The latest developments in the India-Pakistan conflict
Security personnel stand outside the gate of Pakistan High Commission in New Delhi, India, May 8, 2025. REUTERS/Anushree Fadnavis
NEW DELHI - India struck multiple locations in Pakistan this week after a deadly April 22 attack targeting Hindu tourists in Indian Kashmir that New Delhi blames on its Muslim neighbour.
Pakistan, which denies any link to the Kashmir violence, said on Thursday it shot down 25 drones from India overnight. India said it "neutralised" Pakistani attempts to strike military targets with drones and missiles.
Here is a look at the current situation as conflict spreads between the nuclear-armed neighbours.
WHERE DID INDIA'S FIRST STRIKES HIT?
India says it hit nine "terrorist camps" in Pakistan on Wednesday that were used as indoctrination centres, training areas and launch-pads for attacks. Some of them, it says, were linked to the perpetrators of last month's assault.
Pakistan said the Indian attacks hit six locations in its territory, none of them militant camps.
HOW HAS PAKISTAN REACTED?
Pakistan says it shot down five Indian aircraft during those first strikes. The Indian embassy in Beijing said reports of fighter jets being shot down were "misinformation".
Pakistan vowed to retaliate at a "time, place and manner of its choosing". The military said on Thursday India will continue to "pay dearly for this naked aggression".
India says any military attack against it will be met with a "firm response".
WHAT IS THE CURRENT SITUATION?
Cross-border firing and shelling increased after India's first strikes, then tapered off. Pakistan says India is sending drones into its airspace, 25 of which were shot down overnight, including some over its largest cities of Karachi and Lahore.
India said it had targeted some air defence systems in Pakistan, and that it had "neutralised" attempts by Pakistan to "engage" military targets in its north and west.
WHAT HAVE OTHER COUNTRIES SAID?
Global leaders have called for restraint. U.S. President Donald Trump said he hoped the countries would "work it out" and that he "will be there" if he can help.
The United Nations called for "maximum military restraint", saying the world could not afford a military confrontation between India and Pakistan.
WHAT DO WE KNOW ABOUT CASUALTIES?
Pakistan says 31 of its civilians were killed in the Indian strikes and the cross-border violence that followed. India says 16 civilians have died on its side of the border.
Both countries have organised blackout drills in border areas, and panic-buying has been reported in parts of India's northern border state of Punjab.
People living along the de-facto border in India's Jammu and Kashmir have also been asked to move to safer places. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
30 minutes ago
- Straits Times
China says it is working with France on trade differences, no sign yet of a cognac deal
FILE PHOTO: Bottles of Remy Martin VSOP cognac, Remy Martin XO cognac and St-Remy XO Brandy are displayed at the Remy Cointreau SA headquarters in Paris, France, January 21, 2019. REUTERS/Benoit Tessier/File Photo China says it is working with France on trade differences, no sign yet of a cognac deal BEIJING/PARIS - China and France have agreed to resolve their trade disputes through dialogue, China's foreign ministry said on Friday, though there was no indication that agreement had been reached in talks on lifting Chinese levies on European brandy. Talks to resolve the cognac dispute accelerated this week with China's commerce minister Wang Wentao meeting his French counterpart in Paris on the sidelines of an OECD conference, and technical talks on the matter taking place in Beijing. The latest round of negotiations have raised hopes of a settlement, two industry sources with knowledge of the discussions said. "The two sides have reached consensus on resolving economic and trade issues through dialogue and consultation", the Chinese foreign ministry said after a call between the Chinese and French foreign ministers. Chinese anti-dumping measures that applied duties of up to 39% on imports of European brandy - with French cognac bearing the brunt - have strained relations between Paris and Beijing. The brandy duties were enforced days after the European Union took action against Chinese-made electric vehicle imports to shield its local industry, prompting France's President Emmanuel Macron to accuse Beijing of "pure retaliation". The Chinese duties have dented sales of brands including LVMH's Hennessy, Pernod Ricard's Martell and Remy Cointreau. Beijing was initially meant to make a final decision on the duties by January, but extended the deadline to April and then again to July 5. China is seeking to strengthen trade ties with the 27-member bloc as relations with the United States have soured in the escalating trade war. "France will not compromise on ... the protection of its industries, such as cognac," French trade minister Laurent Saint-Martin said after talks with Wang on Wednesday. Chinese officials, meanwhile, signalled to industry officials during three rounds of technical meetings in Beijing this week they wanted to settle the matter, one of the sources said, but added some sticking points remained. With annual imports of around $1.7 billion last year, China is the French brandy industry's most important measured by value and the second-largest by volume after the United States. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
French rabbi tells of two attacks in one week as hate crimes rise
