logo
Staring out the window is not a waste of time, says this workplace coach. Here are her top 3 tips for boosting creativity at work.

Staring out the window is not a waste of time, says this workplace coach. Here are her top 3 tips for boosting creativity at work.

Staring out the window might not be the first thing that comes to mind when thinking about boosting productivity.
Kirsty Hulse, a motivational speaker and workplace coach, thinks it can actually help us find joy and creativity in our work.
The author of "Don't Swear at Work: The Rule Breakers' Guide to Workplace Brilliance" said she often tells people that gazing into space is a valuable use of their time.
"People always laugh," she told Business Insider. "Isn't it radical that that's funny? We're so conditioned to think that thinking isn't valuable, that it's funny even as a concept."
There's a limit, of course, but if your brain is encouraging you to look out the window for a while, it's wise to take heed, Hulse said.
"Your brain is like a snow globe. If you shake up a snow globe, it's so noisy, and then it will start to slowly settle — and we need a settled snow globe in order to be able to solve problems."
Burned-out girlboss
Hulse's first business was a large marketing agency, which she started aged 26.
From the outside, she was immensely successful, landing huge clients such as Virgin Atlantic and IBM, opening offices in London and San Francisco, and expanding her team.
However, in her late 20s she started experiencing severe chest pains. After some tests, doctors concluded her heart was fine, but she was having panic attacks.
Hulse, a millennial, grew up in the "girlboss" era, when hard work and success were prioritized over everything else.
"I thought I was handling it," she said. "I was strong in resilience and all those things that women are conditioned to be, but my body was giving me all of these subtle cues."
Hulse realized she needed a change, so she pivoted to learning everything she could about the neuroscience of success and work and what makes us productive beings.
Now, she's a confidence coach who trains people at top companies, including LinkedIn, Amazon, and Spotify, to be more confident and how workplaces should be structured to bring out the best in people.
Here's her top advice:
1. Don't ignore your emotions
Hulse said many workplaces are still operating like they did in the 1950s, when emotions weren't as welcome.
She said that prioritizing intellectual rigour over our own personalities is not how humans naturally operate, leaving many people feeling like they're not themselves at work, or developing impostor syndrome.
"If we feel as though we have to have some kind of personality transplant and suddenly be this serious, robust professional, it gets in our head," Hulse said. "We're emotional beings. We make emotional decisions, emotional choices."
In the era of AI, Hulse thinks soft skills will help workers stand out.
2. Find out what play looks like for you
Hulse said the opposite of play isn't work; it's depression. Play is a need "as much as food and water."
She often asks what people liked doing for fun when they were little, like running in the forest or playing board games. "Then I ask them the question 'how can you connect that more to your work?' There's nearly always actually a clear path," Hulse said.
It could be an hour a week spent taking a pottery class, painting, playing the guitar, taking a yoga class, or going for a run. "Something that you love that truly fuels your creativity and fulfillment."
3. Work out where you do your best thinking
Instead of worrying about the perception of working hard or being performatively busy, Hulse recommends working out where you do your best thinking: "We're paid for our thoughts, we're paid for our thinking."
Hulse said people often tell her the best place is in the shower, which may be because "innovation is neurologically quiet." Staring out the window has a similar effect.
"We are coming up with cool stuff all the time, but when your brain is going fast and you're doing tasks and you're ticking things off your to-do list, you will never be able to hear your innovative ideas," she said.
"It's not that we have our best ideas in the shower, it's that that's the only time you can hear them."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Expert mom shares 4 tips to protect against emerging threat to children's health: 'There is certainly enough evidence to take action'
Expert mom shares 4 tips to protect against emerging threat to children's health: 'There is certainly enough evidence to take action'

Yahoo

time20 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Expert mom shares 4 tips to protect against emerging threat to children's health: 'There is certainly enough evidence to take action'

