logo
We are witnessing slow constitutional collapse in the US

We are witnessing slow constitutional collapse in the US

The Guardian30-04-2025

It's possible that later, when we know more about how the Trump regime reshapes the US and about how it ultimately comes to an end, we will look back at this moment in 2025 and conclude that we were already living under an autocracy. Checks on executive power seem to have all but vanished; the Trump administration is not acting like either the courts, the judiciary or the people have any prerogatives that they must respect.
Science is suffering: massive cuts to federal funding of research into medicine, climate change or anything that might include a word on a long list of banned ones – like 'transition' – has decimated research, made the US a global laughingstock, and set the cause of human thriving back by years. The economy is in chaos, and the bribery is all but out in the open; it no longer seems to occur to many Americans that their politicians should not be on the take.
Immigrants appear to have lost the entitlement to due process, and the administration appears to be trying to deport as many of them as possible, paying smaller countries in the American sphere of influence to imprison them at forced labor camps from which they have no means of petitioning for their own release. Dissidents are being captured on the streets, kidnapped from their homes and arrested in the courtrooms they preside over as punishment for their speech. In light of all this, even without the benefit of hindsight, it is already becoming more difficult to speak of American 'democracy' with a straight face.
Which is not to say that the developments of the past few months are unprecedented. In many ways, the first 100 days of Trump's restoration are much like the first 100 of his initial term, in 2017: they are marked by a dizzying whirlwind of scandals, so numerous and preposterous as to be difficult to keep up with; by a cartoonish incompetence; and by public displays of aggression, cruelty, malice and dominance – be it over the federal workforce, his political rivals, foreign leaders, major institutions or the American people themselves.
But the second Trump term has also been more reckless, more focused and more frictionless in its work to consolidate power and cut off its political opposition. Long gone are the first-term administration staff members who sought to have some sort of moderating influence on Trump – the bureaucrats and institutionalists who thought they could slow him down with procedure, the more cynical Republican opportunists who thought they could bend his charisma to their own ends. What is left in Trumpworld are only the true believers, or those with the zeal of converts. They are no longer being slowed down from the inside.
Nor are they being opposed much from without. In 2017, when liberal Americans could still comfort themselves with the notion that Trump's election was an anomaly, and in the early months of Trump's first term, an uncharacteristic level of civic engagement and pride sprang up. The Women's Marches attracted millions, and crowds swarmed the airports to lend support to travelers from the countries that Trump had targeted with his Muslim ban. But while the early resistance movement had tremendous amounts of feeling, it ultimately lacked direction: all that outrage did not find a useful place to go, and eventually it ebbed. It is hard to find hopefulness, now, among American liberals, and the Democratic party is showing few signs of life. On the Sunday talkshows last week, the Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer was asked about the administration's attacks on institutions of higher education, which have lost federal funding as the regime attempts to restructure their curricula and faculties. Schumer replied that he had sent a strongly worded letter.
The United States has long been in a state of constitutional erosion. The role of Congress, the most representative of the federal branches, has been dwindling for decades, as gerrymandering and malapportionment have made its two chambers less competitive and more partisan, leading to permanent gridlock and dysfunction. Congress was once endowed with both the power of the purse and the sole power to declare war; it has largely handed the latter off to the executive, endowing the president with broad powers to use the US military abroad even without congressional approval and has not seemed interested in taking that power back.
Now, the Trump administration seems to have also usurped Congress's power of the purse for the executive, declaring that the president may refuse to appropriate congressionally allocated funds by personal fiat. This is a profound constitutional change, one that shifts a massive power into the hands of one man; and again, Congress does not seem to be interested in this assault on its own prerogatives, with even many Democratic leaders seemingly preferring to have less power – and, hence, less responsibility.
For a long time, the decline of Congress meant the ascent of the federal judiciary, which appropriated large swaths of de facto policymaking authority to itself in light of congressional paralysis. This was already a degradation of democracy: the unelected judges came to have far too much influence over federal policy. And the judges were not the neutral, non-ideological referees that they claimed to be: many interpreted the law to be maximally deferential to the whims of the powerful and only minimally respectful to the rights of the less powerful.
The US supreme court, in particular, seemed to change its doctrine almost as whim based on whatever outcome would best serve conservative priorities. Indeed, the judiciary itself seemed more than willing to share in democratically unaccountable power with the president, so long as that president was a Republican: it declared last year that the executive was immune from almost all criminal prosecution, thereby carving out a category of person – Donald Trump – to whom federal criminal law mostly does not apply. But even this wildly partisan federal judiciary does not seem to be good enough for the restored Trump regime, which wants to eliminate all possibility that its agenda might be checked by the courts: JD Vance, the vice-president, has taken to complaining in public when judges rule against the administration, claiming, falsely, that they do not have the authority to check the executive. But such petulant little demonstrations may not long be necessary: increasingly, the Trump regime is simply ignoring judicial orders that it does not like.
Critics of the Trump administration have called this state of affairs a constitutional crisis. I have come to think of it more like a constitutional collapse: long vacant, the vestiges of the US's democracy are crumbling to the ground, falling like an empty tent. We don't yet know what, exactly, will be erected in its place.
Moira Donegan is a Guardian US columnist

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Federal appeals court temporarily reverses decision on Trump's tariffs
Federal appeals court temporarily reverses decision on Trump's tariffs

The Independent

time27 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Federal appeals court temporarily reverses decision on Trump's tariffs

A federal appeals court has ruled that President Trump's tariffs will remain in effect during the appeal process, temporarily reversing a lower court's decision. The decision applies to broad-based tariffs affecting most U.S. trading partners, as well as duties on imports from Canada, China, and Mexico. The court has not yet ruled on the legality of Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs, but will hear arguments on July 31. A lower court previously ruled that Trump had overstepped his authority, stating that the Constitution grants Congress the power to impose taxes and tariffs. The tariffs have created turbulence for global markets and American businesses, but the ruling does not impact tariffs implemented under separate legal frameworks, such as those on steel and aluminum.

