
Trump takes credit for astronauts' planned return. He had little to do with it.
As astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams prepared to make their way back to Earth for a planned Tuesday evening splashdown off the coast of Tallahassee, President Donald Trump praised the efforts to bring them home — and his own role in doing so.
'This began when I asked Elon Musk to go up and get the abandoned Astronauts, because the Biden Administration was incapable of doing so,' Trump posted on Truth Social on Monday, as a Musk-owned Space-X ship waited at the International Space Station to load its human cargo and head home. 'They shamefully forgot about the Astronauts, because they considered it to be a very embarrassing event for them — Another thing I inherited from that failed group of incompetents.'
There was a rocket-sized hole in Trump's story, however: NASA had announced plans for the astronauts' return via SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft last August — five months before Trump returned to office.
If Williams and Wilmore make it back to Earth without mishap, it will be a moment of collective relief — for observers around the world who have followed the astronauts' uncertain plight, for NASA administrators who made the controversial decision to delay their return in the name of safety, and for Musk and his SpaceX, the company that will have successfully ferried them home.
But the astronauts' return also makes for some awkward politics: a president insistent on taking credit, and a government agency that could be facing an existential threat from the man whose company just brought its astronauts back safely.
Musk is the founder and CEO of SpaceX, the company carrying the astronauts home. He's also leading the U.S. DOGE Service, an entity that has already made some cuts at NASA and is feared to be considering more.
Those tensions could serve as backdrop if Wilmore and Williams — perhaps two of the country's highest-profile federal workers — travel to the White House for an event celebrating their return. The White House has not yet announced a date, but Trump has said he plans to make it happen.
'Under President Donald Trump's leadership, no American is left behind — promises made, promises kept!' White House spokeswoman Liz Huston said in a statement Monday.
Trump has described Wilmore and Williams, both veteran astronauts and retired U.S. Navy test pilots, as 'left up there' on the International Space Station. But that's not true.
Back in June, the two pilots flew the first manned test flight of Boeing's new Starliner spacecraft to the International Space Station, with the expectation that they would return eight days later. As they approached the space station, some of the vehicle's thrusters malfunctioned.
Boeing tried to identify the cause of the problem and insisted that their Starliner was safe to fly back to Earth. But by August, after more than two months of troubleshooting and deliberations, NASA officials were still not convinced the Starliner was reliable. The Boeing spacecraft returned to Earth without its crew, and NASA announced that Wilmore and Williams would instead hitch a ride on a scheduled return flight — a SpaceX Dragon capsule due to fly in early 2025.
'Space flight is risky, even at its safest and even at its most routine,' NASA Administrator Bill Nelson said at the time. 'The decision to keep Butch and Suni aboard the International Space Station and bring the Boeing Starliner home [unmanned] is a result of a commitment to safety.'
That's not how Trump has described the decisions that led to the astronauts' return. In his telling, they were abandoned by President Joe Biden.
'We're coming up to get you, and you shouldn't have been up there so long,' Trump said in the Oval Office two weeks ago, when asked by a reporter about his message to the astronauts. 'The most incompetent president in our history has allowed that to happen to you, but this president won't let happen. We're going to get them out.'
Trump went on to suggest that there had been no plan to bring the astronauts home until he decided to intervene.
'I've authorized Elon. I said, 'Can you get them out? … You gotta get them out,' ' he recounted this month. 'So I authorized Elon a week ago. I said, 'You know, we have two people up there that Biden and Kamala left up there.' And he knows it very well. I said, 'Are you equipped to get them?' And he said, 'Yeah.' He's got a Starship. And they're preparing it right now. And so Elon is going to go up and get them.'
Charles F. Bolden, a former astronaut and NASA administrator, said Trump's comments reflect either willful ignorance or that he was misled by Elon Musk.
'If the chief technologist of SpaceX wasn't aware of the plan that was put in place last August, and he advised the president to say that he was getting ready to do a rescue mission, then that speaks loads about the CEO of SpaceX,' Bolden said.
The White House did not respond to a request for comment on the discrepancy between Trump's recounting of events and the announcement made by NASA last August. NASA also did not comment on Trump's comments — or on his accusation that the astronauts had been abandoned by the previous president.
Trump has long been fascinated by space, seeing its exploration as a key symbol of the grand ambitions of his presidency — and using it, like so many other issues, to denigrate his political opponents.
In the summer of 2020, Trump took down a campaign video trumpeting NASA's return to human spaceflight after criticism that his ad had politicized a major NASA event and violated the agency's advertising rules.
