Defense Department designates a second military zone on US border, extending into Texas
The Defense Department said Thursday that it has designated a second stretch on the U.S. border with Mexico as a military zone to enforce immigration laws.
The newest area is in Texas and is attached to the Fort Bliss Army base in El Paso. Like the first zone established last month in New Mexico, military personnel are authorized to take custody of migrants who illegally cross the border until they are transferred to civilian authorities in the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
'The establishment of a second National Defense Area increases our operational reach and effectiveness in denying illegal activity along the southern border,' said Gen. Gregory Guillot, commander of the U.S. Northern Command.
In New Mexico, people who entered the U.S. illegally were charged Monday with breaching a national defense area after the Army assumed oversight of a 170-mile (274-kilometer) strip that is treated as an extension of U.S. Army Garrison Fort Huachuca, Arizona.
A press release from the military didn't say how large the second zone in Texas was and officials were unavailable to comment on its dimensions Thursday night.
Border crossers in the military zones face potential prosecutions on two federal crimes — entering the U.S. illegally and trespassing on military property. The moves come as President Donald Trump's administration has deployed thousands of troops to the border and arrests have plunged to the lowest levels since the mid-1960s.
The military zones have allow the federal government to escape the reach of an 1878 law that prohibits military involvement in civilian law enforcement.
'Any illegal attempting to enter that zone is entering a military base, a federally protected area,' Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on a recent visit to New Mexico. 'You will be interdicted by U.S. troops and Border Patrol."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
18 minutes ago
- Reuters
Dismay and disbelief as Trump bans visitors from a dozen countries
June 5 (Reuters) - Officials and residents in countries whose citizens will soon be banned from visiting the United States expressed dismay and disbelief on Thursday at President Donald Trump's new sweeping travel ban as his administration intensifies its immigration crackdown. Trump signed a proclamation on Wednesday barring citizens of 12 countries from entering the U.S. starting on Monday, asserting that the restrictions were necessary to protect against "foreign terrorists." The order was reminiscent of a similar move Trump implemented during his first term in office from 2017 to 2021, when he barred travelers from seven Muslim-majority nations. That directive faced court challenges and went through several iterations before the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the ban in 2018. Former President Joe Biden, a Democrat who succeeded Trump, repealed that ban in 2021, calling it "a stain on our national conscience." But the new ban is much more expansive and covers Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Citizens of seven other countries - Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela - will be partially restricted. A senior diplomat with the Sudanese Foreign Ministry, who asked not to be named, said Trump's justification did not stand up to scrutiny. "Sudanese people have never been known to pose a terrorist threat anywhere in the world," the official said. Chad President Mahamat Idriss Deby Itno said he had instructed his government to stop granting visas to U.S. citizens in response to Trump's action. "Chad has neither planes to offer nor billions of dollars to give, but Chad has its dignity and its pride," he said in a Facebook post, referring to countries such as Qatar, which gifted the U.S. a luxury airplane for Trump's use and promised to invest billions of dollars in the U.S. Afghans who worked for the U.S. or U.S.-funded projects and were hoping to resettle in the U.S. expressed fear that the travel ban would force them to return to their country, where they could face reprisal from the Taliban. Fatima, a 57-year-old Afghan women's rights defender waiting in Pakistan for her U.S. visa to be processed, had her dreams shattered overnight after Trump's order. "Unfortunately, the decisions made by President Trump turned all the hopes and beliefs of us into ashes," she told Reuters, asking that only her first name be published for security reasons. Trump said the countries subject to the most severe restrictions were determined to harbor a "large-scale presence of terrorists," fail to cooperate on visa security, have an inability to verify travelers' identities, as well as inadequate record-keeping of criminal histories and high rates of visa overstays in the United States. He cited Sunday's incident in Boulder, Colorado, in which an Egyptian national tossed a gasoline bomb into a crowd of pro-Israel demonstrators as an example of why the new curbs are needed. But Egypt was not part of the travel ban. "Because Egypt has been a country that we deal with very closely. They have things under control," Trump told reporters in the Oval Office on Thursday. When asked why he chose this moment to unveil the ban, he said: "It can't come soon enough." The visa ban takes effect on June 9 at 12:01 a.m. EDT (0401 GMT). Visas issued before that date will not be revoked, the order said. In total, just under 162,000 immigrant visas and temporary work, study, and travel visas were issued in fiscal year 2023 to nationals of the affected countries in the now banned visa categories, according to the Migration Policy Institute. The ban is likely to face legal challenges. But Stephen Yale-Loehr, a retired professor of immigration law at Cornell Law School, said he expected those lawsuits to face an uphill climb, because the latest ban contains various exemptions and cited specific security concerns with each country. The ban includes exemptions, such as for dual nationals, permanent residents, immigrant visas for immediate family members of U.S. citizens and athletes traveling for major sporting events like the World Cup. "Trump has learned from the mistakes of earlier travel bans," he said. Some foreign officials said they were prepared to work with the U.S. to address Trump's security concerns. "Somalia values its longstanding relationship with the United States and stands ready to engage in dialogue to address the concerns raised," Dahir Hassan Abdi, the Somali ambassador to the United States, said in a statement.
Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Musk is suffering from ‘Trump derangement syndrome,' US president suggests
Donald Trump accused Elon Musk of suffering from 'Trump derangement syndrome', as he signalled the official collapse of their once warm relationship. 'Elon and I had a great relationship,' Mr Trump told reporters in the Oval Office. 'I don't know if we will anymore.' His remarks illustrate the president's intense anger over the world's richest man's meddling with his legislative agenda after leaving the White House with a golden key and a warm televised send-off. Mr Musk immediately hit back, writing on his social media platform, X: 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election,' he posted. 'Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate.' Since stepping down as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency last week, Mr Musk has slammed Mr Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' as a 'disgusting abomination' for increasing the national debt. Discussion of their broken friendship overshadowed the president's Oval Office press conference with Friedrich Merz, Germany's new chancellor, as Mr Trump said his former ally was lashing out because he did not get his own way. He claimed the Tesla chief executive was upset that his ally had been rejected as the next administrator of Nasa and that the bill meant the end of tax breaks for electric vehicles worth billions to his company. 'He knew it better than almost anybody, and he never had a problem until right after he left,' he said. 'And if you saw the statements he made about me … he said the most beautiful things about me, and he hasn't said bad about me personally, but I'm sure that'll be next. 'I'm very disappointed in Elon.' Mr Trump added that Mr Musk was probably missing the Oval Office and the trappings of power. 'It's sort of Trump derangement syndrome, I guess they call it,' he said. 'But we have it with others too. 'They leave and they wake up in the morning, and the glamour is gone.' Mr Musk appeared in the Oval Office last Friday for his send-off. At the time, Mr Trump said he was 'not really leaving' and would continue to visit the White House. Things quickly unravelled when Mr Musk went on a six-hour X session on Tuesday night, posting his criticism of the bill, particularly that it does not do enough to cut federal spending. Independent analysts warn that its spending cuts are not balanced by tax breaks, with the result that the bill will add more than $2 trillion to the national debt during the next decade. Mr Musk kept up his attacks on Thursday, live tweeting during the president's Oval Office sit-down with Mr Merz. He rejected claims that he had supported the bill when he was at the White House. 'False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it,' he posted. Earlier, he resurfaced an old tweet of Mr Trump's. Wise words — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 5, 2025 And he continued as Mr Trump went on the attack, posting a message suggesting he might be amenable to a trimmed down version: 'Slim Beautiful Bill for the win.' The bill is crucial to Mr Trump's strategy. It contains much of his domestic policy agenda, as well as the campaign promises that propelled him to victory in last year's election, such as ending taxation on overtime and tips. This week, Mr Trump all but disappeared from view as he focused on meetings and phone calls to keep Republicans on side. The bill has already passed the House but faces a difficult passage through the Senate.
The Guardian
32 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on Ukraine's spectacular attack: 21st-century tactics still require support from allies
Since Donald Trump scolded Volodymyr Zelenskyy with the words 'You don't have the cards right now,' Ukraine has been keener than ever to demonstrate that it has a few up its sleeve. On Sunday it showed its hand with an extraordinary, audacious drone attack on multiple bases deep inside Russia, which it says damaged 41 aircraft. Operation Spiderweb, which saw the smuggled drones released from their hiding places in wooden sheds and remotely piloted to their targets, was swiftly followed by another attack on Crimea's Kerch bridge using underwater explosives. Kyiv – often coy in such cases – was unusually swift to claim both incidents, but has not taken responsibility for two railway bridge attacks which Russia says led to the deaths of seven passengers at the weekend. There is obvious satisfaction in hitting Russian bombers and surveillance planes used against Ukrainian civilians, and Spiderweb's unexpected method will surely force Russia to think harder about defence. But the greater significance lies in its potential impact on domestic morale and international support. Ukraine has repeatedly surprised both its enemy and its allies throughout this war. Unexpected successes such as the Kursk incursion have changed the narrative at critical moments. Meticulously planned, and reportedly 18 months in the making, the latest operation must make Russia wonder what else may be on the way. It was also spectacular enough to make Mr Trump pay attention. The US president reportedly judged the attack to be 'badass'. But his cosy phone chats with Vladimir Putin appear to be locking in his tilt towards Moscow. On Wednesday he said that, in a 'good' conversation, Mr Putin had said he would have to respond. It did not appear to have occurred to the US president that discouraging retaliation might be desirable. He should be challenging Kremlin talking points instead of amplifying them. If Ukraine hoped to dispel the nuclear spectre which Russia has repeatedly summoned up, Mr Trump seems to be still in its thrall – with some of those around him talking up the threat again. The Center for Strategic and International Studies argued in a report this week that Russia's military performance has been notably poor in this war, with gains coming at a strikingly high cost in terms of both equipment and personnel – hitting an estimated million casualties this summer. But Russia still has many more cards. It continues to grind out its advance, and in late May it launched its largest drone and missile assault on Ukraine to date. Its war of attrition may look old-fashioned compared with Kyiv's innovations, but it still hurts. Meanwhile, talks in Istanbul have produced agreement on a prisoner exchange but no movement towards peace. There appears to be growing support in the US Senate for further sanctions on Russia, but Lindsey Graham is unlikely to move without Mr Trump's acquiescence, and there is little sign of progress in the House. Pete Hegseth did not attend the session on Ukraine at Thursday's gathering of defence ministers ahead of this month's Nato summit – a telling absence, though the Pentagon blamed scheduling issues. Kyiv needs and deserves increased support from Washington, but damage limitation looks like a more realistic aspiration. Ukraine continues to surprise, and to shift its approach as circumstances demand. Unfortunately, there is little sign of the US president, capricious as he is, changing course on this conflict.
