logo
For over a decade, I had no clue the man I shared a bed with was a Met police spy

For over a decade, I had no clue the man I shared a bed with was a Met police spy

Independent06-03-2025

For 40 years, dozens of women in England and Wales were deceived into forming long-term intimate relationships with undercover Met Police officers – I am one of those women.
There have been over 50 of us identified as survivors of this appalling deception. The real number is likely to be much higher. Some relationships lasted up to six years, and four of the officers even fathered children with the women they targeted on deployment. The ongoing Undercover Policing Inquiry was announced in 2015, but delays from anonymity battles and legal arguments meant it only started in 2020.
There is much to cover. From 1968 until at least 2011, 140 officers from the Special Demonstration Squad [SDS] and the National Public Order Intelligence Unit [NPOIU] targeted over 1000 political groups. We now know that many of the police spies on active duty in these units formed deceptive sexual relationships with activists as an operational strategy. Andy Coles, the former SDS member turned Tory councillor, even produced a tradecraft manual: a 'how-to' for infiltrating people's lives. In an ironic twist, it was Coles' high-profile brother, Rev Richard Coles, who let slip that he was a spy in his autobiography.
The relationships were used as part of the police's strategy to glean information from target groups, bolster the undercover officers' fake identities and allow police spies to infiltrate left-wing and progressive groups, often climbing to positions at the highest level. Other tactics included spreading misinformation to disrupt relationships and inciting activists to commit offences. Several miscarriages of justice have occurred as a result.
Of the 25 police spies we know of who formed these abusive relationships over the years, only two were women. The majority of the male undercovers were married. Their wives were equally unaware of their husbands' secret identities and of us women being deceived into intimate relationships.
For more than two years, I was deceived into a relationship with the Metropolitan Police officer Carlo Soracchi, codenamed 'Neri'. We met in September 2002 at an anti-war demonstration in London. Carlo was a steward on the march, alongside friends of mine who were trade union and anti-racist activists.
We were immediately inseparable, and within six weeks, he moved into my flat, asking me to marry him soon after. We lived together for two years and were planning to have children until he left suddenly in 2004 in the guise of a mental health crisis.
Like many women before me, I discovered a decade later that Carlo had led two lives – one with me, as a locksmith and left-wing activist, and the other with his wife, as a highly-trained undercover officer, operating in a secretive unit within the Metropolitan Police. For over a decade, I had no clue that the man I had lived with was a spy, paid to lie by the state.
The discovery of the officers' true identities has left most of us suffering from trauma. Unsurprisingly, we struggle to trust people and to form new relationships. For some, the relationships happened during the years when they might have had children, creating a whole other layer of loss to process.
Now, a new ITV series shines a very strong light on one of the darkest aspects of the spy cops scandal and reveals the scale of our betrayal by the state. The three-part documentary follows the stories of five women who uncovered the truth about the men they had believed to be devoted partners but who abruptly exited their lives, as Carlo did mine, using harrowing – and fabricated – stories. Carlo left after appearing to have a breakdown. Leading up to his final disappearance, he went missing several times and threatened suicide.
Through detective work, detailed research, and even travelling abroad, the women worked together to unmask these men and expose their true identities as undercover police spies. The five women who feature in the documentary series, Belinda Harvey, Helen Steel, 'Alison', 'Lisa' and 'Naomi' (the latter three are pseudonyms) were part of the first group of eight to uncover the scandal and initiate the legal action which ultimately forced the Metropolitan Police to make an unprecedented public apology. The Met said that the relationships were 'abusive, deceitful, manipulative, and wrong' and admitted that the officers' managers had failed in their duty to prevent the relationships from happening, as a result of a systemic culture of sexism within the force.
The five women wrote a book about this state-sponsored betrayal and their incredible journey towards exposing the truth. A new edition has been released to mark the TV adaptation and renamed the only thing it could be: The Undercover Police Scandal. Let their bravery – and our stories – be what people remember from this. That, and how the police and government betrayed the very people they are supposed to protect.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Police officer who quit to avoid misconduct hearing ‘cannot be barred'
Police officer who quit to avoid misconduct hearing ‘cannot be barred'

Times

timean hour ago

  • Times

Police officer who quit to avoid misconduct hearing ‘cannot be barred'

