EXCLUSIVE Marco Rubio cracks down on Australia for 'censoring' social media posts critical of trans orgy activist
is calling on foreign countries to end their online censorship practices against U.S. companies in an effort to preserve 'free expression.'
It comes as the Australian government is embroiled in a legal battle with Elon Musk 's X social media platform and an advocate against transgender treatments for minors.
The government there sought to censor the online activity of an American company and one of its users.
It placed a geo-based ban on those in the country viewing an X post because the user known as 'Billboard Chris' used the biological pronouns of a transgender individual and Australian citizen.
'I think what this does is put some pressure on the Australian government, because nobody likes to have the United States Government cracking down on them,' Chris Elston told the Daily Mail when asked about the State Department weighing in on the fight.
Last week the State Department's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, & Labor (DRL) called out Australia, the European Union, and Turkey for their recent actions suppressing online activity related to political speech, gender ideology and peaceful protests.
Lawyers for X and Elston, who is Canadian, legally challenged the takedown order by the Australian government's eSafety Commission and appeared last month for a five-day hearing at an administrative review tribunal in Melbourne.
While the panel originally created to take down nude images of minors can control what people in Australia publish and see online, they are also allegedly seeking to police the online activity of the world when it relates to anything posted about Australians.
The post was geo-blocked from being viewed in Australia and X was sent a take down order by the country's eSafety Commission, which the platform is now fighting in Australian court
If someone tries to look at the post Elston made over a year ago, they will instead receive the message: 'This post from @BillboardChris has been withheld in Australia in response to a legal demand.'
The U.S. has said that the way other countries treat American companies could affect trade relationships – and Trump has already threatened or implemented mass tariff policies nationwide.
'They've made freedom of speech a critical component of their entire campaign and how they manage when they want other countries to do the same, it's a big issue for the Trump administration,' Elston told the Daily Mail.
He added: 'So they're not going to be happy that other countries are doing petty censorship about people on the other side of the world.'
The DRL Bureau wrote in a statement on its X account on May 1: 'The Department of State is deeply concerned about efforts by governments to coerce American tech companies into targeting individuals for censorship.'
'Freedom of expression must be protected – online and offline,' the statement added. 'Examples of this conduct are troublingly numerous.'
'EU Commissioner Thierry Breton threatened X for hosting political speech; Türkiye fined Meta for refusing to restrict content about protests; and Australia required X to remove a post criticizing an individual for promoting gender ideology,' according to the statement.
'Even when content may be objectionable, censorship undermines democracy, suppresses political opponents, and degrades public safety. The United States opposes efforts to undermine freedom of expression.'
'As [Secretary Marco Rubio] said, our diplomacy will continue to place an emphasis on promoting fundamental freedoms,' it concluded.
The State Department's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, & Labor (DRL) on Mday 1, 2025 called out Australia, the European Union and Turkey for their recent actions suppressing online activity related to political speech, gender ideology and peaceful protests of U.S. companies
The whole saga with Australia started last year when Elston reposted a Daily Mail article about an Australian transgender member of the United Nations trans health panel under the World Health Organization.
This included posting images of Teddy Cook practicing public nudity and attending bondage parties and trans orgies.
Cook filed a complaint with Australia's eSafety Commission against news outlets that published the images.
Elston reposted the article with the caption: 'This woman (yes, she's female) is part of a panel of 20 'experts' hired by the @WHO to draft their policy on caring for 'trans people.'
'People who belong in psychiatric wards are writing the guidelines for people who belong in psychiatric wards,' he added in the X post from February 2024.
Australia took issue with the fact that he reposted an article that 'doxxed' where one of its citizens worked as well as the images, and the fact that the post 'misgendered' the transgender WHO panel member.
Elston detailed how lawyers with X informed him of Australia's take down notice.
Elston, a Canadian citizen, has gone viral for holding signs in public spaces with messages slamming gender ideology and the implementation of transgender treatments on minors. He told Daily Mail he was fined in Australia for the same actions he takes in other parts of the world
The Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF) came forward to represent Elston in his defense in Australia.
'Everyone has the right to speak the truth online - especially when discussing significant societal debates,' ADF International legal counsel Robert Clarke told the Daily Mail.
'Australian authorities have significantly overreached by attempting to silence a Canadian campaigner on a U.S. social media platform,' he added.
'We're delighted to stand by Chris as he fights his legal battle against censorship, and welcome the State Department's affirmation that Australia, like all governments, must uphold free speech.'
