The Dark Side of 8 U.S. states
While the United States is often celebrated for its opportunities and freedoms, every state has its share of challenges and darker aspects.
From systemic racism to political corruption, these states have skeletons in their closets that defy their postcard-perfect reputations. Let's do a deep dive and pull back that curtain:
California's reputation as the Golden State is overshadowed by a severe and escalating homelessness crisis. Over 187,084 people currently live on its streets, with the unhoused population growing by 5,600 in just the past year.
While the state achieved reductions in veteran and chronic homelessness in 2024, the overall 3% year-over-year increase highlights persistent systemic challenges. Skyrocketing rents in prior years forced many residents into vehicles or RVs, and 66% of California's homeless population remains unsheltered—the highest unsheltered rate nationwide.
Even with recent rent declines in cities like San Diego County (-7%) and Oakland (-9.1%), financial precarity persists. Many Californians are one missed paycheck away from losing housing, reflecting the acute pressure of the state's affordability crisis.
The Sunshine State has a dark secret—after homicides rose 14.7% in 2020, Florida saw law enforcement agencies largely stop reporting crime statistics to the FBI during the 2021 transition to a new system. Only 0.3% of agencies submitted data that year.
By 2022, just 8% of police agencies provided statistics, rendering recent crime claims unverifiable. Florida's data issues persisted into 2023, with major agencies like Miami PD still failing to report.
Why this is happening: Florida lacks a state law mandating crime data reporting to the FDLE or FBI. Participation is voluntary, leading to widespread non-compliance—a problem compounded by underfunded police IT systems.
The Land of Lincoln is experiencing a mass exodus. High taxes, political corruption, and rising crime rates are driving residents away in droves. Cities like Chicago, with its notorious violent crime problem, contribute to the state's declining appeal for both families and businesses.
This Midwestern state has seen more corrupt governors than most people have had hot meals. Since 1960, a whopping four Illinois governors have been sent to prison on corruption charges. Rod Blagojevich (impeached for soliciting bribes for Obama's Senate seat) is the most infamous.
The Keystone State is home to some of America's most notoriously haunted locations. Places like Eastern State Penitentiary in Philadelphia and Pennhurst Asylum are renowned for their dark histories and reported paranormal activity. These sites serve as eerie reminders of past institutional abuses and societal neglect.
Even the state's political foundations aren't spared this spectral presence. While Philadelphia's Independence Hall birthed American democracy, modern efforts to ban 'dark money' from politics have sparked debates about whether transparency laws protect voters or haunt free speech. A far cry from Franklin's Enlightenment ideals, these clashes add a quieter, more insidious layer to Pennsylvania's shadows.
Ohio's reputation as a quintessential Midwestern is challenged by the legend of Helltown, an abandoned area within Cuyahoga Valley National Park. The area's mythology blends Cold War-era suspicions about government actions – originally stemming from documented 1970s property seizures for park development – with supernatural folklore.
While the location's physical decay (abandoned structures, vegetation-choked roads, and boarded homes from mass evacuations) creates visceral eeriness, most tales unravel when examined. The church allegedly displaying Satanic symbols actually featured conventional Gothic Revival architecture, its inverted crosses being standard medieval-inspired motifs rather than occult signs.
Similarly, a frequently cited 'haunted' school bus was merely derelict municipal property left behind. Claims of clandestine government activities directly contradict archival records showing the park's establishment through standard eminent domain procedures.
These narratives gained momentum through late 20th-century teen folklore and internet-era amplification, transforming prosaic urban abandonment into a modern mythos. The site's atmospheric decay continues to invite speculative interpretations, fueling our collective fascination with the unexplained.
The NYPD might be 'New York's Finest,' but they've got a long history of being anything but. From the 'Buddy Boys' corruption case in 1986 (where Brooklyn cops stole drugs, resold them, and extorted dealers) to the Central Park jogger case (coerced false confessions from Black/Latino teens in a 1989 rape case), the department has faced numerous instances of misconduct and corruption.
There was also the 30th Precinct Corruption case of 1994, where 33 officers in Harlem stole drugs and cash from dealers, selling them from the precinct itself.