French rabbi Elie Lemmel talks with people after being attacked at a cafe terrace in the Paris suburb of Neuilly-sur-Seine, France, June 6, 2025. REUTERS/Antony Paone French rabbi Elie Lemmel talks with people after being attacked at a cafe terrace in the Paris suburb of Neuilly-sur-Seine, France, June 6, 2025. REUTERS/Antony Paone French rabbi tells of two attacks in one week as hate crimes rise PARIS - A French rabbi was attacked on Friday for the second time in a week, he told Reuters, reflecting a broad rise in hate crimes across France that has included high-profile anti-Semitic assaults. Elie Lemmel said he was sitting at a cafe in the Paris suburb of Neuilly-sur-Seine on Friday when he was hit in the head by a chair. "I found myself on the ground, I immediately felt blood flowing," he said. He was stunned and unsure what exactly had happened, he said, initially thinking something must have fallen from a window or roof, before it occurred to him he had been attacked. "Unfortunately, given my beard and my kippah, I suspected that was probably why, and it's such a shame," he said. Friday's incident follows another in the town of Deauville in Normandy last week, when Lemmel said he was punched in the stomach by an unknown assailant. Lemmel said he was used to "not-so-friendly looks, some unpleasant words, people passing by, spitting on the ground," but had never been physically assaulted before the two attacks. The prosecutor's office in Nanterre said it had opened an investigation into the Neuilly attack for aggravated violence and that a person was being held for questioning. It said it could not provide further details. "This act sickens us," former Prime Minister Gabriel Attal wrote on X regarding Friday's incident involving Lemmel. "Antisemitism, like all forms of hatred, is a deadly poison for our society." Last week, five Jewish institutions were sprayed with green paint in Paris. "I condemn in the strongest possible terms the anti-Semitic attack that targeted a rabbi in Neuilly today. Attacking a person because of their faith is a shame. The increase in anti-religious acts requires the mobilization of everyone," Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau said in a post on X. France has seen a rise in hate crimes. Last year, police recorded an 11% rise in racist, xenophobic or antireligious crimes, according to official data published in March. The figures did not include a breakdown by attacks on different religions. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Trump asks US Supreme Court to let him dismantle Education Department
US President Donald Trump's move to dismantle the education department is part of a campaign to downsize the federal government. PHOTO: KENNY HOLSTON/NYTIMES WASHINGTON - Mr Donald Trump's administration asked the US Supreme Court on June 6 to permit it to proceed with dismantling the Department of Education, a move that would leave school policy in the United States almost entirely in the hands of states and local boards. The Justice Department asked the court to halt Boston-based US District Judge Myong Joun's May 22 ruling that ordered the administration reinstate employees terminated in a mass layoff and end further actions to shutter the department. The Justice Department said the lower court lacked jurisdiction to 'second-guess the Executive's internal management decisions,' referring to the federal government's executive branch. 'The government has been crystal clear in acknowledging that only Congress can eliminate the Department of Education. And the government has acknowledged the need to retain sufficient staff to continue fulfilling statutorily mandated functions and has kept the personnel that, in its judgment, are necessary for those tasks. The challenged (reduction in force) is fully consistent with that approach,' the filing said. The department, created by a US law passed by Congress in 1979, oversees about 100,000 public and 34,000 private schools in the United States, though more than 85 per cent of public school funding comes from state and local governments. It provides federal grants for needy schools and programmes, including money to pay teachers of children with special needs, fund arts programmes and replace outdated infrastructure. It also oversees the US$1.6 trillion (S$2 trillion) in student loans held by tens of millions of Americans who cannot afford to pay for college outright. Mr Trump's move to dismantle the department is part of the Republican president's campaign to downsize and reshape the federal government. Closing the department long has been a goal of many US conservatives. Attorneys-general from 20 states and the District of Columbia, as well as school districts and unions representing teachers, sued to block the Trump administration's efforts to gut the department. The states argued that the massive job cuts will render the agency unable to perform core functions authorised by statute, including in the civil rights arena, effectively usurping Congress's authority in violation of the US Constitution. Mr Trump on March 20 signed an executive order intended to effectively shut down the department, making good on a longstanding campaign promise to conservatives to move education policy almost completely to states and local boards. At a White House ceremony surrounded by children and educators, Mr Trump called the order a first step 'to eliminate' the department. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon announced plans on March 11 to carry out a mass termination of employees. Those layoffs would leave the department with 2,183 workers, down from 4,133 when Mr Trump took office in January. The department said in a press release those terminations were part of its 'final mission.' Mr Trump on March 21 announced plans to transfer the department's student loan portfolio to the Small Business Administration and its special education, nutrition and related services to the US Department of Health and Human Services, which also is facing deep job cuts. Mr Joun in his ruling ordered the administration to reinstate the laid off workers and halt implementation of Mr Trump's directive to transfer student loans and special needs programs to other federal agencies. The judge rejected the argument put forth by Justice Department lawyers that the mass terminations were aimed at making the department more efficient while fulfilling its mission. In fact, Mr Joun ruled, the job cuts were an effort to shut down the department without the necessary approval of Congress. 'This court cannot be asked to cover its eyes while the department's employees are continuously fired and units are transferred out until the department becomes a shell of itself,' the judge wrote. White House spokesperson Harrison Fields called the judge's ruling 'misguided.' The Boston-based 1st US Circuit Court of Appeals on June 4 rejected the Trump administration's request to pause the injunction issued by Mr Joun. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
