
New Orleans Inmate Escape Update as Two Seen on Surveillance Video
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Two of 10 inmates who recently escaped from New Orleans have reportedly been seen on surveillance video walking the French Quarter.
Newsweek reached out to the New Orleans Police Department, Louisiana State Police and the FBI for comment.
Why It Matters
Seven inmates who remain at large following an escape from the Orleans Parish Jail in New Orleans early on May 16 may have "received assistance in their escape from individuals inside of our department," according to Orleans Parish Sheriff Susan Hutson. Two of the inmates have been apprehended, and one remains in custody.
The FBI, at the request of NOPD, is throwing its resources toward the investigation and discovery of the remaining inmates—originally offering a reward of up to $5,000 per inmate for tips leading to arrests. They later doubled that amount to $10,000 per inmate.
What To Know
A video provided by Project NOLA reportedly shows two of the male inmates walking in black hoodies and jeans near HUSTLER Hollywood on Bourbon Street, with a video timestamp showing their activity occurring before 10 a.m. on Friday, May 16—the day of the escape, according to local CBS affiliate 4WWL.
One of the inmates was identified by authorities as Kendell Myles, 20, who was arrested again at about 11:30 a.m. that morning. He was taken into custody by Louisiana State Police after reportedly hiding under a car at the Hotel Monteleone parking garage. He's been re-booked for simple escape.
Revelers slong Bourbon Street on Mardi Gras day in New Orleans, Louisiana on March 4, 2025.
Revelers slong Bourbon Street on Mardi Gras day in New Orleans, Louisiana on March 4, 2025.
SANDY HUFFAKER/AFP via Getty Images
But another inmate left the surveillance camera's vision and still remains at large, Bryan Lagarde, executive director for Project NOLA, told 4WWL.
The inmates who escaped have been named by law enforcement as Antoine Massey, Lenton Vanburen, Leo Tate, Kendell Myles, Derrick Groves, Jermain Donald, Corey Boyd, Gary Price, Robert Moody and DKenan Dennis.
Aside from Myles, Moody and Dennis have been found and taken into custody.
Project NOLA, self-described as "the most successful and cost effective crime camera program in America," has been in operation since 2010 and has aided in over 500 homicide investigations, thousands of gun-related crimes, and myriad property crimes involving thefts and burglaries.
Working hand in hand with the NOPD, Project NOLA says its services helped reduce the murder rate in New Orleans to a 47-year low in 2018. There were also reportedly double-digit reductions in non-fatal shootings and robberies nationwide.
What People Are Saying
In an earlier statement to Newsweek, the sheriff's office said: "The Orleans Parish Sheriff's Office is putting the public on alert as deputies and partner agencies are searching for detainees who escaped custody Friday, May 16. OPSO is working with local and state law enforcement agencies on the search to return them to custody. OPSO will provide additional information as the investigation precedes."
Orleans Parish Sheriff Susan Hutson said, as reported by Newsweek: "We are launching a full investigation to determine how this escape occurred, including reviewing facility protocols, staff performance and physical security measures. Any lapses or failures that contributed to this incident will be addressed swiftly and with full accountability."
