logo
A New Orleans man with a history of violent allegations killed his neighbor – now a family seeks justice for their son

A New Orleans man with a history of violent allegations killed his neighbor – now a family seeks justice for their son

The Guardian16-05-2025

Over a roughly 14-year period beginning in 2009, Leroy Stelly Jr faced accusations of pepper-spraying two women whom he encountered on a sidewalk and insulted as 'bitches', slapping his future wife at a bar, and threatening to shoot a construction worker while pretending to be a cop.
He also called emergency operators and declared that he was 'going to put a fucking .45'-caliber bullet in the head of someone who had banged on his door. He allegedly punched a guest he had over on Christmas Eve. He reportedly challenged people at a healthcare clinic with which he shares a fence 'to meet [him] out on the street'.
And, finally, he shot his neighbor to death on the sidewalk outside his place in New Orleans while claiming he was standing his ground.
No one has ever filed criminal charges – or even civil litigation, given Stelly's relative lack of assets – in connection with the fatal 7 January 2023 shooting of Richard Bernard 'Richie' Smith, 38, which authorities have deemed justified.
However, Smith's loved ones have never accepted that outcome as valid, instead urging investigators to more zealously scrutinize Stelly's history of alleged violence – and to weigh that against claims that he had to kill to save his own life.
With the help of a precious few close allies, Smith's mother, Dana Leonard, has mounted her own investigation into her child's slaying as well as the man who ended his life. It is summarized in an 80-page report which she presented to police and prosecutors, highlighting Stelly's past alleged criminal behavior, his shifting story about Richie's last moments and factors which investigators did not explore.
The only conclusion at which she can arrive: a perennially understaffed police department – grappling in those days with being the US's murder capital – botched an investigation into a killing that she maintains was unjustifiable and illegal.
Leonard empathizes with what police were up against. No one else witnessed Stelly fatally shoot Smith with a .45-caliber handgun. Investigators concluded that no surveillance camera recorded any footage of the killing.
And, in the eyes of much of the rest of the world, the US has remarkably permissive laws regarding firearm possession and self-defense. They collectively create a political environment in which people believe they can fire guns at others with impunity in many situations – and often have an easy time convincing law enforcement of that.
Louisiana, to boot, is widely seen as having one of the most permissive justifiable homicide – colloquially, 'stand your ground' – laws.
Nonetheless, with every fiber in her being, Leonard suspects that 'Leroy murdered Richie'. And if he didn't, she said she is unconvinced that Richie needed or deserved to die by Stelly's hand.
And, just as fervently, she believes detectives are simply not following the evidence by which they could try to pursue justice for her son.
Attempts to contact Stelly, 46, were unsuccessful. His wife, who was with him the night he killed Smith, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Neither did the local district attorney's office.
In a statement, New Orleans police said they had 'thoroughly investigated this case' on multiple occasions. 'And each time, the conclusion was the same – the case was deemed as a justifiable homicide,' the police's statement said.
Police said they worked with 'diligence and integrity' but could not secure evidence in support of murder, manslaughter or negligent homicide charges, though they would be open to analyzing any new evidence that might materialize in the future.
'We understand the victim's family is dealing with terrible loss and is seeking justice,' police said. 'As a police department, we witness the pain that tragedy brings to families, and we carry a deep sense of responsibility in seeking truth and accountability. At the same time, we recognize there are moments where the justice families hope for may not come in the form that they want or need.'
Louisiana's legislature enacted its stand your ground law in 2006, allowing people who reasonably perceive their lives to be in danger to resort to lethal force without a duty to try to retreat first as long as they are somewhere they can legally be.
Already on Louisiana's books was the so-called 'castle doctrine' law, which enabled property owners to defend their belongings against anyone trying to intrude and placing them in imminent danger without their first needing to attempt a retreat.
And the burden is on state prosecutors to disprove all claims brought to criminal court under the castle doctrine as well as stand your ground laws. That can create a legal climate in which state prosecutors are apprehensive about pursuing cases that aren't 'totally cut and dried', said Joseph Giacalone, a professor at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice and retired New York police department detective sergeant who formerly supervised cold homicide case investigations.
