UK hotel profits fall despite strong investment activity
The UK hotel market entered 2025 on a cautious footing, with the latest Knight Frank Hotel Dashboard for Q1 indicating flat trading performance, rising payroll costs and squeezed profits across both London and regional UK.
Key performance indicators such as ADR and RevPAR have deteriorated, even as operational expenses continue to climb.
London hotels experienced a challenging start to the year, with average daily rate (ADR) and revenue per available room (RevPAR) both dropping.
ADR fell by around 1.3 percent compared with Q1‑24, while RevPAR mirrored that decline.
The most pronounced falls were seen in upper-midscale and select-service segments, with RevPAR down by between 4.6 percent and 7.7 percent during the first quarter.
Across London, payroll outlays per available room (PAR) surged by 4.6 percent year‑on‑year, largely fuelled by increased costs in managerial and non-operational roles.
Regional UK hotels reported a slightly sharper rise of 4.9 percent PAR.
Revenues remained largely static, pushing the share of payroll costs higher and contributing to margin pressure.
Profitability contracted across the sector.
London's gross operating profit per available room (GOPPAR) dropped by an average of 8 percent in Q1, while regional UK saw a 5.4 percent decline.
However, there were exceptions: golf and spa hotels in the regions continued to deliver solid GOPPAR growth, although the pace has moderated.
Despite operational headwinds, hotel investment activity stayed strong in Q1 2025.
Total transaction volumes reached approximately £800 million, spanning over 50 hotels and 4,600 rooms.
London accounted for 60 percent of investment by value, with luxury and upper-upscale properties representing 62 percent of the market
The report highlights the pressure faced by UK hoteliers from stagnating revenues and rising labour costs.
The slowdown in ADR and RevPAR, combined with increasing payroll outlays, signals the need for operational agility.
For investors, the resilient capital inflows into London's luxury and upper-upscale segments suggest confidence remains in long-term value, even as performance metrics stumble in the short term.
"UK hotel profits fall despite strong investment activity" was originally created and published by Hotel Management Network, a GlobalData owned brand.
The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Here's Why Boustead Singapore (SGX:F9D) Has Caught The Eye Of Investors
The excitement of investing in a company that can reverse its fortunes is a big draw for some speculators, so even companies that have no revenue, no profit, and a record of falling short, can manage to find investors. But the reality is that when a company loses money each year, for long enough, its investors will usually take their share of those losses. A loss-making company is yet to prove itself with profit, and eventually the inflow of external capital may dry up. If this kind of company isn't your style, you like companies that generate revenue, and even earn profits, then you may well be interested in Boustead Singapore (SGX:F9D). While this doesn't necessarily speak to whether it's undervalued, the profitability of the business is enough to warrant some appreciation - especially if its growing. This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. If a company can keep growing earnings per share (EPS) long enough, its share price should eventually follow. That makes EPS growth an attractive quality for any company. Boustead Singapore's shareholders have have plenty to be happy about as their annual EPS growth for the last 3 years was 45%. That sort of growth rarely ever lasts long, but it is well worth paying attention to when it happens. Top-line growth is a great indicator that growth is sustainable, and combined with a high earnings before interest and taxation (EBIT) margin, it's a great way for a company to maintain a competitive advantage in the market. We note that while EBIT margins have improved from 12% to 18%, the company has actually reported a fall in revenue by 31%. While not disastrous, these figures could be better. You can take a look at the company's revenue and earnings growth trend, in the chart below. For finer detail, click on the image. Check out our latest analysis for Boustead Singapore While it's always good to see growing profits, you should always remember that a weak balance sheet could come back to bite. So check Boustead Singapore's balance sheet strength, before getting too excited. Seeing insiders owning a large portion of the shares on issue is often a good sign. Their incentives will be aligned with the investors and there's less of a probability in a sudden sell-off that would impact the share price. So as you can imagine, the fact that Boustead Singapore insiders own a significant number of shares certainly is appealing. In fact, they own 46% of the shares, making insiders a very