An under-discussed but extremely dangerous problem of modern life is the scourge of microplastics. The word itself is self-explanatory in describing what microplastics are, but what makes them insidious is just how "micro" they are. Formally defined as being less than 5 millimeters long, microplastics are invisible to the naked eye, which enables them to appear in everything from clothing to food to coral reefs. Scientists have declared them a "global emergency" because of their potential to negatively impact human health, and many still seem at a loss for how to combat an invisible enemy. Tracey Woodruff, a researcher at the University of California, San Francisco, is not one of those scientists. She studies how microplastics impact fertility and child development, and as a world leader on the topic, she is well-suited to describe how to protect against them, as she did in an interview with Business Insider. Woodruff identifies four areas in which she has effectively reduced her children's exposure to microplastics: Cooking, cleaning, clothing, and heating. With cooking, she describes mostly eating food prepared in the home, often made with fruits and vegetables. "We know that … microplastics can come from packaging that leaches into food," she says. "So it's really important to eat food that's not fast food or packaged food." Another way to protect against microplastics is to stay on top of cleaning. Woodruff says that she dusts once a week and vacuums bimonthly. Her family also takes their shoes off before entering the house, because they can pick up microplastics and potentially track them inside. A major concern with microplastics is how prevalent they are in clothing. Woodruff's solution? Buy natural, and buy old. Organic materials like cotton and linen are far less likely to contain plastics than their artificial counterparts, and older shirts not made via current manufacturing processes are also less likely to contain them. How much effort are you willing to make to reduce the amount of plastic and toxins in your home? I'll do whatever it takes Only if it's an easy swap Only if it's cheaper Not interested Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Heating plastic in the microwave and washing plastic containers in the dishwasher is also rather precarious. "We also don't use dishwashing pods, because those are packaged in plastic," Woodruff stated to Business Insider. "It's basically the same thing as the microwave. Heat causes degradation of the plastic material, and it's super hot in your dishwasher." Overall, Woodruff seems cautiously optimistic about being able to combat the more dangerous effects of microplastics. She acknowledges how damaging they can be, but reminds us that there is still plenty of time to change our ways. "There is certainly enough evidence to take action to prevent future harms." Join our free newsletter for easy tips to save more and waste less, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.