At the time, a former astronaut featured in the video spoke out against it, saying she found it 'disturbing' that footage of her and her family were used 'in political propaganda without my knowledge or consent. That is wrong.'
Now, more than four years later, NASA is facing a delicate moment in its relationship with the president. In response to mandates from DOGE, NASA recently laid off 23 employees and shut down three of its departments: the Office of Technology, Policy and Strategy, the Office of the Chief Scientist, and the Diversity, Equity, Inclusion and Accessibility branch.
More significant NASA cuts may lie ahead. And if Wilmore and Williams are invited to the White House, those who oppose further cuts will be watching to see whether, and how, the astronauts will raise those concerns with the president and with Elon Musk.
Tactfully advocating for NASA is part of the job of being an astronaut, said John Logsdon, a professor emeritus at George Washington University and founder of the university's Space Policy Institute.
'The selection process for astronauts emphasizes their technical qualifications, but includes their ability to deal with various public situations — including the political support for the space program.' Logsdon said. 'So they are NASA's best, if you wish, lobbyists in Washington.'
What might the astronauts say to Trump?
'Well, I think they will emphasize how important the space program is to making America great again, that it is a symbol of American achievement, and the idea that large cuts to the NASA workforce and the NASA missions is not a good idea,' Logsdon said.
For some historians, Trump's intense interest in the plight of the astronauts calls to mind another incident: the Apollo 13 mission in 1970, when the explosion of an oxygen tank forced an aborted lunar landing. For four harrowing days, the nation watched raptly as a three-man crew survived in a lunar module, uncertain whether they would return safely to Earth.
President Richard M. Nixon was deeply invested in the outcome, Logsdon said, viewing the astronauts 'almost like sons that he had never had.' And he knew the outcome of the mission would reflect on his presidency.
When the astronauts made it home safely, Nixon traveled to Houston to honor the members of Mission Control before flying to Hawaii to greet the astronauts in person.
Presidents look presidential when they're next to astronauts, said Luke Nichter, a professor of history at Chapman University in California.
'Upon the return of the astronauts, these were the greatest celebrities, not just in the country, but in the whole world,' Nichter said. 'The chance for any public figure to be seen with them at a time when not just many Americans were watching, but many people around the world — I think it's natural for someone in public life to want to be associated with their success.'
Matt Viser contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
12 minutes ago
- CBS News
Trump and Hegseth to visit Fort Bragg as they send troops to Los Angeles
Washington — President Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth are visiting Fort Bragg, the nation's largest military installation, on Tuesday, after sending the National Guard and U.S. Marines to respond to protests in Los Angeles. Members of the Marine Corps arrived in the greater Los Angeles area Tuesday, a defense official told CBS News, after the military activated about 700 active-duty Marines Monday. The Pentagon said the Marines would "seamlessly integrate" with National Guard troops to protect "federal personnel and federal property." There are 2,100 members of the California National Guard now on location in the greater Los Angeles area, operating in Los Angeles, Paramount and Compton. The president is expected to speak at Fort Bragg in North Carolina around 4 p.m. Hegseth is heading to the military base after testifying on Capitol Hill. "Will be going to Fort Bragg today. Big speech, amazing crowd! See you later!!!" Mr. Trump wrote on Truth Social Tuesday morning. The president claimed Tuesday morning that Los Angeles would be "would be burning to the ground right now," if not for his actions to federalize the National Guard. A memorandum the president signed Saturday said the troops are authorized to protect Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials and other federal law enforcement officials. He invoked Title 10, the U.S. code governing use of the armed forces, allowing the National Guard to come into LA in a supporting role. On Monday, California Gov. Gavin Newsom sued the president and Hegseth over the decision to deploy the National Guard to the state against Newsom's wishes. Newsom argued that Title 10 "has been invoked on its own only once before and for highly unusual circumstances not presented here." He pointed to the text of the U.S. code, which states that when the president calls a state's National Guard into federal service under Title 10, "those orders 'shall be issued through the governors of the States.'" Hegseth, Newsom maintained, "unlawfully bypassed the Governor of California, issuing an order that by statute must go through him." "At no point in the past three days has there been a rebellion or an insurrection," the lawsuit reads. "Nor have these protests risen to the level of protests or riots that Los Angeles and other major cities have seen at points in the past, including in recent years."
