logo
Bruno Manser Fonds Denies Baseless Allegations By Sarawak Minister Over ITTO Project Failure

Bruno Manser Fonds Denies Baseless Allegations By Sarawak Minister Over ITTO Project Failure

Scoop22-05-2025

Government policy change over logging core protection zone is the real reason for the termination of the ITTO-supported Upper Baram Forest Area (UBFA) in Malaysian Borneo
Swiss NGO Bruno Manser Fonds (BMF) today denied allegations made by Sarawak Deputy Minister Len Talif Salleh in the Sarawak State Assembly (DUN) yesterday over the reasons for the termination of a flagship sustainability project
'We are not willing to take the blame for a dodgy policy change by the Sarawak government', BMF director Lukas Straumann said. 'Len should be honest and acknowledge that Sarawak dropped the late Chief Minister Adenan Satem's plan of protecting the UBFA's core zone of 79,000 hectares of primary forest – Sarawak's last primary forest outside the totally protected areas.'
Celine Lim, Managing Director of Sarawak-based NGO SAVE Rivers said:' We work with non-Penan communities and were part of the UBFA Project Steering Committee (PSC). So, it is not true that the overall communities were not well represented via the NGOs coalition. The response by YB Datuk Haji Len is intentionally divisive and incomplete to villainise the role of the NGOs, when we were only inquiring public information as per our role as rightholders in the PSC.'
In 2020, Malaysia submitted a proposal to the International Tropical Timber Organization for the conservation and sustainable development of a 283,500 hectare area in Sarawak's Upper Baram region. The proposal was drafted by the renowned late botanist Dr Paul Chai and endorsed by then Forest Director Sapuan Ahmad. A key element of the proposal was the conservation of a 79,000 hectare core zone of primary forest in Upper Baram.
After international funding was secured, the Sarawak authorities unilaterally changed the project design. The 79,000 hectares were no longer to be excised from the logging concessions but became part of a timber licence granted to Borneoland Timber Resources, a company controlled by the politically-linked timber tycoon Hii King Chiong.
Currently, massive logging activities on the western flank of the iconic Gunung Murud Kecil are threatening this habitat of extraordinary biodiversity in the core zone of the former ITTO project.
Neither ITTO nor the Sarawak state government answered NGO letters questioning the reasons for the policy change and highlightling governance failures in the ITTO project. The Swiss City of Basel, the Bruno Manser Fonds and the Japanese government had pledged to support the project with a total amount of USD 556,000.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gaza's 'Humanitarian' Façade: A Deceptive Ploy Unravels
Gaza's 'Humanitarian' Façade: A Deceptive Ploy Unravels

