Pyongyang slams monitoring group's report on N. Korea-Russia military cooperation
North Korea on Monday denounced a monitoring group on the enforcement of UN sanctions against Pyongyang for issuing a report on military cooperation between the North and Russia, calling the move a violation of a state's sovereign rights.
The Multilateral Sanctions Monitoring Team on Thursday issued the first report detailing illegal military cooperation carried out between North Korea and Russia in violation of UN Security Council resolutions against Pyongyang's nuclear and missile programs.
The chief of the external policy office at North Korea's foreign ministry said the MSMT committed a "political provocation" by fabricating a report taking issue with cooperative ties between the North and Russia, according to the Korean Central News Agency.
Calling the MSMT a "bogus group which has no legality in terms of existence and purpose," the official said the report is a "wanton" violation of international legal principles centering on sovereignty equality and non-interference in others' internal affairs.
"We give stern warning against the negative consequences to be entailed by its reckless acts," the North's official said in a statement carried by the KCNA.
North Korea said the MSMT is a "political tool" operating in line with the West's geopolitical interests, stressing, "It has no justification to investigate the exercise of sovereign rights of other countries," according to the KCNA.
In response, South Korea's foreign ministry defended the MSMT's activities as legitimate and in line with the international obligations to enforce and monitor compliance with UN sanctions against North Korea.
The ministry noted that North Korea-Russia military cooperation is a "clear violation" of UN Security Council resolutions banning arms trade with North Korea, calling such resolutions legally binding for all UN member stages.
It rejected the North's claim of a sovereignty violation as an "absurd" argument that disregards the authority of the security council and the international obligation to comply with its resolutions.
The MSMT was established in October last year with the initiative of South Korea and the United States to continue the sanctions monitoring of North Korea following the disbandment of the UN Panel of Experts on North Korean sanctions monitoring due to Russia's veto.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
11 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Five countries win seats on UN Security Council
UNITED NATIONS (AP) — Five countries won seats on the United Nations Security Council on Tuesday in uncontested elections and will start serving two-year terms in January on the UN's most powerful but deeply divided body. The 193-member General Assembly held a secret-ballot vote for the five rotating seats on the 15-member council. Bahrain received 186 votes, Congo 183 votes, Liberia 181 votes, Colombia 180 votes and Latvia 178 votes. This will be the first time on the council for Latvia, which was forcibly incorporated into the Soviet Union and gained independence again after its collapse in 1991. Latvian Foreign Minister Baiba Braze told reporters after the vote her Baltic nation is ready for the responsibility, saying, 'Our historical experience puts us in the position to understand, empathize with, and forge partnerships across every region in the world.' 'We know the value of freedom,' she said. 'We know the fragility of peace and the power of multilateralism to safeguard it.' Braze said Latvia will spare no effort to achieve just and lasting peace in Ukraine and to alleviate suffering in the Middle East, Gaza, Africa and other conflicts around the globe. Bahrain will be the Arab representative on the council, and Foreign Minister Abdullatif bin Rashid Al Zayani said his country's election to the council for a second time reinforces its determination to be 'a proactive contributor" to international peace and security. 'Our goal is to fortify peace and stability within our region,' Al Zayani said, stressing that resolving the decades-old Palestinian-Israeli conflict is 'the cornerstone for achieving peace in the region.' The immediate requirement, he said, is a ceasefire and massive influx of humanitarian aid into Gaza, the release of all hostages taken from Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, and progress toward a two-state solution and 'a viable state of Palestine.' The Security Council is mandated in the UN Charter with ensuring international peace and security, but it has failed in the two major conflicts because of the veto power of Russia on Ukraine and the US, Israel's closest ally, on Gaza. There have been decades of efforts to reform the Security Council to reflect the geopolitical realities of the world in 2025, not of the post-World War II era 80 years ago, when the United Nations was established. But they have all failed. The council still includes five veto-wielding permanent members — the US, Russia, China, Britain and France — and 10 elected members from the UN's different regional groups. One major failing is the absence of a permanent seat for Africa or Latin America and the Caribbean. Under its current rules, five new council members are elected every year. In January, the newly elected countries will replace Algeria, Guyana, South Korea, Sierra Leone and Slovenia. Foreign Minister Therese Kayikwamba Wagner of Congo, which will be serving its third term on the council, told the council its election not only reflects confidence in her country, 'it is also a reflection of Africa's unity and its rightful place in shaping the global peace and security agenda.' Asked about the ongoing fighting by armed groups in the country's mineral-rich east, she said Congo will bring to the council the knowledge of dealing with decades of conflict, the challenges of UN peacekeeping operations and protecting civilians, and 'the convergence between conflict, natural resources, and environmental changes.' Liberia's Deputy Foreign Minister Deweh Gray, whose country was last on the council in 1961, said her country has 'an unwavering resolve to make a difference for all' and to tackle the formidable challenges facing the world including conflict, inequality and climate change, 'to name a few.' 'Liberia's vote is a vote for Africa,' she said, 'and we shall ensure that we follow the African common position.' Colombia's UN Ambassador Leonor Zalabata urged all countries to unite and 'keep working together in harmony with nature to preserve what we have and build peace in the world.' And she said, 'We invite you all to keep working in the path of human rights.'