What Happens Next
Anyone with information is asked to call the FBI at 1-800-CALL-FBI or submit tips at fbi.gov/neworleansfugitives. They can also call the LSP Fusion Center at (225) 925-4192 or Crimestoppers of Greater New Orleans at (504) 822-1111.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Woman struck, killed by vehicle on Laplace highway
LAPLACE, La. (WGNO) — A Laplace woman is dead following a crash in St. John the Baptist Parish. According to Louisiana State Police, around 9:30 p.m. on Saturday, June 7, troopers responded to the scene of a crash on US Highway 61 near Carrollwood Drive. Moments of heavy rain expected Monday Troopers said an investigation revealed that 71-year-old Cecilia Adams attempted to walk across the north bound lanes of the highway, outside of a designated crosswalk while wearing dark clothing. That's when a Nissan Rogue, heading south, reportedly made a U-turn on the highway, striking Adams. She was taken to a hospital where she later died from her injuries. Troopers said the driver was wearing a seatbelt at the time and was not injured. They add that there were no signs of impairment. The crash remains under investigation. Fatal crash leaves two people dead 'Practicing pedestrian safety guidelines while crossing and walking near roadways is crucial in reducing the risk of crashes. Drivers should always keep in mind that they share the road with bicyclists and pedestrians and remember to be vigilant for their presence,' said LSP Troop Protests turn violent in Los Angeles Ram CEO confirms NASCAR return in 2026 Trump vs. California is the fight the White House wants New Trump travel ban takes effect Woman struck, killed by vehicle on Laplace highway Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
Legal Analysts Weigh in on Trump's National Guard Deployment to California
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Legal experts weighed in about whether President Donald Trump has the legal authority to deploy the National Guard to Los Angeles as California Governor Gavin Newsom announced a lawsuit challenging the administration's latest move. Why It Matters Newsom, a Democrat, said on Monday the state will be suing the Trump administration after he ordered the National Guard to Los Angeles, where protests have erupted over U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids in the city. While the raids are following legal directive from federal authorities, protests have erupted amid reports that detainees were being held in the basement of a federal building. ICE denied these allegations, with a spokesperson previously telling Newsweek the agency "categorically refutes the assertions made by immigration activists in Los Angeles." The clashes highlight deepening conflicts between sanctuary jurisdictions and federal immigration policy, as Trump has implemented sweeping changes through executive orders and utilized the wartime Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to expand deportation authority. Critics have accused Trump of abusing his power by sending in National Guard troops, with Newsom casting the move as "unlawful" and a "serious breach of state sovereignty." What to Know Trump, over the weekend, federalized the California National Guard using Title 10 authority, which allows him to presume the top of the chain of command under certain circumstances. He sent 2,000 National Guard troops into downtown Los Angeles, where protests escalated over the weekend as groups shut down parts of the 101 Freeway and clashed with law enforcement officers who responded with tear gas and flash bangs. The White House wrote that Trump decided to do so because the protests "directly inhibit the execution of the laws" and "constitute a form of rebellion." Title 10 authority allows a president to federalize a state's national guard whenever there is a foreign invasion, a rebellion against the authority of the U.S., or when a president is unable to execute the laws of the U.S., former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani told Newsweek. California Highway Patrol officers attempt to control crowds in Los Angeles, California on June 7, 2025. California Highway Patrol officers attempt to control crowds in Los Angeles, California on June 7, 2025. BENJAMIN HANSON/Middle East Images/AFP via Getty Images The administration's case that there is a rebellion preventing ICE from executing law enforcement operations would likely hold up in court, Rahmani said. "I think it's clearly been met if he's unable to enforce the nation's immigration laws with the agents that he has, he can federalize the National Guard," he said. He said he "can't see a court wading into this political question" to say that Trump cannot enforce the immigration law and that "even the most liberal judge" would be unlikely to block legitimate law enforcement. He predicted the case could be quickly dismissed by a judge. There is historical precedence for a president to federalize the National Guard against a governor's wishes, though it is rare. It was used during the Civil Rights Era. The last time this occurred was in 1965 when President Lydon Johnson sent in the National Guard to protect civil rights protesters. Former federal prosecutor Gene Rossi told Newsweek he agreed that the lawsuit may face an uphill battle, as the president has "broad discretion" to invoke the National Guard. But he said his decision to defy Newsom indicates the move is an "indicator to me that this is more political than anything else." Still, he felt it was "ironic" because Trump did not call in the National Guard during the January 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol building, when protests from his supporters over the 2020 presidential election results grew violent. Michael McAuliffe, a former federal prosecutor and former elected state attorney, told Newsweek it's "too early to speculate" about the outcome of Newsom's lawsuit. "The president's general statutory authority to command the national guard will not be in dispute, but the circumstances supporting, or not supporting, such an order will almost