Trump says Iran has 'second chance' to come to nuclear deal
US President Donald Trump has framed the volatile moment in the Middle East as a possible "second chance' for Iran's leadership to avoid further destruction "before there is nothing left and save what was once known as the Iranian Empire.'
Trump claimed on his Truth Social platform that he had given Iran a "60 day ultimatum to make a deal", and that Friday marked "day 61."
The White House has insisted that Washington was not involved in Israel's military operation, although anonymous US officials have said the Trump administration was aware in advance of Israel's planned large-scale attacks on Iran.
In an interview with ABC News on Friday morning, Trump said the Israeli attack on Iran was 'excellent' and again previewed more attacks to come.
'We gave them a chance and they didn't take it,' Trump told ABC's Jon Karl. 'They got hit hard, very hard. They got hit about as hard as you're going to get hit. And there's more to come. A lot more.'
The US president pressed on Iran as he met his national security team in the Situation Room on Friday to discuss the tricky path forward following Israel's devastating strikes, which Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pledged to keep up for 'as many days as it takes' to decapitate Iran's nuclear programme.
While the White House said it had no involvement in the strikes, Trump highlighted that Israel used its deep arsenal of weaponry provided by the US to target Iran's main enrichment facility in Natanz and the country's ballistic missile program, as well as top nuclear scientists and officials.
In the aftermath of the Israeli strikes, the US is shifting its military resources, including ships, in the Middle East as it looks to guard against possible retaliatory attacks by Tehran, according to two US officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters.
The Navy has directed the destroyer USS Thomas Hudner to begin sailing toward the Eastern Mediterranean and has directed a second destroyer to begin moving forward, so it can be available if requested by the White House.
As Israel stepped up planning for strikes in recent weeks, Iran had signalled the United States would be held responsible in the event of an Israeli attack. The warning was issued by Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi even as he engaged in talks with Trump special envoy Steve Witkoff over Tehran's rapidly advancing nuclear programme.
Friday's strikes came as Trump planned to dispatch Witkoff to Oman on Sunday for the next round of talks with the Iranian foreign minister.
Witkoff still plans to go to Oman this weekend for talks on Tehran's nuclear program, but it's unclear if the Iranians will participate, according to US officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe private diplomatic discussions.
Trump also spoke Friday with British Prime Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron about the evolving situation, as well as Netanyahu.
In the early hours on Friday, Israel launched a large-scale military operation against at least 100 targets in Iran, including the Tehran regime's military leadership and strategic sites of the Iranian nuclear programme.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that Israel targeted Iran's nuclear enrichment and nuclear weaponisation facilities, ballistic missile programme sites, as well as individual Iranian nuclear scientists.
About a dozen different sites appear to have been targeted, including those in Tehran, Shiraz and Tabriz, as well as reportedly in Isfahan and Kermanshah.
According to the IDF, Israel used 200 fighter jets and around 330 'various munitions' to strike more than 100 targets across the country.
Israel and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirmed the strikes at the Natanz nuclear site, around 250km from Tehran.
Iran's most significant nuclear enrichment site and its underground centrifuge facilities are protected by heavy concrete walls. Construction work was under way to expand the site.
It is unclear how much damage was done during the attack, but video footage posted online appeared to show the aftermath of massive explosions.
According to the US-based Institute for the Study of War (ISW), the list of targets in Tehran includes the neighbourhoods of Farahzad, Amir Abad and Andarzgou, the Lavizan district and the Asatid-e Sarv complex. Targets were also hit on the Nobonyad, Langari and Patrice Lulumba streets in Tehran. The Jahan Koudak Tower was also struck.
The ISW says unverified images have been circulating on social media showing specific buildings impacted by the airstrikes, suggesting that Israel conducted targeted killings in Tehran.
Israeli Army Radio also reported that Israel targeted Ali Shamkhani, a top adviser to the supreme leader.
Iranian authorities told UN atomic agency chief Rafael Grossi that Israel's strikes had not hit the country's nuclear facilities at Fordow, Isfahan and Bushehr.