Still, William & Mary Law School professor Cynthia Ward said 'reasonable' and 'imminent' are the operative words for the fear of safety and danger that self-defense claimants must cite. Self-defense claimants must also not have provoked the situations making them fearful of their lives, Ward said, a concept to which she referred as 'bringing on the trouble'.
'Many people … don't really understand that you can't just take out your gun and shoot someone just because you believe you might be at risk,' said Ward, a specialist in criminal responsibility. 'Justified self-defense is an exception to the general rule that you are not allowed to use physical force against other people.
'It's only in cases of absolute necessity.'
If a 911 call that he made five months before he killed Smith is any indication, Stelly evidently had a liberal interpretation of those concepts.
Stelly dialed emergency operators in August 2022 to complain that a man in the neighborhood had banged on his door. He quickly told the call-taker: 'I am armed, and I'm fixing to use it. My weapon is on me, and I'm sitting on my front stoop, practicing both the castle doctrine, the 'stand your ground', and everything that I can.
'He's in danger if he comes back across the street. I'm going to put a fucking .45 in his head.'
The 911 operator implored Stelly to lock himself inside his house. 'I'm standing my ground,' Stelly retorted, while also surmising the man who had banged on his door was a 'dopehead' having something to do with the nearby health clinic, which he dismissed as 'a needle exchange'.
It was not the first time Stelly had threatened violence. In some instances, he had even allegedly inflicted it.
In 2009, while wearing the uniform for his private security job, Stelly purportedly walked past two women on a sidewalk, called them 'stupid bitches' and pepper-sprayed them after they told him to not speak to them like that, according to a lawsuit that was filed later. A police officer who noticed the injured women arrested Stelly on two counts of second-degree battery, court records show.
One of those women, Cassidi Townsend-Epherson, recalled claims from Stelly that his reaction resulted from 'a fear for his life'.
During a more recent interview, Townsend-Epherson said she was incredulous at the defense. She remembered how she was 'giggling' with her friend and a third woman about the good time they were sharing together when Stelly, without provocation, bumped into them.
'He couldn't have possibly been in fear for his life,' Townsend-Epherson said. 'We had nothing on us – I don't even think I had my purse on me.'
On the other hand, to her, it appeared Stelly was 'in a manic state' while also reaching for a gun before the officer who arrested him arrived in the nick of time and prevented the situation from spiraling out of control.
Stelly later opted for a trial by judge rather than jury. The case culminated in New Orleans criminal court judge Benedict Willard acquitting him.
Making matters worse for Townsend-Epherson, the lawsuit that she and one of the other women subsequently filed against Stelly's employer was dismissed after the company argued in court filings that it was not liable because Stelly was not at work at the time of his arrest, according to records.
'It was so insane to me … because I'm thinking, we were just small girls, and he … almost made it sound like he had the right to do what he did because we were smart-mouthed to him,' Townsend-Epherson said.
Then, in a bar in 2017, Stelly allegedly slapped the woman he would later marry in her face, getting himself booked on suspicion of domestic-abuse battery. Prosecutors ultimately refused to file charges.
In 2019, Stelly boasted that he was a cop, told a worker at a construction site, 'I will shoot you,' and was charged with counts of false impersonation of a peace officer and aggravated assault with a firearm, police said. He pleaded guilty to lesser charges in exchange for probation.
On Christmas Eve about four months after his August 2022 emergency call, about two weeks before Smith's slaying, a guest of Stelly dialed 911 and reported being punched by his host. Stelly was not arrested.
Emergency operators received another call about Stelly on 5 January 2023, this time from officials at CrescentCare, a health clinic that shares a fence with his back yard on Marigny Street in New Orleans' St Roch neighborhood.
Those at the facility reported Stelly was spraying people with a hose. On a recorded call, one doctor said Stelly 'was threatening to meet people out on the street'. The official added that Stelly 'literally stuck the hose through the fence and proceeded to try to soak' someone with it.