A senior Metropolitan Police counterterrorism officer accused of inappropriate behaviour towards a female officer at an International Women's Day event in the Maldives was allowed to resign before a gross misconduct hearing. Detective Superintendent Jim Knowles was heralded in the event brochure as a 'strong advocate' for gender equality and a 'HeForShe ally' before he allegedly caused distress to a Maldivian police officer, the local liaison for the Met contingent. It is understood that the complaint lodged with the Met alleged that Knowles texted the woman inappropriately after meeting her at the conference in March 2023. He was said to have turned up unannounced at her hotel room after dinner and, although he left when asked, the encounter left her feeling distressed and uncomfortable. An investigation found that Knowles, who has worked in royalty protection and intelligence, had a case to answer for gross misconduct. He faced the sack if found guilty but resigned before proceedings were brought. He now works for a private security company. The case is another test of the Met's commitment to addressing misconduct within its ranks, a key pledge of Sir Mark Rowley, the Met commissioner, after a series of scandals involving police predators. Gross misconduct hearings, which can be carried out in the absence of former officers, also have the power to bar individuals from working in policing again. That was no longer an option in relation to Knowles once the hearing was cancelled. The Met said that his conduct would be part of his file and come up if he applied for jobs that required vetting in the future. Officers from the Met's counterterror squad are regularly sent overseas to engage and advise local police forces, including in the Maldives, which had one of the highest rates per capita of fighters joining Islamic State. Since the collapse of the Islamist caliphate, there is an enhanced threat from fighters who have returned home. In March 2023 Knowles, then the deputy national co-ordinator for Protect and Prepare, a key element of the UK's counterterror strategy, travelled to the Maldives with two colleagues. The Foreign Office arranged an event, at which Knowles was a speaker, with more than 130 female officers to mark International Women's Day, celebrate women in policing and improve co-ordination between law enforcement agencies involved in the Maldives. The morning after the incident, Knowles's colleagues saw the Maldivian officer in distress. A complaint was made about his alleged inappropriate behaviour on their return to the UK. A disciplinary board was convened 20 months later in November last year, but the force confirmed that it was cancelled when Knowles resigned. The Met would not say who took that decision but cited the need to bring the alleged victim from overseas to give evidence and claimed that she was by then living in a country that did not allow video evidence. A Met spokeswoman said: 'We investigated a complaint of inappropriate behaviour by a Met officer seconded to Counter Terrorism Policing towards a woman in the Maldives on March 8, 2023. 'While our investigation determined the officer should face a misconduct hearing, this was reviewed following his resignation from the force and the hearing was cancelled. The matter remains on the former officer's conduct file and would need to be disclosed during any future vetting process. 'There is no place in the Met for anyone who cannot be trusted to work with women or is a risk to the public.' The Met declined to comment on whether Knowles had to get permission from anyone to resign, and if so who. The Times has attempted to contact Knowles.

Trans police officers blocked from strip-searching biological women
Trans police officers blocked from strip-searching biological women

Telegraph

timean hour ago

  • Telegraph

Trans police officers blocked from strip-searching biological women

Transgender police officers will no longer be able to strip-search people of a different biological sex to them. Six forces across England had previously been accused of a lack of urgency in changing policies to ensure detainees should only be searched by an officer of the same sex in the wake of the landmark legal ruling on the definition of sex in April. The constabularies of Merseyside, Sussex, Surrey and Northumbria, as well as the Metropolitan Police and the British Transport Police, previously allowed trans officers to search people if their gender matched the sex of the detainee. This allowed biological male officers who identified as female and had a gender recognition certificate to strip-search women. However, recent interim guidance issued by the National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC) has now been sent to all police forces stating that strip searches 'must be conducted with officers of the same biological sex as the person being searched'. This was based on legal advice following the Supreme Court ruling that found that sex is biological under the Equality Act. Now, it has emerged that the six police forces have reversed their stance and are adopting the NPCC guidance. The reversal has been hailed as a victory by women's rights campaigners who launched a legal challenge on this point. 'Forces have finally about-turned' Maya Forstater, chief executive of human rights charity Sex Matters, said: 'The British Transport Police, the Met Police and several other forces have finally about-turned on strip-searching policies based on gender recognition certificates. 'They should never have considered a man with a £5 certificate based on a change of pronouns and a medical diagnosis of 'dysphoria' as suitable to strip-search women and girls.' The NPCC guidance offers detainees who are transgender the ability to request to be searched by an officer who is of their gender, and not their biological sex. A biological man who identifies as a female, for example, could request the strip-search to be performed by a female officer. The NPCC guidance says that 'as far as operationally viable' this option will be provided to people whose 'lived-in gender is not the same as their biological sex'. For these individuals who are being strip-searched by police, the guidance indicates that written consent from the detainee, the searching officer and the authorising officer will be needed. In these instances, which the NPCC identifies as a rare occurrence, the officer will not be of the same sex as the detainee. 'Dangerous loophole' Ms Forstater called the NPCC guidance, which allows opposite-sex strip-searching by 'consent', a 'dangerous loophole'. 'It leaves female officers exposed to pressure and coercion within the custody suite and when out on the beat. 'This is particularly concerning given the years in which trans lobby groups have trained forces across the UK to centre the demands of trans-identifying men and disregard women's rights and needs. 'The question remains: how has the ethical and legal position of police forces across the UK deteriorated to such a point that they are putting such immense effort into enabling something as sordid as opposite-sex strip-searching?' Campaigners are now investigating if this is a breach of the law under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE). This ensured intimate searches would not be done by a person of the opposite sex. Sex Matters believes this loophole for transgender detainees may be in breach of the law following the ruling of the Supreme Court case that defined sex under the Equality Act 2010. Some female officers have anonymously raised concerns that if they were asked to strip-search a trans woman who has male genitalia they may feel unable to refuse the request for fear of being branded 'transphobic' or unprofessional. 'Nonsensical jumble' The Police Federation called the suggested consensual regime for transgender detainees a 'wholly unworkable idea' and called the guidance a 'nonsensical jumble'. 'We believe that the only lawful option following the Supreme Court decision is to exempt transsexual officers from searching either biological sex and this should be the default situation for all transsexual officers,' it added. All police forces have been approached for comment. A National Police Chiefs' Council spokesman said: 'Those in policing and our communities would benefit from a clear and consistent position across the country in this complex and sensitive area. 'The guidance is explicit that officers will face no career detriment from declining to carry out searches, and any search not conducted in line with biological sex must have the written consent of the detainee, the officer carrying out the search as well as the authorising officer. 'The interim guidance is based on legal advice and has been developed after seeking views across policing as well as those of partners. It reflects working practice that already happens every day across policing, where officers and detainees make requests about searches for a multitude of reasons. 'We understand the depth of feeling there is on these issues, both among transgender communities, as well as those who hold gender-critical views. Policing remains committed to treating everyone with fairness, dignity and respect.'