The Fordow facility is located some 100 km southwest of Tehran. It also hosts centrifuge cascades, but it is smaller than the Natanz facility.
Iran is using Fordow to produce most of the near-weapons-grade uranium it has amassed since 2021.
The site is reportedly designed to withstand airstrikes as it is protected by anti-aircraft batteries. It is a heavily protected enrichment site built into a mountainside, which sits an estimated 80 metres under rock and soil.
Military experts previously said that it would require a weapon like a 'bunker-buster' bomb known as the 'Massive Ordnance Penetrator'. This is the aspect where Israel might need US help and support in providing this type of weapon.
Another nuclear facility not targeted by Israel is the one in Isfahan.
Located around 350 km southeast of Tehran, Isfahan employs thousands of nuclear scientists. It is also home to three Chinese research reactors and laboratories associated with the country's atomic program. Isfahan is considered Iran's largest nuclear research complex.
The Bushehr nuclear power plant on the Persian Gulf, around 750 km south of Tehran, is Iran's only commercial nuclear power plant.
Construction on the plant began under Iran's Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi in the mid-1970s. After the 1979 Islamic Revolution, the plant was repeatedly targeted in the Iran-Iraq War. Russia later completed construction of the facility.
Iran is building two other reactors like it at the site. Bushehr is fueled by uranium produced in Russia, not Iran, and is monitored by the IAEA.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
10 minutes ago
- Euronews
Air India crash death toll reaches 270 as search for bodies continues
The search for bodies at the site of one of India's worst aviation disasters entered its third day on Saturday, with the death toll climbing as high as 270 and authorities continuing their search for more bodies. The Air India, London-bound Boeing 787 crashed into a medical college hostel in a residential area of India's Ahmedabad in Gujarat state, killing 241 on board and at least 29 on the ground. Only one passenger survived, who is currently still under observation for some of his wounds. 'He is doing very well and will be ready to be discharged anytime soon,' said Dr. Dhaval Gameti at the Civil Hospital in Ahmedabad. Some relatives of the crash victims expressed frustration on Saturday that the process of identifying and handing over the remains of the dead was taking too long. Authorities say it normally takes up to 72 hours to complete DNA matching with samples provided by relatives, and they are expediting the process. Meanwhile, the Indian government has formed a high-level, multi-disciplinary committee to look into the causes leading to the crash to go alongside a separate, formal investigation by the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau. The committee will focus on formulating procedures to prevent and handle aircraft emergencies in the future and 'will not be a substitute to other enquiries being conducted by relevant organisations," the Ministry of Civil Aviation said in a statement. Authorities are also inspecting Air India's entire fleet of Boeing 787 Dreamliner aircraft, the country's Miniser of Civil Aviation said in his first news briefing since Thursday's crash. Israel on Saturday warned of further attacks on Iran following deadly retaliatory strikes on Israel which killed at least three and wounded dozens. Iranian state television reported that air defence was firing in the cities of Khorramabad, Kermanshah and Tabriz, signalling the start of what could be a new Israeli attack. Their retaliatory strikes on Saturday morning followed an Israeli assault on Iran targeting key figures in Tehran's nuclear programme and its armed forces the previous day. Iran's ambassador to the UN says 78 people were killed and more than 320 wounded in Friday's strikes. Israel's defence minister Israel Katz warned that 'Tehran will burn' if Iran continues firing missiles on Israel after at least three people died and dozens were wounded in central Israel on Saturday morning. The attacks come amid escalating tensions over Tehran's nuclear programme, which Israel says poses an existential threat. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government says the attack on Iran was necessary in order to prevent it from building a nuclear weapon, something Tehran denies seeking - although officials there have at times hinted they could pursue one. Experts and the US government have, meanwhile, previously assessed that Iran was not working towards developing such a weapon before Friday's strikes. Both Israel and Iran said the attacks would continue, increasing the chances of further escalation and expansion of the conflict in the wider Middle East region. Netanyahu said his objective was to eliminate any Iranian threat to Israel.
France 24
30 minutes ago
- France 24
How much damage has Israel inflicted on Iran's nuclear programme?
