine's Congressional delegation condemned the recent firings of seven employees at the Togus Veterans Administration Medical Center in Augusta, as new details about which employees were impacted came to light Wednesday.
The firings were "arbitrary and (made) without any strategic thinking," Sen. Angus King said in a written statement Wednesday afternoon.
The seven included five military veterans, said King, I-Maine. They were part of a sweeping attempt to downsize the federal government spearheaded by President Donald Trump and billionaire Elon Musk.
The firings included at least one police dispatcher, a member of the veterans experience office and members of the logistics team, King said.
"Without a police dispatcher, there will not be someone to connect police and first responders as they respond to emergencies at Togus," King said. "Without logistics staff, there will not be anyone to distribute incoming supply orders; meaning medical departments across the hospital won't have timely access to the supplies they need."
The logistics team oversees tasks like keeping supply closets stocked with essential medical supplies and removing expired or recalled equipment, one Togus employee told the Press Herald. The employee did not give their name out of fear of retaliation but argued that potential equipment complications could undermine care, despite repeated claims by the Department of Veterans Affairs that cuts would not impact patient experiences.
Probationary employees at the Togus VA Medical Center were fired by email Monday night for alleged "poor performance" without warning, the Maine AFL-CIO said in a statement Tuesday. Probationary workers are those with two or fewer years on the job, but the label can also include more experienced workers who recently moved to a new agency or position.
Rep. Chellie Pingree, who represents Maine's 1st District, said the VA firings, like others by the federal government, were "reckless" and "without clear justification."
"It is unacceptable that Congressional offices continue to learn of such significant personnel decisions through news reports and affected constituents — only after the fact," Pingree said in a written statement. "The progress the VA has made to staff its health care facilities over the last 4 years should be built on, not erased."
A spokesperson for Rep. Jared Golden, D-2nd District, did not return messages asking for the congressman's reaction to the Togus firings.
VA Maine spokesperson Jason Carter said in an email Tuesday night that the cuts would "have no negative effect on veteran health care, benefits or other services. ... We cannot discuss specific personnel matters due to privacy concerns."
The Togus employee, who has worked at the VA for several years, said managers are urging workers not to speak to anyone, including their families and members of the media, about their concerns.
Maine's hospitals know their needs better than those in Washington and "deserve to be included in personnel decisions at their facility," Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, said in a statement Wednesday. She said Togus officials did not appear to have been consulted before the cuts were announced.
Collins said she has been in touch with the Trump administration over the firings and defended the White House's right to make changes to services at the VA.
"But it needs to be taking a careful look at the agency's needs, not making sweeping, indiscriminate cuts — especially when we are dealing with something as critical as caring for our nation's veterans," Collins said.
Carter, the Togus VA Medical Center spokesperson, could not be reached by phone Wednesday afternoon and did not return emailed questions about the scope of the firings or details about those impacted.
Al Lipphardt, the national commander of the Veterans of Foreign Wars, a national veterans service organization, said in a statement Tuesday that the emailed firings appeared "automated with little to no oversight or thought."
Veterans make up nearly one-third of the federal workforce, which is the largest employer of veterans in the country, Lipphardt said. He added that employment is a "social determinate of health" and is thought to reduce suicide, a significant concern among veterans.
"The American people are losing technical expertise, training and security clearances already bought and paid for by taxpayers," he said. "These veterans are now being told their skills are no longer useful to the government. We're losing people who are genuinely committed to the mission and find a continued sense of purpose in what they do."
David Bianculli, commander of the VFW's Portland post, echoed that terminations like these should be made "with care and consideration" rather than through a mass email notice. He also questioned the legitimacy of the five veterans' firings under federal law.
"In fact, because of their previous service, these veterans should not even be considered probationary if they were properly hired under the Veterans Recruitment Appointment," Bianculli said in a written statement.
Veterans Recruitment Appointment is a tool that allows federal agencies to give certain preferences to veterans when hiring for competitive positions. Those given preference through that tool may be subject to a shorter probationary period, but the specific status of those fired as it relates to the practice was not clear Wednesday.
The firings at Togus were part of firings at VA health care facilities around the country, according to local reports.
In addition to the VA cuts, Maine has seen hiring freezes announced at Acadia National Park and the Portsmouth Navy Shipyard. Collins later secured an exemption from the freeze for seasonal positions at the park, her office said.