In a separate statement to the Guardian, a CrescentCare spokesperson accused Stelly of using 'racially derogatory language' before he started spraying the garden hose at staff. The spokesperson said police instructed Stelly to leave those at the clinic alone. Officers also encouraged the facility staff to file a formal report, which they did, though Stelly was not arrested.
The next time Stelly would speak to police would be less than two days later – after shooting and killing Smith.
Smith had moved to New Orleans from Ojai Valley, California. On the last day of his life, when he left his job bartending, stopped in another establishment for a nightcap and headed home, his adopted city had just finished a third straight year in which the annual number of homicides had increased.
That had left New Orleans saddled with the unwanted title of the US's murder capital.
Simultaneously, for much longer, New Orleans's police force – which the city considers one of its most vital components in the battle to hold criminals accountable – has been hundreds of officers below its ideal staffing level.
And it fell to a detective who worked 11 new homicide investigations that year – more than the annual allotment of four to six such cases recommended by the Police Executive Research Forum, a national non-profit thinktank based in Washington DC – to probe exactly how Smith's life was cut short on a sidewalk across the street from his home.
Carrying a tote bag with some food, a paycheck from his second job at a restaurant and a hatchet that he carried for protection, as was his legal right, Smith took a route home which brought him past Stelly's place across the street. Stelly was on the sidewalk when Smith's path crossed his at about 1.30am.
After shooting Smith, Stelly called 911 and said: 'I just shot a person who was attacking me as I was going into my side yard.'
Stelly said he announced to that person that he was armed and was at his home. But Stelly claimed the other man shrieked, 'I will fuck you up,' and then advanced.
'He approached quickly, and he raised his hands towards me, and my life was threatened at this point,' Stelly was heard saying on a recording of the call. 'So I did what I had to do.'
The emergency operator asked Stelly whether he would grab a towel and apply pressure on the wound of the man he had shot. 'I am not doing that – no ma'am,' Stelly replied. 'I am not a medical professional. I am not a medical professional.'
Stelly would later tell the lead detective on the case, Michael Poluikis, during a recorded interrogation that he was outside his home to change a gate lock when he ended up arguing with a man who approached him.
'He went to reach forward, and that's when I drew the weapon,' Stelly said.
Separately, Stelly's wife, Sarah, gave a slightly different account. Sitting in the back of a police car after first responders had been summoned to the scene of Smith's shooting, Sarah Stelly told Poluikis that her husband had gone outside to get firewood from her car.
Sarah Stelly said she heard her husband tell someone to 'stand down' before a gunshot, according to video captured by a body-worn camera equipped on a colleague of Poluikis's.
Crime-scene photos established Smith had dropped a cigarette at his side and his tote bag to the ground at his right foot. The cigarette was still lit near his hand, which made it seem as if Smith had been shot while smoking. The hatchet handle was sticking out of the bag, though it clearly remained inside and was not in Smith's grasp.
'I did what I had to do,' Stelly repeated to Poluikis.
Poluikis, who has since left the police department and moved out of state, obtained warrants to search Stelly's phone as well as to recover any relevant neighborhood surveillance camera footage. An ensuing police analysis determined neither line of inquiry had produced evidence of a crime.
'Detective Poluikis believes this homicide to be a case of justifiable homicide,' the investigative report said.
That finding was not good enough for Leonard, Smith's mother.
Leonard and Smith's father, Andy, hired a private investigator. They and their supporters set out to prove there was much more to the story than police indicated.
For one, Stelly and Smith had lived across the street from each other for the better part of a year before the former killed the latter. They would greet each other whenever they did yardwork outside their homes at the same time. And others in their households were familiar with each other, too.
So much so that the Stellys had invited Smith as well as his roommate over to a party in the hours before the killing, according to information Leonard received as she and Smith's roommate compiled an 80-page report they would later provide to authorities, including prosecutors, Poluikis's sergeant and other law enforcement officials.
