logo
Supreme Court OKs Tennessee ban on gender-affirming care for minors, big loss for transgender rights

Supreme Court OKs Tennessee ban on gender-affirming care for minors, big loss for transgender rights

Associated Press4 hours ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming care for transgender minors, a stunning setback to transgender rights.
The justices' 6-3 decision in a case from Tennessee effectively protects from legal challenges many efforts by President Donald Trump's Republican administration and state governments to roll back protections for transgender people. Another 26 states have laws similar to the one in Tennessee.
The decision comes amid a range of other federal and state efforts to regulate the lives of transgender people, including which sports competitions they can join and which bathrooms they can use. In April, President Donald Trump's administration sued Maine for not complying with the government's push to ban transgender athletes in girls sports.
The Republican president also has sought to block federal spending on gender-affirming medical care for those under age 19 — instead promoting talk therapy only to treat young transgender people. In addition, the Supreme Court has allowed him to kick transgender service members out of the military, even as court battles continue. The president also signed another order to define the sexes as only male and female.
Trump's administration has also called for using only therapy, not broader health measures, to treat transgender youths.
The justices acted a month after the United Kingdom's top court delivered a setback to transgender rights, ruling unanimously that the U.K. Equality Act means trans women can be excluded from some groups and single-sex spaces, such as changing rooms, homeless shelters, swimming areas and medical or counseling services provided only to women.
Five years ago, the Supreme Court ruled that transgender people, as well as gay and lesbian people, are protected by a landmark federal civil rights law that prohibits sex discrimination in the workplace. That decision is not affected by Wednesday's ruling.
But the justices on Wednesday declined to apply the same sort of analysis the court used in 2020 when it found that 'sex plays an unmistakable role' in employers' decisions to punish transgender people for traits and behavior they otherwise tolerate.
There are about 300,000 people between the ages of 13 and 17 and 1.3 million adults who identify as transgender in the United States, according to the Williams Institute at the UCLA School of Law. The Williams Institute is a think tank that researches sexual orientation and gender identity demographics to inform laws and public policy decisions.
When the case was argued in December, then-President Joe Biden's Democratic administration and families of transgender adolescents had called on the high court to strike down the Tennessee ban as unlawful sex discrimination and protect the constitutional rights of vulnerable Americans.
They argued that the law violates the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment, which requires the government to treat similarly situated people the same.
Tennessee's law bans puberty blockers and hormone treatments for transgender minors, but it allows the same drugs to be used for other purposes.
Soon after Trump took office, the Justice Department told the court that its position had changed.
A major issue in the case was the appropriate level of scrutiny courts should apply to such laws.
The lowest level is known as rational basis review, and almost every law looked at that way is ultimately upheld. Indeed, the federal appeals court in Cincinnati that allowed the Tennessee law to be enforced held that lawmakers acted rationally to regulate medical procedures, well within their authority.
The appeals court reversed a trial court that employed a higher level of review, heightened scrutiny, which applies in cases of sex discrimination. Under this more searching examination, the state must identify an important objective and show that the law helps accomplish it.
___
Follow the AP's coverage of the U.S. Supreme Court at https://apnews.com/hub/us-supreme-court.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Cuts LGBTQ+ Support Service From Suicide Hotline
Trump Cuts LGBTQ+ Support Service From Suicide Hotline

Forbes

time15 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Trump Cuts LGBTQ+ Support Service From Suicide Hotline

Support for LGBTQ+ callers to the national suicide prevention hotline will end next month, the Trump administration confirmed Wednesday, ending a counseling service first introduced in legislation during President Donald Trump's first term. The suicide prevention hotline will 'no longer silo' its services and will instead 'focus on serving ... More all help seekers,' officials said. The Trevor Project, a nonprofit that provided support to LGBTQ+ callers in a partnership with the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, said Wednesday the Trump administration ordered the specialized line to be closed by July 17. SAMHSA confirmed the order and referred Forbes to a statement, indicating the specialized support was closed to 'no longer silo' the hotline's services and to 'focus on serving all help seekers.' This is a developing story.

Are cybersecurity stocks a new safety trade? What the Israel-Iran conflict shows
Are cybersecurity stocks a new safety trade? What the Israel-Iran conflict shows

CNBC

time15 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Are cybersecurity stocks a new safety trade? What the Israel-Iran conflict shows

The Israel-Iran conflict has put geopolitics squarely on the radar of investors. In tense moments like these, the importance of owning cybersecurity stocks within a diversified portfolio is impossible to ignore. The overall market reaction to the attacks between the longtime regional foes has, admittedly, been fairly subdued since the strikes began late Thursday local time in New York. The S & P 500 had lost just 1% over the past three trading days. That hardly fits the description of a dramatic sell-off, as investors continue to bet that the conflict will not spillover into a broader entanglement that weighs on global growth. And yet, Club cybersecurity holdings CrowdStrike and Palo Alto Networks held up even better than the broader market and a basket of software peers in that stretch. CrowdStrike and Palo Alto Networks both entered Wednesday's session up more than 2% over the past three days. The iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF, meanwhile, dropped about 0.4%. To be sure, in Wednesday's session, the broader market was higher and our cyber names were giving back some of their recent gains. Earlier Wednesday, President Donald Trump said outside the White House that Iran wanted to negotiate — comments that boosted stocks and sent oil prices lower. The trading action in oil is one way to measure how the market is assessing the geopolitical tensions. CRWD PANW YTD mountain CrowdStrike's stock performance versus Palo Alto Networks so far in 2025. This is not the first time that we've seen cybersecurity stocks hold up better than their tech-industry peers during periods of market disruption. The cohort acted defensively and outperformed the aforementioned software ETF earlier this year when Trump's tariff rhetoric began ramping up. In our minds, the relative stability of cybersecurity stocks amid market turbulence is part of a broader, long-term trend rather than a flash in the pan. The reason is that cybersecurity has become indispensable in today's digital landscape, particularly during geopolitical unrest. Consider the findings of the World Economic Forum's 2025 cybersecurity outlook. "Nearly 60% of organizations state that geopolitical tensions have affected their cybersecurity strategy," according to the report, which was published in January. Additionally, one in three CEOs that responded to the survey said "cyber espionage and loss of sensitive information/intellectual property (IP) theft" is a top concern. And finally, 72% of respondents reported heightened cyber risks, driven partly by the rapid adoption of artificial intelligence, which empowers cybercriminals, with ransomware remaining a persistent threat. This environment signals strong demand for advanced cybersecurity solutions, which CrowdStrike and Palo Alto Networks have. Both companies are capitalizing on mounting security concerns across the corporate and government worlds. That leads investors like us to believe that both Palo Alto and CrowdStrike are well-positioned to deliver long-term value while offering stability amid volatility in the near term. (Jim Cramer's Charitable Trust is long PANW, CRWD. See here for a full list of the stocks.) As a subscriber to the CNBC Investing Club with Jim Cramer, you will receive a trade alert before Jim makes a trade. Jim waits 45 minutes after sending a trade alert before buying or selling a stock in his charitable trust's portfolio. If Jim has talked about a stock on CNBC TV, he waits 72 hours after issuing the trade alert before executing the trade. THE ABOVE INVESTING CLUB INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY , TOGETHER WITH OUR DISCLAIMER . NO FIDUCIARY OBLIGATION OR DUTY EXISTS, OR IS CREATED, BY VIRTUE OF YOUR RECEIPT OF ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH THE INVESTING CLUB. NO SPECIFIC OUTCOME OR PROFIT IS GUARANTEED.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store