logo
We are witnessing slow constitutional collapse in the US

We are witnessing slow constitutional collapse in the US

The Guardian30-04-2025

It's possible that later, when we know more about how the Trump regime reshapes the US and about how it ultimately comes to an end, we will look back at this moment in 2025 and conclude that we were already living under an autocracy. Checks on executive power seem to have all but vanished; the Trump administration is not acting like either the courts, the judiciary or the people have any prerogatives that they must respect.
Science is suffering: massive cuts to federal funding of research into medicine, climate change or anything that might include a word on a long list of banned ones – like 'transition' – has decimated research, made the US a global laughingstock, and set the cause of human thriving back by years. The economy is in chaos, and the bribery is all but out in the open; it no longer seems to occur to many Americans that their politicians should not be on the take.
Immigrants appear to have lost the entitlement to due process, and the administration appears to be trying to deport as many of them as possible, paying smaller countries in the American sphere of influence to imprison them at forced labor camps from which they have no means of petitioning for their own release. Dissidents are being captured on the streets, kidnapped from their homes and arrested in the courtrooms they preside over as punishment for their speech. In light of all this, even without the benefit of hindsight, it is already becoming more difficult to speak of American 'democracy' with a straight face.
Which is not to say that the developments of the past few months are unprecedented. In many ways, the first 100 days of Trump's restoration are much like the first 100 of his initial term, in 2017: they are marked by a dizzying whirlwind of scandals, so numerous and preposterous as to be difficult to keep up with; by a cartoonish incompetence; and by public displays of aggression, cruelty, malice and dominance – be it over the federal workforce, his political rivals, foreign leaders, major institutions or the American people themselves.
But the second Trump term has also been more reckless, more focused and more frictionless in its work to consolidate power and cut off its political opposition. Long gone are the first-term administration staff members who sought to have some sort of moderating influence on Trump – the bureaucrats and institutionalists who thought they could slow him down with procedure, the more cynical Republican opportunists who thought they could bend his charisma to their own ends. What is left in Trumpworld are only the true believers, or those with the zeal of converts. They are no longer being slowed down from the inside.
Nor are they being opposed much from without. In 2017, when liberal Americans could still comfort themselves with the notion that Trump's election was an anomaly, and in the early months of Trump's first term, an uncharacteristic level of civic engagement and pride sprang up. The Women's Marches attracted millions, and crowds swarmed the airports to lend support to travelers from the countries that Trump had targeted with his Muslim ban. But while the early resistance movement had tremendous amounts of feeling, it ultimately lacked direction: all that outrage did not find a useful place to go, and eventually it ebbed. It is hard to find hopefulness, now, among American liberals, and the Democratic party is showing few signs of life. On the Sunday talkshows last week, the Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer was asked about the administration's attacks on institutions of higher education, which have lost federal funding as the regime attempts to restructure their curricula and faculties. Schumer replied that he had sent a strongly worded letter.
The United States has long been in a state of constitutional erosion. The role of Congress, the most representative of the federal branches, has been dwindling for decades, as gerrymandering and malapportionment have made its two chambers less competitive and more partisan, leading to permanent gridlock and dysfunction. Congress was once endowed with both the power of the purse and the sole power to declare war; it has largely handed the latter off to the executive, endowing the president with broad powers to use the US military abroad even without congressional approval and has not seemed interested in taking that power back.
Now, the Trump administration seems to have also usurped Congress's power of the purse for the executive, declaring that the president may refuse to appropriate congressionally allocated funds by personal fiat. This is a profound constitutional change, one that shifts a massive power into the hands of one man; and again, Congress does not seem to be interested in this assault on its own prerogatives, with even many Democratic leaders seemingly preferring to have less power – and, hence, less responsibility.
For a long time, the decline of Congress meant the ascent of the federal judiciary, which appropriated large swaths of de facto policymaking authority to itself in light of congressional paralysis. This was already a degradation of democracy: the unelected judges came to have far too much influence over federal policy. And the judges were not the neutral, non-ideological referees that they claimed to be: many interpreted the law to be maximally deferential to the whims of the powerful and only minimally respectful to the rights of the less powerful.
The US supreme court, in particular, seemed to change its doctrine almost as whim based on whatever outcome would best serve conservative priorities. Indeed, the judiciary itself seemed more than willing to share in democratically unaccountable power with the president, so long as that president was a Republican: it declared last year that the executive was immune from almost all criminal prosecution, thereby carving out a category of person – Donald Trump – to whom federal criminal law mostly does not apply. But even this wildly partisan federal judiciary does not seem to be good enough for the restored Trump regime, which wants to eliminate all possibility that its agenda might be checked by the courts: JD Vance, the vice-president, has taken to complaining in public when judges rule against the administration, claiming, falsely, that they do not have the authority to check the executive. But such petulant little demonstrations may not long be necessary: increasingly, the Trump regime is simply ignoring judicial orders that it does not like.
Critics of the Trump administration have called this state of affairs a constitutional crisis. I have come to think of it more like a constitutional collapse: long vacant, the vestiges of the US's democracy are crumbling to the ground, falling like an empty tent. We don't yet know what, exactly, will be erected in its place.
Moira Donegan is a Guardian US columnist

