logo
The Dark Side of 8 U.S. states

The Dark Side of 8 U.S. states

Yahoo06-03-2025

While the United States is often celebrated for its opportunities and freedoms, every state has its share of challenges and darker aspects.
From systemic racism to political corruption, these states have skeletons in their closets that defy their postcard-perfect reputations. Let's do a deep dive and pull back that curtain:
California's reputation as the Golden State is overshadowed by a severe and escalating homelessness crisis. Over 187,084 people currently live on its streets, with the unhoused population growing by 5,600 in just the past year.
While the state achieved reductions in veteran and chronic homelessness in 2024, the overall 3% year-over-year increase highlights persistent systemic challenges. Skyrocketing rents in prior years forced many residents into vehicles or RVs, and 66% of California's homeless population remains unsheltered—the highest unsheltered rate nationwide.
Even with recent rent declines in cities like San Diego County (-7%) and Oakland (-9.1%), financial precarity persists. Many Californians are one missed paycheck away from losing housing, reflecting the acute pressure of the state's affordability crisis.
The Sunshine State has a dark secret—after homicides rose 14.7% in 2020, Florida saw law enforcement agencies largely stop reporting crime statistics to the FBI during the 2021 transition to a new system. Only 0.3% of agencies submitted data that year.
By 2022, just 8% of police agencies provided statistics, rendering recent crime claims unverifiable. Florida's data issues persisted into 2023, with major agencies like Miami PD still failing to report.
Why this is happening: Florida lacks a state law mandating crime data reporting to the FDLE or FBI. Participation is voluntary, leading to widespread non-compliance—a problem compounded by underfunded police IT systems.
The Land of Lincoln is experiencing a mass exodus. High taxes, political corruption, and rising crime rates are driving residents away in droves. Cities like Chicago, with its notorious violent crime problem, contribute to the state's declining appeal for both families and businesses.
This Midwestern state has seen more corrupt governors than most people have had hot meals. Since 1960, a whopping four Illinois governors have been sent to prison on corruption charges. Rod Blagojevich (impeached for soliciting bribes for Obama's Senate seat) is the most infamous.
The Keystone State is home to some of America's most notoriously haunted locations. Places like Eastern State Penitentiary in Philadelphia and Pennhurst Asylum are renowned for their dark histories and reported paranormal activity. These sites serve as eerie reminders of past institutional abuses and societal neglect.
Even the state's political foundations aren't spared this spectral presence. While Philadelphia's Independence Hall birthed American democracy, modern efforts to ban 'dark money' from politics have sparked debates about whether transparency laws protect voters or haunt free speech. A far cry from Franklin's Enlightenment ideals, these clashes add a quieter, more insidious layer to Pennsylvania's shadows.
Ohio's reputation as a quintessential Midwestern is challenged by the legend of Helltown, an abandoned area within Cuyahoga Valley National Park. The area's mythology blends Cold War-era suspicions about government actions – originally stemming from documented 1970s property seizures for park development – with supernatural folklore.
While the location's physical decay (abandoned structures, vegetation-choked roads, and boarded homes from mass evacuations) creates visceral eeriness, most tales unravel when examined. The church allegedly displaying Satanic symbols actually featured conventional Gothic Revival architecture, its inverted crosses being standard medieval-inspired motifs rather than occult signs.
Similarly, a frequently cited 'haunted' school bus was merely derelict municipal property left behind. Claims of clandestine government activities directly contradict archival records showing the park's establishment through standard eminent domain procedures.
These narratives gained momentum through late 20th-century teen folklore and internet-era amplification, transforming prosaic urban abandonment into a modern mythos. The site's atmospheric decay continues to invite speculative interpretations, fueling our collective fascination with the unexplained.
The NYPD might be 'New York's Finest,' but they've got a long history of being anything but. From the 'Buddy Boys' corruption case in 1986 (where Brooklyn cops stole drugs, resold them, and extorted dealers) to the Central Park jogger case (coerced false confessions from Black/Latino teens in a 1989 rape case), the department has faced numerous instances of misconduct and corruption.
There was also the 30th Precinct Corruption case of 1994, where 33 officers in Harlem stole drugs and cash from dealers, selling them from the precinct itself.
Beyond the Central Park Five, cases like the 1985 torture of Mark Davidson with a stun gun and the 1984 fatal shooting of Eleanor Bumpurs (a mentally ill Black woman) highlight systemic brutality and procedural failures. It's enough to make you wonder if 'Law & Order' is more fiction than we thought.
Everything's bigger in Texas, including its history of racial violence. The Texas Rangers, long celebrated as heroes, have a disturbing past of brutality against people of color.
Rangers systematically displaced Comanche and Cherokee tribes in the 19th century, seizing acres of ancestral land. In 1918, they were involved in the Porvenir massacre, where 15 unarmed Tejano men and boys were executed.
Scholars estimate that the Rangers killed 300–5,000 Mexican Americans between 1910 and 1920. In 2020, Austin's police union headquarters removed its 'Ranger Hall' plaque after protests exposed its genocidal origins.
During the 1940s, Michigan was plagued by systemic corruption, bribery, and even assassination. A grand corruption investigation implicated members of both major political parties, spanning at least three cities: Lansing, Jackson, and Albion.
The most shocking incident was the mysterious 1945 assassination of State Senator Warren G. Hooper, which was linked to the infamous Purple Gang — a purportedly organized crime syndicate that allegedly orchestrated the hit from prison through collusion with corrupt officials. Talk about a political thriller come to life!
Read the original article on GEEKSPIN. Affiliate links on GEEKSPIN may earn us and our partners a commission.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Freshman wishlist: Adam Schiff vs. Trump 2.0
Freshman wishlist: Adam Schiff vs. Trump 2.0