ChatGPT is making us weird
ChatGPT is making us weird

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

ChatGPT is making us weird

Artificial intelligence chatbots like OpenAI's ChatGPT models are changing the way we think. Beyond our workflows and creative processes, the bots are disrupting our social cues and intimate lives. Business Insider spoke to a range of professionals to ask: Is ChatGPT making us weird? The other day, my family group chat lit up when I posed a question about whether it's important to say "please" and "thank you" to ChatGPT when asking it to conduct a niche search or plan out an itinerary. My mother, ever a stickler for manners, said she makes a conscious choice to behave in this way. A choice she said she makes to "keep myself human." Another loved one later admitted she's been leaning on the chatbot for guidance as she navigates a tricky moment in her marriage. And I couldn't resist my temptation to ask ChatGPT to evaluate how attractive I am after The Washington Post reported that people were asking it for beauty advice. (It said I have "strong, expressive features," then told me to stand up straighter and smile more.) But I know it's not just my immediate circle: ChatGPT is making everyone behave a little strange. As large language models become fixtures of our digital lives, the ways we engage with them reveal a society in flux, where machines aren't only mimicking human interaction but quietly altering the expectations and norms that govern it. Business Insider spoke with four professionals who interact with chatbots like OpenAI's GPT models in radically different ways — a sociologist, a psychologist, a digital etiquette coach, and a sex therapist — to explore how the rise of AI is changing how we see each other, how we view ourselves, as well as how it's disrupting our manners and intimate lives. The conversations centered on ChatGPT, since OpenAI's chatbot is quickly becoming the AI world's equivalent of what Google is to search engines, but the professionals said similar conclusions could be drawn for Meta AI, Microsoft Copilot, Anthropic's Claude, or any other large language model on the market today. Digital etiquette consultant and author Elaine Swann said that society has needed to adapt to new social cues as each wave of technology has changed our lives. While we've largely collectively agreed that it's all right to use shorthand in personal email correspondence and rude to take a cellphone call on speakerphone in public, we're still establishing a social code for how to interact with AI bots and agents. Kelsey Vlamis, a senior reporter at Business Insider, said she's started seeing a chatbot-related change in her personal life. While on vacation in Italy, she said her husband found himself impatient with their tour guide, consciously having to keep himself from interrupting with questions "since that's how he talks to ChatGPT when he is trying to learn something." Of course, he had to hold himself back, Vlamis added, "since that is not, in fact, how we talk to human beings." Since AI has gained momentum, social media is full of posts asking whether it's appropriate for a spouse to use ChatGPT to write a love note to their partner, or for a worker to rely on an AI agent to fill out a job application on their behalf. The jury's still out on situations like these. "AI is certainly smarter now, which is great for us, but at the same time, we have to be very careful that it doesn't substitute basically our judgment or empathy," Swann said. "We have to be careful with it, not just utilizing it as our sole source of information, but also making sure that we put a mirror up to ourselves in how we use it, and running its suggestions by people that we know and care about." Maintaining our baseline levels of respect — not just for each other, but the world around us — is also key, Swann said. After OpenAI CEO Sam Altman posted on X in late April that it costs "tens of millions of dollars" for the company to process niceties like "please" and "thank you" directed toward ChatGPT, she stressed that it's up to the company to make processing those statements more cost-effective, not up to users to stop being polite. "This is the world that we create for ourselves," Swann said. "And AI should also understand that this is how we speak to one another, because we're teaching it to give that back to us." Altman, for his part, said the massive amount of funds used on polite requests toward ChatGPT is money "well spent." Laura Nelson, an associate professor of sociology at the University of British Columbia, said that because the world's most popular chatbots are created by American companies, written by US-based programmers, and trained primarily on content written in the English language, they have deeply entrenched biases that are often seen in Western cultures. "It's really important to keep in mind that it's a particular world view that these algorithms have based their training data on," Nelson said. So if you ask ChatGPT to draw you a picture of a plate of breakfast, it'll conjure typical North American foods: bacon, eggs, sausage, and toast. It describes a bottle of wine as a "classic and thoughtful gift," though in many cultures, alcohol is rarely consumed, and a bottle would make a tone-deaf present. While those examples are relatively harmless, the bots also exacerbate more insidious and potentially damaging biases. A 2021 study published in Psychology & Marketing found that people prefer AI to be anthropomorphized as female in their devices, like it is in most pop culture representations, because it makes the technology seem more human. However, the study found that preference may be inadvertently entrenching the objectification of women. There have also been numerous reports that lonely, mostly male, users may verbally abuse or degrade their AI companions. Business Insider previously reported that artificial intelligence is also rife with discriminatory bias due to the data it's trained on, and ChatGPT in particular showed racial bias when screening résumés for jobs, over-selecting Asian women candidates and under-selecting Black men. While these biases may not immediately change our behavior, they can impact our thinking and the ways we operate as a society, Nelson