
World Sevens Football aiming to transform women's game – DW – 05/20/2025
World Sevens Football is a new seven-a-side format focused on global reach, player empowerment, and financial equity. However, the fast-paced new series is not without its critics.
Women's football is experiencing a surge — breaking attendance records, drawing new investment, and inspiring a new generation of players and fans.
Now World Sevens Football (W7F) , a new seven-a-side series, is aiming to take advantage of this boom. It is looking to bring faster, more dynamic matches to fans around the world, while giving players an opportunity for a significant financial reward.
However, the inaugural event, which is to take place in Estoril, Portugal from May 21-23, has been criticized for disrupting the Swedish league schedule for participants Rosengard, as well as adding to player workloads ahead of the Women's Euros in July.
Created to redefine the women's game
The idea for World Sevens Football came from the series' co-founders, entrepreneur Justin Fishkin and NY/NJ Gotham FC and Chelsea minority owner Jennifer Mackesy, with the latter having committed to an investment of US $100 million (€88,7 million) over five years. They have not disclosed how much other shareholders may have invested.
"This project has come from our (Fishkin and Macksey's) shared passion for women's football and the new formats that are proliferating through various sports around the world," Fishkin told DW.
The games are to feature two 15-minute halves on a pitch half the size of a standard 11-a-side field. The smaller pitch was set up within the multi-use Antonio Coimbra da Mota Stadium, including custom-made areas for fans, activations and entertainment to help differentiate the atmosphere from a regular football game.
In an age of digital-first entertainment, the shorter format and smaller pitch, as has also been tried on the men's side, is ideally suited to attract younger fans, Fishkin believes.
"The emerging sports fan globally is less inclined to sit down for 90 minutes and watch a game," he said. "Seven-a-side is made for social media. It's familiar, fast, and accessible."
Putting players first
One of the series' defining features is its player-centric approach. The Player Advisory Council, is made up of current and former players, including names like Tobin Heath, Anita Asante and Caroline Seger.
Former Swedish international Seger told DW the purpose of the advisory council was to help shape player care and welfare, the competition strategy, and make a positive long-term impact on the players and clubs.
"It's very important to see it from the players' perspective, because normally everyone else is making decisions above the players' heads," she explained.
"Anything, from travelling, to the facilities, how the game should be played, what players want to eat after a game. Sometimes it's small things but they're all important."
Fishkin echoed the reasoning behind adopting the Player Advisory Council.
"It was critical to us that this be a player-centric competition." he said. "We needed it to be designed by people who know and love the game."
Financial rewards significant
Clubs will be allowed to bring a squad of 25, with 14 being eligible to play per match. The tournament prize pool is $5 million, including $2.5 million for the winners – significantly more than the €1.4 million the Champions League victors are to earn.
Georgia Stanway will feature for Bayern Munich in the inaugural World Sevens Football tournament Image: David Inderlied/Kirchner-Media/IMAGO
The prize money for the top four teams is to be divided between clubs, and their players and staff, with the exact distribution determined by each club, while the teams that finish fifth to eighth will receive a participation fee, and the tournament's organizers are to pay for each team's flights and accommodation.
"You'll see that 40% of the prize monies are going directly to players and staff," Fishkin said. "We've had teams where captains have said, 'We wanted to make sure everyone (all first team players at the club) gets paid, not just the players that participate.' and that's being driven from the players up to management.'
Swedish league schedule clash
The financial rewards drew immediate interest from the inaugural eight teams, which include Bayern Munich, Manchester United, Ajax and Roma.
However, as World Sevens Football is a series that has not been sanctioned by either FIFA or UEFA and is therefore outside of the world football calendar, decisions on participation rest solely at the discretion of the clubs.
With the competition not being part of the football calendar, Swedish club Rosengard have had to request to move their first division league match against Hacken that is scheduled for May 24, to participate in the inaugural event in Portugal.
This has drawn criticism from Swedish league leaders Hammarby, as well as former Swedish international defender Hanna Marklund.
"I perceive it as frivolous if you do not fully invest in the women's league," Marklund told Swedish national broadcaster SVT.
"It's positive that interest in women's football is increasing, but it's important to find the right time for tournaments like this. Moving a league match to play a seven-a-side tournament is not something I see as an okay reason."
The Swedish side are the only team to face this issue for the inaugural event, with most other domestic European leagues having finished their seasons in mid-May. Whether this problem will crop up again, remains to be seen. Organizers hope to hold a second tournament late this year, but neither dates nor location have been confirmed.
