University at Buffalo teacher residency program in jeopardy after federal funding cuts
BUFFALO, N.Y. (WIVB) — A University at Buffalo program that trains future teachers is in jeopardy if it loses key federal funding. The potential cuts have sparked concern over the impact it can have on local classrooms.
UB's Urban Teacher Residency Program is a yearlong, hands-on experience that prepares aspiring teachers to work in Buffalo Public Schools. Amanda Winkelsas, the programs director, said their model has shown impressive outcomes.
'This is really devastating news both to the program and our people,' Winkelsas said. 'Students in the classrooms of our graduates have better average course grades, they have better attendance, they have fewer disciplinary referrals.'
A few weeks ago, Winkelsas was informed by the Department of Education that the program will no longer be receiving over $7 million in funding it relies on. President Donald Trump's administration revoked two major grants: a Teacher Quality Partnership grant and a Supporting Effective Educator Development grant.
One of the grants allows the university to give a stipend to residents so they do not have to maintain a full-time job while studying and co-teaching. It also allows them not to worry about paying rent, funding transportation, childcare and more.
'There was a real concern that these stipends would immediately cut off,' Winkelsas said. 'Therefore, they wouldn't be able to continue in residency in a full-time capacity.'
With funding now in limbo, current graduate students might not be able to finish their master's degrees and receive certification to become a teacher.
There are also seven employees who could lose their positions as the university would no longer be able to pay their salaries. This puts the enrollment of future members of the program at a standstill.
'We had people interview already and we're ready to make offers that we've held back because we don't know about future funding,' Winkelsas said.
New York Attorney General Letitia James and seven other attorneys general have filed a lawsuit against the Department of Education for unlawfully cancelling these grants that were authorized by Congress. A judge has set a temporary restraining order on the cuts to take effect.
'We have 14 days to continue our work,' Winkelsas said. 'But what happens after those 14 days is once again up in the air.'
Winkelsas is encouraging everyone to call their local representatives as Congress has a say where grants and funds are distributed.
Donations to support the residency program can be made here.
Trina Catterson joined the News 4 team in 2024. She previously worked at WETM-TV in Elmira, a sister station of WIVB. See more of her work here.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
E&E News
22 minutes ago
- E&E News
Committee explores nuclear solutions to AI demand
House Science, Space and Technology Committee lawmakers will meet this week to discuss how nuclear energy could help meet a projected surge in demand from artificial intelligence operations. The Energy Subcommittee hearing — to be led by Chair Randy Weber (R-Texas) — continues Republicans' early focus and significant concern regarding supply and demand in the 119th Congress. They believe baseload energy sources, such as nuclear and fossil fuels, need to be built at a rapid pace to offset a surge in intermittent, renewable energy generation that could put grid reliability at risk. Indeed, transmission providers are forecasting an 8.2 percent growth in electricity load over the next five years primarily due to AI data center proliferation. That's equivalent to hooking up nearly 50 million homes to the grid by 2029. Advertisement But whether nuclear energy can actually meet that demand remains a point of debate among energy and policy experts.
E&E News
22 minutes ago
- E&E News
House schedules vote on climate cuts, more spending bills
House Republicans will take major steps this week toward cutting discretionary funding, including a vote to claw back more than half a billion dollars for international disaster assistance and climate programs. Members will debate the rescissions package that the White House sent to Congress last week during a Rules Committee hearing Tuesday. The full House could vote on it as soon as Wednesday. The request for $9.4 billion in total clawbacks targets $496 million in already appropriated funding to help other countries recover from natural disasters and $125 million for clean energy projects around the world. Advertisement It will be a significant test of Congress' willingness to codify some of the cuts proposed by the Department of Government Efficiency and comes amid a flurry of other efforts by the GOP to slash environmental programs that Democrats support. House appropriators are expected to unveil two new fiscal 2026 spending bills this week.
