Despite US objections, 5 reasons why India-Russia partnership will endure
US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said India's military purchases from Russia had "rubbed the United States the wrong way" while speaking at the eighth edition of the US-India Strategic Partnership Forum (USISPF) Leadership Summit."There were certain things that the Indian government did that generally rubbed the US the wrong way... for instance, you generally buy your military gear from Russia. That's a way to kind of get under the skin of America, if you go to buy your armaments from Russia," Lutnick said.advertisementThe commerce secretary's understanding of the India-Russia relationship is limited. India buys Russian weapons because Russia does not attach strings to these sales. It willingly shares technology and co-produces weapons with India and allows technology transfers in areas no country will collaborate with. THE SOVIET UNION SOLD WEAPONS NO ONE ELSE DID
When India began its rearmament in the mid-1960s after the defeat in the 1962 war with China, it first turned to the West. It wanted submarines and warships for the Navy and fighter jets for the Air Force. These were not offered.The Soviet Union stepped in with sales of frontline Foxtrot class submarines, first-of-its-class missile boats, anti-submarine corvettes and MiG-21 supersonic fighter aircraft. These platforms were used with devastating effect in the 1971 India-Pakistan war. The US, UK and China supported Pakistan in that war.advertisementThe Soviet Union sent its submarines in pursuit of the USS Enterprise carrier battle group that President Nixon sent into the Indian Ocean to intimidate India. This relationship continued through the 1980s. In 1987, the Soviet Union transferred to India on a three-year lease the K-43, the world's first nuclear-powered attack submarine that could fire anti-ship missiles from underwater.RUSSIA CONTINUES THE SOVIET LEGACYThis strategic partnership continued after the dissolution of the Soviet Union. The successor state, Russia, sold to India the BrahMos supersonic cruise missiles in the late 1990s. This weapon now equips all three services and was used with devastating effect during Operation Sindoor in smashing Pakistani airbases and radar installations. Russia has shared all the technology for this radical missile it developed during the Cold War.It leased a second nuclear submarine, the Chakra-2, in 2012. It is refurbishing a third unit, the Chakra-3, which will be transferred to India on a ten-year lease by the end of this decade. Sure, Russia charges a hefty fee for this refurbishment and lease - over $3 billion - but with the exception of the US-UK partnership, no country has sold or transferred nuclear-powered submarine technology to another country. It has offered India advanced hypersonic weaponry and long-range missile systems and fifth-generation fighter aircraft.SUPPORT FOR STRATEGIC WEAPONS PROGRAMMESadvertisementNuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines are the third leg of the triad of air, land and sea-based nuclear weapons. They are also the most secure leg of the triad because submarines can hide deep under the ocean beyond the reach of the enemy.Russia helped India build its fleet of four Arihant class nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines. India began constructing these submarines after the Pokharan nuclear tests in 1998. Today, two Arihant-class submarines have been commissioned and two more will be commissioned in the next four years.These are the most complex defence platforms ever built by India. Then Prime Minister Manmohan Singh acknowledged Russia's support for the programme while speaking at the 2009 launch of the INS Arihant in Visakhapatnam.NO STRINGS ATTACHEDThis is among the most important aspects of the relationship. The US imposed sanctions and embargoed the sale of military equipment to India because of the Pokharan-2 nuclear tests in 1998. President Donald Trump spoke of using trade as a tool to coerce India into negotiating a ceasefire during Operation Sindoor (a fact denied by India).This has led to fears that the sales of US weapons to India could be similarly used in a crisis. Russia has never attached such strings to its weapons sales to India. It has never imposed embargoes or restricted transfers of weapons.advertisementRELATIONSHIP LIMITED ONLY BY IMAGINATIONThe sky is the limit when it comes to the Russia-India strategic partnership. Russia has provided technical assistance for India's Matsyayan ocean bed expedition that aims to send Indians to the deepest point of the Indian Ocean.It has also provided help for the Gaganyaan expedition, which aims to launch India's first astronauts in an Indian-built space vehicle. The India-Russia relationship is limited only by the imagination of the two partner countries.Must Watch
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
26 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Sebi attaches bank, demat, MF accounts of Choksi to recover Rs 2.1 cr dues