'The tables have turned'
While questions remain, including over ticket sales and how much interest has been generated for fans in an already bloated football calendar, Seger said the biggest draw for her to being involved with World Sevens football was the feeling she was working with "allies" wanting to promote women's football.
"I wanted to work with people that feel the same way (about women's football), so I don't have to always fight my way through," Seger said.
"The tables have turned, and you don't have to fight as hard. Even if there's still a long way to go, it's a lot easier today than 20 years ago."
Edited by: Chuck Penfold
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


DW
2 hours ago
- DW
US-China trade talks to move forward after Trump-Xi call – DW – 06/05/2025
The US president said he spoke with Chinese leader Xi Jinping about trade issues and said US and Chinese negotiating teams will be meeting soon. US President Donald Trump said he had a "very good phone call" with China's President Xi Jinping on Thursday. In comments posted on his Truth Social platform, Trump said "some of the intricacies of our recently made, and agreed to, Trade Deal" had been discussed. The US president said the call lasted around one and a half hours and "resulted in a very positive conclusion for both Countries." Trump invited to China Trump said Xi "graciously invited" him and the first lady to visit China, to which he "reciprocated." "As Presidents of two Great Nations, this is something that we both look forward to doing," Trump said. US-China trade talks US and Chinese teams would be meeting "shortly" at a yet to be determined location the US leader said and would involve Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent, Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick, and US Trade Representative, ambassador Jamieson Greer. Trump emphasized that talks had focused almost entirely on trade with no discussions relating to Russia, Ukraine or Iran. The call comes amid a 90-day tariff truce that came into effect last month which paused a spiraling trade war between the world's two largest economies. Trump has lowered his 145% tariffs on Chinese goods to 30% for 90 days to allow for talks while China also reduced its taxes on US goods from 125% to 10%. Edited by: Wesley Rahn


DW
7 hours ago
- DW
Harsh reactions on doubled steel tariffs – DW – 06/05/2025
Four days after announcing a doubling of tariffs on steel and aluminium, the higher tariffs are now in place. It mostly affects neighbor countries Canada and Mexico, two of the US' biggest steel suppliers. The US has raised tariffs on Canadian and Mexican steel and aluminum from 25% to 50%, effectively shutting Canadian exports out of the US market. Mexican officials believe the tariffs will eventually need adjustments due to their economic impact. President Donald Trump is using tariffs as leverage to push for individual trade agreements, with the UK being the only country to finalize a deal so far. While the tariffs are meant to protect American industries and jobs, they also increase costs for key sectors like auto manufacturing and construction. These price hikes may ultimately burden US consumers, including many of Trump's supporters. This video summary was created by AI from the original DW script. It was edited by a journalist before publication.


DW
10 hours ago
- DW
How the fragile US-China trade truce is unraveling – DW – 06/05/2025
Donald Trump has accused Beijing of breaching last month's deal to cut steep tit-for-tat tariffs. Could a much-awaited call between the US and Chinese presidents break the deadlock? The world exhaled when the United States and China unveiled a 90-day tariff truce last month, pausing the escalating trade war between the globe's largest and second-largest economies, which had rattled businesses and investors. The deal, after tense negotiations in Geneva, slashed US tariffs on Chinese imports from 145% to 30% and China's retaliatory levies on US goods from 125% to 10%. Just three weeks later, however, US President Donald Trump reignited tensions, saying that China had "totally violated" the truce deal, without providing further details. Trump later said his Chinese counterpart, Xi Jinping, was "extremely hard to make a deal with." China swiftly countered, asserting that Washington had imposed "discriminatory and restrictive measures" since the Geneva talks, pointing to US curbs on chip design software and warnings about artificial intelligence (AI) chips produced by Chinese tech giant Huawei. Deal stalled over US access to rare earths US policymakers have voiced frustration at China's stalling on export license approvals for rare earths and other elements needed in the high-tech, defense, and clean energy sectors. China, which dominates global rare-earth production with over two-thirds of supply and 90% of processing capacity, has imposed export restrictions on several key minerals. The US, lacking domestic rare-earth processing capacity, remains highly vulnerable to Beijing's restrictions. Confusion remains over what was agreed on rare earths in Geneva. In an interview with news agency Bloomberg on Wednesday, Cory Combs, head of critical-mineral supply chain research at Trivium China, said Washington believed that Beijing would "completely remove the requirement of an approval [for export licenses]," which Beijing said