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump polls well on immigration, amid Los Angeles protests
Trump polls well on immigration, amid Los Angeles protests

The Herald Scotland

timean hour ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Trump polls well on immigration, amid Los Angeles protests

The poll was conducted before Trump ordered the National Guard into Los Angeles on June 8. More: 'I would': Trump says he'd arrest California Gov. Gavin Newsom Under Trump, immigration authorities have ordered arrests and deportations across the country. In San Diego, agents raided an Italian restaurant on June 6, arresting multiple kitchen workers. Sometimes violent demonstrations ignited in Los Angeles that same day over immigration raids. Local law enforcement, responding to the protests were joined by members of the California National Guard on June 8, ordered there by Trump over the objection of Gov. Gavin Newsom. More: Illegal border crossings at record lows as Trump crackdown spreads Newsom has asked the president to withdraw troops, criticized him on social media for "fanning the flames," and said the state is suing the Trump administration. Trump has called the move necessary, writing on Truth Social, "These are not protesters, they are troublemakers and insurrectionists." A small majority of polled voters are backing his overall approach immigration. Fifty-four percent told CBS News and YouGov they approve of the administration's deportation efforts. A little over 40% said they think Trump's crackdown is making America safer. Most of that support came from his base: 93% of Republicans said they approved, compared to 18% of Democrats. Meanwhile, 49% of independents agreed. More: Finneas teargassed in LA protests: 'They're inciting this' Invoking wartime powers to stop what he calls an "invasion," Trump has said repeatedly his administration is targeting violent criminals who are in the country illegally. A majority of voters said they believe all or some illegal immigrants should be deported, in a Pew Research Center survey earlier this year. Of those who said "some," 97% agreed people who committed violent crimes should be forced to leave. More: Massachusetts high school student granted bail by immigration court However, the Trump administration's aggressive efforts have ensnared some immigrants accused of or charged with nonviolent offenses and some with no criminal record at all. And the hurried pace of the deportations has ignored due process, experts and advocates say. Despite receiving most of his support from voters on immigration policy, Trump's overall ratings remain at a dip. Polls in early June show him between 45% and 50% approval. Contributing: Lauren Villagran

Australian reporter Lauren Tomasi shot with nonlethal bullet in LA
Australian reporter Lauren Tomasi shot with nonlethal bullet in LA

The Herald Scotland

timean hour ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Australian reporter Lauren Tomasi shot with nonlethal bullet in LA