Markets regulator Sebi has ordered the attachment of bank accounts and shares and mutual fund holdings of absconding diamantaire Mehul Choksi to recover dues totalling Rs 2.1 crore in a case of violation of insider trading rules in the shares of Gitanjali Gems. The latest move followed a demand notice issued to Choksi on May 15, warning attachment of assets as well as bank accounts if he failed to make the payment within 15 days. The demand notice came after Choksi failed to pay the fine imposed by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) in January 2022 in a case of violation of insider trading rules in the shares of Gitanjali Gems Ltd. Choksi, who was the chairman and managing director as well as part of promoter group of Gitanjali Gems, is the maternal uncle of Nirav Modi. Both are facing charges of defrauding state-owned Punjab National Bank (PNB) of more than Rs 14,000 crore. Both Choksi and Modi fled India after the PNB scam came to light in early 2018. In April, Choksi was arrested in Belgium following an extradition request by Indian probe agencies. He was located in Belgium last year when he went there for getting medical treatment. He had been staying in Antigua since 2018 after leaving India. Modi was arrested by the Scotland Yard Police in March 2019 and is currently in jail in that country. In an attachment notice dated June 4, Sebi said the pending dues of Rs 2.1 crore include the initial fine of Rs 1.5 crore and interest of Rs 60 lakh. To recover the dues, Sebi asked all the banks, depositories -- CDSL and NSDL -- and mutual funds not to allow any debit from the accounts of Choksi. However, credits have been permitted. Further, Sebi has directed the banks to attach all accounts, including lockers, held by the defaulter. Initiating the recovery proceedings, Sebi said there is sufficient reason to believe that Choksi may dispose of the amounts in the bank accounts, mutual fund folios and securities in the demat accounts held with the depositories and "realisation of the amount due under the certificate would, in consequence, be delayed or obstructed". In its order passed in January 2022, the regulator imposed a penalty of Rs 1.5 crore on Choksi and restrained him from the securities market for one year. Sebi had found that Choksi communicated unpublished price sensitive information to one Rakesh Girdharlal Gajera, who sold his entire shareholding of 5.75 per cent in Gitanjali Gems in December 2017 with the intention of avoiding loss ahead of any event which may lead to disclosure of fraudulent issuance of LoUs (letter of undertaking) to Gitanjali Group and magnitude in public domain. It was noted that fraudulent LoUs were issued on behalf of entities belonging to the Gitanjali Group, including GGL. "Noticee no. 1 (Choksi) was found to have communicated UPSI (unpublished price sensitive information) to Noticee no. 2 (Gajera) without any underlying legal obligation or any legitimate purpose," Sebi had said in its final order. Through such activities, the two persons had violated the provisions of the PIT (Prohibition of Insider Trading) rules. In May 2023, Sebi sent a notice to Choksi directing him to pay Rs 5.35 crore in a case pertaining to fraudulent trading in the shares of Gitanjali Gems.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
26 minutes ago
- Business Standard
How Sri City's Ravindra Sannareddy turned scrubland into an industrial hub
Lunch with BS: Sri City has now grown to employ over 65,000 people. Sannareddy dream is to take it past 100,000 by its 25th year Shine Jacob Chennai Listen to This Article It almost feels like Chennai has quietly extended its industrial embrace across the Andhra Pradesh border to Sri City. The 55-km drive to this manufacturing hub, in the Tirupati district, is lined with warehouses and factory sheds, their insignia ranging from global conglomerates to rising Indian giants — all strategically leveraging their proximity to Chennai Port. The four-lane highway buzzes with container traffic, its rhythm set by South India's manufacturing metronome. At the end of it all, nestled among dry scrubland and slow-growing trees, is Sri City — a dream built on stubborn optimism, spiritual roots, and strategic foresight, one
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
RBI as lender of last resort: A lifeline for NBFCs in crisis
Sunil Kanoria is a Kolkata-based Indian businessman with over 35 years of experience in the infrastructure sector including infrastructure leasing & finance. He had the distinction of serving ASSOCHAM, India's oldest and leading chamber of commerce, as President and has served as Member of the Infrastructure Sector in the 10th Five Year Plan of the Planning Commission of the Government of India. He also served as a Council Member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, nominated by the Government of India. He is the former President of The Agri-Horticultural Society of India. Sunil has been engaged in policy advocacy on matters related to economy. Sunil is a visionary who correctly assessed the Indian economy's infrastructure needs at the beginning of his career and anticipated the imminent role of the private sector in infrastructure creation. With foresight and a