it did not agree to. Michael Hart, AmCham China president, told the Financial Times on Monday that China has now stepped up approvals to ship rare earths to several US carmakers, noting how "only a handful" of officials are handling thousands of applications. Trump's economic philosophy: A real plan or simply chaos? To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Penny Naas, a distinguished fellow at the US-based German Marshal Fund think tank, thinks the rare earths are "China's biggest card," telling DW that "a key part of the negotiation will be when and how they liberalize the trade in those products." Naas expressed little surprise at the renewed war of words between Washington and Beijing, noting that, "You often see these highs and lows and even near-death experiences before deals are reached." But with the clock ticking until August 12 — when the 90-day pause expires — and both sides accusing the other of violations, the prospects for a lasting ceasefire and a long-term deal remain uncertain. Trump uses tariffs for maximum leverage Beyond securing access to China's rare minerals, the US seeks to cut its trade deficit with China, which was $295 billion (€259 billion) in 2024 — up nearly 6% on the previous year. The Trump administration has urged Beijing to boost purchases of American goods and eliminate non-tariff barriers, such as anti-monopoly probes targeting US companies and the designation of certain American firms as "unreliable entities." Washington has also demanded further economic reforms and an end to the manipulation of the Chinese yuan, which is kept artificially low to help boost exports. In April, when Trump announced his unprecedented tariffs, the yuan hit a 20-month low of 7.2038 against the dollar and is expected to weaken further if the higher US levies are reinstated. Trump has also pressed China to strengthen efforts to curb illegal immigration and halt exports of precursor chemicals used to produce fentanyl, an opioid fueling a public health crisis in the US. Will Trump-Xi call break the impasse? With US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent acknowledging last week that negotiations have "stalled," all eyes are on whether a call between Trump and Xi will break the tariff deadlock. The US president has said for months that the two leaders were due to speak and even spoke of traveling to China for talks, without a public response from Beijing. US President Donald Trump said his Chinese counterpart is 'extremely hard' to make a deal with Image: Francis Chung/Imago The White House said Monday that a Trump-Xi call was "likely" to take place this week, a development that Antonio Fatas, an economics professor at INSEAD business school, said the US president would see as "his victory." "Trump's typically the one who calls people and tells them what to do," Fatas told DW. "But with a powerful player like China, that's not going to work. I wouldn't be surprised if China postpones the call." Although Trump will get the chance to talk to other world leaders on the sidelines of the upcoming G7 and NATO summits, the US and Chinese presidents aren't likely to meet in person until later in the year, signaling a protracted tussle that could last several more months. Tariff court battle plays into China's hands Another boon to China could be the lack of clarity over Trump's unprecedented tariffs after a US trade court last week ruled they were illegal. Although a higher court temporarily reinstated the levies, the White House has threatened to go to the Supreme Court for the ultimate ruling. "There may be a hesitancy to go all in on an offer at this moment when there's a large lack of clarity about the US position," the German Marshall Fund's Naas told DW. INSEAD's Fatas, meanwhile, predicted that the truce would be extended beyond the 90 days, adding: "Until I see the possibility of a real compromise on both sides, I'll remain very cautious and uncertainty remains incredibly high." Tariffs distract from US-China tech battle Both the Trump and Biden administrations have prioritized maintaining the US's technological edge over China, but there are growing concerns that the tariff policies are diverting resources and focus from US firms' ability to achieve this goal. Investor nervousness that the tariffs could cause a US recession has intensified. The tariffs have already increased costs and strained budgets for American tech firms, limiting their capacity to invest in research and development (R&D) at a critical time. With tariffs consuming significant attention among US policymakers, initiatives to bolster domestic innovation risk being sidelined. NVIDIA profits up, despite trade war challenges To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Beijing, meanwhile, has doubled down on the need to reduce its dependence on US technology. Through substantial state subsidies, China has advanced its capabilities in AI, quantum computing, advanced chip production, and 6G telecommunications, narrowing the technological gap with the US. Naas thinks that China has now caught up on "most of the technological advantage the US thought it had" and that US companies say they're "falling behind while spending all their time on reorienting their supply chains." "Is that the best use of their time when we're in hand-to-hand combat on the future of technology?" she asks. Edited by: Uwe Hessler