The Australian eSafety Commissioner defended the decision to censor Elston in a tribunal last month by claiming his use of biological pronounce was 'intended to have an effect of causing serious harm'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Australia's defense minister downplays concerns over Pentagon review of multi-billion submarine deal
Australia 's defense minister dismissed concerns Thursday that a deal between the U.S., Australia and Britain to provide his country with nuclear-powered submarines could be in jeopardy, following a report that the Pentagon had ordered a review. Australian Defense Minister Richard Marles told Sky News Australia that he had known about the review of the deal 'for some time," saying that it was a 'very natural step for the incoming administration to take.' He noted that the UK's government also reviewed the deal, the centerpiece of a three-way alliance known as AUKUS after it was elected, and that his own government had looked at it as part of its own review of Australia's entire defense posture. "I think an incoming government having a look at this is something that they have a perfect right to do and we welcome it and we'll work with it,' he said. The deal, worth more than $200 billion, was signed between the three countries in 2021 under then President Joe Biden, designed to provide Australia, one of Washington's staunchest allies in the region, with greater maritime capabilities to counter China's increasingly strong navy. The deal also involves the U.S. selling several of its Virginia-class submarines to Australia to bridge the gap as the new submarines are being jointly built. In January, Australia made the first of six $500 million payments to the U.S. under the AUKUS deal, meant to bolster American submarine manufacturing. Marles met with U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on the sidelines of a defense conference in Singapore less than two weeks ago, and told reporters afterward that he had come away with 'a sense of confidence about the way in which AUKUS is proceeding.' 'AUKUS is on track and we are meeting all the timelines that are associated with it,' he said. 'We are very optimistic.' Hegseth's address to the defense forum made multiple mentions of cooperation with Australia but no reference to AUKUS, however, though he did later mention the deal when he was taking questions. Hegseth did urge allies in the Indo-Pacific to increase their defense spending, and underscored the need for a 'strong, resolute and capable network of allies and partners' as the U.S. seeks to counter China.
Finextra
41 minutes ago
- Finextra
Asic cracks ddown on 'finfluencers'
ASIC has issued warning notices to 18 social media 'finfluencers' suspected of unlawfully promoting high-risk financial products and providing unlicensed financial advice to Australians as part of a Global Week of Action Against Unlawful Finfluencers by nine international market regulators. 0 Last week, ASIC and regulators from the United Kingdom, United Arab Emirates, Italy, Hong Kong and Canada took coordinated actions to crack down on unauthorised finfluencers. Together, the nine regulators used a combination of regulatory and enforcement powers including arrests, warning notices, website takedowns, educational schemes with authorised finfluencers and consumer awareness programs to put unauthorised finfluencers on notice and warn consumers of the risks of unauthorised and misleading finfluencer content. ASIC Commissioner Alan Kirkland said, 'Regulators across the world have joined forces to disrupt unlawful finfluencer activity.' 'It's important that consumers separate fun from fact when it comes to finfluencer content. Popularity doesn't equal credibility. Check their credentials and whether they're licensed or authorised, before checking your money out.' Following the issuance of INFO Sheet 269 Discussing financial products and services online (INFO 269) in 2022, ASIC has observed a noticeable drop in social media posts spruiking financial products and services by unauthorised finfluencers. 'In Australia, after ASIC issued INFO 269, we saw that many finfluencers changed what they were saying or became licensed or authorised representatives to comply with the law,' Mr Kirkland added. 'Australian Financial Services licensees who engage influencers also improved their due diligence and monitoring of finfluencers to ensure they don't provide unlicensed financial services and that consumers are not misled.' ASIC's current concerns lie with finfluencers positioning themselves as so-called trading experts, who are providing unauthorised financial product advice and promoting high-risk, complex investment products that can cause real consumer harm, such as contracts for difference (CFDs) and over the counter (OTC) derivative products. Their social media content is often accompanied by misleading or deceptive representations about the prospects of success from the products or trading strategies they promote, sharing images of lavish lifestyles, sportscars and other luxury goods. 'We are seeing a pattern where these unlicensed finfluencers invite consumers to join their closed communities or forums to learn their secrets to success or copy their trades,' Mr Kirkland said. If a finfluencer is not licensed, an authorised representative or exempt, they're legally not permitted to carry on a business of providing investment advice in Australia. Investors and consumers can check the credentials of finfluencers out by using ASIC's professional registers search tool. Recent Moneysmart research found that 41% of young Australians seek financial information or advice from online sources such as social media, including finfluencers. 'Australia's financial services laws protect investors and promote market integrity. They set minimum requirements and provide important protections for investors if something goes wrong. 'If you spruik or discuss financial products and services online, you need to carefully consider how the law applies to you and seek legal advice if you are unsure,' Mr Kirkland said. ASIC conducts targeted monitoring of financial discussion by finfluencers that feature or promote financial products. Where we see harm occurring, we will take action to enforce the law. Unlicensed activity can be reported to ASIC on our How to report misconduct webpage or by calling 1300 300 630 so that we can consider appropriate regulatory action. Background In addition to ASIC, the nine regulators involved in the Global Week of Action Against Unlawful Finfluencers included: Canada, Alberta Securities Commission Canada, Autorité des marchés financiers, Quebec, Canada, British Columbia Securities Commission Canada, Ontario Securities Commission Hong Kong, Securities and Futures Commission Italy, Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa United Arab Emirates, Securities and Commodities Authority United Kingdom, Financial Conduct Authority ASIC issued INFO 269 in March 2022 for social media influencers who discuss financial products and services online. The licensing provisions under the Corporations Act 2001 (the Act) apply to persons who carry on a financial services business in Australia. This includes persons who provide financial product advice or arrange for a person to deal in a financial product. Carrying on an unlicensed financial services business in Australia is an offence under the Act, unless authorised as a representative of a licensee or relying on an exemption. The Act imposes significant penalties, including up to five years' imprisonment for an individual and financial penalties into the millions of dollars for a corporation. The law also prohibits conduct that is misleading or deceptive, or is likely to mislead or deceive, in relation to financial products or services. A finfluencer does not need to be licensed to breach the misleading or deceptive prohibitions. In December 2022, the Federal Court found social media finfluencer Tyson Robert Scholz contravened s911A of the Corporations Act by carrying on a financial service business (between March 2020 and November 2021) without an Australian financial services licence (22-371MR).