New York Post
25 minutes ago
- New York Post
Elite universities offer to spend more endowment cash to stave off tax hit after Trump attacks ‘woke' policies: report
Some of the richest universities in the US are proposing a deal with the federal government that would allow them to spend more of their own money in exchange for a reprieve on a proposed tax on their endowments, according to a report. Nearly two dozen elite schools — including Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Stanford, Duke and the University of Chicago — are backing a plan that would commit them to distributing at least 5% of their endowment value each year. In return, they're asking Congress to scale back a proposed 21% tax on their investment income, a massive jump from the current 1.4% rate, the Wall Street Journal reported. Advertisement 4 Students walk on the Stanford University campus in this 2019 file photo. AP The White House has framed the tax hike as a way to hold 'woke, elitist universities' accountable. President Trump has launched an aggressive campaign against elite universities, accusing them of hoarding tax-advantaged wealth, embracing 'woke' politics and defying federal law. His administration has moved to revoke their tax-exempt status, block access to federal research grants, and restrict international student enrollment — turning once-reliable sources of funding into pressure points. Advertisement The schools, which are part of a group called the Learn Alliance, circulated a proposal on Capitol Hill that outlines a compromise. They'll increase annual spending on things like financial aid and research, and in exchange, they're asking lawmakers to scrap the House-passed tiered tax system in favor of a much lower flat rate — either 2.4% or 3.4% on investment income. 'What I hear from Republican members of Congress is a desire to ensure that colleges are using their charitable endowments to support today's students and researchers rather than saving too much for the future,' Princeton University President Christopher L. Eisgruber told the Journal. Advertisement 4 Nearly two dozen elite schools — including Harvard — are backing a plan that would commit them to distributing at least 5% of their endowment value each year. AP 'Those are valid concerns, and this proposal directly addresses them.' Eisgruber argued the plan would free up billions of dollars for student-focused spending and local economic development, while a steep tax hike would have the opposite effect — discouraging schools from using their endowments. The Learn Alliance says its plan would generate at least $30 billion in additional spending over a decade. Advertisement That far exceeds the $6.7 billion in federal revenue the current House-endorsed tax is expected to raise during the same time period, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation. If adopted, the proposed 5% distribution rule would mark a major shift. Private foundations already follow a 5% payout rule, but colleges and universities have long resisted such mandates, arguing they need flexibility to manage for the long term. The new House bill would also increase the tax on private foundation investment income to 10%, up from the current 1.39%. 'This would be a significant shift in national policy,' Liz Clark, vice president of policy and research at the National Association of College and University Business Officers, told the Journal. 4 The schools, which are part of a group called the Learn Alliance, circulated a proposal on Capitol Hill that outlines a compromise. Yale is one of the members of the alliance. Shutterstock She added that schools are under unusual pressure in the current political climate to show they're putting their money to work. Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), a senior member of the Senate Finance Committee and frequent critic of large endowments, said Thursday that lawmakers were only beginning to dig into the endowment tax issue. Advertisement 'I've heard from small colleges in Iowa who say these tax increases would hit them hard,' he said. According to a recent analysis by higher education research group Ithaka S+R, most schools that would fall under the proposed 21% tax rate currently distribute less than 5% of their endowments annually. 4 The image above shows Blair Hall on the campus of Princeton University in Princeton, NJ. LightRocket via Getty Images Over a five-year period ending in June 2023, the report found that several top universities failed to meet the 5% mark in most years. Advertisement 'Even small percentage increases in spending would translate to a significant jump in dollar terms because the endowments are so large,' said Catharine Bond Hill, an economist at Ithaka. Not all schools are taking the same approach. A group of smaller colleges is lobbying Congress to cap the investment tax at 1.4% for institutions with fewer than 5,000 full-time students. These schools, which lack the diversified funding sources of larger institutions, say the higher rates would hit them disproportionately hard. Meanwhile, another coalition — including Vanderbilt University and Washington University in St. Louis — is pushing for a system that rewards schools with tax breaks if they meet certain benchmarks, like enrolling a higher percentage of low-income students.