Scoop

time16 hours ago

  • Scoop

Gaza's 'Humanitarian' Façade: A Deceptive Ploy Unravels

Just one day before the so-called Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) began operating officially inside the Gaza Strip, its executive director, Jake Wood, resigned. The text of his resignation statement underscored what many had already suspected: GHF is not a humanitarian endeavor, but the latest scam by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to control the Gaza Strip, after 600 days of war and genocide. "It is clear that it is not possible to implement this plan while also strictly adhering to the humanitarian principles of humanity, neutrality, impartiality, and independence," Wood said in the statement, which was cited by CNN and other media. This begs the question: why had that realization become 'clear' to Wood, even though the aid operation was not yet in effect? The rest of the statement offers some explanation, suggesting that the American contractor may not have known the extent of the Israeli ploy until later, but knew that a disaster was unfolding – the kind that would surely require investigating and, possibly, accountability. In fact, an investigation by Swiss authorities had already begun. The US news network, CBS, looked into the matter, reporting on May 29 that GHF originally applied for registration in Geneva on January 31 and was officially registered on February 12. However, in no time, Swiss authorities began noticing repeated violations, including that the Swiss branch of GHF is "currently not fulfilling various legal obligations". In its original application, GHF "pursues exclusively charitable philanthropic objectives for the benefit of the people." Strangely, the entity that promised to provide "material, psychological or health" services to famine-stricken Gazans, found it necessary to employ 300 "heavily armed" American contractors, with "as much ammunition as they can carry," CBS reported. The 'psychological' support in particular was the most ironic, as desperate Gazans were corralled, on May 27, into cages under extremely high temperatures, only to be given tiny amounts of food that, according to Rami Abdu, head of the Geneva-based Euro-Med Monitor, were in fact stolen from a US-based charitable organization known as Rahma Worldwide. Following the CBS news report, among others, and following several days of chaos and violence in Gaza, where at least 49 Palestinians were killed and over 300 wounded by those who promised to give aid and comfort, the Israeli newspaper Haaretz revealed that the funding for the operation is coming directly from Israel. Prominent Israeli politician and Knesset member Avigdor Lieberman went even further, claiming that the money, estimated by the Washington Post to be $100 million, 'is coming from the Mossad and the Defense Ministry.' But why would Israel go through all of this trouble while it can, at no financial cost, simply allow the massive shipments of aid, reportedly rotting on the Egyptian side of the border, to enter Gaza and to stave off the famine? In Netanyahu's mind, the aid mechanism is part of the war. In a video message, reported by The Jerusalem Post on May 19, he described the new aid distributing points, manned jointly by GHF and the Israeli army, as "parallel to the enormous pressure" Israel is putting on the Palestinians – exemplified in Israel's "massive (military) entrance (into Gaza)" – with the aim of "taking control of all of the Gaza" Strip. In Netanyahu's own words, all of this, the military-arranged aid and ongoing genocide, is "the war and victory plan." Of course, Palestinians and international aid groups operating in Gaza, including UN-linked aid apparatuses, were fully aware that the secretive Israel-US scheme was predicated on bad intentions. This is why they wanted to have nothing to do with it. In Israel's thinking, any aid mechanism that would sustain the status quo that existed prior to the war and genocide starting on October 7, 2023, would be equivalent to an admission of defeat. This is precisely why Israel labored to associate the UN Palestinian refugee agency, UNRWA, with Hamas. This included the launching of a virulent campaign against the UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres himself, and other top officials and rapporteurs. On July 22, the Israeli Knesset went as far as to designate UNRWA a 'terrorist organization'. Still, it may seem to be a contradiction that the likes of extremist Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich would agree to such an 'aid' scheme just days after declaring that Israel's intention is to "entirely destroy" Gaza. However, there is no contradiction. Having failed to conquer Gaza through military force, Israel is trying to use its latest aid scheme to capitalize on the famine it has purposely engineered over the course of months. Luring people to 'distribution points', the Israeli army is trying to concentrate the population of Gaza in areas that can be easily controlled through leveraging food, with the ultimate aim of pushing Palestinians out, in the words of Smotrich, "in great numbers to third countries." The latest scheme is likely to fail, of course, like other such stratagems in the last 600 days. However, the inhumane and degrading treatment of Palestinians further illustrates Israel's rejection of the growing international push to end the genocide. For Israel to stop scheming, the international community must translate its strong words into strong action and hold, not just Israel, but its own citizens involved in the GHF and other ploys, accountable for being part of the ongoing war crimes in Gaza. - Dr. Ramzy Baroud is a journalist, author and the Editor of The Palestine Chronicle. He is the author of six books. His latest book, co-edited with Ilan Pappé, is ' Our Vision for Liberation: Engaged Palestinian Leaders and Intellectuals Speak Out'. His other books include 'My Father was a Freedom Fighter' and 'The Last Earth'. Baroud is a Non-resident Senior Research Fellow at the Center for Islam and Global Affairs (CIGA). His website is

Petition To Bring Back The Southerner Passenger Train Launched
Petition To Bring Back The Southerner Passenger Train Launched

Scoop

time17 hours ago

  • Scoop

Petition To Bring Back The Southerner Passenger Train Launched

A petition has been launched in the South Island calling for the restoration of The Southerner regular passenger train, running from Christchurch to Invercargill, via Dunedin. The passenger rail service would also stop at key towns and cities such as Ashburton, Timaru, Oamaru, Balclutha and Gore, and possibly other stops such as Temuka, Palmerston, Mosgiel (for bus connections to Dunedin Airport) and Milton, should demand warrant. The petition will be presented to a cross-Party group of South Island MPs at Parliament in early July, and calls on the 'House of Representatives [to] urge the Government to restore The Southerner Train, from Invercargill, via Dunedin to Christchurch, as a regular public transport service, supporting South Island towns and cities along the route' Save Our Trains Southern spokesperson Dave Macpherson said 'there are 750,000 New Zealanders living along the rail route between Christchurch and Invercargill who are starved of reasonable public transport links between their communities.' 'Rail is a preferred choice of travel for large numbers of them, judging by the very positive early reaction we are getting to our petition out in the streets and on the airwaves. We are starting to collect signatures in the streets of Oamaru, Dunedin, Balclutha and Milton already, and are adding volunteers for that task in Invercargiull, Ashburton, Christchurch, Gore and Timaru.' 'We have today launched the petition online as well, and are making that available to people around the country.' [see Petition link: ] Mr Macpherson said 'we are being told by tertiary students, retired people, families, businesspeople, and especially disabled people that rail will provide them affordable, safe and comfortable links to friends, relatives, study and work activities that are not well served - if at all - by expensive airliinks, unsafe car journeys and slow, uncomfortable private coach links.' 'The North Island already has three Government-supported long distance rail links, but the South Island has nothing. It is about time that this part of NZ Inc. received some transport support.' He pointed out that, 'unlike new highways, the rail route is already in place; the Hillside (Dunedin) and Waltham (Christchurch) KiwiRail workshops are in place to support passenger rail services, rail-enabled ferries are being bought, and tourist trains in the South Island are a roaring success. Everything points to passenger rail being successful in the South Island.' "Local people need passenger trains providing affordable local services.'