Furthermore, call logs show that Sarah Stelly called Smith's roommate twice in the minute before Lee Stelly dialed 911 to report the killing. After learning there had been a killing outside their homes but before authorities confirmed exactly who had been slain, Sarah Stelly also texted the roommate asking whether it was possible that Smith would have not recognized Lee.
The roommate, fearing the worst had happened because Smith never made it home that night, recalled eventually speaking by phone with Sarah Stelly – and then she dialed 911 herself. On the recorded call, the roommate said to the emergency operator: 'I talked to my neighbor this morning, and she said her husband shot and killed someone. And my roommate never came home. And they're freaking out because they think that they killed my roommate.
'And I'm freaking out because I think that they killed my roommate.'
The roommate soon learned it was indeed Smith whom Lee Stelly had killed.
Leonard assessed the texts and the call between Sarah Stelly and Smith's roommate. And she simply does not fathom how the facts relayed in those communications could support the notion that Lee Stelly might have mistaken her son as a fearsome, unrecognizable stranger.
Additionally, having used public records requests to obtain statements that police recorded in the aftermath of Smith's killing to prepare their report, Leonard and her companions noted glaring inconsistencies.
They have substantial doubts about Stelly's assertion that he was changing the lock to his gate when he was ambushed. Stelly told Poluikis that he was changing the lock because he had a hair appointment at 8 in the morning and did not want to bother a house guest sleeping in the front.
But the house guest said he would have had to be at the airport for a 7am flight out of town – if not on the plane itself – by the time Stelly left for the appointment. Sarah Stelly said the same thing.
Poluikis's report says Stelly told the detective that Smith had reached behind him at some point as if to access a backpack, though he mentioned no such detail on the 911 call immediately after the shooting. Leonard does not think that claim is credible because by all indications Smith's hands were occupied with the cigarette and tote bag – and Smith did not have a backpack.
Leonard also realized that Stelly was wearing a headlight around his neck in videos of his police interrogation and at least one taken by an officer's bodyworn camera on Marigny Street. She can't help but wonder whether Stelly had that light on, obstructing Smith's view while Stelly could clearly see Smith during their encounter – and whether that escalated tensions.
Leonard and her associates also culled copies of social media posts that they argue showed Stelly had vigilante inclinations – as well as pride in his short temper.
A 2019 Facebook post under his name muses that people who run stop signs or otherwise drive inattentively 'don't get to dictate the reaction of' fellow motorists.
'When I choose to call you stupid motherfucker and you decide to stop and defend your stupidity, make sure I'm not armed,' Stelly said. 'These assholes always start off by getting out or off of their vehicles ready to fight until they see me chamber a round, then the apologies start.'
In reacting to a July 2022 article from a conservative news outlet about how New York City prosecutors had dropped a murder charge against a Manhattan bodega clerk accused of stabbing a man who attacked him first, Stelly wrote on Facebook: 'Hell yeah! Finally some sense out of NY.'
That post came about seven months after another one in which he described almost being carjacked, calling the police and quickly being greeted by an officer. 'They went running after my 45 slipped leather,' Stelly said, invoking a phrase that means he pulled his gun out of its holster. He also wrote how he suspected the rapid police response 'may have had something to do with me telling the 911 operator that I'm armed and don't mind using it'.
Meanwhile, Leonard and her associates eventually learned that a friend of Smith had recalled Smith giving him a chilling warning in the last weeks of his life. 'Be careful of that guy,' Smith said of Stelly, according to the friend. 'He always carries a gun and isn't afraid to point it at people in the neighborhood and make threats.'
That friend said he called Poluikis days after Smith was killed. He got a return call, but the two did not manage to speak. He wrote an email to police in March 2024 to provide the information he had.
For its part, the New Orleans coroner's office conducted toxicology tests on Smith and made it a point to report how he had been drinking and therefore accumulated a high blood alcohol content before choosing to walk home.
Smith made that choice about two decades after a drunk-driving arrest. It was the only blemish on his record beside a noise ordination violation for playing his set of drums too loudly, police determined.