said. And if ChatGPT or other AI applications are implemented into our decision-making, whether in our personal lives, in the workplace, or at the legal level, it'll have wide-reaching effects we haven't even considered yet. "There's just no question that AI is going to reflect our biases — our collective biases — back to it," Nelson said. "But there are a lot of people interacting with these bots, and we have no data to suggest what the global trends are, or the effects it's going to have long-term. It's a tricky thing to get a handle on." Concrete data about the societal shift caused by AI is hard to come by, but the companies behind the tech know something is happening. Many of them have dedicated teams to figure out what effect their technology has on users, but their publicly available findings aren't peer-reviewed like a typical scientific study would be. OpenAI announced that a recent update to the GPT-4o model had a hiccup. It was "noticeably more sycophantic" than prior models, the company said in a press release. While it passed OpenAI's self-described "vibe check" and safety testing, they rolled it back after realizing its programming to please the user could fuel anger, urge impulsive actions, or reinforce negative emotions "in ways that were not intended." The company's announcement highlighted that OpenAI is keenly aware that the various AI applications gaining momentum online — from digital romantic partners to study buddies to gift-suggesting elves — have also started to have creeping effects on human emotions and behavior. When reached for comment, a spokesperson for OpenAI directed Business Insider to the company's recent statements on sycophancy in GPT-4o and an early study of emotional well-being. OpenAI's research, conducted with users over the age of 18, found that emotional engagement with the chatbot is rare. However, heavy users were more likely to report an emotional connection to the bot, and those who had personal conversations with ChatGPT were more likely to report feelings of loneliness. An Anthropic spokesperson said the company has a dedicated research team, Societal Impacts, which is analyzing Claude usage, how AI is being used across jobs, and studying what values AI models have. Representatives for Meta and Microsoft did not respond to requests for comment. Nick Jacobson, an associate professor of psychiatry at Dartmouth's Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, conducted the first trial study delivering psychotherapy to clinical populations using generative AI. His research found that a carefully programmed chatbot can be a helpful therapeutic tool for people suffering from depression, anxiety, and eating disorders. Engagement among patients in the study rivaled that of in-person therapy, they saw a significant reduction in the severity of their symptoms, and, when measured using the same test as human providers, the patients in the study reported they bonded with their therapeutic chatbot with a similar intensity as a human therapist. "Folks were really developing this strong, working bond with their bot," Jacobson said, a factor which is key to a productive therapeutic relationship. However, most bots aren't programmed with the care and precision that Jacobson's was, so those emotional bonds could be developed with an AI that doesn't have the skills to handle their users' emotional needs in a productive way. "Nearly every foundational model will act in ways that are profoundly unsafe to mental health, in various ways, shapes, and forms, at rates that are totally unacceptable," Jacobson said. "But there are so many people that are using them for things like therapy and just plain companionship that it's becoming a real problem — I think folks should handle this with greater care than I think they are." Emma J. Smith, a relationship and sex therapist, said she believes in-person therapy comes with unique benefits that can't be replicated by AI, but she sometimes recommends using chatbots for anxious clients to practice social interactions in a low-stakes environment, "so if it goes badly, or you get stuck, there's no pressure." "But some of the drawbacks are, like anything really, if it becomes a mechanism to avoid human interaction, or if it is taking you away from going out and being in the world," Smith said. "Video games are probably fine for a lot of people, and then there are some people that it takes over, and then they're missing out on their non-virtual life because they're too involved. I can see that that would be a problem with these bots, but because this is so new, we know what we don't know." While the results of his trial were promising, Jacobson warned that the large language model used in his study was carefully trained for years by some of the most prominent scholars in the psychiatric field, unlike most "therapy" bots available online. "This has inherently got a lot more danger than a lot of folks are necessarily aware of," Jacobson said. "There's probably a great deal of good that can happen from this, but there's a great deal we don't know, like for example, when folks are turning to these things for companionship, does that actually enhance their ability to practice in social settings and build human bonds, or do folks actually further withdraw and replace what would be otherwise human relationships with these parasocial relationships with these chatbots?" Jacobson is particularly concerned about AI's impact on developmental processes among younger people who haven't grown up with old-school social norms and habits. While testifying before the Senate Commerce Committee in early May about child safety in the AI era, Altman said he would not want his son to have a best friend bond with an AI bot, adding that children require "a much higher level of protection" than adults using AI tools. "We spent years and years focusing predominantly on safety, so it's very concerning to me how many people are jumping into the AI space in new ways, and just shipping it," Jacobson said. "And in my mind, that's acting quite irresponsibly. You know, a lot of folks in Silicon Valley want to move fast and break things, but in this case, they're not breaking things — they're breaking people." Read the original article on Business Insider

