CRTC Hears Debate on Including a ‘Cultural Element' in New Definition of CanCon
The federal broadcast regulator is considering whether it should include a 'cultural element' in its new definition of Canadian content.
The Public Interest Advocacy Centre said the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission should instead stick to its current approach, which looks at whether Canadians are employed in key creative positions.
The consumers' group pointed to the United Kingdom, noting it has a special institute to review and assess whether proposed cultural references in a production qualify as 'sufficiently British.'
'We view a potential Canadian application of this approach, or any other cultural elements test, where a small group of people would be attempting to objectively define what and who is culturally Canadian, as being highly problematic,' the advocacy centre said in a written copy of its opening statement.
It also warned that production companies could exploit Canadian stereotypes to get around any 'cultural element' test.
'An American portrayal of how a Canadian character would speak or behave, for example, cannot be considered Canadian content,' it said. 'It is merely a representation of the American cultural view of Canada.'
Related Stories
5/14/2025
5/12/2025
The CRTC has said that while it's leaning away from including a cultural element in its content test, it's open to hearing other viewpoints during the two-week hearing.
The broadcast regulator has heard from others during the hearing who are in favour of including culture in the modernized definition of CanCon.
The National Film Board, which appeared Friday, has argued that now is the time to include cultural elements in the definition of Canadian content.
It said in its prior written submission that not having a cultural element in the definition could result in harmful long-term consequences and risks erasing 'what makes us who we are.'
It pointed to cultural tests used in countries such as Australia, France, Italy and the U.K.
'These countries employ cultural elements alongside other criteria, such as nationality of key creative roles and ownership,' the NFB said. It said those cultural elements include social or political relevance, how the way of life is depicted, and recognizable locations or figures, among others.
'Our national screen culture has long operated on a definition of 'CanCon' that has excluded cultural elements. This approach has contributed to Canadians' inability to recognize when a story is of us,' the NFB submission argues.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Shohei Ohtani thought he was 'in trouble' before Dave Roberts gifted him a toy Porsche
Dodgers designated hitter Shohei Ohtani cringes toward coach Chris Woodward after getting a hit on May 18 at Dodger Stadium. (Robert Gauthier / Los Angeles Times) The last time Shohei Ohtani thought he might be in trouble was when his name was linked to a federal investigation into illegal sports gambling in March 2024. His name was soon cleared by authorities, who charged and convicted Ohtani's interpreter, Ippei Mizuhara, in federal court with surreptitiously stealing more than $17 million from the Dodgers superstar to pay off an Orange County bookmaker. Advertisement Ohtani wondered if something was amiss Wednesday when manager Dave Roberts summoned him before the Dodgers' home game against the New York Mets. But not for long. Ohtani rushed into Roberts' office, saw a bright pink remote-controlled toy car on the ground and immediately started laughing. "I have a gift for you," Roberts told him. "Actually, for your daughter." "For my daughter? OK, thank you." Ohtani replied. "This is from my wife [Tricia] and me to you and your family and your daughter," Roberts said. "So, we have jokes always. This is a little bit of a joke. It's a Porsche. This is going to be your daughter's first car." Advertisement "Thank you, I love it," Ohtani said. He tapped the car with his hand and said in English, "I thought I'm in trouble. Some trouble," evoking laughter from Roberts and others in the room. Ohtani had gifted Roberts a tiny toy Porsche a year ago when he broke Roberts' franchise record of seven home runs by a Japanese-born player, placing it in the manager's parking lot space as a practical joke. When Ohtani signed with the Dodgers in December 2023, he gifted Ashley Kelly, the wife of pitcher Joe Kelly, a Porsche — not a toy — for Kelly giving up No. 17. Roberts kidded Ohtani about gifting him when the modest record was inevitably broken, and the new Dodgers slugger obliged with the toy. Advertisement It took Roberts — born in Naha, Okinawa, to a Japanese mother and American father — a year to reciprocate. Read more: Will Dodgers' pitchers ever get healthy? How the team is tackling its biggest problem "Shohei has been very gracious and we've got this long-running practical joke," Roberts said on video. "This is more of a sincere gesture, not necessarily a practical joke but I wanted to present it to him." Ohtani and his wife, Mamiko Tanaka, have not revealed the name of their daughter, who was born April 19. 'I am so grateful to my loving wife who gave birth to our healthy beautiful daughter,' Ohtani wrote on social media at the time. 'To my daughter, thank you for making us very nervous yet super anxious parents.' Advertisement Super anxious? Wait until she starts driving. Get the best, most interesting and strangest stories of the day from the L.A. sports scene and beyond from our newsletter The Sports Report. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Mike Tyson remains fascinating after all these years
