WWAMI TRUST Scholars become exceptional rural physicians
During my time as a TRUST scholar in Hailey, I had the opportunity to form truly meaningful relationships with my patients. I helped provide prenatal care for an expecting mother, assisted with her delivery, and saw her baby at a four-month well-child visit. At the other end of the spectrum of life, I had conversations with terminally ill patients about transitioning to hospice care, went on home visits, and remained involved until their passing, writes guest columnist Alexis Ericsson. (Getty Images)
As a third-year WWAMI student from Soda Springs, I am writing on behalf of 18 current and former rural medicine trainees in Idaho, primarily from the TRUST program. We are concerned that House Bill 368 will detrimentally impact the state's rural physician pipeline. WWAMI, Idaho's medical education program through the University of Washington School of Medicine, has been educating aspiring physicians from Idaho for 53 years.
Since 2013, WWAMI's Targeted Rural and Underserved Track (TRUST) program has reserved a portion of each class for students from small towns like Cottonwood, Payette, Rockland and Victor. This program is unlike any other in the country and has established a successful pipeline for training exceptional rural physicians.
TRUST scholars spend about nine months throughout medical school embedded in rural continuity sites including half of their third year, engaged in clinical learning experiences. This program allows them to 'try on' life as a small-town doctor and is currently running in Sandpoint, Orofino, Moscow, McCall, Nampa, Hailey and Jerome.
During my time as a TRUST scholar in Hailey, I had the opportunity to form truly meaningful relationships with my patients. I helped provide prenatal care for an expecting mother, assisted with her delivery, and saw her baby at a four-month well-child visit. At the other end of the spectrum of life, I had conversations with terminally ill patients about transitioning to hospice care, went on home visits, and remained involved until their passing.
It was a privilege to be part of these moments, and I realized that I want nothing more than to care for people in my community from birth to death for the rest of my career. My experiences as a TRUST scholar are not unique to me, and I have seen how these formative patient encounters have shaped the career trajectories of my peers.
Many TRUST scholars like me grew up traveling significant distances to receive necessary care. All of us professionally have seen poor health outcomes stemming from inadequate health care access. In addition to our lived experiences, many current students, alongside our non-TRUST peers, conducted research at 22 rural Idaho clinical sites, which found that service access was the most frequently perceived barrier to providing care.
Simply put, Idaho needs more doctors. We support the formation of a committee of experts through the Idaho State Board of Education who can provide the Legislature with guidance on improving medical education in Idaho. We know a plan with rural Idahoans' best interests at heart will always include initiatives like TRUST through the WWAMI program.
House Bill 386 will take 10 seats away from WWAMI, with the potential to cut more annually until the program is obsolete. If Idaho reduces seats or cuts ties altogether with the WWAMI program, causing future students to miss out on experiences like TRUST, it will be a huge loss for all rural communities in the state.
It has been alleged that WWAMI does not embody Idaho values, but that could not be further from the truth. TRUST has become a pipeline where hardworking students from rural and underserved backgrounds can receive outstanding training, preparing them to serve the communities they know and love.
Caring for one's neighbor is intrinsically Idahoan and something the state should be proud to support. As current and former TRUST scholars and rural medicine trainees, we are the future of rural health care in Idaho and ask our legislators to work together with eth State Board of Education to develop a physician workforce that will serve Idahoans in the areas where we are needed the most.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
History Shows the Danger of Trump's Health Policies
U.S. President Donald Trump and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. attend an event in the East Room of the White House on May 22, 2025 in Washington, DC. Credit - Chip Somodevilla—Getty Images On May 11, 2023, President Joseph Biden ended the COVID-19 public health emergency, calling an finish to the pandemic. By the end of 2023, COVID-19 claimed the lives of over 20 million people around the world. But through international cooperation and evidence-based science, vaccines were developed and the world moved on. Indeed, perhaps the biggest success of the period was the quick production of a COVID-19 vaccine. The research behind the mRNA vaccine had been ongoing since the 1970s, but the emergency of the pandemic and international sharing of knowledge helped bring the vaccine to fruition. Today, the COVID-19 vaccine has been credited with saving 2.4 million lives around the world. But now, the U.S. is choosing competition over cooperation. With President Donald Trump's day one executive order to leave the World Health Organization (WHO)—blaming their COVID-19 response—and the shuttering of USAID, the country is taking steps towards further dividing health efforts across the globe. Here in the U.S., a sudden end to $11.4 billion of covid-related grants is stifling national pandemic preparedness efforts on the local and state levels. And most recently, Health and Human Services Secretary RFK Jr. purged experts from the CDC Advisory Committee, putting lives at risk. Historical lessons demonstrate the need for global health infrastructure that works together, shares knowledge, and remembers that pathogens do not stop at borders. White House's Pandemic Office, Busy With Bird Flu, May Shrink Under Trump One of the greatest global health achievements of all time—smallpox eradication—provides a perfect example of what can be done with independent scientific research and international cooperation. During the Cold War between the U.S. and USSR, decades of tension brought the world to the brink of nuclear war. Yet, incredibly, the nations managed to find common ground to support the efforts of smallpox eradication. Indeed, they understood the strategic benefits that came from letting public health practitioners and scientists work outside of political divides. The WHO was founded after World War II in 1948. Its formation marked a move from international health, that focused on nations, to global health, that would serve humanity first. The WHO's first eradication effort was the failed, U.S.