Experts told AFP that while the attacks might have caused some damage to Iran's nuclear programme, they are unlikely to have delivered a fatal blow. What is the extent of the damage? Israel's operation included strikes on Iran's underground uranium enrichment sites at Natanz and Fordow, and a uranium conversion facility at Isfahan, according to the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), citing information from Iranian officials. IAEA said on Friday that a key, above-ground component of Iran's Natanz nuclear site had been destroyed, also citing Iranian officials. There was "extensive" damage to the site's power supply, according to a report from the Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS), a US-based organisation specialising in nuclear proliferation, which analysed satellite images. A loss of electricity to underground facilities can significantly damage the site's centrifuges, the machines used to enrich uranium, the ISIS institute said. If backup power is lost, "at the least, the enrichment plant is rendered inoperable for the time being", it said. Iran has said the damage to Fordow, south of Tehran, was minor. But experts said it is impossible at this stage to determine the impact the strikes might have had on uranium stockpiles believed to be stored around the Isfahan site. Ali Vaez, International Crisis Group's Iran project director, told AFP that if Iran managed to transfer significant quantities to "secret facilities," then "the game is lost for Israel". Can the programme be destroyed? While "Israel can damage Iran's nuclear programme... it is unlikely to be able to destroy it", Vaez said, arguing that Israel does not have the massively powerful bombs needed "to destroy the fortified, bunkered facilities in Natanz and Fordow". Destroying those would require US military assistance, added Kelsey Davenport, an expert with the Arms Control Association. She also stressed that Israel's unprecedented attack cannot erase the expertise Iran had built up on nuclear weapons, despite killing nine Iranian nuclear scientists. What are the risks to the Iranian population? The IAEA has not detected any increase in radiation levels at the affected sites. "There is very little risk that attacks on Iran's uranium enrichment facilities would result in a harmful radiation release," said Davenport. But an attack on Bushehr, Iran's only nuclear power plant, could "have a serious impact on health and the environment", she added. After Israel launched its strikes, IAEA chief Rafael Grossi said that nuclear facilities "must never be attacked" and that targeting Iranian sites could have "grave consequences for the people of Iran, the region, and beyond". Is Iran close to developing a nuclear bomb? After the United States unilaterally withdrew in 2018 from a landmark deal that sought to curb Tehran's nuclear activities, Iran has gradually retreated from some of its obligations, particularly on uranium enrichment. As of mid-May, the country had an estimated 408.6 kilogrammes enriched to up to 60 percent -- just a short step from the 90 percent needed for a nuclear warhead. Iran theoretically has enough near-weapons-grade material, if further refined, for about 10 nuclear bombs, according to the definition by the Vienna-based IAEA. Iran is the only non nuclear-armed state producing uranium to this level of enrichment, according to the UN nuclear watchdog. While the IAEA has been critical of Iran's lack of cooperation with the UN body, it says that there is "no credible indications of an ongoing, undeclared structured nuclear programme". Tehran has consistently denied ambitions to develop nuclear warheads. But Davenport warned the strikes could strengthen factions in Iran advocating for an atomic arsenal.
LeMonde
44 minutes ago
- LeMonde
Philip Gordon, former Kamala Harris adviser: 'Netanyahu called Trump's bluff' by striking Iran
Philip Gordon, former national security adviser to Vice President Kamala Harris, is a committed Europhile and fluent French speaker who was considered for a key position in her future administration, had the Democrats won. In April, Gordon joined the Brookings Institution think tank. He spoke with Le Monde about the early months of Donald Trump's second term. The Trump administration seemed to be pursuing negotiations with Iran over its nuclear program, but then Trump expressed support for Israeli military strikes. Did he just run out of patience with Iran? I am skeptical of the notion that Trump masterfully lulled Iran into complacency with diplomacy and then decided to enforce his "redline" with military force. Trump desperately wanted a nuclear deal with Iran and publicly and privately told Israel not to strike. But a confident Netanyahu called Trump's bluff, told him Israel needed to act, and Trump felt no choice but to go along. He now has to act as if this was his call, but in so doing finds himself having to defend Israel in a war he did not want but could not prevent.