In our shattered-attention-span, zero-common-ground era of endless distraction, it's impossible to get across how powerful the words Heavyweight Champion of the World once were. It's impossible to convey to a modern, celebrity-saturated audience how massive and all-encompassing a shadow Mike Tyson once cast over all of American culture. To see Tyson now — bro avatar, cuddly tough guy, weed magnate — is to see someone who has shed and transcended every element of what made him so fascinating, and so dangerous, in the 1980s. He was a boxer and a criminal, a philosopher with a knee-buckling uppercut. He was a content-generating machine decades before the concept of 'content' was invented, a constant, churning swirl of scandal, controversy, ferocity, triumph. He was, in short, the baddest man alive, and he remains endlessly fascinating as a result. Advertisement Now comes 'Baddest Man: The Breaking of Mike Tyson,' a new book from longtime New York fight scribe Mark Kriegel. Like Tyson himself, 'Baddest Man' is a throwback to an era of words over pictures, paragraphs over video, insight over memes. It's not just a reminder of what Tyson once was, it's a reminder of how good sports journalism can be. To start, Kriegel answers the question of why even publish a book on Mike Tyson in 2025. There's the economic angle — he owed his publisher a book, and Tyson always sells. But that begs a bigger question: Why, exactly, does Tyson still draw such interest? 'First, the fact that he's alive,' Kriegel says. 'I don't think that was to be expected, that he would see this year. But even the greater anomaly, I think, is that he remains economically potent — almost as economically potent now as he was in his prime. He can still generate so much damn money today. … He's the most lucrative attraction in the history of combat sports.' Advertisement 'Baddest Man' begins with the unlikeliest of images — Mike Tyson as doting tennis dad in an exclusive Newport Beach community. It's a sign that he's a survivor, of course, but it's also a sign that Tyson has fought his way into the rarest of air, into gated neighborhoods and social circles he never could have imagined as a juvenile. Kriegel and Tyson first crossed paths early in Kriegel's career as a crime reporter for the New York Daily News. On the job barely a month, Kriegel got the call from an editor at four in the morning: Mike Tyson was in a fight with Mitch Green at a clothing store. Get up there. A few weeks later, Kriegel got word that Tyson had been trashing the mansion he shared with girlfriend-turned-wife-turned-ex Robin Givens. And then came another Tyson story, and another, and another after that … none of which had anything to do with his ever-increasing win total in the ring. Kriegel understood that Tyson was at the center of a new kind of celebrity culture. 'It represents the genesis of what we have been calling 'tabloid culture' for the last 40 or so years,' he says. 'Really splashy, really voyeuristic, and we couldn't get enough of it.' Advertisement Kriegel moved over to the sports desk at the New York Post in 1991, and from then on Tyson — whose career was on a long, slow decline — became what he called a 'designated villain … When you're a 30-something-year-old columnist in New York, nuance is not the first priority.' In 1988, Mike Tyson knocked out Michael Spinks in the first round in one of the most anticipated fights of all-time. (Getty Images) (Bettmann via Getty Images) It would be decades before Kriegel would begin to have empathy for Tyson — empathy for the struggles he went through, the obstacles he overcame, the personal and psychological and spiritual challenges that bedeviled him. None of that excuses the crimes Tyson committed or the pain he caused others, but that empathy nonetheless gave Kriegel the perspective necessary to tell the story of 'Baddest Man.' 'There's so much goodwill directed at him,' Kriegel says. 'I think at some level there's an acknowledgement of the virtue of just having survived the [stuff] he survived — being assaulted as a kid, mom dying early, the dad splitting, the degree of violence in the neighborhood. … His persona is the victimizer, but he's also the victim as well.' Advertisement 'Baddest Man' covers Tyson's earliest days growing up in the Brownsville neighborhood of Brooklyn, his life-saving relationship with trainer Cus D'Amato, his devastating charge upward through the ranks of professional boxing. This volume — there will be another — ends with perhaps the most consequential fight of Tyson's career, the June 27, 1988 beatdown of Michael Spinks. At that point the most expensive fight in history, hosted by an Atlantic City real estate magnate by the name of Donald Trump, the fight was 91 seconds of pure brutality, devastation and excellence. 'It's hard to overestimate how heavy the hype was for that fight at that time,' Kriegel says. 'It's the height of Tyson's boxing career. It's a certain very neat cultural moment where Trump is ascendant, Tyson is ascendant. You don't have to be a prophet to read between the lines — like, this is not headed in a great direction — but in that moment, he is invincible.' 'Baddest Man' is now on shelves wherever books are sold. It's a hell of a portrait of a singular era in boxing and in America, one whose echoes are still resonating today.