Korea Herald
11 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Lee's presidency begins with briefing on handover of military authority
Five-year term for new president commences with election win confirmation at 6:21 a.m. Wednesday Lee Jae-myung on Wednesday kicked off his term as president of South Korea at 6:21 a.m., after the National Election Commission confirmed his win in Tuesday's presidential election. The liberal leader took over from acting President Lee Ju-ho, without the transition period usually given to a president-elect. In Tuesday's early election, conducted two years ahead of schedule due to his predecessor Yoon Suk Yeol's impeachment, Lee won 49.42 percent of the vote. His 17.28 million votes were the highest tally for a president-elect since direct presidential elections were implemented in 1987, although Park Geun-hye in 2012 still holds the record for the highest percentage of votes at 51.55 percent. In his first official move as president, Lee spoke by phone from his personal residence with Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Adm. Kim Myung-soo at 8:07 a.m. Adm. Kim briefed the new commander-in-chief about the handover of military authority, North Korean military movements, and the readiness of the South Korean military. "It was very appropriate for the soldiers in the military to respond passively to the unjust orders given during the period of martial law (declared by Yoon) out of loyalty to the people and the country, which prevented mass chaos," Lee told the highest-ranked military official, according to the presidential office. He stressed his faith in the military's loyalty and capabilities and requested the military to maintain constant vigilance, keeping an eye on the North, based on the South Korea-US military alliance. In his first outing as president, Lee visited Seoul National Cemetery in Dongjak-gu Wednesday morning to pay respects to the Korean independence activists, soldiers, police officers and others who died in service of the country. He is slated to attend an abbreviated inauguration ceremony at the National Assembly at 11 a.m., without a large-scale celebration, which is postponed until Korea marks Constitution Day on July 17.