influential shareholder group. Shareholders and speculators should be reassured by this kind of alignment, as it suggests the business will be run for the benefit of shareholders. And their holding is extremely valuable at the current share price, totalling S$301m. This is an incredible endorsement from them. Boustead Singapore's earnings per share growth have been climbing higher at an appreciable rate. This level of EPS growth does wonders for attracting investment, and the large insider investment in the company is just the cherry on top. At times fast EPS growth is a sign the business has reached an inflection point, so there's a potential opportunity to be had here. So based on this quick analysis, we do think it's worth considering Boustead Singapore for a spot on your watchlist. We should say that we've discovered 2 warning signs for Boustead Singapore that you should be aware of before investing here. There's always the possibility of doing well buying stocks that are not growing earnings and do not have insiders buying shares. But for those who consider these important metrics, we encourage you to check out companies that do have those features. You can access a tailored list of Singaporean companies which have demonstrated growth backed by significant insider holdings. Please note the insider transactions discussed in this article refer to reportable transactions in the relevant jurisdiction. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Liverpool told how much Anthony Gordon transfer will cost as Newcastle stance clear
Liverpool has been told that it would likely have to pay well in excess of $100 million to sign Anthony Gordon from Newcastle this summer. The Reds were keen on a move for the former Everton winger last summer, and for a while it looked as though the Magpies might be forced to cash in on one of their star players as they worked to comply with the Premier League's Profit and Sustainability Rules. Advertisement In the end, Newcastle sold Yankuba Minteh and Elliott Anderson to Brighton and Nottingham Forest respectively, raising around $90 million and quelling the need to sell Gordon. READ MORE: Inside Florian Wirtz's Liverpool transfer - contract length, record fee, player's preference READ MORE: Xabi Alonso's Florian Wirtz comparison says everything about Liverpool's new star The 24-year-old went on to sign a new contract at Newcastle, and speculation linking him with a move to Liverpool has died down. It has not totally gone away though, and that could have something to do with the persistent rumors linking Luis Diaz with a move away from Liverpool. Advertisement Were Diaz to leave, Liverpool would likely enter the market for a new forward, and that could see Liverpool revisit its interest in Gordon. If Luis Diaz departs, Liverpool will need to replace him -Credit:AFP or licensors Addressing the possibility of Gordon joining Liverpool, Football Insider claimed that the Reds will only be in the market for a left winger if Diaz departs. It's claimed Liverpool is keeping an eye on Gordon and still like the player, but Newcastle does not want to sell. Thanks to Gordon's long-term deal, Newcastle would only sell him if an offer between $101 million and $115 million is tabled. Newcastle's PSR situation is much better thanks to securing Champions League soccer for the upcoming season. Advertisement Al-Nassr is reportedly willing to spend $97 million on Diaz, which could seriously test the Reds' resolve during the summer transfer window. Liverpool has no intention of selling Diaz, but an offer of that magnitude could prompt club bosses to sit up and take notice, particularly considering the player is on course to leave for free in two years' time. Liverpool made it clear to Barcelona last week that Diaz is not for sale after rebuffing an approach from the Catalan club. However, there is said to be little expectation that Diaz will pen an extension to his current contract at Liverpool, which is due to expire in 2027.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Analysis-OPEC+ would struggle to cover major Iranian oil supply disruption
By Ahmad Ghaddar and Seher Dareen LONDON (Reuters) -Oil market participants have switched to dreading a shortage in fuel from focusing on impending oversupply in just two days this week. After Israel attacked Iran and Tehran pledged to retaliate, oil prices jumped as much as 13% to their highest since January as investors price in an increased probability of a major disruption in Middle East oil supplies. Part of the reason for the rapid spike is that spare capacity among OPEC and allies to pump more oil to offset any disruption is roughly equivalent to Iran's output, according to analysts and OPEC watchers. Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates are the only OPEC+ members capable of quickly boosting output and could pump around 3.5 million barrels per day (bpd) more, analysts and industry sources said. Iran's production stands at around 3.3 million bpd, and it exports over 2 million bpd of oil and fuel. There has been no impact on output so far from Israel's attacks on Iran's oil and gas infrastructure, nor on exports from the region. But fears that Israel may destroy Iranian oil facilities to deprive it of its main source of revenue have driven oil prices higher. The Brent benchmark last traded up nearly 7% at over $74 on Friday. An attack with a significant impact on Iranian output that required other producers to pump more to plug the gap would leave very little spare capacity to deal with other disruptions - which can happen due to war, natural disasters or accidents. And that with a caveat that Iran does not attack its neighbours in retaliation for Israeli strikes. Iran has in the past threatened to disrupt shipping through the Strait of Hormuz if it is attacked. The Strait is the exit route from the Middle East Gulf for around 20% of the world's oil supply, including Saudi, UAE, Kuwaiti, Iraqi and Iranian exports. Iran has also previously stated that it would attack other oil suppliers that filled any gap in supplies left due to sanctions or attacks on Iran. "If Iran responds by disrupting oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz, targeting regional oil infrastructure, or striking U.S. military assets, the market reaction could be much more severe, potentially pushing prices up by $20 per barrel or more," said Jorge Leon, head of geopolitical analysis at Rystad and a former OPEC official. CHANGE IN CALCULUS The abrupt change in calculus for oil investors this week comes after months in which output increases from OPEC and its allies, a group known as OPEC+, have led to investor concern about future oversupply and a potential price crash. Saudi Arabia, the de facto leader of OPEC, has been the driving force behind an acceleration in the group's output increases, in part to punish allies that have pumped more oil than they were supposed to under OPEC+ agreements. The increases have already strained the capacity of some members to produce more, causing them to fall short of their new targets. Even after recent increases, the group still has output curbs in place of about 4.5 million bpd, which were agreed over the past five years to balance supply and demand. But some of that spare oil capacity - the difference between actual output and notional production potential that can be brought online quickly and sustained - exists only on paper. After years of production cuts and reduced oilfield investment following the COVID-19 pandemic, the oilfields and facilities may no longer be able to restart quickly, said analysts and OPEC watchers. Western sanctions on Iran, Russia and Venezuela have also led to decreases in oil investment in those countries. "Following the July hike, most OPEC members, excluding Saudi Arabia, appear to be producing at or near maximum capacity," J.P. Morgan said in a note. Outside of Saudi Arabia and the UAE, spare capacity was negligible, said a senior industry source who works with OPEC+ producers. "Saudi are the only ones with real barrels, the rest is paper," the source said. He asked not to be named due to the sensitivity of the matter. PAPER BARRELS Saudi oil output is set to rise to above 9.5 million bpd in July, leaving the kingdom with the ability to raise output by another 2.5 million bpd if it decides to. That capacity has been tested, however, only once in the last decade and only for one month in 2020 when Saudi Arabia and Russia fell out and pumped at will in a fight for market share. Saudi Arabia has also stopped investing in expanding its spare capacity beyond 12 million bpd as the kingdom diverted resources to other projects. Russia, the second largest producer inside OPEC+, claims it can pump above 12 million bpd. JP Morgan estimates, however, that Moscow can only ramp up output by 250,000 bpd to 9.5 million bpd over the next three months and will struggle to raise output further due to sanctions. The UAE says its maximum oil production capacity is 4.85 million bpd, and told OPEC that its production of crude alone in April stood at just over 2.9 million bpd, a figure largely endorsed by OPEC's secondary sources. The International Energy Agency, however, estimated the country's crude production at about 3.3 million bpd in April, and says the UAE has the capacity to raise that by a further 1 million bpd. BNP Paribas sees UAE output even higher at 3.5-4.0 million bpd. "I think spare capacity is significantly lower than what's often quoted," said BNP analyst Aldo Spanjer. The difference in ability to raise production has already created tensions inside OPEC+. Saudi Arabia favours unwinding cuts of about 800,000 bpd by the end of October, sources have told Reuters. At their last meeting, Russia along with Oman and Algeria expressed support for pausing a hike for July. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