Axios

time30 minutes ago

  • Axios

Freshman wishlist: Adam Schiff vs. Trump 2.0

Sen. Adam Schiff has some advice for President Trump when attempting to demean him: Pick one nickname. Why it matters: Schiff rose to cable TV stardom as an anti-Trump foil while leading the first impeachment. "Shifty Schiff" or "Watermelon Head" learned to give as good as he got. Trump called Schiff names. Schiff ensured he was impeached — twice. "[T]he cardinal rule of nicknames is: Just stick with one," Schiff told Axios in an interview. Schiff translated his MAGA notoriety into a safe Senate seat, first battling through a tough, expensive primary. Now he's ready for round two with Trump. "I've been thrust back into a lot of that responsibility again because what he's trying to do in the second term is even worse than what he tried to do in the first term," Schiff said. Zoom out: Before Trump dominated the national conversation, Schiff considered himself a fairly nonpartisan national security expert. He endorsed Jim Mattis for Secretary of Defense in 2016 when other Democrats didn't. Schiff had hoped for another rebrand in the Senate. "I was expecting a Biden or a Harris presidency, and the ability to just focus exclusively on what positive things I could get done," he told Axios. What to watch: He is enjoying visiting redder areas of the state after spending years representing just a slice of heavily Democratic Los Angeles. He shared about one such visit in the state's northeast. "I knew I had made progress when one of the farmers looked at me and said, 'I don't know why he calls you watermelon head. You have a perfectly normal-sized head.'" But it's doubtful he'll revert back to a less partisan posture, given the direction of Trump's second term. Driving the news: Two days after our interview, Trump deployed National Guard troops to tamp down on ICE protests in Los Angeles in opposition to Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-Calif.). "This action is designed to inflame tensions, sow chaos, and escalate the situation," Schiff posted on X on Saturday. He also repeatedly called for violence to stop at protests. "Assaulting law enforcement is never ok," he posted Sunday. Zoom in: Schiff tried to pass a resolution shortly before our interview to stop the administration from stripping civil rights leader Harvey Milk's name from a Navy ship. He has demanded financial disclosures from the White House, written letters to stop DOGE from shutting down USDA offices and tried to block the repeal of EV rules. "Most of my days are spent trying to walk this line between stopping the administration from violating the law and ignoring the Constitution on the one hand," Schiff said, "and continuing to deliver for Californians..." Schiff recognizes that his clashes altered his career trajectory. "I have my brand pre-Trump and my brand post-Trump," Schiff told Axios. Between the lines: Schiff's leadership in the House's first Trump impeachment made him a mortal enemy to Trump and his allies, leading to a "weirdly personal" dynamic, Schiff said.