9News reported that Tomasi is sore but otherwise unharmed from the incident. Only about an hour before, Tomasi had been caught in a group of protesters while covering the raids. Exploding flashbang grenades can be heard as Tomasi conducts a live shot before protesters begin yelling at her and grabbing the camera she is talking into. Live updates: Gov. Newsom challenges Trump on National Guard deployment What is happening in Los Angeles? Thousands of people began to gather in Los Angeles on Friday, June 6 to protest President Donald Trump's immigration enforcement operations. Small protests throughout the city have mounted to large demonstrations and some destructive clashes between officers and protesters. Local police and hundreds of National Guard troops were deployed to the city over the weekend. Authorities declared several of demonstrations on Sunday as "unlawful assemblies" and began firing flash bang and tear gas grenades into large groups of protesters. California's 101 Freeway has been blocked by protesters and several vehicles have been set on fire during the protests. Trump and California Gov. Gavin Newsom have continued to spar on the raids, especially after the president sent National Guard troops to the city. "Let's get this straight: 1) Local law enforcement didn't need help. 2) Trump sent troops anyway - to manufacture chaos and violence. 3) Trump succeeded," Newsom said in a X post. "4) Now things are destabilized and we need to send in more law enforcement just to clean up Trump's mess." On the other hand, Trump said in a Truth Social post on June 8 that Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass should "apologize to the people of Los Angeles for the absolutely horrible job that they have done, and this now includes the ongoing L.A. riots. These are not protesters, they are troublemakers and insurrectionists." Contributing: John Bacon, Trevor Hughes, USA TODAY Greta Cross is a national trending reporter at USA TODAY. Story idea? Email her at gcross@

Is Musk ready to rekindle his bromance with Trump?
Is Musk ready to rekindle his bromance with Trump?

The Herald Scotland

timean hour ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Is Musk ready to rekindle his bromance with Trump?

Not long after the president's laudatory Oval Office send-off for Musk on May 30, the first buddy-turned-nemesis dueled with his former boss in a spectacular public spat on social media. Musk criticized the president's so-called "Big, Beautiful Bill," a tax and policy package making its way through Congress, calling it a "disgusting abomination" that would burden Americans with "crushing debt" and agreeing with a post that called for Trump's impeachment. Then Musk went nuclear. "Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files," he wrote on X on June 5 to his more than 220 million followers. "That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!" That Trump had crossed paths with Epstein, a disgraced financier who died while in jail awaiting prosecution on sex trafficking charges, has been public knowledge for years. In 2019, Trump said he'd had a "falling out" with Epstein, whom he described as a "Palm Beach fixture," in the mid-2000s. Now, two days after he'd dropped the bomb, the mercurial billionaire appears to be rethinking those allegations. In less than 48 hours, Musk deleted the Epstein post on X. Then, over the weekend, Musk's reshared post calling for Trump's impeachment disappeared. Instead, Musk highlighted Trump's Truth Social post criticizing California Governor Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass for failing to rein in unruly immigration protests in Los Angeles following ICE raids. "Governor Gavin Newscum and Mayor Bass should apologize to the people of Los Angeles for the absolutely horrible job that they have done, and this now includes the ongoing LA riots," wrote Trump. "These are not protesters; they are troublemakers and insurrectionists. Remember, No Masks!" While Musk has differences with Trump about the spending bill, he has consistently supported Trump's aggressive push to deport undocumented immigrants. Hours after Trump's controversial decision to deploy California National Guard troops t respond to anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles, Musk posted an image of a man in face paint standing on top of a burning car waving a Mexican flag. "This is not ok," Musk said in his post on X. He also reposted Vice President JD Vance's post sharing Trump's Truth Social post saying the "president will not tolerate rioting and violence." The reason for Musk's shift in tone is not clear, although he seemed to voice some regret hours after the big social media fight, after mutual friends of Musk and the president, including hedge fund billionaire Bill Ackman and rapper Kanye West, urged the duo to make peace. "I support @realDonaldTrump and @elonmusk and they should make peace for the benefit of our great country. We are much stronger together than apart," wrote Ackman. Musk responded with a simple: "You're not wrong." Swapna Venugopal Ramaswamy is a White House correspondent for USA TODAY. You can follow her on X @SwapnaVenugopal.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store