Parliament votes for harshest-ever sanctions for Te Pāti Māori co-leaders
Parliament votes for harshest-ever sanctions for Te Pāti Māori co-leaders

NZ Herald

timea day ago

  • NZ Herald

Parliament votes for harshest-ever sanctions for Te Pāti Māori co-leaders

Parliament has voted to dish out the toughest Parliamentary sanctions ever to the Te Pāti Māori co-leaders after a fiery debate in the house today. The debate relaunched this afternoon after it was abruptly adjourned last month to give way to the Budget. Parliament's Privileges Committee recommended suspending Te Pāti Māori co-leaders Rawiri Waititi and Debbie Ngarewa-Packer for 21 days and MP Hana-Rāwhiti Maipi-Clarke for seven days after a controversial haka in the House last year. Previously, the longest suspension in Parliament's 171-year history was three sitting days. ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW LIVE BLOG ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW The committee's recommendations were put to the House for debate where they passed - but only after acrimonious scenes. Winston Peters called Te Pāti Māori is a 'bunch of extremists' and said the Māori world 'has had enough of them'. Te Pāti Māori co-leader Rawiri Waititi held up a noose in Parliament, saying those in power had 'traded the noose for legislation'. Labour and the Greens MPs pushed fiercely for a weaker punishment. Green Party MP Marama Davidson said she believes the committee's recommendations were partisan and the House should guard against this. She said the Treaty Principles Bill was designed to provoke and threatened generations of 'fundamental relationships' between Māori and non-Māori. 'It was political violence,' she said, adding the haka was the least it deserved. Labour's Dr Duncan Webb said the Privileges Committee is usually bipartisan, but it is 'unfortunate' this isn't the case with these recommendations. He acknowledged there was a contempt of the House, but warned the sanctions proposed were 'inconsistent' with the principles of democracy. Act MP Parmjeet Parmar, a member of the Privileges Committee, spoke about the MPs approaching Act's seats and highlighted a hand gesture that Debbie Ngarewa-Packer made which Act compared to a gun. She said MPs can disagree on ideas through debate, rather than intimidating physical gestures. She said the House has debated controversial legislation before without that kind of behaviour. The vote on the sanction for Hana-Rāwhiti Maipi-Clarke passed with 68 in favour and 55 opposed, meaning she has been suspended for seven days. On the question of Debbie Ngarewa-Packer being suspended for 21 days, this passed with 68 in favour and 54 votes opposed. The one fewer vote opposed reflects that Maipi-Clarke has been suspended and therefore cannot vote. On the question of Waititi being suspended for 21 days, this passed with 68 in favour, 53 votes opposed. The haka at the centre of the matter happened during the first reading of the controversial Treaty Principles Bill, which was eventually voted down at second reading. The haka has since gone viral globally, amassing hundreds of millions of views on social media. Maipi-Clarke, Parliament's youngest MP, brought Parliament to a standstill when she began the haka while ripping up a copy of the Treaty Principles Bill, a proposal from Act leader David Seymour to replace the many Treaty principles developed over time by experts and the court with three new ones. Many perceived the bill as a threat to Māori and detrimental to Te Tiriti o Waitangi. It was a catalyst of the massive hīkoi protest to Parliament in November last year. Waititi and Ngarewa-Packer stood up and joined Maipi-Clarke in the haka, moving from their seats towards the Act party benches. Labour's Peeni Henare also moved away from his seat to perform. Henare later apologised to the Judith Collins-led Privileges Committee for knowingly breaking the rules by stepping away from his seat, but said he stood by his haka and would do it again. The trio from Te Pāti Māori were referred to the Privileges Committee but ignored the initial summons to appear in person, arguing they had been denied legal representation and the ability to appear together. At the time, they promised to hold a separate 'independent' hearing. Te Pāti Māori have been defiant in their defence of the haka. Waititi told reporters on Wednesday afternoon it was not clear exactly what the trio were being punished for. 'Some of the House found it intimidating, some of the House found it exhilarating because half of House stood up. We don't know what the reasons are for the 21 days sanctions.' Waititi spoke with The Hui soon after the committee's unprecedented recommendations were released. He said he was thinking about the people who had entrusted him to 'represent them the best way I know'. 'And that is to be unapologetic, that is to be authentic and honest and respectful of who we are. We should be able to do that without fear or favour and be able to do that without being ashamed of being Māori,' Waititi told The Hui host Julian Wilcox. 'What I feel is that we are being punished for being Māori. The country loves my haka, the world loves my haka, but it feels like they don't love me.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store