Copy the Story Link
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
6 hours ago
- The Hill
Democrats see political trap in Trump's Biden probe
Democrats are warning members of their party not to fall into a political trap after President Trump ordered an investigation into former President Biden's mental state and executive actions at the end of his term. Trump directed his counsel, in consultation with the attorney general, to probe 'whether certain individuals conspired to deceive the public about Biden's mental state' amid renewed scrutiny of his predecessor's age and health in the lead-up to last year's election. The probe threatens to keep an issue in the news that Democrats would like to move on from and could force them into the uncomfortable position of having to defend Biden despite his unpopularity. 'We need to avoid taking the bait for a totally unfounded political stunt, which is what this investigation is,' said Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.). 'It's a distraction from the problems that everyday Americans face in our economy: tariffs, rising prices and the 'Great Big, Beautiful Bill.'' Biden also cast the play as a distraction from controversy swirling around the current White House, pushing back sharply against Trump's suggestion that he was not the one making the decisions from the Oval Office. Trump's call for an investigation fixates on Biden's use of an autopen to sign executive actions, claiming that, if advisers 'secretly used' the mechanism 'to conceal his incapacity,' it would constitute an unconstitutional wielding of presidential power. 'Let me be clear: I made the decisions during my presidency,' Biden said in a statement. 'This is nothing more than a distraction by Donald Trump and Congressional Republicans who are working to push disastrous legislation that would cut essential programs like Medicaid and raise costs on American families, all to pay for tax breaks for the ultra-wealthy and big corporations.' On Capitol Hill, where Trump's House-passed spending bill is hitting snags in the Senate as Elon Musk feuds with Trump and calls to kill the legislation, other Democrats are echoing that framing. 'He's clearly trying to deflect attention from the disastrous effect he's had on the US economy,' said Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.). 'He only brings up Joe Biden when he's really worried about something, like 'Vladimir Putin is playing me and the world sees it. My tariffs thing is not working out.'' 'So I would say, give it as little attention as possible,' Kaine said, suggesting Democrats should turn the inquiry around on Trump and say, ''You're the president now. What about your evidence of mental decline?'' Sens. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wisc.) and Ruben Gallego (D-N.M.) concurred that the move is a distraction from the bill and that Democrats should respond by drawing Americans' focus to the budget concerns instead. Engaging could also risk legitimizing some of Trump's claims about the end of Biden's term, suggested Democratic strategist Antjuan Seawright. He called the push for an investigation 'a distraction pitch that Donald Trump is trying to throw down at the batter's box, hoping somebody will swing at it.' 'Anytime we fall into the trap, then we trap our own selves,' Seawright said of Democrats. 'We should focus on this moment and not try to get caught up into conversations that don't gain us anything electorally or politically.' Questions about Biden's age and health dogged him along the 2024 campaign trail, contributing to his eventual exit from the race. Trump, who railed against his two-time rival as 'Sleepy Joe' as they jostled for the White House, has continued to raise the issue, while Democrats seek to turn the page and look toward the midterms and 2028. Trump has repeatedly blasted Biden over his autopen use, questioning whether orders signed by his predecessor — including 11th-hour preemptive pardons for his family members and others to protect against 'politically motivated prosecutions' — are void as a result. The White House confirmed this week that the Department of Justice is reviewing Biden's pardons. The House Oversight and Government Reform Committee has also started its own inquiry into what Republicans have cast as a 'mental decline cover up.' This week, Oversight Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) demanded interviews from some of Biden's former top aides as well as his doctor, Kevin O'Connor. At the same time, new books, including 'Original Sin: President Biden's Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again' from CNN's Jake Tapper and Axios' Alex Thompson, have renewed debate about his mental acuity. The scrutiny also comes after Biden was diagnosed with an aggressive cancer last month. The diagnosis itself prompted questions about whether the timing was intended as a distraction and did little to quell talk about whether the 82-year-old should have dropped out of the race earlier. Republicans, for their part, are largely heralding the inquiries as a pursuit in transparency. 'The American people deserve to know who was making decisions from the White House between 2021-2025. I hope this investigation uncovers the truth,' Rep. Mark Green (R-Tenn.) said on X of Trump's probe. A number of Democrats seen as 2028 hopefuls, asked in recent weeks about the end of Biden's presidency, have acknowledged his weaknesses. Former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg told an Iowa town hall last month that his then-boss's decision to run for reelection 'maybe' hurt Democrats, and Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) told Politico there's 'no doubt' Biden suffered cognitive decline. Across the board, though, Democrats have been pointing toward the future and hoping to move on from questions about their former party leader as they stare down the high-stakes midterms next year and aim for the White House in 2028. Biden's favorability was at 39 percent in the latest YouGov/The Economist polling, compared to Trump's 44 percent and former Vice President Harris's 42 percent. 'If Democrats shift their focus to this, then they risk further alienating and frustrating their base that is ready to put Biden behind them,' said Democratic strategist Fred Hicks. He pointed out Trump's public fallout this week with Musk, who's suggested that Trump's bill could be 'bankrupting America,' and suggested it could be opening for Democrats in their pushback against the administration. But although Democrats are pushing for the party to ignore not just the probe but the Biden discourse more broadly, many have acknowledged that the issue is likely to dog them through 2028 and could even be a political liability for some potential presidential contenders. Strategist Hank Sheinkopfinterpreted Trump's new probe not as a trap or bait, but as a direct attack, and countered some of his fellow Democrats by arguing that the party ought to respond. ''Take [Trump] on or lose in 2026' is really the reality which they don't want to deal with. They somehow believe that if they don't take them on, they'll win anyway,' Sheinkopf said of party leaders. 'What they want is [to say], 'Biden, we're not talking about that, that's the past.' But that's the present. So it's a delusional argument,' he said. 'Trump is making this the present. He's defining the Demcoratic Party by Biden, and the things he's going to say about Biden, whether they are true or not. So you can't let that stand.'