Trump deployed troops to LA. Was it an overreaction?
Trump deployed troops to LA. Was it an overreaction?

The Herald Scotland

timean hour ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Trump deployed troops to LA. Was it an overreaction?

Immigration agents carrying out Trump's goal of deporting 1 million undocumented immigrants annually sparked a series of sometimes-violent protests in the greater Los Angeles area. A small mob set multiple vehicles and a palm tree on fire, threw rocks and fireworks at police in downtown Los Angeles on June 7 and June 8 as thousands of non-violent protesters watched and occasionally cheered. Trump has dispatched 4,000 members of the National Guard and 700 Marines to Los Angeles, arguing that local law enforcement is overwhelmed. Few of those troops are actually on the streets, however. "If I didn't 'send in the troops' to Los Angeles the last three nights, that once beautiful and great city would be burning to the ground right now ..." Trump said in a June 10 post on his social media site Truth Social. The Los Angeles Police Department alone has about 9,000 officers to serve the city of nearly 4 million people sprawling across a land area that's one-third the size of Rhode Island. The larger Los Angeles metro area has more than 18 million residents and covers an area nearly the size of Maine. Local authorities say they have detained about 150 people in connection to the unrest that left small areas of the 5.8-square mile downtown marred with pervasive graffiti and a few broken windows. No serious injuries have been reported. The nightly protests are still being handled primarily by the Los Angeles Police Department and other local law enforcement officers. The graffiti criticizes Trump and Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, and more broadly raises concerns that the country is careening toward a fascist state. Some of California's leaders have accused Trump of using the protests as a pretext to strengthen federal control, especially in a state whose leadership he has long battled. Invoking the memory of Jan. 6 On June 10, Knowlton joined thousands of protesters as they marched around downtown, chanting slogans and criticizing Trump and his immigration-enforcement plans. Some waved the national flags of Mexico or El Salvador, while others carried upside-down American flags, a traditional distress symbol previously used by right-wing groups during the Biden administration. "We all know this is a power grab," Knowlton said before taking a selfie in front of a line of LAPD officers in riot gear. "What I want right now is for the city police to grow a spine and stand up to the feds." Knowlton, a professional musician wearing a sarape adorned with an eagle, carried a sign aimed squarely at Trump: "Marines!! Where were U Jan 6?" Like many protesters, Knowlton said he found it infuriating that Trump refused to call out the National Guard during the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection at the Capitol, and then pardoned the people who violently breached the building and attacked Capitol police officers. "It's funny that you can send the Marines in for some fireworks but you can kill a police officer in D.C. and get a pardon," Knowlton said. An 'experiment' to displace local control? While some people set off large fireworks that echoed around buildings and a few threw water bottles, most of the protesters remained peaceful, although they were occasionally redirected by local police with pepper-ball guns when they got too close to protected buildings like the police headquarters. Many federal buildings in the area, including courthouses and office buildings, were unprotected and targeted with graffiti. On June 11, Mayor Karen Bass said she believes her city is "an experiment" for White House officials in learning how to displace local control. Trump called up the National Guard over the objections of Gov. Gavin Newsom, who promptly sued to stop him, calling it "an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism." In turn, Trump suggested that Newsom could be arrested. "I feel like we've all been in Los Angles a part of a grand experiment to see what happens when the federal government decides they want to roll up on a state or roll up on a city and take over," Bass said. "It's a sense of intimidation and fear that is just so unnecessary and so corrosive to our city." A city of immigrants Across the city, community members worry that the Marines and National Guard will dangerously escalate any violence that does occur. Trump has promised that anyone who assaults a federal officer or member of the military will face swift punishment. One-third of Los Angeles County residents were born in another country and nearly one in 10 lack documentation to remain legally. But many of those undocumented parents have children who were born American citizens, making Trump's aggressive immigration enforcement unwelcome in this city of immigrants. Retired teacher Jose "Bear" Gallegos, 61, who attended protests in the city of Paramount on June 7, said he was angry that California National Guard troops had been called up by Trump over Newsom's objections. Carrying rifles, the guard members spent Monday and Tuesday controlling access to the Paramount Business Center, which Gallegos said is home to a small federal detention said he was among the protesters hit with pepper-ball rounds, and drew a contrast between the armed troops and unarmed protesters worried about family and community members."We don't have guns. All we have is prayers and feathers," he said. Former Los Angeles deputy district attorney Alfonso Estrada said introducing more federal troops to what is effectively a law-enforcement situation may further exacerbate tensions with protesters, but also with local police who didn't ask for that help."It also creates an awkward jurisdictional issue for local law enforcement agencies and their members who now have the national guard and U.S. Marine Corps operating in their jurisdiction," said Estrada, now in private practice as a partner at the California-based law firm Hanson Bridgett LLP. Estrada added: "The unnecessary and provocative acts of the executive branch endanger both the general public and local law enforcement officers who will bear the brunt of the political backlash and anger that Los Angelenos are feeling for the executive branch targeting its immigrant community and population without due process."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store