Investigators conversely never took steps to determine whether Stelly had been drinking, too, or if he had ingested any other intoxicants, including at the house party he was hosting on the night he killed Smith.
Drawing in part from court documents pertaining to his past, Leonard's report delves into Stelly's numerous other brushes with the law. It provides a link to a change.org petition with more than 2,000 people urging officials to not give up on 'justice for Richie'.
A civil attorney whom Leonard also consulted talked her out of suing Stelly for wrongful death damages, saying in essence that he wasn't wealthy enough for it to be worth it. Yet she and her supporters delivered their report to police and prosecutors, asking each to give it a fresh look.
The commander of the police's homicide investigators assigned a cold-case detective to re-examine the case in about the late spring of 2024. But police have not obtained a warrant to book Stelly with a crime in Smith's killing. And prosecutors have not taken the case to grand jurors to see if they would hand up charges.
She said: 'They told me it would be hard to disprove Leroy Stelly's self-defense claim beyond a reasonable doubt,' which is the evidentiary standard for a conviction at trial but not for a grand jury proceeding. The standard of evidence for a grand jury to return charges is slightly lower – it can do so if it believes a crime probably occurred.
Though Stelly's wife remains at the home near where Smith died, Leonard understands Stelly may have moved out of state, too, continuing to live his life unimpeded, at least as it appears to her.
It is a gut-wrenching set of circumstances for at least a couple of people. One is Townsend-Epherson, who said she was terrified to learn about Stelly's having killed Smith. She said she can't help but think that she and her companions could have met the same fate as Smith if things had played out differently on the night in 2009 when Stelly bumped into them.
'There's no way he should have been running around with no consequences for anything,' Townsend-Epherson said. 'And now, someone is gone.'
Elsewhere, Leonard said she abides by one of the main opinions contained within the 80 pages of the report produced by the private investigation she helped helm.
And that opinion reads: 'Leroy Stelly took a man's life for no reason other than to fulfill his agenda of policing his neighborhood and bullying the citizens of New Orleans.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Woman appears in court charged with murdering mum ‘found buried in garden' 15 years after she vanished
Woman appears in court charged with murdering mum ‘found buried in garden' 15 years after she vanished

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

Woman appears in court charged with murdering mum ‘found buried in garden' 15 years after she vanished

A WOMAN has appeared in court charged with murdering a mum "found buried in a garden" 15 years after she vanished. Izabela Zablocka disappeared on August 28, 2010, after speaking to her family in Poland. 3 Police launched a murder probe two weeks ago after new information came to light. Human remains, believed to belong to Izabela, were then found in the garden of a home in Normanton, Derbyshire. Anna Podedworna appeared at Derbyshire Magistrates' Court today charged with murder. The 39-year-old is also accused of preventing a lawful burial and perverting the course of justice. Podedworna spoke only to confirm her name, date of birth and address during the hearing. She was remanded into custody to next appear at Derby Crown Court on Monday. Five people have been arrested as part of the murder investigation, including two women aged 39 and 43. All five have bailed pending further inquiries, Derbyshire Police confirmed. Izabela came to the UK from Poland in 2009 and worked at the former Cranberry Foods Turkey and Chicken Factory. Her family reported her missing to Polish police in August 2010 but the report never reached British cops. Her daughter Kasia, who was nine at the time of her mum's disappearance, contacted Derbyshire Police in May. She spoke out after the body was found, telling The Sun: "I definitely want to know the truth as soon as possible." Samanatha Shallow, Deputy Chief Crown Prosecutor in the East Midlands, said: 'Following a review of the evidence provided by Derbyshire Constabulary, we have authorised criminal charges in relation to the death of Izabela Zablocka 'Ms Zablocka went missing in August 2010, when she was aged 30. Her body was recovered in Derby on 1 June 2025. 'Anna Podedworna, 39, from Derby, has been charged with her murder. She has also been charged with preventing a lawful and decent burial and perverting the course of justice. 'Our thoughts remain with the family of Ms Zablocka at this time." Crimestoppers is offering a £20,000 reward for information, which expires on August 27. Anyone with information can call the charity anonymously on 0800 555 111. 3 3

