Drive a Tacoma? 100,000+ Toyota trucks recalled. Here's why
If you drive a Toyota Tacoma, you might want to stop — while you can — and take it to your dealer. The company is recalling more than 106,000 vehicles, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Certain configurations of the 2024-2025 Toyota Tacoma are being recalled over the potential for a brake fluid leak. Dealers were notified in early February and notification letters will be going out to owners in late March and April.
You can check if your vehicle is being recalled by searching NHTSA's database based on your vehicle identification number or VIN.
The NHTSA said that certain Toyota Tacoma 4-wheel drive trucks equipped with a 4-wheel drive may experience a buildup of mud and dirt inside the wheels that could, over time, damage and wear through the brake hoses and cause a break fluid leak, a reduction of brake performance, an increase of brake stopping distance, and an increased risk of crashing.
The recall applies to 2024-2025 Toyota Tacomas manufactured between January 2, 2024 and Jan. 17, 2025 equipped with 4-wheel drive and a combination of 16-inch brakes and 17-inch Toyota wheels. There are an estimated 106,061 vehicles affected.
Toyota is still investigating 2024-2025 Toyota Tacomas equipped with 2-wheel drive and a combination of 16-inch brakes with either 17-inch or 18-inch Toyota wheels, and other 4-wheel drive Tacoma vehicles with 16-inch brakes and 18-inch Toyota wheels to see if they are experiencing the same problem.
Tacoma trucks equipped with 17-inch brakes use a different brake system design and are not affected, the NHTSA said.
Dealers will replace the brake hoses free of charge. If you have already replaced the brake hose you can seek reimbursement through Toyota's Reimbursement Plan, the notification letter will include details.
There are Toyota dealerships across Florida. You can find the one closest to you at toyota.com/dealers/florida/.
This article originally appeared on Pensacola News Journal: Toyota Tacoma recall for trucks' potential brake issues
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Tesla Is Launching Robotaxis in Austin. Safety Advocates Are Concerned
Elon Musk's ugly public spat with former bestie Donald Trump is sure to cause more headaches for the Silicon Valley mogul down the line. Not only has he sacrificed any influence he might have with the White House by blasting the president for his association with the late sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, but some in the administration have floated the idea of reviving regulatory investigations into Musk's corporate empire. The timing of such a threat could hardly be worse. That's because Tesla, Musk's electric vehicle manufacturer, is about to face a make-or-break test of self-driving technology that the CEO believes is key to its future value — yet has been the subject of a years-long probe by the Justice Department into potential securities and wire fraud. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is meanwhile conducting multiple investigations into the possible risks posed by the same tech. More from Rolling Stone The Biggest Boondoggles in Trump's Big Beautiful Bill 'Dejected' Trump Says Relationship With Musk Is Over; Calls Him a 'Big-Time Drug Addict': Report Vance Says 'Trump Didn't Do Anything Wrong With Jeffrey Epstein' Last fall, at a carefully staged event on the Warner Bros. Discovery studio lot in Burbank, California, Musk unveiled what he called a 'Cybercab,' a sleek, two-seat vehicle with no steering wheel. This was the long-awaited prototype of Tesla's robotaxi, or a fully autonomous, driverless passenger vehicle. Back in 2019, Musk had predicted that existing Tesla models would become capable of driving themselves without human oversight once their 'Full Self-Driving' (FSD) driver-assistance software had been adequately updated. Now he was demoing a different, built-to-purpose model, seeming to signal that Teslas already on the road would not be upgraded to robotaxi capability. Then, in a January earnings call, Musk offered one of his typically optimistic predictions about a timetable for a paid robotaxi service, similar Amazon's Zoox, or Waymo, a subsidiary of Google parent company Alphabet. 'Teslas will be in the wild, with no one in them, in June, in Austin,' Musk said, referring to the Texas city that has been a base of operations for his businesses in recent years. Investors were skeptical. After all, Musk has a history of overpromising, and the Cybercab unveiled barely three months earlier was essentially a glorified movie prop. By late May, however, Musk was declaring significant progress on a robotaxi launch. 