-backed, Malaria Eradication Program from 1955 to 1969. The Smallpox Eradication Program, with intensive efforts beginning in 1967, provided a chance for redemption for the U.S. and WHO. For the United States, investing in disease eradication and poverty helped to mitigate growing backlash against the Vietnam War. In June of 1964, President Lyndon B. Johnson stated, 'I propose to dedicate this year to finding new techniques for making man's knowledge serve man's welfare.' He called for 1965—the same year he ordered ground troops to Vietnam to stop the spread of communism —to be a year of international cooperation that could bypass the politics of the Cold War. Previously, the USSR did not participate in the U.S. and WHO's first, failed global eradication plan for malaria. But upon rejoining the WHO in 1956, it was the Soviets who made the first call and investment into global eradication of smallpox in 1958. The WHO functioning as a mediator was crucial to allowing the USSR and the U.S. to work together. It allowed both nations to avoid giving credit to each other; rather success went to science itself. President Johnson called this 'a turning point' away from 'man against man' towards 'man against nature.' The limited role of politicians in the program proved to be key to its success. Scientists made decisions and worked together—no matter what country they came from—by focusing on disease and vaccination, not international tensions. The Soviet-initiated program was lead by Donald A. Henderson, a U.S. epidemiologist, who worked alongside the Russians until the last case of smallpox occurred in Somalia on October 26, 1977. During the 20th century, smallpox was responsible for an estimated 300 to 500 million deaths. Smallpox was officially declared eradicated by the WHO in October 1980, and is today still the only human disease to achieve this distinction. Less than a year after the declaration of smallpox eradication, the emergence of another pandemic, the HIV/AIDS crisis, reinforced the importance of science-first cooperation over politically-driven decision making. In June 1981, the first cases of a new unknown disease were reported in the CDC's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. In short order, gay men were stigmatized and blamed in what would become one of the biggest public health disasters of all time. It took years of grassroots science-based activism to move beyond HIV/AIDS victim-blaming and find medical solutions. The Poster Child for AIDS Obscured as Much About the Crisis as He Revealed Too often, governments across the globe placed blame on the gay community for their 'sins' and did not provide needed support, leaving the sick to suffer and die. The pharmaceutical companies profited from the limited medications they had available and did not pursue sufficient development. The FDA process for new drugs was scheduled to take nine years, at a time when life expectancy after receiving an HIV/AIDS diagnosis was one year. These issues sparked activism, spawning the AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power (ACT UP) in 1987. ACT UP organizers took science into their own hands and began educating themselves. Members began reading scientific journals religiously, learning the chemistry and epidemiology of drug manufacturing and clinical trials. Members learned how to translate these dense scientific messages to educate the community members on what was—and what was not—being done to help. Because of this work, the FDA changed policies to allow for new treatments to be tested at accelerated rates in times of emergency. ACT UP was able to shift the cultural blame showing that the issue was a result of politics getting in the way of scientific advancements. By 1990, ACT UP influenced the largest federal HIV program to pass Congress, the Ryan White CARE Act. This program was a vital precursor to the 2003 PEPFAR (The U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief) global initiative. Both of these histories offer a powerful lesson: global health is national health, and national health is local health. With the recent funding cuts from the U.S. government, the future of global health is going in an unknown direction. And yet, the occurrence of pandemics is expected to increase in frequency due to climate change, mass migration, urbanization, and ecosystem destruction. It has been estimated that there is about a 25% chance we will have another COVID-sized pandemic within the next 10 years. No matter how secure the world makes borders, history shows that it can not protect us from disease if we do not have a strong, interconnected public health infrastructure. Luke Jorgensen is a Master of Public Health student at Purdue University where his epidemiology research examines human migration and infectious disease. Made by History takes readers beyond the headlines with articles written and edited by professional historians. Learn more about Made by History at TIME here. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of TIME editors. Write to Made by History at madebyhistory@
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Doctors warn against ‘dangerous' viral Chinese sleep hack: ‘A physics experiment on your spinal cord'