Trump vows to "HIT" any protester who spits on police. He pardoned those who did far worse on Jan. 6
Trump vows to "HIT" any protester who spits on police. He pardoned those who did far worse on Jan. 6

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump vows to "HIT" any protester who spits on police. He pardoned those who did far worse on Jan. 6

In one of his first acts of his second term as president, Donald Trumppardoned hundreds of people who attacked the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, to try to keep him in office, including those who beat police officers. On Monday, Trump posted a warning on social media to those demonstrating in Los Angeles against his immigration crackdown and confronting police and members of the National Guard he had deployed: 'IF THEY SPIT, WE WILL HIT, and I promise you they will be hit harder than they have ever been hit before. Such disrespect will not be tolerated!' The discrepancy of Trump's response to the two disturbances — pardoning rioters who beat police on Jan. 6, which he called 'a beautiful day,' while condemning violence against law enforcement in Los Angeles — illustrates how the president expects his enemies to be held to different standards than his supporters. 'Trump's behavior makes clear that he only values the rule of law and the people who enforce it when it's to his political advantage,' said Brendan Nyhan, a political scientist at Dartmouth College. Trump pardoned more than 1,000 people who tried to halt the transfer of power on that day in 2021, when about 140 officers were injured. The former U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, Matthew Graves, called it 'likely the largest single day mass assault of law enforcement ' in American history. Trump's pardon covered people convicted of attacking police with flagpoles, a hockey stick and a crutch. Many of the assaults were captured on surveillance or body camera footage that showed rioters engaging in hand-to-hand combat with police as officers desperately fought to beat back the angry crowd. While some who were pardoned were convicted of nonviolent crimes, Trump pardoned at least 276 defendants who were convicted of assault charges, according to an Associated Press review of court records. Nearly 300 others had their pending charges dismissed as a result of Trump's sweeping act of clemency. Roughly 180 of the defendants were charged with assaulting, resisting or impeding law enforcement or obstructing officers during a civil disorder. 'They were extremely violent, and they have been treated as if their crimes were nothing, and now the president is trying to use the perception of violence by some protesters as an excuse to crack some heads,' said Mike Romano, who was a deputy chief of the section of the U.S. Attorney's office that prosecuted those involved in the Capitol siege. A White House spokesman, Harrison Fields, defended the president's response: 'President Trump was elected to secure the border, equip federal officials with the tools to execute this plan, and restore law and order.' Trump has long planned to use civil unrest as an opportunity to invoke broad presidential powers, and he seemed poised to do just that on Monday as he activated a battalion of U.S. Marines to support the presence of the National Guard. He mobilized the Guard on Saturday over the opposition of California's governor, Gavin Newsom, and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, both Democrats. The Guard was last sent to Los Angeles by a president during the Rodney King riots in 1992, when President George H.W. Bush invoked the Insurrection Act. Those riots were significantly more violent and widespread than the current protests in Los Angeles, which were largely confined to a stretch of downtown, a relatively small patch in a city of 469 square miles and nearly 4 million people. The current demonstrations were sparked by a confrontation Saturday in the city of Paramount, southeast of downtown Los Angeles, where federal agents were staging at a Department of Homeland Security office. California officials, who are largely Democrats, argued that Trump is trying to create more chaos to expand his power. Newsom, whom Trump suggested should be arrested, called the president's acts 'authoritarian.' But even Rick Caruso, a prominent Los Angeles Republican and former mayoral candidate, posted on the social media site X that the president should not have called in the National Guard. Protests escalated after the Guard arrived, with demonstrators blockading a downtown freeway. Some some set multiple self-driving cars on fire and pelted Los Angeles police with debris and fireworks. Romano said he worried that Trump's double standard on how demonstrators should treat law enforcement will weaken the position of police in American society. He recalled that, during the Capitol attack, many rioters thought police should let them into the building because they had supported law enforcement's crackdown on anti-police demonstrations after George Floyd was murdered in 2020. That sort of 'transactional' approach Trump advocates is toxic, Romano said. 'We need to expect law enforcement are doing their jobs properly,' he said. Believing they just cater to the president 'is going to undermine public trust in law enforcement.' ___ Associated Press writers Michael Kunzleman and Alanna Durkin Richer in Washington contributed to this report.