Beyond the Central Park Five, cases like the 1985 torture of Mark Davidson with a stun gun and the 1984 fatal shooting of Eleanor Bumpurs (a mentally ill Black woman) highlight systemic brutality and procedural failures. It's enough to make you wonder if 'Law & Order' is more fiction than we thought.
Everything's bigger in Texas, including its history of racial violence. The Texas Rangers, long celebrated as heroes, have a disturbing past of brutality against people of color.
Rangers systematically displaced Comanche and Cherokee tribes in the 19th century, seizing acres of ancestral land. In 1918, they were involved in the Porvenir massacre, where 15 unarmed Tejano men and boys were executed.
Scholars estimate that the Rangers killed 300–5,000 Mexican Americans between 1910 and 1920. In 2020, Austin's police union headquarters removed its 'Ranger Hall' plaque after protests exposed its genocidal origins.
During the 1940s, Michigan was plagued by systemic corruption, bribery, and even assassination. A grand corruption investigation implicated members of both major political parties, spanning at least three cities: Lansing, Jackson, and Albion.
The most shocking incident was the mysterious 1945 assassination of State Senator Warren G. Hooper, which was linked to the infamous Purple Gang — a purportedly organized crime syndicate that allegedly orchestrated the hit from prison through collusion with corrupt officials. Talk about a political thriller come to life!
Read the original article on GEEKSPIN. Affiliate links on GEEKSPIN may earn us and our partners a commission.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Man indicted on charges from pipe bomb explosions
Jun. 11—A federal grand jury indicted a Hamilton County man Wednesday on federal crimes related to explosive devices. Robert Gilb, 50, of Green Twp., allegedly detonated three improvised explosive devices, or pipe bombs, in Hamilton and Butler counties in March and April. He was arrested Tuesday by the FBI's Joint Terrorism Task Force. He possessed an unregistered destructive device and transporting explosive materials, the press release says. "This alleged activity posed a serious risk to public safety. The FBI worked closely with our law enforcement partners to neutralize this potential danger and protect the community." Hamilton County Sheriff's deputies were dispatched to Miami Twp. for a report of a loud explosion. What appeared to be a blast crater and components of an improvised explosive device were found, according to the U.S. Attorneys Office. The FBI investigation revealed there were two previous incidents in Morgan Twp. in Butler County that appeared to have had similar characteristics to the incident in Miami Twp. Butler County Sheriff's deputies responded to incidents March 23 and March 28. The FBI said witnesses saw Gilb in a white BMW near the site of at least one of the locations of the explosion. Gilb is charged with three counts of possessing an unregistered destructive device and three counts of transporting explosive materials. Each charge is punishable by up to 10 years in prison.

43 minutes ago
Trump EPA moves to repeal climate rules that limit greenhouse gas emissions from US power plants
WASHINGTON -- The Environmental Protection Agency on Wednesday proposed repealing rules that limit planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions from power plants fueled by coal and natural gas, an action that Administrator Lee Zeldin said would remove billions of dollars in costs for industry and help 'unleash' American energy. The EPA also proposed weakening a regulation that requires power plants to reduce emissions of mercury and other toxic pollutants that can harm the brain development of young children and contribute to heart attacks and other health problems in adults. The rollbacks are meant to fulfill Republican President Donald Trump's repeated pledge to ' unleash American energy ' and make it more affordable for Americans to power their homes and operate businesses. If approved and made final, the plans would reverse efforts by Democratic President Joe Biden's administration to address climate change and improve conditions in areas heavily burdened by industrial pollution, mostly in low-income and majority Black or Hispanic communities. The power plant rules are among about 30 environmental regulations that Zeldin targeted in March when he announced what he called the 'most consequential day of deregulation in American history.' Zeldin said Wednesday the new rules would help end what he called the Biden and Obama administrations' 'war on so much of our U.S. domestic energy supply.' 'The American public spoke loudly and clearly last November,'' he added in a speech at EPA headquarters. 