knack for taking calculated risks, Sunil converted several pioneering ideas into business reality within the infrastructure domain, many of which were first-of-its kind in India. Focusing on spirituality, Kanoria Foundation has organized confluences with a conglomeration of major issues on Humanity, Power (inner & outer) and Spirituality at Work. Kanoria Foundation organized World Confluences since 2009 which was also attended by former Presidents of India, Late Dr APJ Abdul Kalam and Late Shri Pranab Mukherjee respectively, among other distinguished luminaries from all walks of life globally. LESS ... MORE The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) is reportedly set to redefine its role by preparing to act as a lender of last resort for non-banking financial companies (NBFCs), mutual funds, and microfinance institutions during severe liquidity crises. As reported by the press last week, this move aims to ensure the survival of these entities when they are excluded from lending markets during crises. Given their deep ties to the banking system through borrowings and investments, this step is vital for financial stability. The RBI's economic capital framework (ECF) committee recently raised the contingency risk buffer (CRB) band, indicating readiness to intervene in crises. While post-pandemic asset purchases focused on public assets, the RBI is now considering private asset purchases in future crises. This policy shift acknowledges that NBFCs and other regulated entities are as critical to financial stability as banks. Over the past two decades, the RBI has tightened NBFC oversight, aligning it with banking regulations. Extending the lender-of-last-resort function to these institutions is a logical next step. However, this initiative is overdue. Past crises have exposed NBFCs' vulnerabilities. For example, during the 2018 liquidity crunch, infrastructure finance companies faced a severe asset-liability mismatch, worsened by the RBI's COVID-19 moratorium guidelines in 2020. While borrowers received relief, NBFCs were pressured by creditors, leading to bankruptcy proceedings. Timely liquidity support could have averted such outcomes, stabilizing similar institutions and reducing risks to the financial sector. Globally, central banks have long supported non-bank institutions during crises. In the United States, the Federal Reserve has been instrumental in stabilizing NBFCs and mutual funds. During the 2008 financial crisis, the Fed's Commercial Paper Funding Facility (CPFF) provided liquidity to money market mutual funds and other non-bank entities facing funding shortages. In 2020, the Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility (MMLF) enabled institutions to purchase assets from money market funds, preventing a collapse in short-term funding markets. These actions highlight the critical role central banks play in supporting non-bank entities to maintain financial stability. In Europe, the European Central Bank (ECB) has similarly supported NBFCs during crises. In 2020, the ECB expanded asset purchase programs and offered targeted longer-term refinancing operations (TLTROs) to indirectly ensure liquidity for non-bank institutions through banks. The Bank of England's COVID Corporate Financing Facility (CCFF) also supported large non-bank firms by purchasing commercial paper, ensuring operational continuity during market disruptions. These global examples demonstrate the effectiveness of central banks extending their lender-of-last-resort function beyond banks. The RBI's proposed framework aligns India with these global practices. By acting as a lender of last resort, the RBI can prevent systemic shocks from liquidity freezes in NBFCs or mutual funds. Their interconnectedness with banks means their failure could trigger a domino effect, threatening the financial ecosystem. Past crises affecting infrastructure finance companies underscore the consequences of inaction. Had this mechanism been in place earlier, significant disruptions might have been avoided. Yet, the RBI must proceed cautiously. Extending this role requires clear guidelines to prevent moral hazard, where NBFCs might take excessive risks expecting bailouts. The RBI should establish strict eligibility criteria and robust oversight to ensure only well- managed institutions facing temporary liquidity issues receive support. It must also balance interventions to avoid crowding out private market solutions, which could stifle innovation and competition. The RBI's move to become a lender of last resort for NBFCs, mutual funds, and microfinance institutions is a forward-thinking step. It addresses a critical gap in India's financial safety net, aligning with practices of global central banks like the Federal Reserve and ECB. While commendable, its success depends on precise implementation to ensure stability without encouraging reckless behaviour. Had this framework been introduced earlier, the financial sector might have been spared some amount of distress. The RBI's proactive stance promises a more resilient financial system for India. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.