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
RFK Jr's report calls farmers the ‘backbone' of the US – but Trump's cuts hurt them
Independent and organic farmers say chaos created by the Trump administration's cuts has hurt their businesses, even as the US health secretary, Robert F Kennedy Jr, praises small farms and regenerative agriculture. The split-screen for small and organic farms – which one farmer described as the administration 'talking out of both sides of their mouth' – comes on the heels of the release of the 'Maha' report. The White House document mentions farms, farmers and farming 21 times, and argues conventional agriculture has led to more ultra-processed foods. 'Reading that report, it's like a small-scale organic farmer's dream,' said Seth Kroeck as he slammed the door on his 1993 F350 truck. Kroeck owns the organic Crystal Spring Farm, 331 acres (135 hectares) in Brunswick, Maine. 'But then at the same time, [secretary of agriculture] Brooke Rollins's name is on this – she's proposing to cut two-thirds of the agriculture budget.' Related: Trump vowed to help US farmers. These four say his policies are 'wreaking havoc' Kroeck had just finished planting 2,500 brussels sprouts and one-10th of an acre of specialty peppers. He still needed to fix a flat on a piece of farm equipment that day. He said small-scale farmers have promoted local, organic and whole foods for decades. While Kroeck is presumably the kind of farmer Kennedy would laud, all he finds is frustration with the administration, and actions that will 'undoubtedly' make food more expensive. 'We're dealing with two personalities with our government,' said Kroeck. As conventional farmers decry the Maha report's criticism of agricultural chemicals such as atrazine and glyphosate (the active ingredient in RoundUp), some organic and independent farmers have found that the meager government support they depend on has been upended by an administration that claims it wants to support them. 'Farmers are the backbone of America – and the most innovative and productive in the world,' the report, led by Kennedy, argued. 'We continue to feed the world as the largest food exporter. The greatest step the United States can take to reverse childhood chronic disease is to put whole foods produced by American farmers and ranchers at the center of healthcare.' Reading that report, it's like a small-scale organic farmer's dream. But Brooke Rollins's name is on this Seth Kroeck, Crystal Spring Farm But by March, the administration had already cut a total of $1bn in programs that supported small farms that grow locally produced fruits and vegetables. For instance, they cut a program that helped tribal food banks provide healthy food and ended a $660m program that brought fresh local foods to school cafeterias. In just one example of impact, the cut quickly ended fruit and vegetable snacks in New York City schools. 'This is a huge deal for small farmers,' Ellee Igoe told the New Lede publication in March. Igoe is a co-owner of Solidarity Farm in southern California. 'We're growing healthy food and providing it to local communities. And they are cancelling contracts without real reason. Out here, it feels like it is very politically motivated.' In just one example of direct impact to Kroeck, the Trump administration fired most of the staffers at Kroeck's local Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) office, an arm of the US Department of Agriculture that provides technical assistance to farmers, including on-site visits. The staff shrank from six to one – only the director remains. Related: Trump has no plan for who will grow US food: 'There is just flat out nobody to work' 'In my book, she's a superwoman, but how long is that going to last?' said Kroeck. 'And what farmer is going to want to take on new contracts when it's going to take her months and months and months just to return a call?' Kroeck also criticized the Maha report for including apparently invented scientific references. 'The citations in the report seem to be made up by ChatGPT – this is crazy,' said Kroeck, who said he's not a cheerleader for occupants of ivory towers, but 'we do have to have some standards'. Groups such as the Organic Trade Association have largely echoed Kroeck's sentiments, noting that this is what the organic movement has been saying all along and they need money. 'We've long known that health begins on the farm and encourage the administration to invest in meaningful policies that expand access to organic for consumers,' said co-CEO Matthew Dillon in a statement to the Guardian. While some organic farmers say their relationship with the government has always been tenuous, small farmers say chaos has only worsened that relationship. Coastal wild blueberry farmer Nicolas Lindholm said at least a portion of the funding he was expecting for the year – to mulch his blueberries with wood chips – was 'dead in the water'. We had applied for three different funding programs ... as of February all three of them were basically frozen Nicolas Lindholm, blueberry farmer 'My wife and I have an organic wild blueberry farm here on the coast of Maine,' said Lindholm. 