'They wanted to make sure that … no matter what agency anybody might be confirmed to lead, we are finding opportunities to pursue common-sense, pragmatic solutions that will help reduce the cost of living … create jobs and usher in a golden era of American prosperity.' Environmental and public health groups called the rollbacks dangerous and vowed to challenge the rules in court. Dr. Lisa Patel, a pediatrician and executive director of the Medical Society Consortium on Climate & Health, called the proposals 'yet another in a series of attacks' by the Trump administration on the nation's 'health, our children, our climate and the basic idea of clean air and water.' She called it 'unconscionable to think that our country would move backwards on something as common sense as protecting children from mercury and our planet from worsening hurricanes, wildfires, floods and poor air quality driven by climate change.' 'Ignoring the immense harm to public health from power plant pollution is a clear violation of the law,'' added Manish Bapna, president and CEO of the Natural Resources Defense Council. 'If EPA finalizes a slapdash effort to repeal those rules, we'll see them in court.' The EPA-targeted rules could prevent an estimated 30,000 deaths and save $275 billion each year they are in effect, according to an Associated Press examination that included the agency's own prior assessments and a wide range of other research. It's by no means guaranteed that the rules will be entirely eliminated — they can't be changed without going through a federal rulemaking process that can take years and requires public comment and scientific justification. Even a partial dismantling of the rules would mean more pollutants such as smog, mercury and lead — and especially more tiny airborne particles that can lodge in lungs and cause health problems, the AP analysis found. It would also mean higher emissions of greenhouse gases, driving Earth's warming to deadlier levels. Biden, a Democrat, had made fighting climate change a hallmark of his presidency. Coal-fired power plants would be forced to capture smokestack emissions or shut down under a strict EPA rule issued last year. Then-EPA head Michael Regan said the power plant rules would reduce pollution and improve public health while supporting a reliable, long-term supply of electricity. The power sector is the nation's second-largest contributor to climate change, after transportation. In its proposed regulation, the Trump EPA argues that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases from fossil fuel-fired power plants 'do not contribute significantly to dangerous pollution' or climate change and therefore do not meet a threshold under the Clean Air Act for regulatory action. Greenhouse gas emissions from coal and gas-fired plants 'are a small and decreasing part of global emissions,'' the EPA said, adding: 'This Administration's priority is to promote the public health or welfare through energy dominance and independence secured by using fossil fuels to generate power.' The Clean Air Act allows the EPA to limit emissions from power plants and other industrial sources if those emissions significantly contribute to air pollution that endangers public health. If fossil fuel plants no longer meet the EPA's threshold, the Trump administration may later argue that other pollutants from other industrial sectors don't either and therefore shouldn't be regulated, said Meghan Greenfield, a former EPA and Justice Department lawyer now in private practice at Jenner & Block LLP. The EPA proposal 'has the potential to have much, much broader implications,' she said. Zeldin, a former New York congressman, said the Biden-era rules were designed to 'suffocate our economy in order to protect the environment,' with the intent to regulate the coal industry 'out of existence' and make it 'disappear.' National Mining Association president and CEO Rich Nolan applauded the new rules, saying they remove 'deliberately unattainable standards' for clean air while 'leveling the playing field for reliable power sources, instead of stacking the deck against them.' But Dr. Howard Frumkin, a former director of the National Center for Environmental Health and professor emeritus at the University of Washington School of Public Health, said Zeldin and Trump were trying to deny reality. 'The world is round, the sun rises in the east, coal- and gas-fired power plants contribute significantly to climate change, and climate change increases the risk of heat waves, catastrophic storms and many other health threats,' Frumkin said. 'These are indisputable facts. If you torpedo regulations on power plant greenhouse gas emissions, you torpedo the health and well-being of the American public and contribute to leaving a world of risk and suffering to our children and grandchildren.' A paper published earlier this year in the journal Science found the Biden-era rules could reduce U.S. power sector carbon emissions by 73% to 86% below 2005 levels by 2040, compared with a reduction of 60% to 83% without the rules. 'Carbon emissions in the power sector drop at a faster rate with the (Biden-era) rules in place than without them,' said Aaron Bergman, a fellow at Resources for the Future, a nonprofit research institution and a co-author of the Science paper. The Biden rule also would result in 'significant reductions in sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, pollutants that harm human health,' he said.