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Prince Harry Accused Of 'Directly Insulting' The Royal Family By Considering Changing His Last Name
Prince Harry's rift with the royal family has reportedly worsened amid reports that the Duke of Sussex considered adopting the Spencer surname. The US-based royal is said to have discussed the idea with his late mother's brother, Earl Spencer, who advised against it. However, royal experts say the move by Prince Harry has deepened tensions within the monarchy, with King Charles and Prince William reportedly "hurt and dismayed." Harry reportedly discussed with his uncle, Earl Charles Spencer, the possibility of adopting his late mother Princess Diana's surname, which would symbolically sever his ties with the Mountbatten-Windsor name currently used by his children. According to the Daily Mail, Harry brought up the idea during a recent visit to the U.K., where he had a "very amicable conversation" with his uncle, the 9th Earl Spencer. While the discussion was friendly, sources revealed that Earl Spencer advised against "taking such a step." The proposal has since sparked concern within royal circles. Royal commentator Hilary Fordwich told Fox News Digital that Harry's inquiry alone has stirred unease. "Once again, Prince Harry has managed to make yet another deeply divisive and emotionally charged move, further fracturing his already tenuous relationship with the royal family," she said. Fordwich continued: "The overwhelming advice from within his own family, particularly from his Uncle Earl Spencer, is to abandon the ludicrous idea due to its legal and emotional consequences." She added: "Even his inquiry highlights the enduring complexities of Harry's relationship with his royal roots… It further thwarts any future reconciliation." The commentator further noted that the royal family is "hurt and dismayed" by the development, causing additional "damage to the already strained family relations." British broadcaster Helena Chard echoed the sentiment, describing the potential name change as having "an air of revenge." Speaking to Fox News Digital, she called the move "hurtful and vindictive" toward King Charles, emphasizing that it reflects Harry's ongoing bitterness. "It highlights Prince Harry's little to no regard for his family," Chard said. "A huge amount of bitterness and frustration bubbling away in Harry could have led to him feeling the Spencer name would help grow his Royal court." Chard also suggested that aligning more closely with the Spencer legacy could be a strategic move for Harry. "No doubt Prince Harry feels reinventing himself keeps him relevant," she remarked. "The world still has a love affair with the late Princess Diana. Harry and Meghan could take a cash grab of Princess Diana's legacy. [However], tarnishing Princess Diana's legacy would leave a bitter taste in the public's mouths." Royal analyst Richard Fitzwilliams also commented, warning that Charles would likely view the idea as a painful rejection of his paternal legacy. "For Harry to consider doing this, he must still feel very embittered," Fitzwilliams noted. "King Charles will regard this with great sadness… What will Harry think up next?" Fordwich also noted that the proposal is "viewed as a direct insult to his father, King Charles III, as well as his extended royal family." She explained: "Ironically, Harry was close to Prince Philip, who fought for the historical significance of the Mountbatten-Windsor name for his descendants. So it is a direct insult to him." According to Fordwich, Harry may see adopting the Spencer name as a way to honor his late mother, Princess Diana, "while distancing himself from the rest of the royal institution he feels alienated from." Fordwich noted that "there is also some speculation that Harry's wife, Meghan Markle, wants their children to be more closely associated with Diana's legacy, especially their daughter, Princess Lilibet, whose full name is Lilibet Diana Mountbatten-Windsor." Even so, Fordwich warned that tensions within the royal family remain high, and this new revelation only makes things worse. "King Charles III is hesitant to speak with Harry, and Prince William is disgusted that he keeps referencing their mother," Fordwich claimed. She concluded that "trust and communication are currently at an all-time low. Any hope of rapprochement is now said to be 'in tatters,' particularly given Harry's wish to change his surname, which is viewed as a final break from his royal roots." Meanwhile, royal commentator Ian Pelham Turner told the outlet that he wasn't surprised by Harry's reported interest in adopting the Spencer surname, noting the prince's enduring emotional connection to his mother's side of the family. "Prince Harry, at the time of this alleged conversation, was at a very low ebb," Turner explained. "He found tremendous support from Earl Spencer and Diana's two sisters, who rallied around [him]… The Spencer name is always a potential path for the beleaguered couple and their children. But at this stage, it's not on the horizon." Turner added that the "royal family and Harry are still seemingly at war with each other."