Joe Biden's only hand-signed pardon during his final months in office
Joe Biden's only hand-signed pardon during his final months in office

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Joe Biden's only hand-signed pardon during his final months in office

Joe Biden's only hand-signed pardon during his final months in office was also his most controversial - his son, Hunter. The bombshell comes as Donald Trump ordered a sweeping investigation into Biden's use of an autopen to sign a huge number of presidential documents. Trump alleges the widespread reliance on the device that replicates a person's signature concealed Biden's 'serious cognitive decline' and amounted to a 'dangerous and unprecedented conspiracy.' Biden, battling an aggressive form of prostate cancer and facing mounting questions about his mental acuity throughout his time in the White House, granted clemency to more than 1,500 individuals in his final weeks in office. Biden's administration touted the figure as the largest single-day act of clemency in US history. But according to documents reviewed by the Department of Justice and White House officials, virtually all of those pardons were signed using the autopen. The one glaring exception was Biden's controversial hand-signed pardon of his son Hunter, shielding him from prosecution for any federal crimes committed between January 1, 2014, and December 1, 2024. For months, Biden had assured Americans he would not interfere in his son's legal woes but in December 2024, after Hunter pleaded guilty to felony gun charges and faced additional federal tax violations , Biden suddenly reversed course. 'From the day I took office, I said I would not interfere with the Justice Department's decision-making, and I kept my word even as I have watched my son being selectively, and unfairly, prosecuted,' Biden said in an emotional address. 'There has been an effort to break Hunter - who has been five-and-a-half years sober, even in the face of unrelenting attacks and selective prosecution. In trying to break Hunter, they've tried to break me - and there's no reason to believe it will stop here. Enough is enough. 'I hope Americans will understand why a father - and a president- would come to this decision.' Aside from three felony gun offenses, the first son was also charged with federal tax crimes over his alleged failure to pay at least $1.4 million in taxes. Special Counsel David Weiss, who led the probe into Hunter, blasted Biden's pardon as an affront to justice. In a report, Weiss excoriated Biden's public statement dismissing the years-long investigation as 'selective' and 'infected by raw politics.' 'This statement is gratuitous and wrong,' Weiss wrote. 'Other presidents have pardoned family members, but none have used the occasion to malign public servants based solely on false accusations.' The pardon effectively ended Weiss's investigation, barring any further charges against Hunter Biden. Biden also issued pardons for his two brothers and his sister shortly before leaving office, hoping to shield them from potential prosecution under Trump, who had promised retribution during last year's campaign. Other pardon recipients included members of a congressional committee that investigated the January 6, 2021, riot at the US Capitol. Now back in the White House, Trump has seized on the controversy, ordering Attorney General Pam Bondi and White House Counsel David Warrington (pictured) to investigate Biden's use of the autopen. In a scathing memorandum, Trump stated: 'It has become increasingly apparent that former President Biden's aides abused the power of presidential signatures through the use of an autopen to conceal Biden's cognitive decline and assert Article II authority. 'This conspiracy marks one of the most dangerous and concerning scandals in American history. The American public was purposefully shielded from discovering who wielded the executive power, all while Biden's signature was deployed across thousands of documents to effect radical policy shifts.' Trump's directive calls for a forensic review of every document signed during Biden's presidency. It includes everything from pardons, executive orders, judicial appointments and proclamations to determine which bore Biden's authentic signature and which were replicated by autopen. The autopen, though little-known to the public, has long been used by US presidents to manage the deluge of documents requiring a signature. The device can accurately replicate a signature, saving presidents precious time. The Justice Department, under Democratic and Republican administrations, has recognized the use of an autopen by presidents to sign legislation and issue pardons for decades - and even Trump himself acknowledges using it. 