Korea Herald
a day ago
- Korea Herald
S. Korea's path to new leadership began one December night
From night of martial law to early presidential election, what S. Koreans went through over past six months For the second time in a decade, South Korea held an early presidential election to fill a leadership void following the impeachment of a sitting president. And once again, the vote comes on the heels of months of political turmoil that shook the country's young and vibrant democracy to its core. This time, however, the path to abrupt leadership change was marked by even greater tension and drama — a failed self-coup, a riot at the courthouse, swirling conspiracies of election fraud and a more deeply polarized electorate than ever before. It all began on a December night. At 10:20 p.m. on Tuesday, Dec. 3, 2024, President Yoon Suk Yeol made an unexpected appearance on national television, announcing that he was placing the country under martial law. He accused the opposition-controlled National Assembly of plotting to destroy the state and described them as 'anti-state forces' working with 'North Korean communists.' Yoon also ordered the suspension of the legislature, the press, and allegedly instructed authorities to detain political rivals and judges. For many in South Korea, especially those who remember the authoritarian era before the 1987 democratic reforms, the announcement was deeply alarming. Military units attempted to block lawmakers from entering the National Assembly, prompting widespread fears of a coup. But the institutional response was swift. Within hours, nearly two-thirds of legislators convened in the National Assembly chamber despite military interference and voted to nullify the martial law declaration. Public outrage followed. Mass street demonstrations erupted, demanding Yoon's resignation. Though Yoon formally revoked the decree a few hours later, the damage had already been done. Lawmakers began impeachment proceedings. After an initial failed attempt due to a boycott by Yoon's People Power Party, a second vote on Dec. 14 passed with support from the opposition and even a dozen ruling party lawmakers. Yoon was suspended from office that evening. In the weeks that followed, South Korea entered legally and politically uncharted territory. For the first time in its modern history, a sitting president was detained by law enforcement. Yoon resisted arrest at first, leading to a standoff with presidential bodyguards. On Jan. 15, he was taken into custody. Days later, on Jan. 19, the Seoul Western District Court approved an arrest warrant for charges including insurrection. On the night the warrant was issued, hundreds of Yoon's supporters stormed the courthouse, breaking windows, setting off fire extinguishers and searching for the judge who issued the ruling. The riot lasted three hours and left several officers injured. Ultimately, prosecutors indicted Yoon for attempting to violently overturn the constitutional order. He was released after 52 days in detention but remained under investigation. The Constitutional Court began impeachment proceedings immediately following the impeachment vote. At the heart of the case was whether Yoon's actions on Dec. 3 had crossed a line from political misjudgment into a deliberate attempt to bypass democratic rule. In its unanimous ruling on April 4, the court said that Yoon had declared martial law without meeting any legal or constitutional requirements. He bypassed his Cabinet, failed to notify the National Assembly and deployed military forces to obstruct lawmakers. He had also, according to the court, illegally ordered the arrest of sitting judges and political opponents. The ruling removed Yoon from office immediately. Under South Korean law, this triggered a requirement for a new presidential election to be held within 60 days. The election campaign: Lee Jae-myung emerges as frontrunner Just days after Yoon's removal, Rep. Lee Jae-myung, former governor of Gyeonggi Province and leader of the liberal Democratic Party of Korea, announced his candidacy. Lee narrowly lost the 2022 presidential election to Yoon and had become a central figure in leading the political and public resistance to martial law. He was officially nominated as the presidential candidate of the Democratic Party on April 27. Despite holding a commanding lead among potential presidential candidates, Lee's main obstacle was his own legal troubles, some serious enough to threaten his eligibility to run for public office. Chief among them was the Supreme Court's expedited decision on May 1 to order a retrial on his election law violation charges, overturning a lower court's ruling that had acquitted him. However, this potential setback was averted when the lower court, along with other courts handling Lee's cases, decided to postpone Lee's trial proceedings until after the presidential election. The conservative People Power Party, battered by the fallout from Yoon's impeachment, faced internal turmoil in choosing a candidate. After a contested primary and a failed attempt to replace the primary winner, the party ultimately nominated Kim Moon-soo, a former labor activist-turned-conservative politician. Kim campaigned on restoring democratic stability, but struggled to completely shake off associations with Yoon, even after publicly criticizing the former president's decision to declare martial law. A third major candidate, Lee Jun-seok of the Reform Party, gained support among younger voters, especially after standing firm against calls from the People Power Party to unify behind Kim. His rising popularity did cut into the conservative base, but it was not enough to fundamentally change the race. Because the early election was triggered by the early removal of a president, once the National Election Commission confirms the results, the new president will take office immediately. This marks the second time in eight years that South Korea has removed a president and held an emergency election, following the 2017 impeachment of President Park Geun-hye. But unlike Park's case, which involved a personal corruption scandal, the crisis surrounding Yoon has raised deeper concerns about the abuse of executive power and the resilience of Korea's democratic safeguards. It also leaves a sharply divided electorate. While the Constitutional Court's ruling was widely accepted by the public, a vocal minority continues to protest Yoon's removal. Some of his supporters have used rhetoric and symbols associated with far-right movements in the US, including "Stop the Steal" slogans. Yet, for now, all eyes are on the election results and how the new leadership will steer the country out of the turmoil it has endured while confronting a host of challenges domestically and globally.