Editorial: MAGA morphs into Make America Cruel Again
Editorial: MAGA morphs into Make America Cruel Again

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Editorial: MAGA morphs into Make America Cruel Again

The horrifying weekend scenes in Los Angeles — National Guard on the streets, the governor of California threatening to sue the president of the United States for breaching state sovereignty, vehicles set on fire, attacks on law enforcement officers, ordinary people getting hurt, kids seeing all kinds of horrors from people they have been taught to trust — were deeply disturbing to the point where we wondered how on God's green earth this country can hold it together for three-and-a-half more years of this level of presidential overreach, this amount of hatred and division. But we do know this. We sure don't want to see any kind of repeat of those scenes in Chicago. Everyone had better pick their words carefully. Nobody can argue that Donald Trump, as president of the United States, does not have the authority to deport those who crossed the border without authorization and who have received due process in a court of law. Nobody can argue that he did not disclose his intention to do so during the presidential campaign. Nobody who believes in the rule of law can say that federal agents should be physically prevented from following their orders (withholding cooperation is something entirely different). And nobody can say that the Trump administration is the first to remove such people. But the brute nature of the methodology, the scale of the operation and the horrifying accompanying theatrics should shock every American, even those who consider themselves part of the MAGA movement. They supposedly signed up for American greatness, not abject cruelty. This is the danger of a fundamentally performative president, a leader for whom the political benefits of calling in the National Guard clearly outranks the far greater risks, which is that such a decision destabilizes a city and forces everyone into ever more extreme positions. The scorched earth rhetoric from federal officials has been like something out of dystopian fiction. Stephen Miller, the White House deputy chief of staff, posted on social media that 'this is a fight to save civilization.' On the contrary, Mr. Miller. His ultimate boss, Trump, said 'a once great American City, Los Angeles, has been invaded and occupied by Illegal Aliens and Criminals,' which is so much balderdash, mere red-meat language designed for political purposes and not effective immigration policy, which requires disincentives, sure, but also nuance, complexity and a sense of the historical realities. There was a mandate from the American people for securing the border, deporting those who break or have broken the law and for fixing immigration. There was no mandate for brutality. We lay some of the blame for what happened in Los Angeles this weekend on both political parties, given that it is at least in part a consequence of their collective failure to pass any kind of comprehensive immigration reform that would have secured the borders, prevented overwhelming numbers of unauthorized folks entering and offered a fair and compassionate solution for the many people here without legal permission who have lived productive U.S. for years. That's on Democrats, who allowed the border to get out of control during the first part of the Biden administration, as well as Republicans. Many left-wing Democrats came to favor de facto open borders over the past several years, or at least no criminal-style enforcements of immigration violations, and Democrats knew they could not get that past a plurality of Americans in a general election. Rather than confront that internal division and reach a compromise, they punted for years. By the time Trump had total fealty from the Republican Party and could (and did) derail any such effort merely for his own political gain, it was too late. And now, with cruel, scorched-earth zealots in charge, we have the worst of all possible worlds for America's great cities and for many people whose only crime was trying to escape poverty and seeking out a better life. Anyone with even an ounce of common sense could see that Trump's apparent intention of deporting 12 million people in the country without legal permission, concentrated as they are in the core of America's biggest cities, is both unethical and impractical, given the above. The current rhetoric makes no distinction between recent arrivals and those who have lived here productively for years, and it paints otherwise law-abiding folks with the same brush as criminals, which is un-American. Leaders of blue cities and governors of blue states now find themselves caught somewhere between wanting to stop these deportations, over which they know they have no formal legal control, and their Welcoming Cities ordinances that forbid only cooperation with federal authorities. They, too, have political considerations to weigh. But they should not be the prime concern. Caught in the middle are local police departments, whose job is not to aid federal immigration officers but to maintain law and order. On the one hand, they have to deal with the tactics of an increasingly militarized ICE, as aided by the National Guard. They also have to deal with progressive politicians ready to accuse them of cooperation at every juncture. No, cops should not leave when protesters (or rioters, depending on your preferred politics) take to the streets. They have a different job to do, which is to keep our cities safe. So we are serving advance notice, Mr. President, that we don't want to see the National Guard, or the Marines, or any other branch of the U.S. military on the streets of Chicago. We urge you to dial down the rhetoric and the threats and we call on Democratic officials to do the same, which is not to say they should refrain from disagreeing with the manner of these actions. We urge those in your administration to negotiate with local officials, to treat everyone with dignity and respect, and to understand, for the love of God, that our children are watching and listening. Submit a letter, of no more than 400 words, to the editor here or email letters@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store