It's not that kind of swingers party. How far would you go to get a good night's rest? Would you take supplements, journal or do a fire-burning ritual? How about swinging from your neck in a public park? That's precisely what some senior citizens in the northern Chinese city of Shenyang are doing — and it's going viral. 6 People in China are swinging from their necks in public parks to get better sleep. Future Publishing via Getty Images Footage shared on social media shows older adults looping U‑shaped belts attached to playground bars or trees around their chins and gently swaying back and forth like lemurs, seemingly without a care in the world. While it's certainly not a sight you wanna stumble across in the middle of the night, locals swear by this bizarre practice as a cure for sleep-related issues and spinal discomfort. The brains behind this operation is Sun Rongchun, 57, who developed the device to treat his cervical spondylosis — a common, age-related condition that can cause headaches, dizziness and insomnia, the Economic Times reported. Rongchun has trademarked the device and applied to have it patented — until then, he comes to the park every day to educate the public. 6 Footage shared on social media shows older adults looping U‑shaped belts attached to playground bars or trees around their chins and gently swaying back and forth like lemurs. REUTERS It seems his spinal exercises are really taking off. 'In the past, my cervical spine was in bad shape, so I was uncomfortable lying down every night, but after a few days, it worked pretty well,' one fan told local media. 'Now, my throat condition is better and the uncomfortable symptoms are completely gone. I've been doing this exercise for two years already.' 6 Sun Rongchun, 57, developed the device to treat his cervical spondylosis. Future Publishing via Getty Images It's unclear exactly how this device works on the spine — and experts say this is one trick you definitely should not be trying at home. 'People are desperate for better sleep, but no trend is worth risking paralysis or stroke,' said certified sleep science coach Rosie Osmun of 'Hanging any part of your body, let alone your neck, is biomechanically dangerous. There are safe, research-backed alternatives that actually work.' 6 'In the past, my cervical spine was in bad shape, so I was uncomfortable lying down every night, but after a few days, it worked pretty well,' one participant said. Future Publishing via Getty Images Done wrong, this trend can result in nerve damage, spinal injury or even death from restricted blood flow to the brain. There's already been at least one reported incident in which a man died after mistakenly looping the belt around his neck instead of his chin. 6 'Hanging any part of your body, let alone your neck, is biomechanically dangerous,' one expert said. REUTERS Human error aside, in a public park, you've also got the elements to contend with. 'Medical traction uses precise grams of force; park-belt swinging is essentially an uncontrolled physics experiment on your spinal cord,' said physical therapist Dr. Jennifer Miller, who is affiliated with Amerisleep. According to Osmun, the only reason these sleeping hacks gain traction is because 'they're dramatic, visually striking and falsely promise quick fixes for chronic problems.' 6 There's already been at least one reported incident in which a man died after mistakenly looping the belt around his neck instead of his chin. REUTERS If you're looking for a soothing, rocking sensation to make you feel like a baby before bed — get a hammock. Otherwise, you might be in for the forever sleep. 'Sleep is essential for life, but so is safety,' Osmun said. 'The solution isn't in belts, but in balance: real strategies grounded in science, not spectacle.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
New Oklahoma law makes contraception more convenient
A new law taking effect Nov. 1 gives women more access to birth control. (Getty Images) (This image cannot be republished unless you have a Getty subscription.) OKLAHOMA CITY- A new law that gives women access to a six month prescription of birth control will make it easier to access pregnancy prevention medication, one health advocate said. Maintaining access to contraceptives can be difficult for women who live in rural areas, have multiple jobs, children to care for and limited transportation. Senate Bill 176 will require fewer trips to the pharmacy, said Laura Bellis executive director of the Take Control Initiative. The new law, which takes effect Nov. 1, requires insurance companies that provide coverage for contraception to allow women to obtain six months of birth control at the same time after being prescribed a three month supply. The Take Control Initiative, which is based in Tulsa County, has operated the nation's longest running birth control access program for 15 years. The program is focused on removing barriers while growing access to birth control. Increasing access can also improve the effectiveness of contraception. Bellis said some methods of contraception require individuals to take it at the same time every day. Maintaining access to care aids in consistency. Having access to contraception by age 20, reduces women's chances of living in poverty, according to the group's 2024 annual report. Sen. Jo Anna Dossett, D-Tulsa, one of the authors of the legislation declined to comment. Rep. Cynthia Roe, R-Lindsay, did not return messages seeking comment. Although contraception can be used to prevent pregnancy, 14% of women use it for non-contraceptive reasons. It can be used to treat acne, irregular periods, cramps, migraines and endometriosis. 'Hopefully this change in law will remove a barrier to these organizations that are truly trying to protect public health in Oklahoma,' said Mary Boren, D-Norman. She was one of 30 senators who voted in favor of it. Gov. Kevin Stitt allowed the bill to become law without his signature. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
