
Article 23 security law update provides ‘legal certainty' against threats, Hong Kong leader John Lee says
The new subsidiary legislation for Hong Kong's homegrown security law – also known as Article 23 – provides 'legal certainty' against national security threats, Chief Executive John Lee has said.
Hong Kong fast-tracked the subsidiary laws under Article 23 through the legislature last week, enacting the laws less than 24 hours after they were introduced to the Legislative Council (LegCo).
The new laws created six offences related to Beijing's Office for Safeguarding National Security (OSNS) in Hong Kong and designated six sites occupied by the office as 'prohibited places' to prevent intruders and spies.
Asked if the legislation had been given sufficient time, Lee said on Tuesday that the update must be completed 'as early as possible' amid growing uncertainty in global politics.
'I have said many times that national security risks are like a virus; the risks always exist around us,' he told reporters during a regular press conference.
'It is imperative to complete the subsidiary legislation as early as possible to ensure legal certainty,' he said.
He also said the subsidiary legislation did not grant new powers to the OSNS; instead, it provided details about the office's work under the Beijing-imposed national security law.
'The subsidiary legislation refines the implementation rules, their details, and administrative matters of these provisions, making them clearer,' Lee said.
6 new offences
The OSNS was established in July 2020 under the Beijing-imposed national security law, which was enacted in the wake of the 2019 pro-democracy protests and unrest.
Separate from the Beijing-imposed national security law, Article 23 – formally called the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance – was enacted in March 2024, after it was fast-tracked at the city's opposition-free legislature.
Under the new subsidiary laws, failing to comply with the OSNS' legal notices or providing false or misleading information to the OSNS has been criminalised, carrying a maximum penalty of seven years in jail and a HK$500,000 fine.
Entering the OSNS' premises without authorisation could result in a maximum jail term of two years, while conducting espionage activities such as inspections in person or via electronic devices is punishable by up to 20 years in jail.
The changes were enacted under a 'negative vetting' procedure, allowing them to be first published in the gazette before being formally brought to the legislature for scrutiny.
A LegCo subcommittee, comprising the same 15 lawmakers who oversaw Article 23's passage last year, did not raise any amendment proposals as it vetted the new laws for about five hours on Thursday.
Lee on Tuesday also lauded his administration for drafting the legislation and the 'quick results' of the LegCo subcommittee.
It 'reflects that the executive and the legislature are working together to safeguard national security,' he said.
Separate to the 2020 Beijing-enacted security law, the homegrown Safeguarding National Security Ordinance targets treason, insurrection, sabotage, external interference, sedition, theft of state secrets and espionage. It allows for pre-charge detention of up to 16 days, and suspects' access to lawyers may be restricted, with penalties involving up to life in prison. Article 23 was shelved in 2003 amid mass protests, remaining taboo for years. But, on March 23, 2024, it was enacted having been fast-tracked and unanimously approved at the city's opposition-free legislature.
The law has been criticised by rights NGOs, Western states and the UN as vague, broad and 'regressive.' Authorities, however, cited perceived foreign interference and a constitutional duty to 'close loopholes' after the 2019 protests and unrest.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


South China Morning Post
28 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
Springtime for China's engineers and scientists. In US, not so much
Out of curiosity, I asked ChatGPT which side is winning the chip war. It replied that it was too early to say, characterising it as 'a complex and ongoing situation with no clear winner yet'. Impressive! Advertisement But while that may be true at a competitive national level, it seems pretty clear that individually, engineers and researchers in chips and other related tech fields have received a great boost in career and prestige in China, likewise the firms and research institutes that hire them. It's rather different in the United States. The situation is not an accident, but rooted in the respective national or state policies of Beijing and Washington. Consider the technical or industrial responses of China to Washington's chip war. They involve increased domestic production in the semiconductor industry to achieve self-sufficiency; reducing reliance on foreign technology, especially from the US; massive resource commitment to advanced chip research and manufacturing; strategic state subsidies; and ramping up even legacy and less advanced chips. The latter is necessary both to try to squeeze the most computing power out of older chips – in the absence of the most advanced ones – and to counter US restrictions that now target even less powerful chips and software. China therefore needs more and more engineers and researchers. Contrast that with US chip policy, which focuses on trade restrictions, sanctions and regulations, not to mention the White House's crackdowns on elite universities. Advertisement They aim to deny China's access to advanced chips, technology, and manufacturing equipment, and are being applied not only to US firms but those of allied countries such as the Netherlands, Japan and South Korea. As a result, they severely hamper their business in the world's biggest chip market, as well as their ability to fund future research and development. The latest trade restriction against China will reportedly cover chip design software, also known as electronic design automation. Germany's Siemens, a big player in this specialised field, will be affected.


South China Morning Post
3 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
China targets chip, quantum advances with 2030 metrology action plan in tech race with US
China has released an action plan for 'disruptive technological innovation' in metrology – the scientific study of measurement – within the next five years. Advertisement The 2030 action plan, released by the State Administration for Market Regulation, focuses on breakthroughs in chip technology and quantum-scale measurement, both critical to a wide range of industries. According to a report by ministry newspaper Science and Technology Daily last week, the plan targets tackling several 'pain points' or shortcomings in China's metrological capabilities, including measurement capabilities that are missing or need to be improved. Metrological applications relating to chips and rare earth magnets have been flashpoints in the US-China technological rivalry , as Washington continues to tighten controls on hi-tech chip exports to China citing national security while China leverages its dominance in rare earth metals with its own export restrictions. As metrology is the foundation for all industries dependent on precise and dependable measurements, the expansion of such capabilities is a strategic priority for both countries. Advertisement 'By 2030, basic metrology capabilities will be comprehensively improved, with key breakthroughs in more than 50 key core technologies of metrology,' the Chinese action plan released on May 16 says.


South China Morning Post
7 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Singapore minister tells nations to ‘build bridges' with China to avoid misconception
Singapore 's defence minister on Sunday said it was 'incumbent' on other countries to reach out to China to avoid misinterpretation and misunderstanding as he urged Beijing to use every opportunity to make its perspective understood by the world. 'It is in the interest of all of us to work with China, and it is also in the interest of China to work with everyone else,' Chan Chun Sing told delegates at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore. 'It is in the interest of all of us to better, deeper understand China's fears, concerns and aspirations, just as it is important for China to understand how the rest of the world perceives China,' Chan said at the three-day premier Asian defence summit, which began on Friday. 'Regardless of whether China attends the Shangri-La Dialogue, it's incumbent upon all of us also to reach out to China in different forums to try to build those bridges so that we not end up in a situation whereby either side misinterpret or miscommunicate or misrepresent each other's positions.' In a departure from its practice since 2019, Beijing sent a lower-level delegation to the conclave attended by ministers, defence chiefs and academics from 47 countries. Chan, who is attending the event as defence minister for the first time after being sworn in on May 23, said on Saturday that the superpower's presence was missed at a ministerial round table and stressed the importance of dialogue with China to prevent misunderstanding intentions.