'For the past several days, Tesla has been testing self-driving Model Y cars (no one in driver's seat) on Austin public streets with no incidents,' he posted on X on May 28. 'A month ahead of schedule. Next month, first self-delivery from factory to customer.' It would appear, in this case, that Tesla had defaulted to the original idea of modifying its commercially available models to make them autonomous rather than holding off until it had a fleet of Cybercabs. Aside from stray comments like these, little is known about what Tesla's initial robotaxi program will look like. The company is reportedly targeting a launch date of June 12, with just 10-20 vehicles to start. A Morgan Stanley analyst — not Tesla itself — has claimed that rides will be available by invite only, not to the general public, and that the cars will be remotely supervised by operators prepared to take manual control if needed. That the automaker is keeping most details under wraps has left plenty of room for questions, doubts, and concerns — particularly as Waymo and other competitors tend to collect data and conduct local testing for far longer periods before welcoming passengers aboard. Dan O'Dowd, a software entrepreneur and founder of the tech safety group the Dawn Project, which has routinely showcased the shortcomings of Tesla's FSD tech, predicts that the robotaxi rollout will amount to lackluster stunt. 'Musk's upcoming robotaxi launch will still be nothing more than a bigger version of the 1950s Disneyland ride that Tesla demonstrated at [the Cybercab] event last year, if it even takes place at all,' he says. 'Despite Elon Musk claiming that Tesla was less than a year away from solving autonomy for nearly a decade and decrying the real robotaxi companies for geo-fencing and remote supervision, Tesla plans for its so-called robotaxis to only be able to drive around certain parts of Austin, avoiding intersections that are difficult,' while being remotely supervised,' O'Dowd notes. (Musk admitted in a recent interview that the robotaxis would be 'geo-fenced,' or restricted from certain parts of the city.) 'Tesla has also shown itself incapable of developing a working Cybercab, instead leaning on its Model Y in another backtrack on Elon's many false promises about solving autonomy,' O'Dowd adds. 'The golden Model 3 mules that Tesla is using to develop the Cybercab's software clearly demonstrate that Tesla has put the cart before the horse with the Cybercab.' On June 2, an X user posted a video of a Model 3 in a Tesla lot in San Diego that had seemingly been modified to resemble the Cybercab design, with its side mirrors removed and the rear windshield painted gold along with the body panels. The clip was taken by many Tesla observers as evidence that it was also using Model 3s to run autonomous driving experiments ahead of the robotaxi pilot program. Brett Schreiber, a partner at the San Diego law firm Singleton Schreiber who is currently pursuing multiple injury and wrongful death suits against Tesla over accidents involving its driver-assistance features, agrees that the company is backing down from the Cybercab concept Musk presented last year. 'It is a retreat on the idea that they are going to build out a new vehicle that is capable of autonomy,' he says, though 'a repeat of the continued lies and misrepresentations' from the CEO — namely, that existing Teslas can be turned into robotaxis. 'There is nothing about the vehicle today, whether you slap some lipstick on the pig of a Model Y, or any other vehicle in their production fleet, that [makes it] capable of level four or level five autonomy without driver intervention. They simply haven't gotten there, and just because they keep saying so doesn't make it true.' Levels four and five of driving automation refer to systems in which 'a human driver is not needed,' per NHTSA guidelines. Tesla's FSD is currently classified as level two, meaning that a human driver 'is fully responsible' for operating the vehicle even while assistance features are engaged. Schreiber believes that Tesla brought the robotaxi project to Texas for 'a more lax environment with respect to enforcement,' saying that 'in many states, California being one of them, they would not be allowed to do this in the way that they are doing it. They fled California for a lot of reasons, the least of which was the fact that they felt more constrained by their ability to roll out and continue to use the public roadways as their own personal test track, and use the members of the public as the guinea pigs in the grand experiment.' Indeed, the Texas Department of Transportation does not require any special permits for operating autonomous vehicles — only that these meet the same safety and insurance requirements as other vehicles. In California, by contrast, the Department of Motor Vehicles 'issues permits to manufacturers that test and deploy autonomous vehicles on California public roads.' Tesla, which does not have a press department, did not reply to a request for comment on details of the robotaxi launch or why Austin was chosen as the site. As for regulatory enforcement by NHTSA, it would largely come after the fact, since autonomous vehicle permitting is a state matter, not a federal one. 