Married ex-prison officer who had sex with inmate free months after being jailed
Married ex-prison officer who had sex with inmate free months after being jailed

Daily Mirror

time3 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Married ex-prison officer who had sex with inmate free months after being jailed

Linda de Sousa Abreu, 31, from Fulham, southwest London, was jailed after being filmed having sex with an inmate at HMP Wandsworth where she was working as a prison officer A married former prison officer who was jailed after being filmed having sex with an inmate has now been freed, just five months after being sentenced. Linda de Sousa Abreu, 31, was given a 15 month sentence after the video was shared on social media, and she has now been released early after serving just five months. A police investigation was launched after officers were made aware of the footage from inside HMP Wandsworth in south London. The mother-of-one, was arrested and pleaded guilty to misconduct in public office at Isleworth Crown Court in July last year. And she appeared at the same court on January 6, wearing a grey suit and white shirt, where she was given her sentence and told half would be served in custody, with the rest on licence. ‌ ‌ She was also entitled to a reduction of 95 days after it was revealed she had been wearing an electronic tag for 190 days. Following her release ex-Met Police detective Peter Bleksley was critical of the release. He told The Sun: 'This is a shocking example of soft justice. Where's the deterrent when sentences and time served are as short as this?' During her sentencing, Judge Martin Edmunds KC had told de Sousa Abreu: 'You engaged in sexual activity with a prisoner. That compromised your role as an officer, and was misconduct which undermines discipline within the prison, and puts fellow officers at increased risk. You knew that conduct was forbidden and forbidden for good reason.' The charge said that she had 'wilfully and without reasonable excuse or justification misconducted yourself in a way which amounted to an abuse of the public's trust in the office holder by engaging in a sexual act with a prisoner in a prison cell'. The court heard that de Sousa Abreu from Fulham, southwest London, who had a history of poor mental health and trauma, had consented to sexual activity with Linton Weirich at Wandsworth on June 25 2024. She also agreed to a second prisoner being present and filming the activity while appearing to smoke cannabis. The second prisoner later sent the video to a friend who shared it on X, formerly known as Twitter. de Sousa Abreu also asked Judge Edmunds to consider two further offences, one being sexual activity with the same prisoner earlier that day and the other being a separate sexual encounter with Weirich within at least three to four days of the main offence. After seeing the clip had gone viral, the prison officer attempted to fly to Madrid and later Madeira, where she had family, to wait for things to 'calm down'. She was arrested at Heathrow Airport after notifying the prison of her travel plans. ‌ Judge Edmunds said: 'From what I know about you, you were certainly not naive about the media or social media. It must have been obvious that the recording would be shown around and shared, at least amongst prisoners at Wandsworth where it would do the most harm. 'Whether you intended it or not, the fact is that the video went viral, and caused great harm. Many offenders do not intend the harm that their offending causes, but they nevertheless bear responsibility for it.' ‌ Victim impact statements read out on behalf of members of the Prison Service, including the current governor of Wandsworth, heard how the defendant's actions had led to female officers at the prison being 'subject to abuse and harassment from prisoners' as well as being subjected to sexual approaches and being seen as 'fair game'. Some female officers claimed their children have been subjected to teasing at school over what their mothers may do at work, the court heard. Judge Edmunds concluded: 'The consequence of the recording going viral, a result that you did not intend but which was certainly a consequence of your offence, has been that prison officers have faced heckling and harassment. 'They have been confronted with sexualised images falsely suggesting that your conduct is typical. Children of your fellow female prison officers have been teased as to what their mothers may do at work. It is inevitable that the damage for which you were responsible at Wandsworth has spread, to some degree, through the prison estate.' A Prison Service spokesperson said at the time of the sentencing: 'While the overwhelming majority of Prison Service staff are hardworking and honest, we're catching more of the small minority who break the rules by bolstering our Counter Corruption Unit and strengthening our vetting processes. As today's sentencing demonstrates, where officers do fall below our high standards we won't hesitate to take robust action.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store