'Autopens to me are used when thousands of letters come in from young people all over the country and you want to get them back,' Trump said on Thursday. 'Biden's cognitive issues and apparent mental decline during his presidency were even 'worse' in private, and those closest to him 'tried to hide it' from the public,' Trump said in his statement. 'To do so, Biden's advisors during his years in office severely restricted his news conferences and media appearances, and they scripted his conversations with lawmakers, government officials, and donors, all to cover up his inability to discharge his duties.' Past presidents, including George W. Bush and Barack Obama, have employed the autopen in limited circumstances, such as signing routine letters or lower-level appointments. However, critics argue that Biden's reliance on the device was unprecedented. An exhaustive review by the Oversight Project found that nearly every document from Biden's presidency from 2021 to 2025 bore identical autopen signatures, except for the document announcing his withdrawal from the 2024 presidential race. Biden's reliance on the autopen came as his public appearances diminished, with aides scripting his engagements, heavily curating his interactions with lawmakers, and significantly limiting press conferences. Behind the scenes, insiders claim Biden's inner circle - including family members - wielded disproportionate influence, raising fresh questions about who was truly making presidential decisions. Trump, while acknowledging he occasionally used the autopen himself , argues Biden's alleged overuse could nullify significant executive actions. 'Essentially, whoever used the autopen was the president,' Trump said during a press conference. 'That's wrong. It's illegal. It's so bad and it's so disrespectful to our country.' House Oversight Chairman James Comer has launched parallel inquiries, demanding testimony from Biden's former top aides including Mike Donilon, Anita Dunn, Ron Klain, Bruce Reed, and Steve Ricchetti , alleging they participated in a 'cover-up' of Biden's cognitive decline. Comer cited explosive allegations from CNN's Jake Tapper and Axios' Alex Thompson's book 'Original Sin,' which claimed 'five people were running the country, and Joe Biden was at best a senior member of the board.' The committee has also issued subpoenas for Biden's physician Kevin O'Connor and several White House aides who reportedly helped shield Biden's true condition from public view. Republicans argue that if Biden's aides, not Biden himself, made key decisions, it could throw into question the validity of major executive actions including the pardons of his siblings, other family members, and members of the House committee investigating the January 6 Capitol riot. Biden has lashed back at the accusations. 'Let me be clear: I made the decisions during my presidency. I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation, and proclamations. Any suggestion that I didn't is ridiculous and false,' Biden said in a statement. Biden's reliance on the autopen came as his public appearances diminished, with aides scripting his engagements, heavily curating his interactions with lawmakers, and significantly limiting press conferences. Behind the scenes, insiders claim Biden's inner circle - including family members - wielded disproportionate influence, raising fresh questions about who was truly making presidential decisions. He accused Trump and Congressional Republicans of creating a 'distraction' to divert attention from ongoing political battles, including a contentious tax bill moving through Congress. 'This is nothing more than a distraction by Donald Trump and Congressional Republicans,' Biden declared. 'They are working to push disastrous legislation that would cut essential programs like Medicaid and raise costs on American families.' In private, Biden's aides insist that autopen use was limited to routine matters, and that Biden personally reviewed major decisions. However, newly surfaced internal memos suggest that a handful of senior advisors controlled access to the president and directed autopen usage without always consulting him, raising further doubts about the authenticity of some presidential actions. The implications are enormous - if Trump's investigation finds that Biden's use of the autopen was improper, it could challenge the legitimacy of thousands of presidential decisions, from judicial appointments to sweeping regulatory changes. House Republicans are already signaling they may attempt to invalidate actions signed via autopen, raising constitutional questions that could land before the Supreme Court. 'The American people deserve to know who was really running the country,' Trump said. 'This scandal could be one of the greatest in American history.'