I want to lose weight and build strength. A dietitian said to lift weights and make simple food swaps.
I want to lose weight and build strength. A dietitian said to lift weights and make simple food swaps.

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

I want to lose weight and build strength. A dietitian said to lift weights and make simple food swaps.

A 57-year-old woman who wants to lose fat and build strength shared her diet with Business Insider. A dietitian reviewed it and recommended that she walk more, lift weights, and monitor portion sizes. Fill out this form to have your diet reviewed by a registered nutritionist or dietitian for BI's Nutrition Clinic. Joanne Erstad, 57, is a public sector worker from Canada who wants to lose weight and gain strength and flexibility. She sent in an average day of eating, which a registered dietitian and personal trainer, Kara Mockler, assessed. "I am fairly sedentary, with a desk job, but I work out for one hour two to three times a week (HIIT and Pilates), and I do like to walk, but don't often get out as I work 10-hour days," Erstad said. She said she tries to eat healthily 90% of the time and typically gets seven hours' sleep a night. "I never really had a problem with my weight until I hit menopause, and I've put on over 20 pounds in the last couple of years," Erstad said. Erstad sent what she eats on an average day to Business Insider's Nutrition Clinic. Mockler said that while Erstad's diet is high quality, reducing her portion sizes should help her hit her goals. For breakfast, Erstad typically has half a cup of full-fat plain Greek yogurt with about a quarter cup of berries, half a cup of no-sugar-added granola, one to two teaspoons of dried cranberries, two teaspoons of pumpkin seeds, two teaspoons of walnuts, and one to two teaspoons of sunflower seeds. Lunch is usually chicken breast with salad greens, cucumber, cherry tomatoes, and feta cheese, with no dressing, Erstad said. For dinner, she has a protein source — mostly chicken or fish, occasionally red meat — with either salad or vegetables such as broccoli or cauliflower. Erstad snacks on celery with organic peanut butter and raisins, or nuts. "I eat mostly organic non-GMO whole foods, and try to avoid sugar and UPFs, although I have a sweet tooth and like chocolate," Erstad said. "I try to eat one square of good-quality chocolate if I want something sweet, and I do try to follow a keto-Mediterranean diet." She continued: "I never eat at fast food places, and if I do go out to eat, I try to eat as I would at home, but that is harder to do." Mockler said that Erstad's diet is "very nutritious" thanks to all the plants, quality proteins, and whole foods she eats. "Since one of her goals is to lose weight, we have to look at the quantity of her calorie intake," Mockler said via email. "Something I see quite often is people consuming a lot of healthy foods but forgetting that those foods contain calories, too, and can still be overeaten (in terms of weight management)." At breakfast, for example, Erstad could consider eating one teaspoon each of seeds and nuts rather than two. She could also swap dried fruit for fresh, which is more filling and higher volume for fewer calories. Erstad's go-to snacks are nutritious, but the quantity could be preventing her from losing weight, as peanut butter and nuts are energy-dense. "Little decreases in her portions throughout the day at each meal can add up big time and reduce her overall calorie intake by 300 to 500 calories per day, which can lead to weight loss," Mockler said. Mockler said a few tweaks to Erstad's fitness routine would help her achieve her fitness goals. Strength training twice a week would be a good place to start — Mockler recommended swapping one hour of her HIIT or Pilates workouts for two 30-minute full-body lifting sessions. "Including cardio (her HIIT workouts), pilates (great for flexibility), and lifting (strength) will give her a well-rounded workout routine," Mockler said. Ideally, Erstad would also try to move more in general, despite her sedentary job. "Getting more steps or non-exercise movement would not only be good for her overall health but would likely help with her goal of weight loss as well," Mockler said. "I'd recommend adding 2,000 steps to whatever her current daily step average is right now as a goal. Then in a few weeks, she can try to increase her step average again until she is around 7,000 to 10,000 steps per day." Creating habits such as parking farther away from your destination, getting up from your desk every hour, using stairs rather than elevators, and getting a walking pad can help, Mockler said. "Overall, I think Joanne's diet is very nutritious and her fitness routine is in a good place," Mockler said. "With small tweaks to both (decreasing portion sizes, adding strength training, and increasing steps), she will be well on her way to her goals." Read the original article on Business Insider

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store