certainly be challenged. The legal challenge also will likely contain both an immediate component––timely injunctive relief––and the underlying legal issue of whether the record facts support the mobilization. A different, and higher, legal standard applies for immediate injunctive relief," he said. He said Trump's decision should "give every American chills." "The mobilization of troops for domestic crowd control should remain the rarest of events and only in the most utterly extreme circumstances. The current protest in California against the ICE/federal immigration arrest spree is not one of those instances. The President's action likely will be counter-productive and actually raise tensions, instead of gaining better control of the situation," he said. What People Are Saying California Governor Newsom wrote on X on Sunday: "I have formally requested the Trump Administration rescind their unlawful deployment of troops in Los Angeles county and return them to my command. We didn't have a problem until Trump got involved. This is a serious breach of state sovereignty — inflaming tensions while pulling resources from where they're actually needed. Rescind the order. Return control to California." President Donald Trump on Truth Social: "If Governor Gavin Newscum, of California, and Mayor Karen Bass, of Los Angeles, can't do their jobs, which everyone knows they can't, then the Federal Government will step in and solve the problem, RIOTS & LOOTERS, the way it should be solved!!!" Representative Kevin Kiley, a California Republican, told Newsweek on Monday: "The acts of violence, lawlessness, and obstruction we are seeing in Los Angeles pose an ongoing risk to public safety. The President has chosen to protect federal officers and LA citizens because Governor Newsom has refused to do so. I am praying for everyone's safety during this time." Former federal prosecutor Joyce White Vance wrote in a Substack post: "The role of California Governor Gavin Newsom isn't entirely clear. There is an inside baseball legal dispute over whether the law requires his consent to nationalize the Guard or not. There is little legal guidance on this point, and for now, it's sufficient to say we can expect this to be one of the issues included when California goes to court. The Trump administration is acting under Title 10 USC 12406, which provides that 'orders for these purposes shall be issued through the governors of the States.' That language is as clear as mud." What Happens Next Although Newsom has called for the National Guard troops to be returned to California control, the Trump administration has not said they plan to do so. It's unclear how long the National Guard will stay in Los Angeles.


Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
LA Could Face Losing Millions for Police Using Nonlethal Bullets
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The City of Los Angeles could lose millions if it is sued over the Los Angeles Police Department's alleged use of rubber bullets, case history suggests. Over the past few days, there have been reports of police using rubber bullets during protests and riots in Los Angeles. If people allegedly shot by the police sue the city, they may receive payouts, as suggested by the damages awarded to plaintiffs in similar cases considered by California civil courts. There is no evidence that there has been any litigation at this point. Newsweek reached out to the LAPD and the City of Los Angeles via email for comment. Why It Matters A series of immigration raids on Friday sparked a large protest in Los Angeles over the weekend. In response to some incidents of violence and looting, President Donald Trump announced the deployment of 2,000 National Guard without California Governor Gavin Newsom's consent. The demonstrations are among the most intense wave of public opposition to federal immigration enforcement since Trump returned to office in January. What To Know As the protests have intensified, there have been reports that the LAPD is using rubber bullets against protesters. An Australian journalist was also struck. A British news photographer said that he had to undergo emergency surgery after a plastic bullet hit his thigh. In previous cases, court ordered payments to people who officers shot with rubber bullets. In March 2023, a federal jury awarded $375,000 to Deon Jones after he was shot in the face with a rubber bullet by an LAPD officer during a May 2020 protest. In May 2024, Benjamin Montemayor was awarded $1.5 million after being shot in the testicles with a foam projectile in a 2020 protest, an injury that required surgery. Protesters confront police on the 101 Freeway near the Metropolitan Detention Center of downtown Los Angeles, on June 8, 2025. Protesters confront police on the 101 Freeway near the Metropolitan Detention Center of downtown Los Angeles, on June 8, 2025. AP Photo/Jae C. Hong What People Are Saying Matthew Mangino, a former district attorney in Lawrence County, Pennsylvania, told Newsweek: "A jury verdict in a California Federal Court found the LA police's use of non-lethal bullets during a protest was 'malicious, oppressive, or in reckless disregard of' plaintiff's rights. That opens the door to federal 1983 civil rights actions for the same conduct. "The continued use of non-lethal ammunition that cause bodily injury, and in some cases serious bodily injury, is going to open the City of Los Angeles to civil liability." Patrick Wilcken, Amnesty International's researcher on Military, Security and Policing issues previously said in a report about rubber bullets: "We believe that legally-binding global controls on the manufacture and trade in less lethal weapons, including KIPs [kinetic impact projectiles], along with effective guidelines on the use of force are urgently needed to combat an escalating cycle of abuses." What Happens Next Newsom has asked the Trump administration to withdraw federal troops from Los Angeles. During a press conference on Sunday, LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell said that multiple people had been arrested that day.