an hour ago
Trump is expected to sign a measure blocking California's vehicle emissions rules
WASHINGTON -- President Donald Trump is expected to sign a measure Thursday that blocks California's first-in-the-nation rule banning the sale of new gas-powered cars by 2035, a White House official told The Associated Press. The resolution Trump plans to sign, which Congress approved last month, aims to quash the country's most aggressive attempt to phase out gas-powered cars. He also plans to approve measures to overturn state policies curbing tailpipe emissions in certain vehicles and smog-forming nitrogen oxide pollution from trucks. The timing of the signing was confirmed Wednesday by a White House official who spoke on condition of anonymity to share plans not yet public. The development comes as the Republican president is mired in a clash with California's Democratic governor, Gavin Newsom, over Trump's move to deploy troops to Los Angeles in response to immigration protests. It's the latest in an ongoing battle between the Trump administration and heavily Democratic California over everything from tariffs to the rights of LGBTQ+ youth and funding for electric vehicle chargers. 'If it's a day ending in Y, it's another day of Trump's war on California,' Newsom spokesperson Daniel Villaseñor said in an email. "We're fighting back." According to the White House official, Trump is expected to sign resolutions that block California's rule phasing out gas-powered cars and ending the sale of new ones by 2035. He will also kill rules that phase out the sale of medium- and heavy-duty diesel vehicles and cut tailpipe emissions from trucks. The president is scheduled to sign the measures and make remarks during an event at the White House on Thursday morning. Newsom, who is considered a likely 2028 Democratic presidential candidate, and California officials contend that what the federal government is doing is illegal and said the state plans to sue. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy, Energy Secretary Chris Wright and Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin are expected to attend, along with members of Congress and representatives from the energy, trucking and gas station industries. The signings come as Trump has pledged to revive American auto manufacturing and boost oil and gas drilling. The move will also come a day after the Environmental Protection Agency proposed repealing rules that limit greenhouse gas emissions from power plants fueled by coal and natural gas. Zeldin said it would remove billions of dollars in costs for industry and help 'unleash' American energy. California, which has some of the nation's worst air pollution, has been able to seek waivers for decades from the EPA, allowing it to adopt stricter emissions standards than the federal government. In his first term, Trump revoked California's ability to enforce its standards, but President Joe Biden reinstated it in 2022. Trump has not yet sought to revoke it again. Republicans have long criticized those waivers and earlier this year opted to use the Congressional Review Act, a law aimed at improving congressional oversight of actions by federal agencies, to try to block the rules. That's despite a finding from the U.S. Government Accountability Office, a nonpartisan congressional watchdog, that California's standards cannot legally be blocked using the Congressional Review Act. The Senate parliamentarian agreed with that finding. California, which makes up roughly 11% of the U.S. car market, has significant power to sway trends in the auto industry. About a dozen states signed on to adopt California's rule phasing out the sale of new gas-powered cars. The National Automobile Dealers Association supported the federal government's move to block California's ban on gas-powered cars, saying Congress should decide on such a national issue, not the state. The American Trucking Associations said the rules were not feasible and celebrated Congress' move to block them. Chris Spear, the CEO of the American Trucking Associations, said in a statement Wednesday: 'This is not the United States of California.' It was also applauded by Detroit automaker General Motors, which said it will 'help align emissions standards with today's market realities.' 'We have long advocated for one national standard that will allow us to stay competitive, continue to invest in U.S. innovation, and offer customer choice across the broadest lineup of gas-powered and electric vehicles,' the company said in a statement. Dan Becker with the Center for Biological Diversity, in anticipation of the president signing the measures, said earlier Thursday that the move would be 'Trump's latest betrayal of democracy.' 'Signing this bill is a flagrant abuse of the law to reward Big Oil and Big Auto corporations at the expense of everyday people's health and their wallets,' Becker said in a statement.