The MAGA civil war over Iran
Over the last week, as the exchange of missiles between Israel and Iran intensified, Donald Trump's supporters have found themselves in two camps: the hawks, like Lindsay Graham and Ted Cruz who support America joining Israel in its fight against Iran. And the isolationists, like Steve Bannon and Tucker Carlson, who urge the president not to plunge the U.S. into yet another protracted war in the Middle East.
Now that the U.S. air strikes on Iran have been met with a retaliatory strike on a U.S. military base in Qatar, are the MAGA factions digging in their heels or falling in line with the White House?
Adam Wren, senior Politics correspondent at Politico and a contributing author to POLITICO Playbook, breaks it all down.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
38 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Why Lockheed Martin Stock Stumbled Today
Stock markets rallied Tuesday as a ceasefire between Israel and Iran appeared to be holding, just a couple of days after conflict seemed set to expand after a U.S. attack on an Iranian uranium enrichment site. In a social media post Tuesday morning, President Donald Trump said that "ISRAEL is not going to attack Iran. All planes will turn around and head home, while doing a friendly 'Plane Wave' to Iran. Nobody will be hurt, the Ceasefire is in effect!" However, Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT) stock was falling as the rest of the market soared. At 3 p.m. ET, Lockheed stock was down 3%. Investors predict falling demand Lockheed Martin makes weapons systems, both offensive and defensive. Demand rises in times of conflict and falls in more peaceful times. Two weeks ago, when the Israel-Iran conflict spiked with an attack on Iranian nuclear sites, Lockheed stock took off as investors bet on heightened demand for fighter jets and missile systems. Two weeks later, as future demand for such military products comes into question, Lockheed Martin stock is giving back most of its gains, and, indeed, trading right about back where it was before recent events. Is Lockheed Martin stock no longer a buy? All this is logical, but also probably a wrong reaction to the ceasefire news. Granted, active conflict increases demand for weapons systems, in particular consumable weapons systems such as missiles, which, once fired, must be replaced. The theory is that the longer the conflict lasts, the greater the demand. But, the current ceasefire notwithstanding, there will always be a need for the products Lockheed sells. Should you invest $1,000 in Lockheed Martin right now? Before you buy stock in Lockheed Martin, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Lockheed Martin wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $676,023!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $883,692!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is793% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to173%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025
Globe and Mail
39 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
The right and left have converged in their moral confusion on Iran
One of the most vicious institutions on Earth is the Evin Prison in Tehran, where prisoners, many of them political dissidents, are subject to abuse, torture and rape. In her memoir, Prisoner of Tehran, Marina Nemat, who was sent to Evin at 16 for engaging in 'activities against the Islamic government,' provides a firsthand account of the mercilessness and brutality to which those in Evin are subject. In one part of the book, a fellow prisoner describes how she's heard that prison guards will rape girls scheduled for execution because 'they believed virgins went to heaven when they died.' It's just one example of the unconscionable cruelty that upholds Iran's brutal theocracy. This is the Iran that most people in the West don't see, or choose not to see. It is where women are violently removed from the streets – and in the case of Mahsa (Jina) Amini, beaten to death – for wearing their hijabs improperly; where gay people are publicly hanged, and where women cannot engage in various aspects of normal life without permission from their husbands. And the Iranian regime isn't only an oppressive force on its own people – it is a threat to the world through its terrorist proxies and nuclear enrichment activities. When its leaders chant 'Death to America' and 'Death to Israel,' they are not speaking figuratively. Yet, many in the West seem to be suffering from a sort of moral confusion about how to view one of the most objectively vile theocracies on Earth. After Israel carried out targeted killings of Tehran's military and nuclear leadership, as well as strikes on nuclear sites, protesters took to the streets in London and Toronto to oppose 'unprovoked' action by Israel. Ontario's largest public-sector union lent its support to a 'Hands off Iran' rally. Opinion: The Iranian people are caught between forces they cannot control After the U.S. bombing of three nuclear enrichment facilities Saturday, the L.A. County Sheriff's Department issued a statement saying, 'Our hearts go out to the victims and families impacted by the recent