'Over the past five months, we had applied for three different funding programs – all different – and finalized them through December and into January – and as of February all three of them were basically frozen.' Like many farmers, Lindholm's needs were time-sensitive: blueberries can only be mulched every two years because of their growing cycle. In addition to direct cuts by the administration, congressional Republicans proposed cuts to food programs that indirectly benefit farmers. House Republicans passed a bill proposing $300bn in cuts to food stamps, or the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (Snap), to fund tax cuts. They have also proposed cuts to a food program that helps new mothers and babies buy fruits and vegetables. Related: Bleak outlook for US farmers – and Trump tariffs could make it worse The panic within conventional agriculture communities has also been pronounced – with pointed criticism of the report coming before it was even published. Corn and soybeans dominate American cash crops, accounting for $131.9bn in receipts in 2023, versus just $54.8bn in all fruits, vegetables and nuts combined. 'It's no secret you were involved in pesticide litigation before you became secretary,' said Cindy Hyde-Smith, a Republican senator for Mississippi, to Kennedy, leading into a question about the need for glyphosate (the active ingredient in RoundUp), and asking whether Kennedy could be impartial. Kennedy, who went on to pledge he would not put 'a single farmer' out of business, said: 'There's nobody that has a greater commitment to the American farmer than we do – the Maha movement collapses if we can't partner with the American farmer.'


New York Post
6 hours ago
- New York Post
Musk jokes he might change his stance on Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill' over Adam Schiff's praise
Elon Musk appeared to jokingly reconsider his stance on the Big Beautiful Bill after a California Democrat came to his defense. Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., wrote on X that 'I can't believe I'm saying this – but [Elon Musk] is right.' However, that seems to be the last point on which the two agree. They both object to the Big Beautiful Bill, viewing it as full of pork. Musk opposes the bill because he believes it raises government spending too much, while Schiff objects to what he calls its 'far-right' content, which he describes as 'dangerous.' Musk fired off a response rejecting Schiff's alleged praise of the tech billionaire's position on the bill. 'Hmm, few things could convince me to reconsider my position more than Adam Schiff agreeing with me!' On May 30, Musk's time with the administration came to an end, and he seemed to leave things on good terms. President Donald Trump thanked Musk for his work with the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and gave him a symbolic 'key to the White House' as a parting gift. 4 Elon Musk appeared to jokingly reconsider his stance on Trump's Big Beautiful Bill after a California Democrat came to his defense. via REUTERS 4 'I can't believe I'm saying this – but [Elon Musk] is right,' Schiff wrote on X, leading to Musk responding with 'Hmm, few things could convince me to reconsider my position more than Adam Schiff agreeing with me!' SenAdamSchiff/X Following his departure from the White House, Musk said he was looking forward 'to continuing to be a friend and adviser to the president.' However, things took a sharp turn as a feud between Trump and Musk quickly heated up after the Tesla founder began publicly criticizing the Big Beautiful Bill. After the legislation passed the House, Musk said that the 'massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' Musk's criticisms received mixed reactions from Republicans, with some — such as Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, and Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. — agreeing with him. Meanwhile, House Speaker Mike Johnson said he was 'surprised' by Musk's reaction and claimed the two of them had a good discussion about the bill. 4 Musk originally left the White House on good terms, but later began publicly criticizing the Big Beautiful Bill. Getty Images 4 Musk and Trump have carried their feud to their respective social media platforms, X and Truth Social. realDonaldTrump/TruthSocial Trump and Musk then began slugging it out on their respective social media platforms — X and Truth Social — as well as TV. The president told reporters in the Oval Office that he was 'very disappointed' with Musk and claimed that the former DOGE head knew what was in the bill, something that Musk denied. The heated exchange led to two explosive tweets, both of which were later deleted. In one post, Musk claimed Trump was mentioned in files relating to Jeffrey Epstein, the deceased sex offender and disgraced financier. In his other post, Musk endorsed a message that called for Trump's impeachment and said that Vice President J.D. Vance should take over. While it's unclear whether Trump and Musk will reconcile, for now it seems unlikely. Trump told Fox News chief political anchor Bret Baier that he was not interested in talking to Musk and that 'Elon's totally lost it.'