Daily Mail
43 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Elon Musk phoned Donald Trump to try and fix their feud after 'regretting' his scathing posts about the President
The apparent end of the feud between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk came after the Tesla boss place a call to the politician. The tech tycoon had been seeking to claw his way back into Trump's good side with a series of surprisingly positive social media posts about the President. Trump, meanwhile, continued to wish him 'well' - apparently taking notice and easing his threats to try to shred the government contracts held by Musk's companies. Now, it has been revealed that Musk phoned Trump late on Monday before he offered his public admission of regret, The New York Times reported. The moment came after Musk spoke on Friday with Vice President JD Vance and White House Chief Of Staff Susie Wiles, according to the Times. 'I regret some of my posts about President Donald Trump last week. They went too far,' Musk posted on Wednesday. Trump said on Saturday that he thought his relationship with Musk was effectively over, and at the weekend he warned of 'serious consequences' if the Tesla boss were to start financially supporting Democrats. It came after Musk described Trump's tax bill as a 'disgusting abomination'. By Monday afternoon, the day of the call, Trump was taking a softer tone. He told a New York Post podcaster he had 'no hard feelings '. When asked if he could ever bury the hatchet, Trump said: 'I guess I could. He went after a bill that's phenomenal, it's the best thing we've ever signed in this country. And when he did that I was not a happy camper. So, it's too bad.' Last month, Trump had presented Musk with a golden key to the White House, only to see their relationship blow up over a series of escalating attacks and threats. During a podcast appearance with Theo Von that aired on Saturday, Vance hinted at a potential truce. He said: 'Elon, he's an incredible entrepreneur. And look, man, I'm always going to be loyal to the president, and I hope that eventually Elon kind of comes back into the fold.' On Wednesday afternoon, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt gave the first public reaction from Trump's side to Musk saying he went 'too far'. She said: 'The president acknowledged the statement that Elon put out this morning, and he is appreciative of it, and we are continuing to focus on the business of the American people.' She also didn't give any indication of a government-wide review of the multi-billion contracts for work Musk's companies do for the U.S. government. 'No efforts have been made on that front, as far as I'm aware,' Leavitt said. The rapprochement comes just days after Trump stashed his red Model S Tesla out of public view, in a tangible display of how the relationship had deteriorated. Hours after Trump introduced the idea that he may move his new car around 'a little bit,' the vehicle had vanished by Tuesday from the prime parking spot it had occupied on White House grounds since he purchased it. A White House official, pressed for details, refused to provide additional information to on its whereabouts, saying: 'We're not playing Where's Waldo. If you don't see it, you don't see it.' Trump was coy when a reporter asked him about the car on Monday after he spent the preceding days warring with Musk by threatening his government contracts. Musk had originally published and deleted a post saying the feds had additional information on Trump in the Jeffrey Epstein files and even suggested the President should be impeached. Trump said Musk would face 'serious consequences' if he backed Democrats, although the Tesla boss later appeared to be using his X account to try to claw himself back into Trump's good graces. Amid the threats and counter-threats, reporters wanted to know if Trump would keep the car and maintain the Starlink Internet service installed for the White House by Musk's DOGE aides, despite reported warnings by government security experts. The Tesla remains a fixation, and there were media reports Trump was considering selling it amid the astonishing breach with his former first buddy. 'No, I haven't heard that. I mean, I may move the Tesla around a little bit, but I don't think we'll be doing that with Starlink. It's a good service,' Trump responded. The car, which lists for about $80,000, has Florida tags, giving Trump more street parking options if he moves it back to Mar-a-Lago. He also could store the car at his nearby golf club just across the Potomac River in Sterling, Virginia. Trump says he paid for it with a check.