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
CartCon 2025: Tariffs, turbulence and the future of resilient retail
At second-annual CartCon conference in Napa Valley, CA, the tone was electric with anticipation but also laced with urgency. Billed as a summit for the company's expansive ecosystem of brands, vendors and strategists, the event served as both a product showcase and a pressure valve. Nowhere was that tension more visible than during one of the conference's hardest-hitting panels, a deep dive into the complexities of tariff policy and its ripple effects on global sourcing, consumer pricing and retail resilience. The panel consisted of three voices with rare insight into the collision of policy and commerce: Chris Smith, president of Summit Global Strategies; Tim Manning, former White House supply chain coordinator under President Joe Biden; and Nick Stachel, logistics strategy adviser at Izba Consulting. What followed was not a high-level overview, but a granular exploration of the legal, political and operational forces shaping how, and where, products are made, moved and sold. From globalization to geo-economics Smith opened the discussion by tracing the historical arc of U.S. trade policy. For decades following World War II, American trade strategy revolved around multilateralism. The U.S. saw global trade not just as an economic imperative but as a geopolitical tool, creating allies, raising standards of living and preventing conflict. But in 2016, that long-standing consensus fractured. The bipartisan abandonment of the Trans-Pacific Partnership signaled a sharp pivot. As Smith explained, the political center collapsed under the weight of the 'China Shock,' a term describing the decimation of American manufacturing towns due to offshoring. Smith described President Donald Trump's tariff policy as a psychological reset. Before Trump, U.S. tariffs averaged around 2%. Within months, they jumped to 18% in key categories. This wasn't just an economic strategy, it was anchoring. 'It's like burger sizes,' Smith said, relating back to Wendy's psychological marketing strategies. 'Before Trump, we had singles and doubles. Now the triple is on the menu, and everything else looks small by comparison.' Tariffs, he added, have become Trump's 'cat toy' — a provocative distraction wielded without consistent strategy. Even if future administrations soften tariff policy, Smith warned, the structure of global trade has already shifted. Retailers and manufacturers alike are building permanent workarounds. Inflation, particularly in consumer goods, is the slow-burning consequence. While Smith provided the philosophical backdrop, Manning broke down the legal tools underpinning today's tariff landscape. The real disruption, Manning emphasized, has come through the use, and misuse, of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). Originally designed as a tool for national security sanctions, IEEPA has been repurposed by the Trump administration to enact sweeping tariffs with little congressional oversight. Manning described the legal and logistical chaos for businesses from these tactics. In just six weeks, the Trump administration issued 17 executive orders using IEEPA authority, stripping trade policy of its usual predictability and process. For businesses, this has been catastrophic. Sourcing strategies built over years have unraveled in days. 'We're in a volatile environment,' Manning said. The cost of doing business now includes factoring in the potential for abrupt, unexplained swings in tariff exposure. Long-term investments have become high-risk bets, and in many cases, they're simply not being made. On-the-ground retail strategy Bringing the policy talk down to the warehouse floor, Stachel outlined how brands are actually coping with this new reality. In the short term, some are fast-tracking inventory from China before new tariffs hit, relying on expedited ocean freight and cross-docking at West Coast ports to minimize delays and avoid customs bottlenecks. Others are making subtler moves — like holding prices steady on high-visibility products – say, a gaming console – while raising prices on accessories and add-ons to recoup margin. Stachel noted that many brands have moved beyond the now-familiar 'China Plus One' strategy, opting instead for a 'China Plus Three' approach. They are spreading risk across Vietnam, India and Mexico, often working with global manufacturing giants like Foxconn that can seamlessly shift production across borders without retooling or retraining labor. In essence, brands are outsourcing flexibility itself. For those planning beyond the current election cycle, geographic diversification is no longer enough. Brands are factoring in port access, transportation infrastructure, exposure to natural disasters and local workforce stability. Some are eyeing countries like Morocco, Colombia and Thailand as next-generation sourcing hubs. Nearshoring to Mexico has particular appeal, not just because of its proximity to U.S. consumers, but because of the downstream economic benefits. 'We're still benefiting from a cross border perspective, from a transportation trucking perspective, from a warehousing perspective, as these border towns are growing, the economies in the small border towns are growing as well,' said Stachel. These sourcing shifts are backed by hard data prepared by Stachel. According to a comparative analysis of emerging manufacturing markets, countries like Vietnam, Indonesia and the Philippines are increasingly viable alternatives to China, not only in terms of labor costs but also port infrastructure and U.S.