bombings in Iran,' as if there were families eating dinner at the Fordow enrichment facility when B-2 bombers dropped bunker-busters. In Canada, the NDP released a statement condemning this 'illegal escalation of violence.' As far as I am aware, the NDP did not release a similar statement about the many times Iranian leadership has pledged to wipe Israel off the map and attacked it through its terrorist proxies, nor did the party do so in response to the International Atomic Energy Agency's finding that Iran had breached its non-proliferation obligations. This moral confusion is no doubt rooted in the antipathy many in the West hold for both Israel and the United States. Their reflexive response thus appears to be to lurch in defence of Israel's enemies – its targets – even if those targets, according to thousands of documents obtained in 2018, have long pursued nuclear weapons. The war in Gaza is undoubtedly shaping Western perspectives on the operation in Iran, but what it shouldn't do is obscure the danger of a nuclear Iran. Indeed, one can abhor the actions of Israel in Gaza, but also accept that Iran poses a bigger threat to the West. Opinion: The U.S. military's show of force in Iran sends a message to every global capital This conflict has revealed a curious convergence of opinion between the pacifist left and the isolationist right – the latter of whom are wary of another Iraq-style 'forever' war and, similar to those on the left, believe that the actions from Israel and the U.S. were largely unprovoked. These are individuals such as broadcaster Tucker Carlson, former congressman Matt Gaetz, comedian-turned-pundit Dave Smith and others, who are supporters of U.S. President Donald Trump but loudly opposed U.S. intervention in the region. Mr. Smith, for example, condemned Mr. Trump's 'war of aggression' on 'a country who posed no threat to us' (never mind the proxies that killed American citizens in Gaza, targeted shipping routes and launched attacks in the Red Sea) and later praised the Iranians for showing restraint in their ballistic response. What appears to be happening among this cohort is that opposition to the U.S.'s timing and manner of action in the region is clouding the view of the isolationist right to this violent theocracy's stated goals. One could make the argument that it was wrong for the U.S. to join Israel's operation (though if there was any time to intervene militarily, it would be with Hamas pummelled, Hezbollah decapitated, the Houthis weakened, Bashar al-Assad in exile, China distracted, and Russia still fighting another war), and that none of this was worth the unfortunate but inevitable civilian casualties. But that argument is distinct from one that claims that Iran's 60-per-cent enriched uranium is nothing to worry about. We should be clear-eyed about the brutality, the viciousness and the threat posed by the Iranian regime.
CTV News
39 minutes ago
- CTV News
BlackRock rolls out Texas ETF as Lone Star State draws capital, companies
Flags fly at BlackRock headquarters in New York, on Jan. 13, 2021. (Mark Lennihan / AP) BlackRock on Tuesday launched a Texas-focused exchange-traded fund, as the asset manager aims to tap into the state's growing reputation as a magnet for companies, capital and jobs in the United States. The Lone Star State's low taxes, business-friendly policies as well as growing tech and energy sectors have attracted investors and asset managers looking to tap into its long-term growth potential. BlackRock said the iShares Texas Equity ETF will invest in companies headquartered in the state. Such funds are popular for offering low-cost, tax-efficient access to regional or sector-specific growth in a single trade. The world's largest asset manager said Texas is home to one in ten publicly traded U.S. companies, and that more than 300 firms have relocated their headquarters to the state since 2015. Elon Musk-led Tesla and SpaceX, as well as tech giants Oracle and Hewlett Packard Enterprise, have moved to the state in recent years. 'TEXN presents a new opportunity ... to capitalize on Texas' twin engines of business and population growth,' said BlackRock's Head of the Americas Client Business Joe DeVico. The Texas Stock Exchange, a new venture backed by financial giants including BlackRock, Citadel Securities and Charles Schwab, is targeting a 2026 launch, reflecting Wall Street's growing interest in the state. The asset management giant has had a complicated relationship with officials in Republican-leaning states in recent years over its climate-focused investment policies. Texas lawmakers accused the firm of boycotting the fossil fuel industry, which BlackRock denied, citing continued investments in energy companies. Earlier this month, Texas removed BlackRock from a list of companies it viewed as hostile to the energy sector, after the firm scaled back several key climate commitments. BlackRock said it manages nearly US$380 billion in assets tied to public companies in Texas, including about US$115 billion in the state's oil and gas sector, making it one of the largest investors in the region. --- Reporting by Manya Saini in Bengaluru; Editing by Sriraj Kalluvila and Alan Barona