Boeing seals £812m deal to avoid prosecution over 737 Max plane crashes that killed 346 people - as lawyer for victims' families condemns agreement as 'morally repugnant'
Boeing seals £812m deal to avoid prosecution over 737 Max plane crashes that killed 346 people - as lawyer for victims' families condemns agreement as 'morally repugnant'

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Boeing seals £812m deal to avoid prosecution over 737 Max plane crashes that killed 346 people - as lawyer for victims' families condemns agreement as 'morally repugnant'

Boeing has reached a deal with the US Department of Justice to avoid prosecution over crashes involving a 737 Max plane that killed 346 people. The agreement, outlined in a court filing this week, will see the aerospace giant pay $1.1 billion (£812 million), including a $487.2 million criminal penalty, half of which was already paid in a previous settlement. The move has been blasted by the victims' families' lawyer, Sanjiv Singh, who told the BBC the deal was a 'morally repugnant' escape which allowed the firm to 'sidestep true criminal accountability'. If approved by a federal judge, the deal would protect the firm from a criminal fraud trial. The company previously said it is 'deeply sorry' for their loss, adding that it remains 'committed to honouring their loved one's memories' by pressing ahead with changes to the company. The deal would also see $444.5m in compensation to families of the crash victims. It will also put $455m towards improving its compliance, safety and quality programmes. Boeing would also agree to pay a criminal penalty of $487.2m, although half of that was already paid in 2021. The two Boeing 737 Max crashes, which happened less than five months apart, claimed 346 lives and sparked global outrage. In October 2018, Lion Air flight 610 plunged into the Java Sea shortly after takeoff from Jakarta, in Indonesia killing all 189 people on board. Then, in March 2019, Ethiopian Airlines flight 302 crashed minutes after departing Addis Ababa, resulting in the deaths of 157 passengers and crew. Both disasters were later traced to faulty flight control systems, leading to the worldwide grounding of the 737 Max fleet for nearly two years. Since then, many families of the victims have spent years demanding a full public trial, tougher penalties for Boeing, and the prosecution of senior company executives. In 2021, Boeing avoided criminal prosecution by reaching a deferred prosecution agreement with the US Department of Justice, which included a $243.6 million fine. However, prosecutors later alleged that Boeing had breached the terms of its 2021 deferred prosecution agreement by failing to put in place promised reforms to detect and prevent future violations of federal anti-fraud laws. In response, Boeing agreed last July to plead guilty to a felony fraud charge, potentially avoiding a lengthy and high-profile public trial. It will be the fourth meeting between the DOJ and the families, some of whom are seen here in 2019, of those who died in the two 737 MAX crashes that killed 346 people in 2018 and 2019 But in December, US District Judge Reed O'Connor rejected the plea deal. He raised concerns that government and corporate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies could influence the selection of an independent monitor, the person responsible for overseeing Boeing's compliance, and argued that race might become a factor in the appointment process. A spokesperson for Boeing said: 'Boeing is committed to complying with its obligations under this resolution, which include a substantial additional fine and commitments to further institutional improvements and investments. 'The resolution also provides for substantial additional compensation for the families of those lost in the Lion Air Flight 610 and Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 accidents. 'We are deeply sorry for their losses, and remain committed to honouring their loved ones' memories by pressing forward with the broad and deep changes to our company that we have made to strengthen our safety system and culture.' MailOnline approached the US Justice Department for comment. The firm maker has also been plagued by other incidents involving its other planes in the US. Last year, a wheel fell off a Boeing 777-200 shortly after takeoff in San Francisco, with the wheel falling after takeoff, crushing cars parked below after it plummeted to the ground. The United Airlines flight 35 left San Francisco Airport on its way to Osaka in Japan and was barely off the runway when the Boeing 777-200's wheel came off. The plane with 235 passengers and 14 crew diverted to Los Angeles Airport after it was alerted to the landing gear failure and safely landed with no further issues and no injuries reported. Just days before this, a 737 engine caught fire mid-flight with a heart-stopping video catching the moment the Boeing jet's engines exploded and burst into flames in the skies above Texas, forcing an emergency landing. The terrifying incident took place just minutes into a United Airlines flight bound for Fort Myers, Florida. Moments later, they were forced to make an emergency landing and return to George H. Bush Intercontinental Houston Airport moments after takeoff. No injuries were reported in the incident.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store