-bound vessel frequency. Vietnam, for instance, operates nearly 50 seaports, including Ho Chi Minh City and Hai Phong, both of which have multiple sailings to the U.S. each week. Indonesia boasts over 100 ports, including Tanjung Priok in Jakarta. Even Cambodia, though limited in scale, has weekly direct sailings from both Phnom Penh and Sihanoukville. These figures underscore the importance of transportation fluidity and market access in sourcing decisions. As Stachel emphasized, brands are no longer optimizing solely for cost, they're optimizing for resilience. Both Smith and Manning cautioned that the real reckoning may be ahead. While tariff impacts are already being priced in at the retail level, the broader inflationary wave has yet to crest. Smith called inflation the 'other shoe,' likely to drop later this summer as new tariffs pass through the supply chain and collide with already fragile consumer sentiment. Uncertainty, they agreed, has become the greatest tax of all. With businesses unable to predict future policy, many are frozen. Manning advised attendees to monitor key macroeconomic signals, including treasury bond activity, consumer confidence indices and safety stock drawdowns. Executive orders posted on he added, are the best early indicators of a sudden policy shift. What retailers are saying – and doing The audience at CartCon also offered candid perspectives. Through real-time polling, attendees offered a rare window into how brands are navigating the chaos. Asked what recent policy had most affected their supply chains, 68% cited China tariffs, with an additional 24% naming de minimis enforcement, or stricter checks on duty-free, low-value imports. In a sign of just how volatile the environment has become, 64% said they revisit their sourcing strategies quarterly. And nearly half, 47%, have responded by raising prices. Twenty-nine percent have changed sourcing countries, while 18% are simply eating the cost. Looking ahead, most brands aren't betting on reshoring. Asked if they expect to source more from the U.S. in five years, 70% said their sourcing would remain about the same, and 30% expected an increase. No one expected to source less. It was a striking rebuke of the idea that domestic manufacturing is due for a renaissance, at least for the retail segment. Tariffs and uncertainty are already impacting consumer demand. Thirty percent of respondents said they expect a consumer slowdown by Q4 2025, while 45% said they're already feeling one. And yet, the vast majority, 82%, said they are not cutting marketing budgets in response. In today's environment, visibility is survival. In a forward-looking poll, 81% of respondents said online shopping will be the dominant channel in the next decade, compared to just 6% for stores. Even more striking, 75% believe direct-to-consumer models can still succeed, suggesting that agility, not abandonment, is the key to survival. The post CartCon 2025: Tariffs, turbulence and the future of resilient retail appeared first on FreightWaves. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


American Military News
13 minutes ago
- American Military News
700 Marines deployed to Los Angeles amid major riots
President Donald Trump's administration deployed 700 Marines to Los Angeles and the surrounding area on Monday in response to the city's massive riots against U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations. In a Monday press release, U.S. Northern Command announced that it had activated the Marine infantry battalion that the Trump administration 'placed in an alert status over the weekend.' 'Approximately 700 Marines with 2nd Battalion, 7th Marines, 1st Marine Division will seamlessly integrate with the Title 10 forces under Task Force 51 who are protecting federal personnel and federal property in the greater Los Angeles area,' U.S. Northern Command stated. 'The activation of the Marines is intended to provide Task Force 51 with adequate numbers of forces to provide continuous coverage of the area in support of the lead federal agency.' According to the press release, Task Force 51 includes 700 active-duty Marines and roughly 2,100 National Guardsmen in Title 10 status. Northern Command noted that members of Task Force 51 have been trained in 'de-escalation, crowd control, and standing rules for the use of force.' 'Due to increased threats to federal law enforcement officers and federal buildings, approximately 700 active-duty U.S. Marines from Camp Pendleton are being deployed to Los Angeles to restore order,' Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth wrote in a statement on X, formerly Twitter. 'We have an obligation to defend federal law enforcement officers – even if Gavin Newsom will not.' READ MORE: Videos: 500 Marines ready to deploy to Los Angeles amid major riots Northern Command confirmed in the press release that there were roughly 1,700 soldiers from the 79th Infantry Brigade Combat Team in Los Angeles and the surrounding area as of Monday. On Monday evening, Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs Sean Parnell tweeted, 'At the order of the President, the Department of Defense is mobilizing an additional 2,000 California National Guard to be called into federal service to support ICE & to enable federal law-enforcement officers to safely conduct their duties.' According to The Associated Press, Trump's authorization for the Department of Defense to deploy an additional 2,000 National Guardsmen in response to the anti-ICE riots in Los Angeles brings the total number of National Guardsmen mobilized by the federal government in response to the riots to over 4,100. In a Tuesday morning statement on Truth Social, Trump said, 'If I didn't 'SEND IN THE TROOPS' to Los Angeles the last three nights, that once beautiful and great City would be burning to the ground right now, much like 25,000 houses burned to the ground in L.A. do to an incompetent Governor and Mayor.'