Hong Kong judges challenge jailed political party chief's appeal argument
Two Hong Kong judges hearing an appeal by the head of a now-dissolved pro-independence political party have questioned his lawyer's argument that the national security law cannot be used for sentencing some conspiracy offences.
Joseph John, 42, appeared before three Court of Appeal judges in the High Court on Friday to challenge his five-year jail sentence for conspiracy to incite secession.
He admitted last year to circulating 42 posts on the Hong Kong Independence Party's social media platforms, which called for the placement of American and British troops in the city and the abolition of the Sino-British Joint Declaration. The agreement paved the way for Hong Kong's return to Chinese sovereignty in 1997.
In sentencing, District Judge Ernest Lin Kam-hung set a starting point of 78 months imprisonment, but declined to award a full one-third discount to John as defendants in other criminal cases would have received.
The judge instead reduced the sentence to five years, the statutory minimum for a serious offence of inciting secession.
The Beijing-decreed legislation stipulates a maximum of 10 years imprisonment for inciting secession.
It does not provide a mechanism for penalising a conspiracy to commit the same offence. Instead, conspiracy offences are punished in accordance with the colonial-era Crimes Ordinance.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
HKFP
2 hours ago
- HKFP
Same-sex couples should have ‘right to found family,' lawyer tells Hong Kong court in reciprocal IVF case
Same-sex couples should have 'the right to found a family,' a lawyer has told a Hong Kong court after lesbian parents who had a child via reciprocal in vitro fertilisation (RIVF) were barred from including both their names on their son's birth certificate. Hong Kong's High Court heard arguments in a judicial review related to the legal parental rights of same-sex couples with children born via RIVF on Wednesday and Thursday. The case relates to a lesbian couple, R and B, who underwent RIVF – a procedure allowing two women to take part in pregnancy – in South Africa in 2020. The egg was extracted from R, and B carried and gave birth to the baby, K, in Hong Kong in 2021. Hong Kong, which does not recognise same-sex marriage, views only a child's birth mother and her husband as legal parents. In R and B's case, only the birth mother, B, is the legal parent of their son. The couple went to court in 2023 to seek a declaration under the Parent and Child Ordinance that R is also a legal parent. The judge declined but, in her ruling, stated that R was a 'parent at common law' – a first in the common law world. Representing K, barrister Nigel Kat said on Wednesday that the 'parent at common law' status is not recognised in the Parent and Child Ordinance, and the child does not have a birth certificate showing that R is a legal parent. 'Therefore, R can walk around and tell everybody, 'I'm a parent,' [but] she can't prove it,' he said, adding that gay people 'are not excluded from the right to found a family.' Kat argued that the birth certificates of children born via RIVF should reflect both parents' names, and that references to parents in the Parent and Child Ordinance should be amended to include 'parents at common law' where their children were born via RIVF. 'Demeaning' discrimination During the hearing on Wednesday, barrister Isabel Tam – who is representing the birth mother, B, as an interested party in the case – said her client faced discrimination because of her sexual orientation. If B and R were a heterosexual couple who had undergone IVF, they would 'not be in this position,' Tam said. 'This has quite a disproportionate impact on the development of her family life as well as how she presents herself to the outside world.' The discrimination was 'particularly demeaning' because it was based on personal characteristics that could not be changed, the barrister said. 'B and R cannot change their… sexual orientation,' Tam said. 'K cannot change the manner of his birth.' Stewart Wong, representing the Department of Justice, said on Thursday that while he accepted that the easiest way to prove parental status was a birth certificate, the suggestion that K's family would encounter embarrassing situations was 'exaggerated.' One would not have to prove to the school that you are the parent every day, Wong said, adding that it would only need to be done when applying. For 'regular check-ups' at the hospital, the nurse would just require proof at registration, he said. It is 'not as if you need to prove or bring… [the child's] birth certificate every day of your life when the child is a minor,' Wong said. Guardianship order There is already an existing framework – a guardianship order from the court – if one is seeking parental rights and status, he said. 'The guardianship order offers clear and absolute proof on occasions that legal rights and obligations… [are] necessary,' Wong said. In response, Judge Russell Coleman said having to apply for a guardianship order may make the parents feel 'like less of a parent or a second-class parent.' Barrister Azan Marwah, representing K, raised other issues that may not be addressed by guardianship orders. In the event of a separation, B would not be able to demand maintenance payments from R, who can 'simply get away,' he said on Thursday. K would also have the 'lifelong disability' of not being able to inherit from R under the city's intestate ordinance, Marwah said, referring to the set of laws that regulate inheritance arrangements when one dies without a will. On Thursday, Coleman challenged Wong's view that those seeking parental rights could simply apply for a court guardianship order. The judge said 'what bristles with people' was the assumption that 'people like R and B… can't be perfectly good parents,' and questioned why a 'licence' was required. Wong said such same-sex relationships could be 'too variable' as the parties may not be stable. Coleman replied that the same could be said for heterosexual relationships. The judge said he would hand down a decision by August 22. The hearing comes ahead of the government's October deadline to provide a framework for recognising same-sex partnerships, per a top court ruling in 2023. No public consultations, however, are known to have taken place yet.
South China Morning Post
5 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
China's Xi Jinping meets Panchen Lama, urges continued ‘sinicisation of religion'
Chinese President Xi Jinping met the Panchen Lama on Friday and called for continued efforts to promote the 'sinicisation of religion', state media reports said. The call from Xi comes exactly one month before the exiled Dalai Lama 's critical 90th birthday, when the Tibetan spiritual leader has indicated he may reveal his preferred method for choosing a successor. According to state news agency Xinhua, Xi received a visit from the Panchen Lama in Beijing and expressed hopes that he would 'work hard to become a Tibetan living Buddha with profound knowledge of Buddhism, beloved by monks and lay followers, and take the lead in obeying the law and adhering to the precepts'. The Panchen Lama is the second-highest spiritual leader in Tibetan Buddhism, after the Dalai Lama. 02:45 Tibetans in exile march in solidarity with Dalai Lama in India Tibetans in exile march in solidarity with Dalai Lama in India
South China Morning Post
7 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Crypto confiscated in Beijing to be liquidated in Hong Kong through licensed exchanges
Beijing's police authority has unveiled a plan for liquidating cryptocurrencies confiscated in criminal cases by selling them through licensed exchanges in Hong Kong, a move that could aid the southern city's efforts to become a virtual asset hub. The municipal Public Security Bureau in Beijing said on Thursday that it has partnered with the China Beijing Equity Exchange (CBEX) to offload seized cryptoassets through regulated platforms in Hong Kong. Under the 'Framework Agreement on Handling Seized Virtual Currencies', CBEX will be responsible for appointing third-party agencies to sell the assets through the exchanges. Proceeds will be converted into yuan and deposited in designated accounts, according to a statement posted on the bureau's official WeChat account. This marks the first time that a mainland agency has detailed a process for disposing of confiscated cryptoassets, while working within Hong Kong's virtual asset regime to offload them. Mainland China enforces a strict ban on crypto trading, complicating efforts to handle such assets seized by law enforcement. From 2019 to June 2024, Chinese authorities publicly documented 2,206 criminal cases involving digital currencies, according to Wolters Kluwer's database. In a September report, the People's Court Daily, a newspaper under the Supreme People's Court, estimated that the value of cryptocurrencies awaiting disposal by Chinese authorities by the end of 2022 exceeded several billion US dollars. In 2023, the value of crypto involved in criminal cases surged to 430.7 billion yuan (US$60 billion), a 12-fold increase from the previous year.