'Under U.S. law, NHTSA does not pre-approve new technologies or vehicle systems — rather, manufacturers certify that each vehicle meets NHTSA's rigorous safety standards, and the agency investigates incidents involving potential safety defects,' a sposkesperson for the agency tells Rolling Stone. 'Following an assessment of those reports and other relevant information, NHTSA will take any necessary actions to protect road safety.' NHTSA, as it happens, was one of a handful of regulators scrutinizing Musk's businesses to face cuts imposed by his so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), with at least four percent of staff dismissed. In Schreiber's estimation, the agency's Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) 'has been completely gutted,' hampering its ability to go after Tesla. Even so, the ODI did send a letter to Tesla's director of field quality in May, requesting extensive information about the proposed automated driving system for its robotaxis in order 'to understand Tesla's technologies and operational use cases further, including to assess the ability of Tesla's system to react appropriately to reduced roadway visibility conditions.' NHTSA's probe into Tesla's FSD involves several accidents in which the system faced conditions such as fog or sun glare, including a 2023 collision in Arizona in which a Model Y struck and killed a pedestrian while driving into direct sunlight. That investigation 'remains open,' the agency spokesperson says. Meanwhile, if Tesla doesn't answer NHTSA's questions about how its robotaxis work and what steps it is taking to ensure their safe operation by a deadline of June 19, or secure a filing extension, it could be subject to civil penalties. By that time, of course, people may already be hailing driverless Teslas in Texas, with passengers, other motorists, and bystanders all at the mercy of a supposed breakthrough in vehicle autonomy. That's what has safety advocates like O'Dowd so alarmed. 'The people of Austin did not sign up to be crash-test dummies for Musk's reckless deployment of Tesla's defective and dangerous Full Self-Driving software,' he says. If the thought has ever bothered Musk, he hasn't said so. Upon stepping down from DOGE, he wrote on X that he would return to a '24/7' focus on his companies, Tesla in particular, as 'we have critical technologies rolling out.' Best of Rolling Stone Every Super Bowl Halftime Show, Ranked From Worst to Best The United States of Weed Gaming Levels Up
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Toyota, Subaru Hit with Class-Action Lawsuit Over Claims of 12-Volt Batteries in EVs That Keep Dying
A new lawsuit filed against Subaru and Toyota claims that the two automakers' jointly developed electric vehicles, the Solterra and bZ4X, suffers from an issue that causes the 12-volt battery used for accessories to repeatedly fail, with the plaintiff filing the suit claiming his vehicle has gone through multiple batteries in 5000 miles. The class-action lawsuit, which was filed in the U.S. Eastern District Court of California, claims that Subaru and Toyota both knew about 12-volt battery problems before the the Bz4X or Solterra went on sale. Allegedly, these cars (from the 2023–2025 model years) drain and kill the 12-volt battery on a regular basis; despite that, the suit claims the two carmakers failed to warn customers or to fix the issues at hand. The filing mainly focuses on this single owner's account. "The 12-volt battery equipped in Plaintiff Wade's Class Vehicle has failed three times after only about 5000 miles of driving the vehicle. The 12-volt battery in Plaintiff Wade's vehicle has been replaced twice since March 2023,"says the filing, according to The owner claims that the first failure happened within weeks of ownership; then the battery died again when it had around 2000 miles on it, and yet again around the 5000-mile mark. Based on other accounts posted online, however, he's not alone when it comes to 12-volt battery issues. As one person with a 2024 example of the Solterra told the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration: "I have had the car since December of 2024, the car was a new lease. The battery has failed twice — once in January, and again last week. When I took it to the dealership, they said they replaced the battery, the new battery is now doing the same thing." On Reddit, customers have been complaining about similar situations since early 2023. "At 6 months had the 12 volt battery replaced, now after 3 weeks getting low battery again," said one commenter. Another made a post in January alleging that since picking up the car in April of 2024, they've had a dead 12-volt battery three different times. Interestingly, it doesn't appear as though the lawsuit in question defines what the central issue is between the 12-volt battery and the rest of the system. In other words, it doesn't define what the core defect, is aside from the 12-volt battery dying prematurely. Whether or not that factors into the suit's outcome is yet to be seen. The electric Toyobaru siblings are hardly the only EVs to suffer from issues and allegations of problems with their 12-volt batteries in recent years. Back in 2021, Ford issued a service bulletin regarding a software problem that caused the Mustang Mach-E's 12-volt to drain while the car's propulsion battery was being charged, while earlier this year, an owner took to Reddit to claim that his 2021 Mach-E's 12-volt lost power and trapped his child in the vehicle. Meanwhile, back in 2023, Hyundai found owners of the Ioniq 5 complaining about unexpected 12-volt battery death, eventually pinning the problem down as one related to third-party applications pinging the car too frequently via Bluetooth. You Might Also Like You Need a Torque Wrench in Your Toolbox Tested: Best Car Interior Cleaners The Man Who Signs Every Car Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Car and Driver
12 hours ago
- Car and Driver
Mazda Recalls 12K Miatas for Traction-Control Light That Might Not Work
Mazda is recalling 12,244 Miata models due to an issue where certain warning lights don't display. The recall involves 2024–2025 models, whose traction- and stability-control systems might not properly behave. Miata owners affected by the recall can bring their car to the dealer to fix the issue free of charge—though some will have to wait for an available part. Sideways shenanigans might go unsupervised in newer Mazda Miatas due to an issue with their dynamic stability control (a.k.a. DSC), which can fail to illuminate a warning light in the required situation. This has led the Japanese automaker to recall over 12,000 Miatas from the 2024 and 2025 model years. Mazda filed a recall report with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) on June 3, 2025. The report states that the lights for the DSC as well as the traction-control (TC) systems may not light up when an abnormal yaw rate (see: getting sideways) is detected. Without the warning lights, drivers could potentially get themselves in trouble with sudden steering inputs that could lead to oversteering or understeering. Since the DSC/TC software is malfunctioning, the systems might not come to the rescue, which obviously raises the risk of a crash. View Interior Photos Mazda According to Mazda's NHTSA filing, the issue is caused by an error with the DSC unit's software diagnostic programming. To fix the problem, Miata will ask owners to bring their vehicles to a dealer who will replace the faulty part with improved software. This won't cost customers a penny. However, Mazda says this will be a phased (long-lead) recall, as the necessary parts for all the affected vehicles aren't expected to be available until the second quarter of 2026. Still, individual owners will be notified whether the part for their Miata is available or not available by July 21, 2025. Eric Stafford Managing Editor, News Eric Stafford's automobile addiction began before he could walk, and it has fueled his passion to write news, reviews, and more for Car and Driver since 2016. His aspiration growing up was to become a millionaire with a Jay Leno–like car collection. Apparently, getting rich is harder than social-media influencers make it seem, so he avoided financial success entirely to become an automotive journalist and drive new cars for a living. After earning a journalism degree at Central Michigan University and working at a daily newspaper, the years of basically burning money on failed project cars and lemon-flavored jalopies finally paid off when Car and Driver hired him. His garage currently includes a 2010 Acura RDX, a manual '97 Chevy Camaro Z/28, and a '90 Honda CRX Si. Read full bio
